Here’s the clip of last night’s talk with Gard Goldsmith, host of the Liberty Conspiracy podcast. We mostly talked about Trump’s impending (apparently) regime-change operation against Iran. My segment begins at about the 40 minutes in mark:
. . .
If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos.Â
We depend on you to keep the wheels turning!Â
Our donate button is here.Â
 If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:
EPautos
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079
PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $25 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)
If you’d like a Baaaaa hat or other EPautos gear, see here!
CO2 facts never discussed on the mockingbird MSM media:
CO2 is a life gas, without it we all die (plants require CO2 to give off O2)
current level of CO2 is (near) lowest in earth’s history
CO2 levels in the last glaciation got so low plants died causing the megafauna extinction (180ppm)
plants stop growing below 200ppm, farming not even possible until CO2 gets to 240ppm
current levels of CO2, still very low compared to most of earth’s history, have double crop yields CO2 has increased from 280 to 420 ppm
plants are optimized to grow at much higher CO2 levels because the evolved when CO2 was higher
CO2 levels have never controlled earth’s temperatures (thus the basic premise of global warming is false)
CO2 always follow temperature (no the other way around)
Al Gore never took a single collegiate science course, has no right to speak on CO2, not qualified, same for Leonard DiCaprio (who’s on the Epstein list) or little Greta Thunderborddumbass
This one chart destroys the CO2 causing warming narrative:
https://i.ibb.co/C3my5Lf9/CO2-LAGS-TEMPERATURE-going-up-and-down.png
CO2 never causes warming, it always follows
FACT – glaciations always start at high CO2 and terminate at low CO2
Eric mentions the $55 billion cost of EV mandates. It is far worse than that, the climate cult (a 100% political scam) cost 16 trillion (vs the car company loss of 55 billion)
Was Climate Change the Greatest Financial Scam in History?
By Stephen Moore February 18, 2026
Environmental scholar Bjorn Lomborg recently calculated that across the globe, governments have spent at least $16 trillion feeding the climate change industrial complex.
And for what?
Arguably, not a single life has been or will be saved by this shameful and colossal misallocation of human resources. The war on safe and abundant fossil fuels has cost countless lives in poor countries and made those countries poorer by blocking affordable energy.
Since the global warming crusade started some 30 years ago, the temperature of the planet has not been altered by one-tenth of a degree — as even the alarmists will admit.
In other words, $16 trillion has been spent — a lot of people got very, very rich off the government largesse — but there is not a penny of measurable payoff.”
I’m not a historian, but I can make predictions … Eric mentions Iran hitting the USS Gerald Ford, the latest and biggest USA aircraft carrier. Well now, that reminds me of British naval history, wooden warships suddenly outdated by iron clad. Likewise hypersonic missiles and satellites might make the US Navy obsolete. We may see in this war a sudden shift in the balance of power if the USS Ford is sunk.
IMO there is a very good chance the USA military empire may be suddenly withdrawing from the Middle East. Russia, China, and Iran have a great interest in getting Uncle Shmule out of their backyard. IOW, military defeat, financial collapse is coming down the Albert C. Pike highway to hell. Trump then gets impeached and named the enemy of the state by the Senate like Rome in 68 AD with Nero, Trump’s removal ends the Neocon dynasty.
If Iran wins this standoff, Trump TACO’s out or if Iran is able to withstand US blitzkrieg, what are the Arab nations going to do? Stick with the empire or realign into a new Arab block. We could easily see an collapse of the old petro-dollar order.
Why wouldn’t Iran-Russia-China make a new oil trading block? The USA dominating the ME area makes no sense. China is now aggresively moving chess pieces to defend Iran, I have speculated why in the past over at Unz, Tehran is dead center on their belt and road initiative.
If Russia and China allow ZOG to destroy/fracture Iran, they are next, ZOG would be on their doorstep. It makes perfect sense, that Russia and China are going to use Iran as proxy to fight this Trumpenstein expansion for Greater Israel.
And if that happens, what about the supremacy of US bonds?
It’s Happening: The Islamic NATO that ENDS Greater Israel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7Up2CFjuJU
Indeed, Jack –
The aircraft carrier may be our time’s battleship. The latter were thought to be the mightiest ways to project power – until WW I-era fabric-clad biplanes crippled the Bismarck and (later) the Japs sank the American battleships at Pearl Harbor. Even the mighty (70,000 ton) Yamato and her 18 inch guns could not stand up to air power. Today, there are missiles that could render the aircraft carrier as obsolete as the battleship.