Four Years a Slave

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Well, almost four years.

For the next 40 months (3.3 years) former VW engineer James Liang will be a prisoner of Uncle as punishment for “cheating” Uncle’s emissions tests.

He will also be made to pay $200,000 to Uncle.

Liang, 63, was sentenced in U.S. District Court on Friday by Judge Sean Cox.

Liang, a diesel expert who’s been with VW for more than 30 years, aided prosecutors as they built their case against higher-level VW executives for their alleged roles in a “global conspiracy” to cheat on diesel emissions. Prosecutors said Liang “provided an insider’s perspective of a company that had lost its ethical moorings in pursuit of increased market share and corporate profits.”


VW “cheated” unreasonable, arbitrary government rules – no different than an ordinary motorist using a radar gun to “cheat” a speed trap.

Liang’s attorney, David Nixon, had asked the court to impose a sentence as low as 21 months of house arrest, while prosecutors had sought three years of prison – two years less than the maximum five-year sentence for the conspiracy charge.

But Cox said that, despite Liang’s cooperation with authorities, he had been “too loyal” to his lifelong employer. He also said he wanted to impose a sentence that would be a “message” to other employees in the industry who might try to “cheat” Uncle on behalf of their customers and their company.

“In my mind, this is a serious crime,” Cox said. “… and it involves a massive fraud on the American consumer, which you knew, and you played a role in.”

One can imagine a traffic court judge lecturing a “speeder” in similar terms.

In March, Volkswagen pleaded guilty to three felony counts under a plea agreement to resolve U.S. charges that it installed secret software in vehicles in order to cheat on emissions tests.

Oliver Schmidt, a former VW executive, pleaded guilty in federal court in Detroit in connection with the scandal. He faces up to seven years in prison and a fine of up to $400,000 after admitting to conspiring to mislead U.S. regulators and violating clean air laws. Schmidt will be sentenced on Dec. 6. In court Friday morning, Cox said he took Schmidt’s case into consideration in Liang’s sentence.

U.S. prosecutors have charged eight current and former Volkswagen executives so far. Along with Schmidt and Liang, those indicted earlier included Heinz-Jakob Neusser, former head of development for the VW brand and two former heads of engine development, Jens Hadler and Richard Dorenkamp.

In a statement, VW said it “continues to cooperate with investigations by the Department of Justice into the conduct of individuals. It would not be appropriate to discuss personnel matters.”


Share Button


  1. I imagine the public reaction (if any) will be the usual. Lots of ill-informed commentary about how justice was served and how horrible those evil businessmen are. The “too loyal” thing is interesting too. Not enough to just live in the system, poor Winston has to love the law more than everything else.

    Meanwhile, the white shoe crowd’s summer vacation in the Hamptons is winding down. Soon they’ll be back to selling CDOs to suckers and extending unimaginable amounts of credit to people who have no business getting it. This time instead of stupid/greedy home flippers it’s 18 year old kids who never even had a checking account or have seen a pay stub. Nor do they have any idea what compound interest is or can even conceive of a 10 year loan. But that’s not their problem, just sell ’em on to Sallie-mae and institutional investors (retirement accounts and pensions) and collect commissions. No law against it, but boy does it screw up people’s lives.

  2. It’s like this article I read today.

    A local town wasted $4800 on one of those stupid electronic “speed” signs (the same town that has problems finding money to fill pot holes, $4,800 would have bought a lot of cold patch). The one with the radar that tells you the speed your going (like you don’t have any other way to know……). Well, its recording peoples speed too, at least that one does (supposedly not plates numbers etc, yeah sure they don’t wink wink).

    It’s recording that 85% are speeding. But it never occurs to ANYONE (outside of comments on the article) that the reason why is that the speed limit is set WAY TO LOW.

    No one will drive 30 in a mostly rural area.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here