Here’s the latest reader rant – along with my reply!
Brian writes: Just want to compliment you on your articles – you are right on. Gov’t mpg standards are a scam; traffic lights and traffic flow would make real savings. Also on the spot with your Obamacare fines/fiasco. Keep us updated on that, blatantly unconstitutional, un-American, unethical and immoral, absolute travesty.
My reply: Thanks, Brian – and, I will!
I’ve asked many times, over the years, how it is that the government got into the business of decreeing to the car industry – and thereby, to us – how many miles-per-gallon cars should be returning. That is properly the business of the people buying the cars, who will convey their desires in the form of their purchasing decisions. Defenders of government dictating MPG standards argue that the mean, selfish car companies would build nothing but “gas guzzlers” if it weren’t for the mandates. To which I reply: If “gas guzzlers” are what the market wants, as expressed by people’s willingness to voluntarily part with cash for them, then that is no business of the government’s. But some buyers will want more economical cars; and if enough of them do to make producing such cars a profitable thing, then the car companies would manufacture them for the very same “selfish” and “greedy” motives the government snugglers attribute to the car companies. They are in the business of making money – and money is made (absent government, absent crony capitalism) by the free exchange of value for value. If that means big SUVs, so be it. But it doesn’t mean other types of vehicles would not be available – assuming demand for them.
On Obamacare: It is extremely worrisome, for two main reasons.
First, “health” encompasses all aspects of life and if the individual’s health (his “care”) are now public matters, then so is every aspect of his life that can be said to affect his health and his care. Because it is now a corporate thing; it “affects us all.” This is the means by which government will assume total, micromanaging control over our lives. For example, it will be argued that possessing a gun constitutes a “threat” to health; or, conversely, they will claim that an individual’s “attitude” or “recalcitrance” constitute evidence of mental problems and people with mental problems – defined eventually to include everyone who does not enthusiastically support whatever the government decrees – cannot be allowed to possess guns.
Second, if we can be forced to buy health insurance then surely for the same reasons and using the same logic we can also be forced to by life insurance as well as just about any other form of insurance they can think up. Certainly, house insurance – even if you have a paid-for house and don’t feel the need. We can’t have you “imposing costs on society,” after all.
Even if you never do.
. . .
Got a question about cars – or anything else? Click on the “ask Eric” link and send ’em in!
If you like what you’ve found here, please consider supporting EPautos.
We depend on you to keep the wheels turning!
Our donate button is here.
If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079
PS: EPautos magnets are free to those who send in $20 or more. My latest eBook is also available for your favorite price – free! Click here. If you find it useful, consider contributing a couple of bucks!