2025 Chevy Malibu

16
10117
Screenshot

At one time, you had multiple options if you were interested in a mid-sized family sedan and didn’t want to spend more than about $25k for it.

Your options have been reduced to one.

The 2025 Chevy Malibu.

What It Is

The Malibu is the last car Chevrolet still sells – and the last mid-sized family sedan anyone still sells with a base price under $25k. Nissan no longer sells the Altima – and the Mazda6 has been gone since 2021. The Toyota Camry and the Honda Accord both start close to $30k now.

Which leaves us with the one.

You can pick up a new Malibu LS for $24,700 – as opposed to $28,295 for the lowest-price version of the 2025 Honda Accord. Or $28,700 for the lowest priced version of the 2025 Toyota Camry. They are both very nice cars but both have become pricey cars.

The next-closest thing to the Malibu is terms of cost is the 2025 Hyundai Sonata, which lists for $26,900 to start.

How come the Malibu is the only one of the bunch that costs less than $25k to start? Probably because it’s the oldest of the bunch. The 2025 iteration is basically the same as the 2016 iteration – and so it’s “old” relative to what’s “new.” But new almost always comes with a higher price.

The base trim Malibu LS comes standard with 16 inch steel wheels (which are also sturdier and less expensive to replace than aluminum wheels) a six speaker stereo, an 8 inch CD touchscreen and remote engine start. AC, power windows and locks are also included.

A top-of-the-line Malibu 2LT lists for $31,500. This one comes standard with 19 inch wheels, LED headlights, heated leather seats (and heated steering wheel), a nine speaker Bose audio system and a partial digital main gauge cluster.

All Malibus share the same drivetrain, which consists of a 1.5 liter turbocharged four cylinder engine paired with a continuously variable (CVT) automatic transmission and front-wheel-drive.

What’s New For 2025

This will be the Malibu’s final year – and so probably the last year you’ll be able to buy a brand-new mid-sized family sedan for less than $25k.

What’s Good

An affordable family car – just about the last of its kind.

Sensible steel wheels are standard – and a digital dashboard is optional.

Does not come standard with automatic emergency braking.

What’s Not So Good

Standard engine is small, underpowered and turbocharged.

No optional engine.

CVT automatic makes already anemic engine feel (and sound) more so when pressed.

Under The Hood

Back in 2016 – when the current Malibu made its debut – it was still available with a 2.0 liter turbocharged four that made 250 horsepower. The standard engine the prior year (2015) was a 2.5 liter four without a turbo that touted 196 horsepower.

This year, the only engine you can get in a new Malibu is a 1.5 liter four that – even with a turbocharger – only manages to make 163 horsepower. That’s actually pretty impressive horsepower from an engine this small. The problem is the Malibu’s a mid-sized sedan with a curb weight of 3,135 lbs..

That’s not especially heavy for a current-year mid-sized sedan.

As a counterpoint, the 2025 Toyota Camry weighs 3,450 lbs.

But the Camry has 225 hybridized horsepower to get all that weight moving. The Malibu doesn’t. Which is why it’s the slowest-accelerating mid-sized family sedan still on the market. It takes about eight seconds to get to 60. Both the 2025 Camry hybrid and the 2025 Accord are significantly quicker, despite being much heavier.

Both are also available with optional – even stronger – engines that make them even quicker. So also the 2025 Hyundai Sonata, which is available (in N-Line trim) with 290 horsepower.

The Chevy’s power-to-weight imbalance would be less of a weakness if the payoff were spectacular gas mileage. But the Malibu’s EPA rated 27 city, 35 highway is slightly lower than both the Sonata’s (28 city, 38 highway) and the Accord’s (29 city, 37 highway) and much lower than the hybrid Camry’s (53 city, 50 highway).

Even more interestingly, the 2025 Malibu’s mileage – with the 1.5 liter engine – isn’t appreciably higher than the 2015 Malibu delivered with its 2.5 liter (no turbo) engine. The latter managed 25 city, 36 highway while also delivering 196 horsepower without needing a turbo – because it was big enough to make 196 horsepower without needing a boost.

