Trump – and many of Trump’s supporters – have made a big whoop about what they style election integrity ever since the obviously sketchy election of 2020. The proposition is that sketchy elections are a problem.
In fact, the problem is that elections are sketchy. It being sketchy to put to a vote whether to take other people’s money, to force them to pay for things the people who vote for that want money spent on. It’s sketchy to transform what were once understood to be inalienable rights into conditional privileges, in the sense that all it needs is one election to vote away people’s rights – thus rendering them implicitly conditional privileges subject to modification or revocation whenever the voters so decide. How secure would you feel in your home if you knew your wife and kids could, come November, vote to eminent domain you curbside? That’s what the ballot box is, just writ large.
Does it matter to the victim of a mafiosi whether, prior to being shaken down, the members of the “family” took a vote about whether to shake hime down and how much? 
It is telling that there is never a none of the above option in any major (or even minor) election in the American electoral scheme. The choice is always A or B (occasionally, there is also C) which means that every election is fixed in that it is certain the outcome will affirm the power of the state to plunder and control people who would rather not be plundered or controlled.
And worse.
Consider the most recent (2024) election. The voters were led to believe there was a meaningful choice on offer; that A was not the same as B. That B would be better than A. It turned to be worse than just the same, didn’t it? Instead of no more wars of choice we got the most consequentially catastrophic war of choice in decades. Instead of accountability for Epstein (and Fauci and the rest of that lot) we got Tech Bros and body bags (more to come, probably).
The late election highlights incandescently the lie children are taught in school about representative democracy. This fatuous idea that the people elected to office represent the people who vote for them. It is something of a piece with the tale about the 600 year old man who built an ark that housed a breeding pair of every animal and insect extant, plus the plants; i.e., it is fairy tale. Something only children or people with the minds of children can take seriously. In fact, the people are deluded into believing they are represented; this is necessary so as to avoid the people noticing they are ruled. This is the genius of the peddlers of democracy. It obscures the true relationship between the “represented” and the rulers. It keeps the people enthralled by the silly idea that by Voting Harder next time, they will surely set the ship back on an even keel.
A true representative – such as an attorney you hire, for instance – can only act in accordance with your specific, agreed-upon instructions and only you hire him. No one else can hire him for you. If he acts on his own – contrary to your instructions – you are freed from any obligation to transact future business with him. You can fire him on the spot; no show of hands is necessary. Even better, a wayward attorney can be disbarred for such misconduct.
The president can be impeached, of course. Meaning, he can be scolded for his actions. He may even be forced to resign, as Nixon was forced to resign. It is a trivial – almost irrelevant thing – because the impeached/resigned president is replaced by another, just as voting to replace A with B does not mean anything will really change. It only means a kind of changing of the guard.
“Election integrity” is thus a a distraction; a false cause that is used to make sure people do not catch on to the real cause of their woes. It is an issue to keep them busy, which can be seen as way to keep the rulers safe.
The big whoop made by Trump and his greek chorus about election integrity channels the energy of people who think elections matter into harmless (to the rulers) conduits. Like sportsball rallies.
Putting other people’s money and liberties to a vote that is the problem – because it is morally sketchy to put such things to a vote. It is nothing less than legalized plunder, as Bastiat correctly styled it. He picked those words purposefully. To plunder is to take what is not rightfully one’s own, usually by force. When this action is performed by an individual or several individuals, it is almost universally agreed that it is a morally wrong thing and ought to be punished. Also that the victim is within his rights to resist being plundered; that if, in the process of defending himself, he injures or even kills his would-be plunderer, then that is the plunderer’s just desserts.
When plunder is legalized – via the ballot box – it becomes a “crime” to resist being plundered; even more galling, the plundered is obliged by law to assist in his own plundering (as by filing out tax forms detailing his financial affairs). The dissonance is remarkable, is it not?
When plunder is legalized, the moral sense is badly injured. Taking other people’s money – theft, fraud, robbery – becomes routine business; a thing actually debated openly by ostensibly decent people seeking the votes of ostensibly decent people. And yet it is not fundamentally different than these vote-seekers debating whether your wife or daughter ought to be placed in service to the men who vote for that (and it will probably one day come to that, too). Why not, after all? Property is property and if others can vote to take some (or all) of one form of it then it stands to reason they can vote to take all of some of another form.
This is the inevitable result of putting anyone’s right to keep what is theirs – including their very corpus – away from the mitts of others up for a vote. To expect anything less than perpetual plunder and all the evil pathologies associated with that, such as contempt for others and the elevation of the worst-imaginable kinds of grifters and sociopaths to positions of power is as preposterously naive and deluded as believing the Noah’s Ark story is actual history. 
Instead it might be better to put away childish things and look squarely at the reality of things – as unpleasant as that often is.
. . .
If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos.
We depend on you to keep the wheels turning!
Our donate button is here.
If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:
EPautos
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079
PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $25 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)
If you’d like a Baaaaa hat or other EPautos gear, see here!
