Tesla Posts Record Loss – As if That Mattered

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Well, no surprise.

Tesla Inc. posted a $671 million lossfor the third quarter – its largest ever quarterly deficit.

Elon Musk’s subsidy and mandate-dependent crony capitalist operation blames the loss on “ramping up”  problems with the Model 3, its newest electric Turducken. It has had to push back its timeline of producing 5,000 Model 3 vehicles a week from the fourth quarter of this year to the first quarter of 2018.  Tesla spokesmen cited the battery assembly line at its Nevada Gigafactory as the primary constraint in Model 3 production, adding that it will reduce Model S and Model X production by 10 percent in the fourth quarter to move inventory and dedicate more manpower to Model 3 production.

“There are thousands of processes to build the Model 3,” said Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who spoke during an earnings conference call from the Gigafactory. “We can only move as fast as the least competent elements of that mixture.”

The company burned through $1.4 billion in cash during the quarter as it continued to invest heavily in its plants. That’s compared with a cash burn of $1.16 billion during the second quarter. 

“A continued delay in Model 3 production and bigger losses were not the news hoped for with Tesla’s earnings report,” wrote Michelle Krebs, a senior analyst at Autotrader, in an emailed statement.

Tesla is under pressure from investors and customers to hit deadlines before the end of the year. After launching the mass-market Model 3 sedan, Musk at the time said the automaker would manufacture 20,000 of those vehicles by December, but had only produced 260 as of Oct. 2.

Musk also said in 2016 that a Tesla would be able to complete a cross-country trip without a driver touching the wheel by the end of 2017, and Tesla customers who paid up to $8,000 for autonomous capabilities would receive gradual updates throughout the year to vastly improve semiautonomous driving capabilities.

However, according to a class-action lawsuit, those features have yet to arrive, and Tesla’s breakup with computer vision and camera sensor supplier Mobileye may have set back the automaker’s progress.

The company did not give an update on when the cross-country drive would occur or when updated self-driving features would be available, but reiterated that all Tesla vehicles are capable of full autonomy with the current hardware suite.

. . .

Got a question about cars – or anything else? Click on the “ask Eric” link and send ’em in!

If you like what you’ve found here, please consider supporting EPautos.

We depend on you to keep the wheels turning!

Our donate button is here.

 If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:

721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079

PS: EPautos stickers are free to those who send in $20 or more to support the site. Also, the eBook – free! – is available. Click here. Just enter you email in the box on the top of the main page and we’ll email you a copy instantly!








  1. The reason savers can’t make any interest income and a big reason why pensions are having funding issues is so there is an endless supply of money for companies like Musk’s and Uber and many more to burn through. Without LIRP, ZIRP, and NIRP companies like Tesla Motors and Uber would cease to exist in short order.

  2. Sounds like Elon needs to fire another 700 engineers who are just lollygagging around the “lease competent elements” of his supply chain. I bet morale is soaring working for this putz.

    What a nice man to be working for!

    • It sounds as if Musk is using the GE bottom 10% model or rank and yank. This is not surprising to me. The model has nothing to do with competency or performance although performance reviews are done to justify the outcome.

      The first rule of this method is that “diversity” numbers must be preserved or improved. As such this means no matter how badly someone who helps those numbers actually performs he or she will not be let go. The second rule is that the popular kids do not get let go. The third rule is that the disruptive voices are to be voted off the island. The fourth rule, and the reason the method was created, is to remove higher salary people who have been with the company for some time so they can be replaced with less experienced and cheaper people.

      Even if the bottom 10% method worked and was applied as advertised eventually the bottom 10% of employees is better than one will find out in the general pool of people available to replace them. But the method still demands they be fired.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here