Here’s the latest reader question, along with my reply!
Matt asks: I’m curious as to why so many automakers in the U.S. are moving away from manual transmissions. I recently visited the UK and it seemed like most of their cars have manual transmissions. Is this simply a result of consumer preference in the U.S. or are there policies in place that are causing (whether intentional or not) automakers to move away from the manual trans or in some cases not even offer them in many vehicles?
My reply: It’s both of those things, Matt.
In the first place, the government’s fuel economy fatwas – more specifically, the tests the government uses to measure a car’s average city/highway fuel economy – favor automatics because they can be programmed to do better on the tests than the same car with a manual transmission (the performance/economy of which is more affected by the variable of the driver’s skill – or lack of it). If you check the stats of most new cars that offer a manual or automatic transmission option with a given engine, you’ll find that – usually – the automatic version scores a few MPG higher on the tests.
Since these tests are the basis for levying the fines that attend the fatwas, there has been a general, industry-wide move away from manual transmissions – even in vehicles that (historically) used to always at least offer them, such as trucks.
The second factor is declining interest – most people seem to prefer automatics and probably (my guess) at least half and maybe two-thirds of the driving population doesn’t even know how to drive a car with a manual transmission.
Part of this is the drift toward passivity behind the wheel – a function of the demonization of involved, active driving (it’s portrayed as “aggressive” and “unsafe”). People are browbeaten to drive “defensively,” which doesn’t mean being responsible, aware and considerate. It means a person conditioned to regard anything more than the most tepid, turtle-like acceleration as . . . aggressive (and unsafe) … a hyper-cautious, rule-obeying drone incapable of exercising independent judgment.
This sort of “driver” is a meatsack behind the wheel, target-fixated on the bumper of the car ahead, which he follows (usually too closely) like one elephant after the next at the circus. A manual transmission for such a driver would be as pointless as sending a gay guy to the Bunny Ranch.
The two things – government fuel economy fatwas and the declining interest in shifting for oneself – are of course inter-related. As manual-equipped cars grow ever-scarcer, fewer people ever learn to drive a car so equipped. They can’t drive a manual-equipped car. So they have to buy an automatic. So the dealers stock them – and the manufacturers build them.
This – along with the automatic’s slight fuel efficiency advantage – puts more automatics on the road, accelerating the drive toward an automatic-only future.
It’s already happened with at least one category or vehicle – 1500 series trucks – and is well advanced in other categories, such as mid-sized sedans – which are almost all automatic-only now.
Gather ye rosebuds while ye may…
. . .
Got a question about cars – or anything else? Click on the “ask Eric” link and send ’em in!
If you like what you’ve found here, please consider supporting EPautos.
We depend on you to keep the wheels turning!
Our donate button is here.
If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079
PS: EPautos magnets are free to those who send in $20 or more. My latest eBook is also available for your favorite price – free! Click here. If you find it useful, consider contributing a couple of bucks!