Some of us understood the danger of Diapering from the beginning. Understood it was more than just a degrading Obedience Ritual. Could see the next step in the inevitable progression.
That “masking” would lead to “vaccinating.”
It is why some of us refused to wear the god-damned “mask.” Ever. Period.
We tried to warn others. The ones who said, “it’s just a mask” and “you can take it off” once you’ve finished shopping. How do you take off the “safe and effective” drugs they made you take next? That you agreed to take when you put on that god-damned “mask?
Maybe you didn’t think, at the time, that you’d agreed to that. But think about it now. Wearing that “mask” was not fundamentally different than agreeing to pay a tax on one cent of your income. By doing so, you have agreed that income taxing is fundamentally legitimate. You have thus denied yourself the means of arguing that higher income taxes are illegitimate.
Principles matter. Precedents are set. Once set, they are expanded upon. Tyrants understand this. It is the way they slow-walk those who do not understand it into accepting their tyrannization.
If it was legitimate to make people wear a “mask,” then it was legitimate to make people take the drugs that, as we now know, are “vaccines” in the same sense that the grape juice in the Communion cup is “wine.”
By believing, you are agreeing.
That is why they pushed those Face Diapers as hard as they did. Even to the extent of accepting as a “mask” a pulled-up T-shirt or nasty old bandana. So long as you had something over your face – to show you agreed with the premise. That it was necessary to wear a “mask” because it would “stop the spread,” “flatten the curve” and – the big one – protect others.
“Masking” was thus presented as a kind of civic duty, an obligation of decency owed to your fellow man. Immense social-psychological pressure was brought to bear, to leverage people’s natural and laudable instincts to be decent to get them to participate in what is arguably the most indecent thing done to a large number of people since what was done in Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge (Communists) back in the ’70s – and that was localized to Cambodia.
“Masking” was afflicted upon practically the entire world with an official, organized rabidity that cannot be explained except as laying the necessary predicate for what came next. What they had in mind all along. What they knew would never fly until after they had already managed to get a huge percentage of the population to publicly display their own agreement with the necessity of it.
Cue the “roll out” of the drugs they somehow developed from scratch in a matter of months and which they now told the people who wore the “mask” they needed to take on the same basis they wore the “mask.”
It was their civic obligation to help “stop the spread” and to get things back to “normal” again. Most of all, the drugs had to be taken for the sake of protecting others. If you did not take them, then you were a really bad person. How could anyone who put that god-damned “mask” on their face refuse to roll up their sleeve and extend their flesh? If they refused, they were unprincipled. If they objected, they were unreasonable. It being akin to objecting to the government taking 45 cents of every dollar in income after having not objected to the government taking a penny of every dollar.
And so most of the millions who wore that god-damned “mask” rolled up their sleeves, just as had been planned. And now – having sown the wind – they are reaping the whirlwind.
A just published Rasmussen poll of the people who did roll up their sleeves gives us an indication of its magnitude. It claims seven percent of them – which is a hell of a lot more of them than the 1 percent or less of the general population who were seriously afflicted by the “virus” – report having experienced serious, often debilitating side-effects after taking the drugs pushed on them to “prevent infection” and “stop transmission.” Which, as we now know these drugs do not do.
But they lied to people about them. Told people they were vaccines. Told them they were “safe and effective.” Just as they told them that wearing a “mask” “worked.” And millions bought the lie or acceded to the lie, for the sake of convenience, or to not “buck” the system and to avoid “making a fuss.”
Rasmussen’s head pollster, Mark Mitchell, says his poll suggests at least 12 million people have experienced serious side effects as a result of being dosed with these drugs that are not vaccines. He also told podcaster Emerald Robinson that this does not include people whose side effect was death. “If somebody died from the vaccine (sic) we couldn’t poll them.”
We do have some idea of the death count, however. It numbers in the tens of thousands, according to the government’s own tabulation system, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). And we all know about the interesting new phenomenon of people – in particular young people, often athletic young people – “suddenly” dying, which is a thing that happened extremely rarely up until lots of people began rolling up their sleeves to take the drugs they’d already accepted the need of taking, by having worn a “mask.”
It is perhaps impolitic to say we told you so. But we did – and there you go.
. . .
If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos.
PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $20 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)