2022 Audi A7

6
3344
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Speed, it is said, is a question of money. How fast do you want to go? 

Well, how about looks?  

Audi’s A7 is a much more dramatic looking car than the A6 sedan it’s related to. It has “coupe-like” styling, including a more rakish windshield and lower roofline. 

It’s also about $15k-to-start more expensive than the A6. 

How good do you want to look?

What It Is

The A7 is a mid-sized luxury-sport sedan (styled Sportback by Audi) related to the Audi A6 sedan. Both are about the same overall size – but the A7 has a sleeker profile – at the cost of a little front and rear headroom. This is offset by its significantly increased cargo capacity – which it has because it hasn’t got a trunk, like the A6 sedan. Instead, it has a hatchback rear opening, which increases the available cargo-carrying space from 13.7 cubic feet (in the A6) to 21.6 cubic feet. 

This makes it a more practical – as well as more dramatic-looking – car. 

It’s also a more expensive one.

Prices begin at $69,200 for the Premium trim, which comes standard with a 3.0 liter turbocharged V6 engine and all-wheel-drive. You can pick up an A6 for $55,900 to start.

But it doesn’t come standard with the V6 (a smaller, less powerful turbocharged four cylinder engine is what you get as it comes) or the head-turning quotient of its stylish A7 relation. 

A top-of-the-line Prestige version stickers for $81,250.

It also comes standard with the turbocharged V6 and AWD but you can swap out the V6 for a plug-in hybrid drivetrain that ups the power – and gives you about 26 miles of range on battery power alone. 

What’s New

The big update for this model year is a larger – and now standard – digital instrument cluster for the base trim and an available 21 inch wheel/tire package. Rear side-impact airbags are also standard equipment in all A7 trims. 

What’s Good 

It’s a head-turner.

Standard V6 is becoming a luxury-car rarity. 

Practicality to go with the looks. 

What’s Not So Good

Sleek roofline cuts down on headroom a bit. 

Plug-in’s electric-only range isn’t much. 

You can get the same V6 for much less in the A6.

Under The Hood

Unlike its A6 sibling – which comes standard with a four – the A7 comes standard with a V6. The 3.0 liter engine is turbocharged and paired with a belt-driven generator-starter system that quietly and quickly cycles the engine off when it’s not needed, to save gas (and reduce the output of carbon dioxide gasses, which all car companies are under regulatory pressure to reduce). 

Output is 335 horsepower and 369 ft.-lbs. of torque – enough to get the A7 to 60 in 4.9 seconds. A seven-speed dual clutch automatic transmission and all-wheel-drive are standard. Gas mileage with this combination is 21 city, 30 highway – with a highway range on a full tank of 579 miles. 

Speaking of range . . .

If you’d like to be able to drive about 26 miles without burning any gas, Audi offers the A7 with a plug-in drivetrain that combines a version of the 2.0 liter turbocharged four that’s standard in the A6 with a  battery pack/electric drive that’s strong enough to propel the car on its own for about that far, assuming a full charge. 

In addition to that, you also get a bump in total output to 362 horsepower – but in spite of that gain in power, the considerably heavier plug-in is slower. It takes about 5.7 seconds to get to 60. This model also comes standard with the seven-speed automatic and Quattro AWD. 

An interesting thing about the hybrid is its reduced highway range – not because it’s thirstier, but because it has a smaller 13.7 gallon capacity gas tank vs. the 19.3 gallons for the non-hybrid. Even though the hybrid averages about 3 MPG better than the non-hybrid – 27 vs. 24 MPG – the sacrifice of six gallons of tank capacity results in the hybrid’s gas-burning range being only about 370 miles – on the highway, where the gas engine is generally going to be running most of time – in order to keep the A7 moving.

The extra six gallons the non-hybrid carries gives it an extra 144 miles of range vs. the hybrid. 

