There are lots of crossovers that look like SUVs but aren’t. Few can pull more than 3,500 lbs. and none are built on a truck-type, rear-wheel-drive based layout. That’s why they are crossovers rather than SUVs.
Not that there’s anything wrong with that. Crossovers are fine for people who want a vehicle that’s good in the snow and don’t need a vehicle that can pull a heavy load – but like the looks of an SUV.
For people who want more than just looks, there are SUVs like the Ford Explorer.
The Explorer is a mid-sized SUV – as distinct from the multitude of mid-sized crossovers that look like SUVs. It is based on a rear-drive layout and comes standard with rear-wheel-drive rather than front-wheel-drive/all-wheel-drive (as is true of crossovers made to look like SUVs).
It has room for seven in three rows, though the third row is tight and mainly there for kids and cargo.
The base rear-drive Active trim stickers for $39,785. Full-time 4WD is available as a stand-alone option. So equipped, the MSRP rises to $41,785. Either way, this trim comes standard with a Class III hitch and a maximum tow rating of 5,300 lbs. – on par with the pulling capability of a mid-sized truck. A turbocharged 2.3 liter four cylinder engine that makes 300 horsepower is standard – another point of difference vs. most mid-sized crossovers that come standard with much less powerful engines. Many do not offer optional engines as powerful as the Ford’s standard engine.
The next-up ST-Line stickers for $44,595 (RWD) or $46,595 (4WD) and adds more aggressive visuals as well as some functionals, including a set of 20 inch wheels and short sidewall tires. This trim also gets an upgraded 10 speaker Bang and Olufsen audio system.
The Platinum trim – $52,100 with rear-drive, $54,100 with 4WD – includes the ST-Line’s visual and functional upgrades and adds a twin-panel sunroof, massagers for the front seats, heated second row captain’s chairs, power folding third row and a 14 speaker B&O sound system. The 4WD version of the Escape can also be equipped with a larger, 3.0 liter turbocharged V6 engine that touts 400 horsepower as part of a $4,615 Platinum Ultimate package.
There is also a high-performance ST variant that comes standard with the 3.0 liter V6 plus a sport-tuned suspension, upgraded brakes and 21 inch wheels with high-performance tires, plus paddles shifters for the transmission and all the ST-Line’s cosmetic upgrades. The rear-drive version lists for $54,240; with the optional 4WD system, the price tops out at $56,240.
Competitors include the Dodge Durango – which is a little larger but costs less to start ($38,495) has a higher max tow rating (6,200 lbs.) comes standard with a V6 – and is still available with a V8 as well as a 4WD system with a two-speed transfer case an Low range gearing.
There’s also the slightly smaller Chevy Blazer, which also costs less ($35,400 to start) but tows less (3,250 lbs.) comes standard with a smaller (2.0 liter) engine and only has room inside for five people.
What’s New for 2025
In addition to some exterior styling tweaks to the front and rear clips, the ’25 Explorer gets a new, Google-based infotainment system and all but the base Active trim are available with Ford’s BlueCruise hands-free driving tech.
What’s Good
SUV – rather than crossover – capability.
Standard engine is very strong; optional engine even stronger.
Third row is standard.
What’s Not So Good
Automatic Stop/Start “technology” is standard – along with an array of “driver assistance technology” that ought to be optional – for those who want to be “assisted.”
Optional engine is only available in the expensive Platinum and ST trims.
Because it is an SUV, the third row is tight for adults.
The Explorer’s standard 2.3 liter turbocharged four touts 300 horsepower and 310 ft.-lbs,. of torque – output that is on par with what many early 2000s V8s put out – and that’s one reason why the Explorer can pull 5,300 lbs. even though it only has a four cylinder engine. The other reason, of course, is that the Explorer is an SUV and so more ruggedly built. And because it is rear-drive rather than front-drive.
The little four also touts not-terrible gas mileage – 20 city, 29 highway. And it can get the nearly 4,800 lb. Explorer to 60 in 7 seconds, too.
