Home Features What Keeps Dodge Afloat?

What Keeps Dodge Afloat?

22
1772

It’s interesting to note that the one new Doge that’s selling well is a 16-year-old Dodge. It’s the Durango – and this Dodge is pretty much the same today as it was back in 2010. “Selling well” doesn’t quite do the Durango justice. Automotive News reports that the Durango had its best year in decades last year – despite the fact that the current model might as well be a 2010 model.

But maybe that explains it.

The 2026 Durango is the only remaining Dodge that comes standard with a V6 engine. Back in 2010, this was nothing to get excited about because back in 2010, you could still get a V6 in small crossovers such as the Toyota RAV4. It was no big deal. Big SUVs – which is what the Durango is – came with at least a V6. It was expected. The minimum. Like the way you expect to see a dozen eggs when you open the carton you just bought.

Not eight eggs.

Fast forward from 2010 to now and you can’t find a V6 in anything RAV4-sized (or priced). The V6 engine has become a near-luxury item, just the same as eating a meal at a fast-food joint has become. With the difference that McDonald’s still at least sells Big Macs.

Dodge is still selling V6s – but only in the Durango. And for $38,995 – the base price of the 2026 GT. That’s almost manna from heaven in 2026, where that sum will leave you about $2,500 shy of the buy-in price of a base-trim Toyota Grand Highlander, which is a crossover about the same size as the Durango that lists for $41,860 and for that you get a 2.4 liter four, augmented by a turbocharger under the hood rather than the V6 that used to come standard in vehicles like the Highlander as recently as four years ago. And for $35,855 – which was the V6 Highlander’s base price back in 2022.

It feels like buying a Toblerone chocolate bar today – as regards the current Highlander and others like it – and noticing that not only is the price higher but there’s less chocolate inside the box. Meanwhile, you could spend less – thousands less – and get a V6, in a Durango. It’s like stumbling on some Toblerones from 2010 at the store that are still the same size inside the box as they were once.

How about a V8?

You can get a Hemi in a new Durango for $43,675 – not much more than Toyota wants for a Grand Highlander with a 2.4 liter turbo-augmented four. It is also noteworthy that the Hemi that’s optional in the Durango is not afflicted with “eTorque” – a compliance technology that got grafted onto the final run of Hemis installed in Ram trucks just before Ram ceased offering Hemis at all in Ram 1500 trucks beginning with the 2024 models. Ram hurriedly brought the Hemi back for 2026. But this Hemi is afflicted with the “eTorque” system, which is a “mild hybrid” set-up that uses a belt-driven starter/generator system to cycle the engine off as often as possible and has a 48 volt electrical system and EV-like battery pack to power accessories. It is a compliance technology that Stellantis developed to reduce the Hemi’s “emissions” of CO2 – by shutting off the Hemi – but people who like the Hemi hate the “eTorque” system because shutting off the Hemi is something like turning off the hot water when you’re wanting a hot shower. The federally imposed “water saver” toilet is another way to understand what these compliance technologies are all about – and why they are almost universally despised.

Also, while the 2025 Ram 1500 still came standard with the 3.6 V6 that’s still standard in the Durango, the Ram’s version also got afflicted with the “eTorque” system. Somehow, the Durango retained both its standard V6 and its optional V8 and neither of them got saddled with the unpopular “eTorque” system.

There are other things the Durango isn’t saddled with that could explain the doing-gangbusters sales of this sixteen-year-old new SUV. It lacks the latest “safety” and “driver assistance” crap that – contrary to the way it’s pushed by the car press as desirable – lots of people want to avoid having to pay for and do not want to have to fight every time they go for drive. Edmunds.com faults the Durango because “Many of the latest advanced driver safety features don’t come standard.”

They do not grasp that it isn’t a fault. It is a selling point. If all of this “assistance” and “safety” stuff is so desirable, then why was it never offered to people as a selling point; i.e., a desirable option they could buy? Lane Keep Assist – which interferes constantly with your steering – and Brake Assist – which obnoxiously applies the brakes when the computer decides you are too close to something in the vehicle’s path – are almost universally hated “technologies” that got pushed on people like the “vaccines” during “COVID.”

But – as with the “vaccines” – if you are hesitant about these “technologies,” you can still buy a new Durango without them.

Apparently, word has gotten out.

Dodge can’t stamp them out fast enough to keep up with demand created by the lack of demand for turbo-augmented fours in pricier rivals that all come standard with the very latest and most advanced “assistance” and “safety” technologies.

It is not going too far to say the Durango is keeping Dodge in business – because it is. The rest of the lineup sure isn’t. The Charger is a nice-looking car that costs almost $50k to start – which is nearly $20k more than the 2023 Charger cost back when it last came standard with a V6 (in 2023). It now has a standard 3.0 liter six, which is definitely preferable to the battery Dodge tried to foist on buyers in 2024 after pulling both the V6 and the V8 that had been available in the Charger – but in this economy, expecting people to pay nearly $20k more than they paid to get a V6 just three years ago for an inline six is a bit much.

