How much is not having a third row worth to you? How about $24,200? That is the difference – in base price – between a new Range Rover and the Range Rover Sport, which is basically the same full-size, ultra-premium SUV.
Aside from about three inches in length – and the availability of a third row.
It’s available with the same array of engines, though. Including a V8, if you can imagine that.
If you don’t need to carry more than five people, this could be a way to save a lot of money and free up a little more space in your garage as well.
What It Is
The Range Rover Sport is a slightly shorter – much less expensive – version of the Range Rover. Both are ultra-luxury (and ultra-capable) SUVs with full-time 4WD systems, height-adjustable suspensions and turbocharged six-and-eight-cylinder engines. The main difference between the two – other than about three inches of length – is that the longer RR is available in an even longer iteration with a third row while the RR Sport comes only in one length and with only two rows of seats.
The RR Sport’s base price – for the P360 SE trim – is $83,700. That includes a standard 355 horsepower 3.0 liter six augmented by mild hybrid tech that shuts off the engine when it is not needed to actually propel the vehicle, 21 inch wheels, the adjustable ride-height suspension, heated and ventilated leather seats and a 13.1 inch curved LCD touchscreen and digital/configurable main instrument cluster. Other than being just shy of three inches less long, the base RR Sport is basically the same in terms of equipment as the base trim Range Rover P400 SE RR, which lists for $107,900. The slightly longer RR does come standard with a slightly stronger version of the 3.0 liter six (395 hp vs. 355 in the Sport) but the real difference is the almost $25k difference in MSRP.
In addition to the base P360 trim, the RR Sport is also available in six other trims, including the $90,800 P400 Dynamic SE – which gets the 395 horsepower version of the 3.0 liter six – as well as the $95,100 P460e – which gets an even more powerful (454 horsepower) version of the 3.0 liter six plus plug-in hybrid capability and the ability to be driven about 21 miles on battery power alone, assuming a full charge to start.
The next up P530 Dynamic SE gets a 523 horsepower 4.4 liter turbocharged V8 engine, also augmented by a mild hybrid system, rear wheel steering and an adaptive suspension system to improve handling that Land Rover calls Dynamic Response Pro. This one stickers for $109,700.
The $118,700 P530 Autograph adds massaging seats, 22 inch wheels, four zone climate control, an ultra-premium Meridian audio system, refrigerated compartment in the centers console and a Heads-Up Display. If you want even more power to go with that, the $123,400 P550e comes with a 540 horsepower version of the 3.0 liter six with plug-in hybrid augmentation.
At the apex of the pyramid is the $180,700 P635 Edition Two. This one comes with a 626 horsepower version of the 4.4 V8 (also augmented by mild hybrid tech), a 30 speaker Meridian audio system, upgraded Brembo brakes, 23 inch forged alloy wheels, a firmer-riding suspension system and unique-to-this model driver-selectable modes.
What’s New For 2025
There are several new trims – including the P460e plug-in hybrid and V8-powered P530.
What’s Good
Six and eight cylinder engines befitting the brand – and the price.
Legendary capability isn’t just a legend.
Though only slightly smaller than the Range Rover, the Sport is much less expensive.
What’s Not So Good
Both engines come standard with compliance technology (i.e., hybrid systems).
Available massaging seats and the superb 30 speaker Meridian audio system are only available in the more expensive trims.
Though capable of handling extreme off-road terrain, like all modern high-end SUVs, the RR Sport has easily damaged plastic front and rear clips that are also extremely expensive to repair if damaged.
It used to be a given that when you paid this kind of money for a vehicle, the least you’d get was a six and an eight was usually at least in play. And so it is here. Instead of a depressing 2.0 liter turbocharged four – which is what you get in almost everything nowadays, even in vehicles with starting prices pushing $60k – such as the Mercedes GLE 350, instance (which used to come standard with a 3.5 liter V6) you get a standard 3.0 liter inline six. Exactly the type – and size – engine you have a right to expect in a vehicle such as this.
It is available 355 and 395 horsepower configurations and with either “mild” hybrid tech or (in the P460e) plug-in hybrid tech. The so-called mild hybrid thing just means the engine gets automatically shut off when the vehicle isn’t moving or is coasting/decelerating. This isn’t done so much for the sake of increasing gas mileage – because who buys an $83k-to-start SUV and worries about gas mileage? – but rather for the sake of compliance. More finely, Land Rover is able to offer the six – rather than a four – by using the hybrid tech to reduce the “emissions” of carbon dioxide, by shutting off the engine as often as possible.