If that’s not quick enough – and if you can afford it – the Explorer is available with a 3.0 liter turbo’d V6 that makes 400 horsepower and 415 ft.-lb.s of torque that knocks about 1 second off the 0-60 time and adds 300 more pounds of maximum towing capacity, which goes up to 5,600 lbs. Impressively, gas mileage goes down hardly at all. Equipped with the larger, 100 horsepower-stronger V6, the Explorer still manages 18 city, 25 highway.
Of course, this is on par with the mileage you’d get if the Explorer had a V8 – in which case it would not need a turbo to make 400 horsepower. So why doesn’t the Explorer come with a V8 – as it did, once upon a time? The answer is that the smaller engine helps with compliance. Like every vehicle manufacturer, Ford has to satisfy its customers while also complying with the government’s regulations, including those pertaining to the “emissions” of carbon dioxide. The words are italicized to make a point in relation to “emissions” – which is that the latter used to be only those things that caused or contributed to pollution, i.e., the stuff that makes the sky brown, the air harder to breath and makes your eyes water.
Whatever your position on the subject of “climate change,” CO2 is not a pollutant because it does not cause or even contribute to any of those things. But it is considered an “emission” now – by the EPA – and the only way to “emit” less of it is to reduce the quantity of it coming out of the exhaust pipe; it cannot be chemically cleaned up via catalytic converters and more efficient burning of fuel. The only way is to burn less fuel – and smaller engines do just that.
The turbo is added to make power on demand. This could be rephrased as to make up for lost displacement on demand. It amounts to the same thing. And it’s not necessarily a bad thing in that buyers get what they want – power/performance – and Ford delivers what the government demands.
The turbo’d six engine costs more to make and so for you to buy – significantly impeding the number of buyers who can afford to indulge. And because it is under pressure – literally – it may not have as long a service life as a less-stressed V8.
Both the 2.3 liter and the 3.0 liter engines are paired with a ten speed automatic and you can choose either rear-drive or a full-time 4WD system. Interestingly – and laudably – Ford lets you have the 3.0 liter engine with rear-drive, if you prefer.
As soon as the Explorer moves, it’s evident it’s an SUV rather than a crossover trying to look like an SUV. This is a good thing – if you like the planted, heavy (in a good way) authoritative driving feel of an SUV. There’s real heft here – which not only feels good, it is good in that weight is an inherent, built-in safety advantage. This thing feels like you could drive it right through a crossover and come out the other side.
It ought to feel that way given it weighs just shy of 4,800 lbs. empty.
That heft is on account of ruggedness, – the heavier-duty, more truck-like underthings –Â hence the standard 5,300 lb. tow rating.
Another thing to like about this big lug is it’s small standard engine. – which makes the power (300 horsepower and 310 ft.-lbs. of torque) of a much larger engine. Put another way, it is not necessary to upgrade to the larger, optional engine – which is a significant cost savings that does not come at the cost of low towing capability. As a point of comparison, the Acura MDX – which is a crossover about the same size as the Explorer that looks like an SUV – can only pull a maximum of 3,500 lbs. even though it comes standard with a V6. (Note that the MDX weighs about 700 lbs. less, too – a function of it being a less rugged vehicle).
The only objectionable thing about the little four is that it sounds little. It is not a bad sound. Just an incongruent one. Imagine the sound of a 250 cc single emanating from a big Harley cruiser bike and you get the idea. The optional six corrects that incongruity. It almost sounds like a V8, in fact – but only when pressed. If you don’t press down too much on the accelerator you just go – without any incongruent sounds.
This Explorer also handles and drives like a modern car – even though it is an SUV – which is quite something when you reflect upon the history of SUVs and of the Explorer in particular. The first-gen Explorers weren’t dangerous – except in the hands of people who did not understand that SUVs weren’t designed to be driven at 80-plus on low-inflated tires for hours on the highway. Sometimes, one of those under-inflated Firestone tires would fail – suddenly – and the Explorer would do a barrel roll.