There’s not much else, either.

The Hornet – which is a re-skinned Fiat – has been benched (due to slow sales caused by high prices and general incongruity with the Dodge brand) and that’s pretty much it.

Back in 2010, there was so much more.

Perhaps that’s why so many people are lining up to buy something from back then – before it, too, gets taken away.

. . .

If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos. 

We depend on you to keep the wheels turning! 

Our donate button is here

 If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:

EPautos
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079

PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $25 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)

If you’d like a Baaaaa hat or other EPautos gear, see here!

 

 

 

22 COMMENTS

  1. Between 2010 and 2013 the nannification was slowly eyedroppered into vehicles. At first these bullshit annoyances were default programmed to on mode at startup to match on button almighty which had replaced a simple key. Each nanny had a switch to manually turn it off. Pilots used internal checklists to disable nonsense as desired. By 2015 the crap was firmwared on and some remaining switchology replaced by layered FU menus. . Most are gone forever. That Durangos numbers reveal how free willed humans feel about what sociopathic engineering robots think. Take your four wheeled etracker and shove it back up your ass.

  2. One of my daughters bought a later model Durango, a 23 or 24 SRT with that magnificent 392 hemi. It’s way too new for my taste, but a really nice car. Only downside is the average mpg, a good old days 19.8 with mostly highway driving. Then again, she doesn’t drive 200 miles a day like I do.

    • 300+ hp V6 that get 19 city 29 highway in 3800 lb sedans existed in 2013. Non compliance $43k+ stickered treasures. Happy hunting kids, they’re goin away fast. And nothins gonna bring em back. . .

      Cept for people like Eric and many other skilled human genius who keep em flyin. My grandkids love real cars and planes.

  3. That straight 6 should be a base engine just like the 4.0 was in every jeep back in the day. The dodge v6 is a pretty powerful engine though, I have one in my grand Cherokee. I remember the first generation of it and although it had much higher HP than the 4.0, it felt slow to me until the RPMs ran up since the 4.0 had the lower RPM torque advantage.

  4. What Keeps Dodge Data Centers Afloat?

    Tax rebates:

    ‘The Stratos data center project in northern Utah cuts a deal on property taxes for energy generation facilities and data centers.

    ‘Instead of a standard certificate of occupancy — which would normally trigger property taxes — the project will use a “letter of completion” that sets a flat 1.2% tax on a site’s value.

    ‘From there, the tax is further reduced. The developer is first credited back enough to bring it in line with Box Elder County’s normal property tax rate, which Morris said is about 0.926%. Of the tax revenue collected at that rate, 80% will be directed to O’Leary Digital.

    ‘Personal property taxes also will be rebated for data centers. “They would not get any hyperscalers to come if you try to do the personal property tax on the equipment.”

    https://www.sltrib.com/news/2026/04/25/hyperscale-data-center-may-be/

    So here’s the answer to Eric’s long-standing quest to be freed of property taxes: if you’re big enough, just bellow ‘Hand it back, bitchezl‘ And they’ll thank you as they fork over the loot.

    • That is appalling and true. This game has been going on a long time, offering zero property taxes on new businesses in “Opportunity Zones”. As usual, as soon as there are excessive taxes, the power players get to make a sweetheart deal.

  5. I used to run into Eddie Money often when I lived in Lafayette CA back in the day. He was always nice, personable, funny and willing to talk to anyone. RIP Eddie.

  6. I’m curious why if Dodge can make money selling older technology why doesn’t everyone else do it? I forget who said something to the effect of “Selling a customer what he wants usually results in him buying from you again in the future”.

    Sadly in our fallen times no one seems to realize this.

    • Hi Landru,

      Well, in most cases that would require resurrecting out-of-production vehicles, which is a much more difficult thing to do than just continuing to make a vehicle like the Durango.

      • Eric, is it true that the 2026 and 2027 models will have a kill switch and will have special tools or software that only the dealer can access? If so this would eliminate independent mechanics.

        • Hi Rik,

          The bad news is all new vehicles already have the “technology” that could be used to “kill” – that is, disable – them whenever an “update” so ordering is transmitted. As far as eliminating the independent mechanics, that’s been in process for years. It’s being done by making it uneconomic for them to work on new cars; the “investment” they have to make in proprietary diagnostic equipment/subscriptions is too high relative to money that might be earned working on the car, so they don’t work on certain makes/models. Inevitably, it will be all makes and models.