This can be compensated for – if a lot of your driving is within the hybrid’s 26 mile radius of action on a full charge. In part because the cost of the plug-in hybrid isn’t all that much – a $1,550 option. On the downside, this option is only available with the Premium Plus and top-of-the-line Prestige trims, both of which are several thousand dollars more costly than the base Premium trim – which comes only with the V6 drivetrain. 

On The Road

The V6 A7 has the auctoritas – as the Romans once styled it – that’s absent in the four cylinder iteration of its A6 sibling. What’s meant by that is not merely the prestige that comes with having an engine that’s bigger than the engines that come in common cars – in economy cars – but also the power and performance that you have a right to expect when you just spent nearly $70k for your new car.

Or for that matter, $50k.

The A6 is a very nice car. But – as it comes – it hasn’t got auctoritas. A 2.0 liter four, 261 horsepower and 0-60 in 5.8 seconds is right there with . . . a Honda Accord. Not that there’s anything wrong with the Accord. Far from it. But you get what you pay for. The Accord – with a 2.0 liter four and 252 horsepower – lists for about $33k. The A6 costs $55k – and that makes you feel a little let down, given what you didn’t get for what you paid.

Something else you don’t get – with the A7 – is something you’ll be glad you didn’t.

Combustion interruptus. 

Well, the  unpleasant sensations thereof.

The A7’s V6 does shut itself off regularly – and not just at red lights, as is becoming usual with most combustion-engined new cars as a way to lower what are styled “greenhouse gas emissions” – meaning, carbon dioxide. Without veering off the road into a rant about that, let’s leave it at the fact that everyone selling combustion-engined cars is scrambling to find ways to lower those “emissions.” The obvious and simplest way being to shut off the engine as often as possible.

A not-running engine doesn’t “emit” anything.

The problem is the driver can feel and hear the engine shutting off – and being turned back on – when the off-and-on’ing – is done by the crude means of automatic stop-start (ASS) “technology.” Which is nothing more elaborate than shutting off the engine at every red light and then using the starter motor to start it up again.

The problem there being that starter motors – and the 12 volt electric systems that power them – weren’t designed to serially re-start the engine and weren’t designed to do it without any sensation of it being done. The design brief was to start the engine – at start-up. Which then remained running for the duration of the drive. The driver turned the engine off, at the end of the drive.

As Inspector Clouseau once said – not anymore.

ASS uses the same starter and battery that starts the car at start-up to start it again. And over and over, again. You hear and feel every stop-start cycle.

This Audi’s engine also shuts off and turns back on – but without the abrupt and obvious sounds and sensations. Instead of a small 12 volt starter motor not designed for such duty, the re-starts are handled by a belt-driven starter powered by a 48 volt electrical system, which spins the engine back to life almost instantaneously. This happens throughout the course of your drive, without interrupting the peace and quiet of your drive.

It is also what makes it possible to get 30 MPG out of 335 horsepower (and get to 60 in less than five seconds) which is pretty remarkable. A historic comparison will make the point. Back in 1970, a Pontiac Trans Am came with a 335 horsepower V8. It averaged about 13.5 MPG and didn’t get to 60 in less than five seconds.

The A7’s handling is tenaciously neutral – a function of its standard all-wheel-drive. Rivals like the Mercedes-Benz CLS come standard with rear-drive (AWD is optional) but the differences are much less pronounced than they once were – unless you’re really pushing it. The main accessible difference is the total absence of wheel-slip in the A7. If you disable the traction control in the RWD version of the Benz and stand on the gas while holding the brakes you can get the rear tires to spin.

You can’t do that in the AWD-only A7.

At The Curb

The look is what counts. Or rather, it’s what you pay extra for – vs. the A6. As you would to date Ginger vs. Mary Ann.

Both cars are about the same size – that being mid-sized. The A7 is slightly longer than the A6 (195.9 inches vs. 194.4) but the A7 is visually and actually much lower. The raked windshield tapers to a roofline that is 56 inches off the pavement vs 57.4 inches for the more formally-styled A6.