A weak standard engine – relative to what’s standard (and available) in rivals like the Accord, Camry and Sonata – and nothing-to-brag-about gas mileage relative to those rivals – constitutes the Malibu’s greatest weakness relative to those rivals.

Another – related one – is that the Malibu is not available with AWD, probably because it hasn’t got enough engine to offset the additional weight of AWD. Both the Sonata and the Camry are available with AWD – because they are powerful enough to carry the additional weight.

But – on the other hand – all of the Chevy’s rivals cost more. In the case of the Camry and Accord, many thousands more. This offsets their gas mileage advantage – and while they still offer superior performance, what good is that if you can’t afford it?

On The Road

The Malibu is slow – relative to its more expensive rivals. But quickness is relative. The Malibu is capable of getting to 60 in about 8 seconds, which is quicker than most American full-size sedans with V8 engines were back in the ’80s. The relevant question is whether the Malibu is quick enough to serve as family transportation.

And the answer to that question is certainly yes.

This car will not meet your need for speed, but it could meet the need you may have to pick up the kids at school. And to reach and hold highway speeds without signs of struggling to maintain them. It only feels – and sounds – slow when you floor it and expect it to reach highway speeds as quickly as a Camry or an Accord can reach them.

This is exaggerated by the sound – and feel – imparted by the Chevy’s CVT automatic transmission, which is designed to let the little four rev high up to where it makes it maximum power and then keep it there until you ease up on the accelerator pedal. Naturally, this generates a lot of engine noise – and since you’re not accelerating especially quickly, it feels like the engine’s struggling. The key is to understand that the Malibu isn’t designed to accelerate quickly – and to drive accordingly. If you do, the Malibu is a pleasant car to drive.

In some ways, it is a more pleasant car to drive than its newer rivals because it’s older (its design) and so lacks some of the design attributes that have become common in newer-design cars, such as tap/swipe controls for secondary functions such as the AC/heat and fan speed. Also, the Malibu’s standard instrument cluster is still analog – meaning, it isn’t digital. There’s a conventional needle-and-dial speedometer, tachometer and fuel/temp gauges. These are arguably preferable because they’re less distracting. There’s also less glare because they’re not barraging your eyes with the glow of a screen.

So long as you understand that there’s not a lot of power in reserve – and mitigate that by anticipating the need to accelerate (which many other drivers don’t) – you will rarely notice the Malibu’s underwhelming power-to-weight ratio. But you will notice you’ve avoided some of the less-appealing aspects of newer-design (and nominally quicker) competitors.

At The Curb

The 2025 Malibu is still a nice looking car – even after almost ten years largely unchanged. It is certainly less rococo-looking than, say, the current Camry – which went from being a family-looking-sedan to a Nextel Cup stock car-looking sedan. Which is fine, if you’re wanting something that looks like that.

The point here is that the Chevy’s looks haven’t aged. It will still look good in another ten years from now.

Another point – one that matters a lot when shopping for a family car – is how roomy the car is, especially in the back (and the trunk).

On these metrics, the Malibu compares vey favorably with its more expensive rivals – and particularly vs. its least-expensive rival, the 2025 Hyundai Sonata. It is a very sleek-looking car with a very tight back seat – just 34.8 inches of legroom, which is dimensionally more on par with compact-sized sedans. The Chevy has 38.1 inches of backseat legroom, which is a difference you can see as well as feel – if you try to sit back there (in the Hyundai).

The Malibu also has slightly more trunk space (15.7 cubic feet) than either the Sonata (15.6 cubic feet) or the Camry (15.1 cubic feet). The Honda Accord has the most backseat legroom (40.8 inches) and the largest trunk of the bunch (16.7 cubic feet). But – once again – those are great things to have if you can afford to spend the extra several thousand it takes to buy them.

The Rest

The Malibu’s asking price is its own sell – but in addition to that, it’s probable you’ll be able to buy one for even less than what Chevy is asking. For essentially the same reason that you can usually get a great deal whenever’s there’s a closeout sale.

The downside is you’ll probably have to pick from among inventory – meaning it’ll be harder to spec one out the way you want.