SUVs were never meant to be mass-market vehicles but that’s what they became. And Ford – along with the other manufacturers of SUVs – redesigned their suspensions (and so their handling characteristics) to be more like those of cars and so less likely to barrel roll in the hands of a driver who bought an SUV without understanding that an SUV isn’t car (or a car-based crossover, either).
The ST is as expected the best-handling of the bunch. The 21 inch wheels and short sidewall tires deliver sharp and accurate steering response and even though the suspension in this trim is tuned to be firm the ride is not hard. With the seat massagers on, the ride is in fact extremely pleasant.
The Explorer is 198.8 inches long so about the same overall size as a current slightly-larger-than-mid-sized sedan such as a Toyota Crown (which is 196.1 inches long overall). But it has room for several more people than a Crown or any other equivalent-size sedan and vastly more room for cargo – because you have essentially the entire interior space to work with rather than just a trunk (the Crown’s has just 15.2 cubic feet while there’s 18.2 cubic feet behind the Explorer’s third row and the total available space can be opened up to 87.8 cubic feet).
The Explorer also looks like the SUV it is. Or – put another way – it does not try to look like what it isn’t, as seems to be the trend among crossovers. But – unlike any new truck – it is not all jacked-up and so not a climb to get in and out of. This is a major appeal of both SUVs and crossovers relative to today’s trucks – at least to people who are not wanting to have to climb up to get in.
There’s still 7.9 inches if ground clearance, though – and that (plus the optional full-time 4WD system) will get you through the snow and raises you high enough off the ground to drive out into the field, if you need to. There’s no low range transfer case, though – and no 4WD Low range – so this Explorer isn’t really set up to deal with more than fields and dirt/gravel roads that crossovers can safely ascend.
The Rest
It’s nice that you do not have to pay extra for the 4WD system if you don’t feel the need – even in the Platinum and ST trims. On the other hand, if you want to get the six rather than the four, you must buy at least the Platinum trim and then nearly another $5k to get it as part of a bundled package that includes other things you may not want – or want to pay extra for.
The Bottom Line
The Explorer’s not as capable an SUV as the Durango but it is an SUVÂ – unlike all those crossovers out there that look like SUVs – and it does offer things you cannot get in a Durango, such as massaging seats. You could look at a Range Rover – which is very capable and has the massaging chairs – but one RR costs more than twice as much ($107,900) as two Explorers.
Plus, if you get the Explorer, other drivers will assume you’re a cop and get out of your way!
. . .
If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos.Â
We depend on you to keep the wheels turning!Â
Our donate button is here.Â
 If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:
EPautos
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079
PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $20 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)
If you’d like a Baaaaa hat or other EPautos gear, see here!
I know I sound like an old man, but I prefer steeing boxes (instead of rack & pinion) and high profile / low offset wheels on vehicles such as the Explorer, for both functional and aesthetic reasons, like Explorers used to have until sometime around 2010.
The beauty of these vehicles is that there’s a enormous pool of 1 to 5 year old used ones to pick from, mostly with lower prices than similar used cars.
I had a 97 explorer 2 door with V6 and a 5 speed manual, with 4WD on the fly, drove it all over and only had to replace the clutch.
But I’m biased, I suppose, I drove a 78 Pinto for years, and still have an Excursion….
YMMV…..
FORSCAN (with adapter) is necessary to access anything now on Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, Mazda and is an excellent free program or $20 year extended license to use some functions. They constantly update it and it does include the 2025 Ford Explorer now. It is a Great tool for Fords! They also have versions for ‘fones’ and can read ALL OBDII, DTC, PID codes and change preferences for things or even kill ASS and other things on some models.
https://forscan.org/download.html
https://forscan.org/forum/
By now, every cop in every municipality/county must be thinking, oh, God, not another Ford Explorer. Make it stop, please. har
Trump is a lost cause. What’s with the duckbill hats, different colors, even. His own color revolution. The stupid ties, a clown show, a travesty of a mockery of a sham.
The emperor has no hair!
Trump threatens protesters with crackdowns and jail time. Bibi told Donnie what to do.