You pay a little something else for this – in the form of less headroom in both rows vs. the A6. Up front, the spec is 37 inches vs. 38 in the A6; in the back, 37.1 inches vs. 38.1 in the A6.

But it’s a small price to pay for the sake of style.

And it can also be made up for (up front) by lowering the seat to compensate. It can be a little tighter in the back of the A7, if you’re very tall – because you can’t lower the rear seats.

Legroom front and back is essentially identical in both cars (41.3 inches up front for the A7 and A6; 37 inches in back for the A7 and 37.4 inches for the A6).

The really big difference –  beyond the looks – is what you can carry in the A7 vs. the A6. This being a function of the A7’s not being a sedan – with a trunk. Instead, there’s a hatchback, which opens up 21.6 cubic feet of cargo-carrying capacity vs. the 13.7 cubic feet inside the A6’s trunk.

The A7’s usable space is also greater because of the larger opening – which opens up the entire passenger compartment. The A7 is not exactly the ideal vehicle for carrying home a bundle of 2x4s from Lowes – but it’s doable. Just reverse the floor mats to the rubber side and drape the carpeted side over the leather-covered center console and other surfaces that might otherwise get marred by the 2x4s.

All trims now come standard with the fully LCD 12.3 inch primary gauge cluster that was previously found in the higher trims. There is also a 10.3 inch secondary LCD screen for the stereo/apps/vehicle systems – and a third touchscreen below it for the climate controls.

There are almost no physical controls in this car, aside from the gear selector lever. And of course, it doesn’t physically control anything, either. When you select a range, a signal is sent to the computer to engage it.

More than anything else, this is what defines a modern luxury car – because ordinary cars have become pretty luxurious. When every new car – including the humblest economy car – comes standard with AC (often, climate control AC) and power everything, what do you do to establish some separation between such cars and cars that cost three times as much?

You add electronics – and technology.

The downside – if you’re selling luxury cars – is that electronics and technology get cheaper to install with each passing year. Within a few years, probably all cars – even the humblest economy cars – will also have LCD main gauge clusters, 3D cameras, ambient lighting and all the rest of it.

Heck, some of them already do.

The Rest

Some interesting options include an available wireless charging pad with a signal booster (most in-car chargers just charge) and – for the top-of-the-line Prestige trim – driver and front seat passenger massaging chairs. All trims also come standard with Audi’s Connect system, which lets you monitor and even control certain car functions (such as the door locks) remotely, using an app on your smartphone.

One odd omission – for a car with a base price of nearly $70k – is the absence of a standard heating steering wheel.

It’s available – but it’ll cost you extra.

The Bottom Line

Can you put a price on good looks?

Audi just did.

. . .

Got a question about cars, bikes or anything else? Click on the “ask Eric” link and send ’em in! Or email me at [email protected] if the @!** “ask Eric” button doesn’t work!

If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos. 

We depend on you to keep the wheels turning! 

Our donate button is here.

 If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:

EPautos
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079

PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $20 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)

My eBook about car buying (new and used) is also available for your favorite price – free! Click here.  If that fails, email me at [email protected] and I will send you a copy directly!

     

Share Button

6 COMMENTS

  1. I get that it’s an Audi, so it’s better than your average car,
    but – and this isn’t limited to Audi – what do I really get for $70-80K ?

    If I pay double the price of the avg car, am I getting twice the car or just being flashy?

    Maybe I’m just really uninspired by current cars.

    • Hi Dan,

      I agree with you. The differences – the meaningful ones – that used to separate a luxury car from an economy car are much less than they were. A $20k Corolla has climate control AC, power everything, a good stereo and is nicely finished inside and out. A $40k A3 has . . . well… it has a stronger engine. A larger LCD screen. A slightly nicer cabin/stereo. But is it worth it?

      A car such as the Corolla is by no means slumming it – as was once the case with a basic economy car.