The Bottom Line

It’s not the newest – or the quickest. But it is the last car of it type – at this price – you can still buy new.

Just not for much longer.

. . .

If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos. 

We depend on you to keep the wheels turning! 

Our donate button is here

 If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:

EPautos
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079

PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $20 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)

If you like items like the Baaaaaa! baseball cap pictured below, you can find that and more at the EPautos store!

 

 

16 COMMENTS

  1. The last GM vehicle I had was an essentially unknown,
    but great ride, a 2004 Malibu Maxx.

    Engine: 3.5 liter V6, auto trans 4-speed, hatchback.
    Nearly matched the utility of a SUV, and had remote
    start. Supposedly was based on a Saab design.

    It’s still running strong in the hands of offspring.

  2. ‘It is certainly less rococo-looking than, say, the current Camry’ — eric

    ‘Rococo-looking’ — ah ha ha ha! Which perfectly describes the Orange Oracle of Obtusity as well.

    He thought you were gushing about Mar-a-Lago …

  3. ‘Your options have been reduced to one.’ — eric

    LOL, that’s what I thought upon seeing this photo of campaign signs in Florida, in the special election to replace Mike Waltz:

    https://postimg.cc/DJDRnYf1

    Vote for the ziotard of your choice. They don’t represent this country anyway.

  4. That engine was in the Cruze, a smaller car, for a while. Sad that GM is just putting shit in their toolbox together to make a vehicle. And why it will not sell well.
    The last pretty decent sedan Chevy made, although still FWD (yuk), was the Impala (ended 2019?). Came with two decent V6’s, the better one the 3.9L, we had 2 of them.
    I will give GM some kudo’s though about the Caddy CT4’s and 5’s. Pretty darn good and pick your flavor, price vs performance.

  5. I recently had one of these for a rental and was pleasantly surprised by how straightforward it was to disable all the nanny crap, even though it had to be done aat every engine start. I didn’t do a deep dive into the touchscreen but was able to set up the radio and heater/a-c controls ok. Biggest complaint was how it tended to stumble in stop and go traffic because of the CVT. All in all a nice car, I would consider owning one if it didn’t have the CVT.

    • Mike, it has to have the CVT to go anywhere, cause as Eric mentioned, it has to be put in it’s near peak power rpms to go anywhere. If it had a traditional auto, it wouldn’t go anywhere. So sad.
      Hey chevy, if regs are indeed dead, put your v6 in it and it will sell well.

  6. “This will be the Malibu’s final year”

    The Malibu is a nice car. the last of itz kind in the USA. I wish the automaker could at least give us a choice of engine size. A 2.5 and 3.6 could be presented as a final going away choice. The 3.6 makes 310HP. That Malibu would be a rocket and would challenge BMW, Audi, Lexus, Genesis etc.

    We can only wish. There are too many EPA, save the world types working at the top positions in the car companies. What will happen ten years from now if this madness doesn’t stop?

  7. As long as it’s been in production the reliability should be pretty good. “Last Year” models are usually the pinnacle of a model. However, with the 1.5L this Malibu is probably like a 70 year old golfer trying to hit a 300 yard drive.

    If Trump wants to help the U.S. auto industry (or, what’s left of it) get rid of the regs and put a 6 in this car. But, that doesn’t look like it will happen.

    Leaving people to their own devices, desires and activities is anathema to GovCo. When it comes to politics, which is what our country is based on, everyone likes a large ship of state, so long as their hand is on the tiller.

    • Amen, Mark –

      I was thinking how nice this car would have been if it had a 3.8 V6 under the hood – as GM cars of this type used to commonly have. It’s striking to reflect that what was common and taken-for-granted as recently as five or so years ago is now “exotic” – for the few who can afford to spend the $50k-plus it takes to buy any new car with a six.

      • My brother recently got the last of the v6 Lexus models. The smaller one. He said it was now or never.

        My biggest concern is what will rise from the ashes of our imploding empire. I don’t see a Galt’s Gulch mentality coming to the fore no matter how much I might want it.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here