Turns out, it looks like a Mexican Standoff in LA.
Our muni is moving to tahoes, I think better?
I work for a municipality and the FWD explorers were junk for police duty. You can’t reach the rear 3 spark plugs so they never get changed and the tiny FWD transmission couldn’t hold up to the heat and was usually junk by the automatic 100k mile decommissioning. They also usually were chugging because they needed plugs from all of the idling. These RWD explorers seem to be holding up much better being built like an actual truck not an economy car. Ford only made these improvements to please their biggest customer, the government
“Plus, if you get the Explorer, other drivers will assume you’re a cop and get out of your way!”
Perhaps the reason I already loathe the look of these things.
Where’s the, ‘Like’ button?
I was close to buying this car until I found the tow rating. I was surprised it was on the low side for a RWD based car, but still better than most FWD units in this category. I got lucky and found 24 grand cherokee L w/v8, which raised the tow rating to 7200, which I wanted towing 5K +/- through the mountain west.
The explorer is a nice car relative and I applaud ford for making it RWD based which is very rare, but I think the cops had more of a say than I did.
Have a friend that just tuned his 3.0T with some other mods and it is very fast, and comfortable.
Is the Cherokee FWD or RWD? I kind of don’t mind the looks of that car.
Hi Swamp,
The current Grand Cherokee is still RWD.
The smaller Cherokee is FWD, similar names different cars. Not sure if they still make them though.
Poke your head under the Explorer. It’s unibody like the smaller cross overs. It’s been unibody since 2011, at the time the redesign shared a platform with the Taurus. Most of the other SUVs are still traditional body on frame.
Hi Harold,
Yes – that’s true. But the Range Rover is also unibody and it’s not a flimsy vehicle. I like body-on-frame because it means the body is more easily (and inexpensively) repairable. But it also adds a lot of weight and the overall vehicle tends to develop more rattles and so on over time as the body/frame shift around.
Re: repair. Doesn’t seem to matter much anymore. They are totaling cars with smaller accidents that you would think would not be totaled.
Cost to repair is through the roof like everything else.
My wifes caddy ct4 got the front bumper hit in a parking lot. $6-7K. It was just a bumper cover and the grill.
Her GC got hit in parking lot too, just a little rear quarter fender bender. $6-7K.
Friends Ram went off an icy driveway, front headlight area hit, low speed. Totaled it.
There’s an argument for unibody but if it was better then why do all pickup trucks (except the little cute ones like Maverick) retain frames, as well as most commercial trucks?
It’s better for hauling and towing to not subject the body to the twisting of that stress on the frame. You can make a fairly rigid unibody, I would agree Ford is doing as much any company to push the limits since the Transit is also unibody, but has a solid rear axle.
The whole reason trucks never went unibody while passenger cars did whole cloth is that for vehicles that work it’s better to isolate chassis from body. Anyone who actually uses their SUV offroad will also know this, you can actually rip body mounts things twist up so much so Ford is tacitly saying they do not expect this SUV to actually need 4WD for more than shopping mall runs since they now sell the Bronco to fill the offroad role.
But if the argument is the Explorer is a “real” SUV then I think it needs to be pointed out that there is a difference. And you mention the Durango, which went back to body on frame after a brief period as unibody. One suspects there may be a reason for this.
The Ford is also front and rear independent suspension. Which is similar to most SUVs now except the Toyotas, which still retain a solid rear axle. The 4Runner, Land Cruiser, GX, LX are the closest to a pickup truck still. Although even those are going to rear coil suspensions, so getting softer for delicate American buyers.
‘Both the 2.3 liter and the 3.0 liter engines are paired with a ten speed automatic.’ — eric
If ten speeds are good, surely 15 speeds would be even better, and 25 speeds to die for.
My hard ceiling on transmission speeds is six … with a clutch.
LOL. There’s a new cop in town, and all of a sudden you’re Hut Hut Hutting around in one of these too.
Morning, Steve!
Yup! I had one of. them nod at me; he thought I was “on the job”!
lol. cops.