Chart of the day – how Trump’s evil war is causing T-Bonds to collapse:
https://i.imgur.com/aUwHIEU.jpeg
every vertical bar since the war started at the end of Feb 2026 is a day of 10 year bond trading – as you can see Trumpenstein and his evil war is causing a massive sell of in bonds and making rates go up.
Trump is an evil orange bastard waging an evil Jew war which will hurt us all. Never forget that Trump’s 30% approval rating means 30% of 345 million Amerikans still approve of the bastard. 100,000,000 still approve of Trump. That is why I am not optimistic, Amerikans are really fucking dumb plus immoral.
The military willfully carries out Trump’s disasterous war plans. The military allows itself to be ordered around by the IDF terrorists – Congress votes to merge the US morons with the IDF terrorists – what could go wrong? We the people are morally challenged and brain dead …
Bow down before the one you serve
You’re going to get what you deserve
head like a hole, black is your soul
God money, I’ll bomb anything for you
God money, just tell me what you want me to
Jew money, nail me up against the wall
Jew money, I serve the Jews who want it all
Bow down before the Jews you serve (Oh, oh)
You’re going to get what you deserve (Oh, oh)
Hi Yukon,
I think they’re just demoralized. What, after all, can we do? I mean, beyond “call your congressman”?
Quit. No one can force you to attack Iran, just because Trump says attack Iran, you do not have to. Soldiers could quit en masse.
Trump has never dropped one bomb. Trump is leading us into a very bad place as a nation, here are some predictions what may happen:
https://www.unz.com/mhudson/were-headed-for-a-depression/#comment-7707122
You can quit, yeah, but face UCMJ. In today’s climate, Hegseth could probably fill Leavenworth and thereby become the frontrunner for ’28. Not saying its right, just that it is.
If forced to weigh in (they can’t be forced because all they have to do is deny the request) the USSC would probably just say Gillette still holds — you can’t CO a particular war, you have to CO war in general, and now with an all-volunteer force, it’s going to be hard to argue that you were anti-war when you signed up for the military.
Hi Jack,
I recently spoke with someone who thinks (a) the Iranians are pining for a different government (a “democratic” one, natch, with a Wal-Mart on every corner) and that Iranians getting a nuclear weapon simply cannot be “allowed.” Allowed? By whom? We know the answer to that one. I told this person that were I Iranian, I would seethe with hate toward this country and desire that my country obtained the capacity to defend itself.
Trump is a Jewish supremacist, talks like he is god incarnate, king of the world, who can have nukes and who can’t.
Trump is forcing the Iranians to get nukes, so says CIA Larry Johnson:
When Iran Gets Nukes, It Will Be 100 PERCENT Trump’s Fault! – Larry Johnson
The Jimmy Dore Show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEHzpvYjCIA
That 30% of rabid Republicans is on top of the consistently 30% of rabidly left-of-Genghis Khan Democrats (the ones who supported Biden even at his worst). That’s 60% of America we’re dealing with here.
There is about 150 million Americans who vote in national elections. There are supposedly 350 million residents, subtracting 30 million illegals and 50 million otherwise ineligible, still only about 60% vote in the highest turnout elections. Of that there are a large percentage who vote R because the D has proven intolerable, and a similar large percentage who vote D because they hate everything the R says they stand for.
Point being, it’s not actually that bad, and when you talk to folks one on one, the vast majority say a pox on both their houses.
And the LPUS and other “alternatives” are sick jokes which have the dubious distinction of being entirely unable to win/do anything other than act stupid.
Every time the subject of voting comes up, I’m astonished that so many believe wolves and a sheep voting to have mutton for lunch is the best government. Especially since no government has ever excelled at doing anything except kill people.
Speaking of election integrity, today the WaPo updated the bizarre case of ‘F. Joe Biden,’ a homeless man who crawled in through a basement window of the White House in early 2021 and — unaccountably, unbelievably — convinced millions that he had been elected ‘president’:
‘Joe Biden’s world has grown smaller. Eighteen months after leaving the White House, the 83-year-old former president moves within a narrowed circle of relatives, old friends and longtime aides as he undergoes treatment for metastatic cancer.
‘In May 2025, four months after leaving the White House, Biden was diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer. Former first lady Jill Biden has described her husband’s diagnosis as deeply unexpected, saying the family was shocked to learn that the cancer had already reached Stage 4 and metastasized to his bones.’
https://archive.ph/nywNH#selection-693.12-693.214
Prostate cancer usually takes years to develop and flare up into metastasis. Two possibilities: 1. The Bidens knew and lied about his illness all during his ‘presidency’; 2. It’s a turbo cancer caused by the covid ‘vaccines’ he cynically promoted.
Ultimately ‘Joe,’ a proclaimed lifelong zionist, will be remembered for authorizing hundreds of shipments of 500-lb and 2,000-lb bombs used by little Shitrahell to demolish a city of 2.2 million and mass-murder probably 300,000 of its inhabitants. That’s “Joe’s” twisted, misanthropic legacy of hate.