Gas mileage is 20 city, 25 highway – which is about what you’d expect from a 3.0 six in a 4WD SUV that weighs just over 5,000 lbs. empty. It’s a little better than what you’d get with a V8, 25 years ago – but it’s a lot more compliant.
The available 4.4 liter V8 also comes in different horsepower configurations, 523 in the P530 SE and 626 in the top-of-the-line Sport SV. The latter can launch itself from zero to 60 MPH in 3.7 seconds, according to Land Rover – and it still manages 16 city, 22 highway.
There is also the P550e – which comes with a 542 horsepower/plug-in hybrid iteration of the 3.0 liter six. This one can be charged up without driving it or by plugging it in. When the battery is fully charged, this version of the RR Sport can be driven about 50 miles without burning (or “emitting”) any gas at all.
All RR Sports come standard with an eight speed automatic and full-time 4WD with driver-selectable modes.
You can pull a maximum of 7,716 lbs. with this SUV.
The Sport part isn’t just a badge – or a lower price. The RR Sport is sportier than its longer and several hundred pounds heavier brother.
It is certainly quicker when equipped with the same drivetrains as its bigger and heavier brother; The base P360 SE with the standard 355 horsepower, 3.0 six/mild hybrid combo can get to 60 in 5.7 seconds. The P400 version, with the 395 horsepower 3.0 six/mild hybrid combo, can do the same in about 5 flat. With the 523 horsepower V8, the time goes down to 4.3 seconds, a good time for ’90s-era Ferrari or Porsche that weighed less than half as much. The apex predator P365 SV – with the 626 horsepower version of the 4.4 V8 – is quicker than any ’90s-era supercar from Ferrari or Lamborghini and it can go seriously off-road, too.
You can also raise or lower the ride height a couple of inches at the touch of a button and ford creeks that would drown a Ferrari or a Porsche. And the ride is vastly more serene. The only hair in the soup is the array of assistance tech – especially the speed limit monitor that pesters you with soft but repetitive scolding sounds when you drive about 5 MPH above whatever the posted speed limit is. It can be turned off but – like “assistance” tech in general – it is annoying to have to turn it off. These “assistance” nannies ought to be optional – for those who feel the need for such “assistance.”
Do people who can walk unaided buy canes and wheelchairs?
Because it is only 196 inches long, the Sport has about the same sized footprint as a current mid-sized- sedan such as the Toyota Crown – which at 196.1 inches long is actually just slightly longer than the RR Sport. Either fits comfortably in a standard-sized garage or parking spot, which makes both easier to park and to live with. Though the RR is much taller than a sedan it is as easy to get into and out of as a sedan; arguably more so because modern sedans tend to be pretty low riding – so you sit down and then have to get up and out. You just get – and out – of the RR.
It’s not just size (the right size) that matters. It’s also looks. In the sense of not looking like everything else. The RR does not. It looks like what is and that’s no small thing given how much everything else tries so hard to look like something else.
Like a Range Rover, for instance.
And that makes sense. After all, the RR was one of the very first luxury 4x4s (the Jeep Wagoneer was another) and it set a standard the others sought to emulate, both functionally and visually.
That tradition continues. Especially inside. While everything is “nice” now – relative to how it was, once – the interior of the RR is nicer. It is more tasteful, for openers – being more reliant on high-end materials such as pewter inserts and black chrome trim rather than over-showy plastic (or even glass-faced) LCD touchscreens, which it has but which do not dominate the interior. The main gauge cluster is digital but pleasantly smaller than what’s common now, displaying the important info analog gauges used to display in a similar style and not much more than that. The secondary screen is big enough (13.1 inches) to make using it while driving easy but not so big as to be the focal point of the interior.
The available massaging chairs – which also feature 22 ways of adjustability – complete the first-class experience. One of the nice touches – about the seats – is that to adjust them, you just touch the door mounted movement controls and that brings up the other seat control displays on the LCD touchscreen. There’s also a volume wheel for the stereo on the steering wheel which allows the driver to increase or decrease the volume without taking his hands off the wheel – or his eyes off the road.
The exterior door pulls are flush-mounted, Tesla-like and extend when you approach (assuming you have the key fob transmitter with you).
