Here’s the latest reader question, along with my reply!
N asks: My Geico insurance premium just increased dramatically. I have a 2007 Accord and in the 22 years I’ve lived here in Maine have never had an accident. I’m considering letting the insurance lapse. My car isn’t worth much except to me (Ive never had collusion) and I have medical coverage if that ever became necessary. I may take a chance and just let it go … it feels like a scam. I’ve never had AAA and just once had to pay to have my car towed. I’m aware it’s a legal requirement but still. What do you think?
My reply: I had Geico, too – and like you, for no legitimate reason, they summarily raised my premium by a substantial amount last year. I had never filed a claim or had one filed against me in the 20-plus years I paid them for “coverage” I never used. It amounted to many thousands of dollars. This obnoxiousness roused me to seek a different “family” of the mafia, as I style insurance – because we’re forced to buy it by threats of violent repercussions if we don’t (and continue to drive). It says a lot about the nature of the exchange, doesn’t it? When you’re forced to buy something, it is almost always something you don’t need. And when they can force you to buy it, then it’s a sure bet it’s going to cost more, too.
Some will say – the usual objection – that if people weren’t compelled to buy insurance, there’d be dangerous deadbeats out there who’d drive without insurance. It is exactly the same idiot argument that is used to push for gun control; i.e., that if guns were outlawed, then “gun violence” would disappear or be much less. As in Chicago, for instance.
Gun control and forced insurance “covering” punish people for harms they haven’t caused – because someone fears they might. It dismisses out of hand the possibility that they might also be responsible – and not cause harm – and if they do, that they would pay for any damage caused. This is a vile kind of pre-emptive assuming of irresponsibility rather than a presumption of responsibility until facts say otherwise.
I was lucky in that I found a company – Erie – that offered me a policy that met the minimum requirement in my state for liability-only coverage for a sum I would have paid freely (about $120 annually). I then told Geico – which had been charging me several times that sum – to take a hike.
I recommend you try doing what I did first. In the good old days – which were just that – you could “get away” with not having insurance because everything wasn’t computer-connected. Nowadays, it is. They – the DMV – run regular checks and if they find out your insurance has lapsed (Geico may give them a call) then you’ll be slammed with heavy fines, possible loss of your driving “privileges” and so on.
Hopefully, you will be able to find a better “family” to be forced to buy “coverage” from!
. . . .
Got a question about cars, Libertarian politics – or anything else? Click on the “ask Eric” link and send ’em in! Or email me at EPeters952@yahoo.com if the @!** “ask Eric” button doesn’t work!
If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos.
PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $20 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)
My eBook about car buying (new and used) is also available for your favorite price – free! Click here. If that fails, email me at EPeters952@yahoo.com and I will send you a copy directly!