      This closing of the gap is a real problem for luxury car sellers. It is why luxury cars tout their “technology.” But “technology” is inherently cheap – and all the high-zoot “technology” that was only available in high-end cars last year or this year quickly becomes available in basic cars – viz, the touchscreens, ambient lighting and good stereos, too.

  2. If you are a speed freak and want to terrorize teslas and everything else here is a great solution from Audi:

    A brand name new Audi RS 3 starts off at a base price of $56,200 in the USA, MSRP.

    You can buy and tune an RS 3 for less then a tesla plaid and it is quicker, this RS 3 ran an 8.4 second quarter mile. 0 to 60 1.3 seconds. 3000 lb

    This RS 3 is a better solution then buying a 5000 lb. tesla plaid. ice cars are better then EV’s.

    The RS 3 you can actually hear, feel and smell, the sound of this thing is wild, EV’s are dead no emotion or fun.

    https://www.hotcars.com/worlds-fastest-audi-rs3-drag-races-ken-blocks-1400-hp-mustang-hoonicorn/

    • I agree with you, Anon –

      Any car is better than an electric car – if the measure is “aliveness,” for want of a better term. A Tesla Plaid is very quick. So is a high-speed skyscraper elevator. An interesting experience, once or twice – then it gets boring, just another thing. Push the button, arrive at your floor. Floor the accelerator and the car runs o 60 in 3 seconds, silently. No engine noise, no tire squeal. No gear whine from the transmission. Nothing to do, either. Just sit there and hold the accelerator down. The RS3 is more enlivening idling.

      • How about a real car?
        DSG VW Golf Mk2 4 motion (AWD) 1233HP powered by a VW 4 cyl turbo engine

        These electric motors don’t make much power, they are a joke, the plaid has 3 motors, the quickest EV in the world the Rimac has 4 motors, a tiny little VW Golf Mk2 with ONE tiny little 4 cyl. turbo engine is quicker then the plaid or Rimac. Actually the only car quicker 0 to 200 kph then the Golf (excluding purpose built drag racing cars) is a $250 million F1 car and it requires a gas engine plus an electric motor.

        DSG VW Golf Mk2 4 motion (AWD) 1233HP powered by a VW 4 cyl turbo engine

        0 to 100 kph = 1.66 sec
        100 to 200 kph = 2.74 sec.
        0 to 200 kph = 4.4 sec.
        1/4 mile 8.26 sec. 170 mph

        Porsche 919 Hybrid EVO (Mk II) 8.3 sec. 1/4 mile
        The Porsche 919 Hybrid EVO (Mk II) is the quickest car in the world on some tracks, the Nurburgring for example.

        The only car quicker 0 to 200 kph is a $250 million dollar F1 car 0 to 200 kph = 4.1 sec.

        0 to 200 km in seconds

        Porsche gt2 rs 8.3

        caterham 620r Super 7 313 hp 10.1

        donkervoort gto Audi 5cyl 370 hp 7.8
        (Super 7 clone)

        HKT Super 7 Audi 1.8 20vt 400 hp 7.5
        (Super 7 clone)

        tesla 14.1

        Bugatti Chiron 6.3

        mclaren senna 6.8

        c8 corvette 12

        Ferrari f40 10.4

        Porsche 919 hybrid EVO 4.5
        (quickest car in the world other then F1, on some tracks quicker then F1).

        VW ID R electric race car 5.0
        (quickest car in the world at Pike’s peak and Goodwood hill climb)

        F1 4.1

        F2 6.6

        F3 7.8

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7t4C_0BZT4

  3. It’s a looker for sure. Have seen some. I like that you can still get a V6 non-hybrid. I don’t particular like that Audi has switched from blown to turbo. I favor superchargers, but they are almost gone now with some exceptions.
    Certainly don’t like ASS, but I’d have to witness this one for myself to see if it’s a Pita or not.

    Eric, is it true that most, if not all German cars, do not have remote start? For a lot of us that want to warm up the car in cold climates, this is a hard thing to miss. Although maybe most owners of these have garages. I don’t.

    Great write-up as always.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here