The main weakness here is one that afflicts every new vehicle in that the front and rear ends of the RR are painted plastic that are extremely fragile and so very easily torn or even ripped entirely off the vehicle. This is not a safety issue; the structure that’s behind the plastic is designed to absorb impacts. It is a vulnerability-to-damage issue. More finely, a vulnerability to very expensive damage because the plastic is not cheap if it has to be replaced and neither are the many cameras and related apparatus that are part of these “fascias” – as they are called.
It’s an expensive vulnerability in all new vehicles but arguably more so in a new SUV – if you decide to take it off road, where it’s even easier and more likely that you’ll accidentally hit a dip you didn’t see while going too fast and – whoops – there goes the entire front (or rear) clip.
Brush guards would help. Exposed metal bumpers would help more. But those have fallen by the wayside because they add weight – which makes it harder to comply with federal regs pertaining to gas mileage – and that’s why every new vehicle made now has these very light but very flimsy painted plastic front and rear ends.
The Bottom Line
The RR Sport is a great way to get into a Range Rover for about $25k less – and there’s a lot to like about that.
. . .
If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos.
We depend on you to keep the wheels turning!
Our donate button is here.
If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:
EPautos
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079
PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $20 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)
If you’d like a Baaaaa hat or other EPautos gear, see here!
I see acres of plastic. Acres and acres of plastic. They looked good in the past, and the first gen RR sport from around 10-15 years ago was cool- also had a good appearance in my opinion, but the current look is not good I think. All I see now is plastic, electric problems, and questionable off road ability. They are always touted as being capable, but I never see them on the trails. Of course, I also never seem them with proper all terrain or mud terrain tires either like the defender left the factory with.
Via googuhl – asking if it has a viscous center diff – the answer is no.
The new Range Rover Sport features a full-time four-wheel-drive (4WD) system, which is often referred to as all-wheel drive (AWD). It does not, however, utilize a viscous center differential. Instead, it employs Land Rover’s Active Driveline system, a part-time 4WD system that intelligently manages power distribution between the front and rear axles, offering enhanced efficiency and on-road performance while still providing capable off-road ability.
Elaboration:
Full-time 4WD (AWD):
In a full-time 4WD system, power is continuously sent to all four wheels, unlike part-time systems where the vehicle operates primarily in 2WD until engaging 4WD.
Viscous Center Differential:
This type of differential uses silicone fluid that thickens under shear stress to transfer power between the front and rear axles, effectively acting as a limited-slip differential.
Land Rover’s Active Driveline:
The Range Rover Sport uses a more advanced system called Active Driveline, which is a part-time 4WD system that can disconnect the front or rear driveline when not needed, optimizing efficiency.
Benefits of Active Driveline:
This system offers better fuel economy than traditional full-time 4WD systems while still providing the capability to engage all four wheels when needed for off-road or challenging conditions.
Off-Road Capability:
While the Active Driveline system prioritizes efficiency, it still offers Land Rover’s renowned off-road capabilities with features like Terrain Response and optional low-range gearing.
—————–
I sure got the short end of the stick going to trade school when I did, things are way more complicated now with all the hybridization.
You think you got it bad? You lost me at, “uses silicone fluid”.
My first experience with a center diff AWD system was in a ’07 Sierra Denali. I couldn’t believe how good it was driving in snow, which I did often, and at speed, vs prior trucks I owned. It also had a locking rear.
Most truck buyers did not like it though, cause it didn’t have the old-school low-range, etc… and GM discontinued it a few years later.
But it was an amazing urban-burban truck for winter performance. I made it a point to drive in the snow when no one else was around.
In fairness todays e-assisted std. 4wd systems are pretty darn good too.
Below some information about the BMW “Hot Vee” turbo V8. I think there is too much complexity in a DOHC twin turbo V8, I prefer a straight 6.
https://www.bmwblog.com/2024/01/02/bmw-n63-engine-pros-cons-and-reliability/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_N63
Not the Ingenium 3.0 six:
“But we didn’t realize the 3.0-liter straight-six would be so high-tech: This turbocharged engine is supported by a 48-volt electrical system, which powers an electric supercharger and an electric motor.
Whoa. That makes the new Ingenium inline-six, at least in the configuration Land Rover is debuting it in, a hybridized mill with traditional turbocharging and electric supercharging. If this setup sounds familiar, it’s because Mercedes-AMG’s new E53 models have a very similar arrangement (right down to their inline-six engines). Thanks to its dual forced induction and electric assist—the electric motor aids the gas engine and also is used as its starter and as a generator to replenish the 48-volt battery pack—the 3.0-liter inline-six produces a stout 395 horsepower and 406 lb-ft of torque.”