  7. Drove one of these on vacation in Charleston, SC two weeks ago.
    Total piece of garbage, IMO, and actually dangerous to drive.
    Impossible to either accelerate or brake smoothly.
    Vehicle insisted on jack rabbit “launches” and panic stops.
    Besides that, it is yuge, and the doors are extremely heavy.
    I am 5′-11″ but always hit my head on the door header.
    Steering wheel felt very clumsy, to me. Not a proper round wheel, but rectangular & very thick.
    Emergency flasher switch is placed just above center console tray, and is very easy to activate flashers inadvertently.

    I can’t understand why *anyone* would pay money for one of these.

      • Hi, Eric,
        Please see my comment to “Anon” (figures) below.
        Plus side: the Durango can “get up and scoot” when necessary, and the brakes are excellent. 20-20 hindsight: “drive by wire” controls (maybe you can confirm actual setup?) were *not* functioning properly. Probably should have returned it to the rental company, and demanded a replacement.

        Tip for anyone visiting Charleston/Mt. Pleasant:
        Streets are very narrow. Best to rent a “skinny car,” not a beast like the Durango, which IMO is more suited to the open road.
        JMO.

    • “ Drove one of these on vacation in Charleston, SC two weeks ago.
      Total piece of garbage, IMO, and actually dangerous to drive.”

      Thanks to ninny’s like you this is why we can’t have nice things. Dangerous? Pfft. Give me a break. And yet here you are on a libertarian car site acting like a Karen.

      “ Impossible to either accelerate or brake smoothly.”

      That’s on you old man. Get control over your own foot.

      “ I am 5′-11″ but always hit my head on the door header.”

      “ Emergency flasher switch is placed just above center console tray, and is very easy to activate flashers inadvertently.” Oh the horror of a car being different than your own.

      So basically you’re saying you’re a slow learner. Couldn’t learn how to operate the stop or go pedals and couldn’t learn to stop banging your head. Couldn’t learn where the emergency flashers were.

      Spatial awareness becomes diminished among the elderly.

      You’re certainly entitled to your own opinions but it’s clear that you’re the one that is dangerous out there. It’s a wonder a Karen such as yourself didn’t file a complain with NHTSA given the dangers you encountered.

      • > Get control over your own foot.

        Car would not *allow* me control over my own foot. As Eric has pointed out, numerous times, the newer cars tend to be “drive by wire,” rather than direct mechanical connection, as in older models, such as my ’89 F150.

        In retrospect, I surmise the sensor-actuator setup was defective, and that is on the car rental company. I heard an anecdote about someone else who had a similar experience (different make & model), and the car ended up totaled, run into a power pole because the accelerator was “all or nothing.”

        >Couldn’t learn where the emergency flashers were.
        Emergency flashers are easy to find and well marked. I said THEY ARE EASILY ACTIVATED INADVERTENTLY. Poor switch placement, IMO.

        >couldn’t learn to stop banging your head.
        Couldn’t learn to be a “short guy.” Great car for Randy Newman. I don’t bang my head on the door frame of my Ford. Never have.

        >you’re the one that is dangerous out there
        Not according to State Farm, my auto insurance carrier. They give me every “safe driver” discount they offer, and have for years.

        I *was* involved in a fatal accident once, back in 1989.
        AGW (County Mounty) on his Gov’t issue Kawasaki crossed over the double yellow and offed himself on my front bumper. He was declared at fault by traffic accident investigators from his own agency. Totaled my Ford Ranger. I walked away (was wearing seat belt, otherwise would have launched through the windshield).

        Paid cash for my ’89 F150 to replace the Ranger. Still driving it. Only accident was when a teenager driving Daddy’s car backed into my right rear quarter panel at a Chevron station. Sheet metal damage only. Daddy’s insurance paid for the damage.

        Ever been inside a C5?
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_C-5_Galaxy
        If you look up at the tail assembly (way up there) you will notice the control surfaces are cable operated, not fly by wire. Ask Lockheed why they chose that design.

        • Something is wrong with the throttle by wire, you’re correct. My 2018 Jeep is the same setup the throttle is reponsive but linear not jumpy. Wonder if they changed parts supplier & later production is going lame early. My issue is the Jeep electric assist steering with “wanderlust”, will not track in the wind it’s a horrible design. Calm days it’s just tolerable.

          My Harley has a borderline jumpy (electronic by wire) stock throttle response however that can be dialed back via software tweak. The current tune I’ve loaded is a good set, not laggy but not jumpy either. Stock it was so jumpy on rough roads I always used cruise control since my hand bouncing around was maddening with jumpy throttle response.

          • PS: aircraft flight controls cable vs fly by wire. Airbus A320 is no cables fly by wire only, with a side mounted joystick pilot input. Boeing’s first FBW the 777, it has cable control for a spoiler on each wing and the stabilizer trim, the reasoning was IF the electrics go dark you can maintain level flight while getting systems back online. Battery is only good for a few minutes. Also 777 traditional yoke & column, pilots did not want that joystick by an overwhelming margin.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Skip to toolbar