Reader Question: “Compliant” Diesels?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Here’s the latest reader question, along with my reply!

Mike asks: I can’t help but think German engineers could make air cooled engines that “comply” and are quieter, cooler etc . Just look at what they did with diesel engines, and now you can’t distinguish them from gasoline engines. Don’t you think the technical issues could be over come ? (Notwithstanding the political bullshit.)

Thanks for all you do as I love cars and freedom too.

My reply: Just look at what they (the government, I mean) did to diesel engines – via political bullshit! As you note, they were made quiet, smooth – and very clean (by any sane standard, which means excluding any characterization of the non-reactive gas, carbon dioxide, as “dirty”) yet got curb-stomped off the road for just that reason – in my opinion.  They were too good – especially as regards cost – and that meant they were a threat to the electric car agenda, which aims at forcing us all into electric cars (the better to control us as well as to mulct us).

I think the same rule-of-thumb applies to air-cooled engines. They’re simpler and so inherently cheaper than water-cooled engines. They can be made very DIY serviceable as well. That’s strike two. And – yes – they can be made “clean” – by any sane standard. The proof of this is the last air-cooled car available for sale in this country, the ’98 911. It complied with every federal emissions reg in effect that year – and that means it was very, very “clean.”

The difference in objectionable emissions (not C02) between a ’98 model car and a 2018 model car is – literally – fractional. It is made to seem like much more by deliberate legerdemain – such as talking about “50 percent” reductions… of .05 percent NOx (as an example).

All cars – water cooled and air-cooled – made after about 1992 are “clean.” But this fact is kept from the public by omission and misrepresentation, in order to justify the continued existence and expansion of the federal regulatory apparat.

. . .

Got a question about cars, Libertarian politics – or anything else? Click on the “ask Eric” link and send ’em in!

If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos. 

We depend on you to keep the wheels turning! 

Our donate button is here.

 If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:

721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079

PS: Get an EPautos magnet (pictured below) in return for a $20 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a sticker – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)

My latest eBook is also available for your favorite price – free! Click here.  If that fails, email me and I will send you a copy directly!




Share Button


  1. If “Diesel Gate” happened during Trump, wouldn’t of ended up the way it did

    The Limp Wristed Queen’s puppet masters wanted Agenda 21, so thats essentially what happened. Personally, a TDI makes too much sense for those who are fuel misers, even if Diesel isn’t as cheap as regular, though the problem is the DPF and stuff, which needs to be gutted.

    Hopefully term two, the Dank God Emperor turns things around even further for a reemergence of small diesels

      • No one’s perfect, we ain’t Jesus

        Still, compared to any of the competition, he’s our best shot, just needs to get rid of these candy assed Rinos and these commie globalists who throw everything they got to destroy him

        Imagine what he’d get done if things ran smoothly

        • Remember that beam the Borg had, that cut out and removed whole chunks of the Enterprise? Can we get one of those Borg cubes to do the same with the EPA? And maybe NHTSA while you’re at it?

          I will hope for the best (4 more years of MAGA) and prepare for the worst.

          Si vis pacem, para bellum, or parabellum as FN Herstal would have it.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here