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a26340535/jaguar-land-rover-ingenium-inline-six-engine/
Turbocharged, electric supercharged, hybrid electric motor that shuts off when it likes, with software updates direct from Palantir. What could go wrong.
One reason I have never liked Range Rovers is their power plant “diversity”. From the start, the Range Rover used a second hand Buick alumimum block V8. Since then they have used Ford, BMW and even VW engines. Parts availability becomes an issue with all those different engine lines to support.
To me, the heart of automotive engineering is the engine, and if the manufacturer is parts-bin purchasing engines then they are simply not a first tier manufacturer. A Lamborgini will never be more than an Audi wearing an Italian suit.
At least the new Range Rover with the 3.0 six are using an inhouse developed “ingenium” engine.
https://www.carsuk.net/jaguar-land-rover-finally-announces-petrol-ingenium-engines-2017/
The 4.4l V8 is from BMW. Both are running on the ZF 8HP transmission like BMW, Ram, Dodge and Jeep. This is a fantastic transmission.
But it begs the question: why buy a Range Rover Sport when you can have a BMW X5 M Sport with the same inhouse V8 and the higher BMW quality and larger dealer network.
Oh yes, then there is this for racists like me:
“Range Rover is owned by Jaguar Land Rover (JLR), a British automotive company. JLR, in turn, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Tata Motors, an Indian multinational automotive manufacturer, which acquired JLR from Ford in 2008.”
Hi Brosi –
Yup. And ditto Volvo, which is owned by the Chinese now.
Hi Eric, I asked Grok: What auto brands does geely own?
Geely, a Chinese automotive company, owns or has significant stakes in several auto brands. Here’s the list based on the most recent information:
Volvo Cars: Geely acquired Volvo from Ford in 2010 and owns 82% of its shares, with full control over operations.
Polestar: A performance electric vehicle brand, originally a Volvo sub-brand, now a separate entity under Geely’s ownership (Geely holds a significant stake, though Volvo retains some shares).
Lotus: Geely acquired a 51% stake in Lotus, the British sports car manufacturer, in 2017 through its purchase of Proton’s parent company.
Proton: Geely owns a 49.9% stake in this Malaysian automaker, acquired in 2017.
Lynk & Co: A premium brand launched by Geely in 2016, focused on connected and electrified vehicles, fully owned by Geely.
Geometry: A Geely sub-brand focused on affordable electric vehicles, launched in 2019.
Zeekr: A premium electric vehicle brand under Geely, launched in 2021, targeting the luxury EV market.
London Electric Vehicle Company (LEVC): Formerly the London Taxi Company, Geely owns this brand, which produces electric taxis and commercial vehicles.
Radar Auto: A Geely brand focused on electric pickup trucks and off-road vehicles, launched in 2022.
Smart (partial ownership): Geely owns a 50% stake in Smart, the compact car brand, through a joint venture with Mercedes-Benz, established in 2019.
Geely also has a significant stake in Daimler AG (Mercedes-Benz’s parent company), owning around 9.7% as of recent updates, but this is a financial investment rather than operational control. Additionally, Geely has partnerships and investments in other ventures, like Farizon (commercial EVs) and Terrafugia (flying cars), but these are not standalone auto brands.
Man, your comment + Nasir’s below.
IF we lived in a free market world, and I were 20yrs. old, why not make your own car to offer to the world? A better one, less B.S. P.C. tech prone to failure,… ah, pardon me, been watching the parade of perfectly operating tractors from the 1940’s & 60’s driving by too much, ‘er sumthin’.?
…So sick of the air-bag this, sensor that, non-durable crap.
/Rant OFF.
Also, RE: “Terrafugia (flying cars)”
…I wonder when Eric will do his 1st flying car review?
…When they have one with carburetors & no failure-prone L.E.D. e-lectronic gizmos on board??
…Imagine the possibilities… IF, we didn’t have overlords.
What I dont get is despite them using other engines and kit as the Germans – why is the reliability so poor on JLR cars. This in turn leads to long waits at the dealers for service, and never having any courtesy cars. Which is not something you expect in a premium brand like this. If you’re willing to deal with this – they are genuinely nice cars. And I find somehow the engines tuned a bit different to the same engine in the equivalent german car – where they silence it soo much (you know the European compliance mentality) that they have to pump fake exhaust sounds in the speakers…. which I dont think I can live with.