Well, you’ll work harder with a gun in your back
For a bowl of rice a day
Slave for soldiers ’til you starve
Then your head is skewered on a stake
Pol Pot, Pol Pot
— Dead Kennedys, Holiday in Cambodia (1980)
https://www.corvus-rising.net/blog/posts/on-your-knees-joe/
“This is the inevitable result of putting anyone’s right to keep what is theirs – including their very corpus – away from the mitts of others up for a vote.”
Never heard of Bastiot, so looked him up. According to WIKI: “In The Law, Bastiat wrote that everyone has a right to protect “his person, his liberty, and his property”. The state should be only a “substitution of a common force for individual forces” to defend this right…Under extraordinary circumstances, for urgent cases, the State should set aside some resources [?legal plunder?] to assist certain unfortunate people, to help them adjust to changing conditions”.[25]” [Not sure who revealed these truths to Bastiot.]
Anyhoo, right off the bat, Bastiot (and you) authorize some collective entity to deprive him of his life (your very corpus), liberty and property to defend the lives, property and liberty of others (or whatever the hell they decide to go to war over). Immediately he authorizes an entity to form a military and a police force to defend his life and property either of which can be turned against him and agrees to pay taxes for that purpose.
I think you once defended the Revolutionary War because “no taxation without representation,” which you’re now claiming is not possible. The first thing these revolutionaries who wanted no taxation w/out representation did just like with Davis/Lincoln’s war, was to deprive other men (without representation) of their liberty and potentially their lives to fight the revolutionaries’ war, assessed them taxes to pay for the revolutionaries’ war, and got their property destroyed/confiscated by both the British and their Continental Armies because these Revolutionaries didn’t want to pay the Stamp Tax (which was to pay for the British soldiers defending the colonies) or the Sugar Tax (which was to pay for the French Indian War) [the tea tax lowered the price of British tea, but undercut the colonial smuggling business of Dutch tea]. Supposedly everyone has a “right to property” but the continental congress authorized “privateers” to capture British vessels and cargo (when you’re at war it’s LEGAL to plunder the other side’s property!).
In our time and place, this theory of gov’t not only means registering for the draft if you’re male, it means transferring $1.5 TRILLION dollars ($4,412/person or $9,285 per taxpayer) to a “military industrial complex” and getting the rest of your property eaten up by inflation from unjust wars of aggression that destroy lives and property and plunder the wealth and resources of entire countries (Venezuela, Cuba, Iran, Gaza, Ukraine and Russia) for the benefit of a criminal Epstein class. Isn’t that really “legal plunder?”
Whenever you belong to a group, even in a marriage, you have to make accommodation if you want to remain in the group/keep it afloat. I believe you once said one issue that broke up your marriage was your refusal to purchase a 401k. My sister is telling me she has to move because her condo association is charging a special assessment and she just knows they’re going to do it again and again and again (they’ve been doing other things she doesn’t like also). People change churches all the time. Most all our ancestors came here from somewhere else. The great American novelist, Fitzgerald said: “They were careless people, Tom and Daisy- they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made.”
All the pundits are advising Trump, “Just declare you’re the winner and walk away. Bomb the living hell out of them, declare you’re the winner and walk away.” Then they laugh: He can get away with it!
P.S. It’s funny how you know that Noah’s Ark is a fairy tale, but “Dune” and Bastiot are true stories.
Hi AJC,
I’ve never endorsed any form of taxes or coercive collectivism. That I referenced Bastiat’s observation about legal plunder was just that. I referenced his observation, which I think stands on its own two feet. Must I agree with everything a writer has ever said to be able to reference anything he ever said? There are things in the Bible that I consider worth referencing; it does not follow that I endorse everything that is in the Bible.
In re Dune. I am well aware it is fiction. As is the story about the 600 year old man who built a boat. I mean no insult. The claim is extraordinary and in defiance of the Everest of observational evidence that the human lifespan is perhaps 130 years in the extreme and by that time, the person is unlikely to be able to stand, let alone build a boat.
Never mind the rest.
“I’ve never endorsed any form of taxes or coercive collectivism”.
Eureka! I read that, and it suddenly occurred to me: When one votes, that is exactly what one is doing. It just becomes a question of which psycho-criminal one desires to officiate over the theft.
By ‘voting’ for ‘your representative’, you are implicitly giving consent for that ‘representative’ to make decisions / laws on your behalf, which will then be binding on you as if you entered into them of your own free will.
In other words, you are agreeing to ‘be governed’ by others. Which governing then includes things like having to pay taxes for something you do not even use or want (like endless wars overseas), having to be ‘licensed’ to sell lemonade by the side of the road, or paying fines for ‘speeding’.
Even the most honest & well-meaning politician – an oxymoron, I know – can never even remotely satisfy the wishes and expectations of all those varied individuals who ‘voted’ for him/her.
Add to that fact the requirements of party politics and the fact almost no politicians are well-meaning and/or honest, and the outcomes are inevitable.
So yes, voting harder ain’t gonna help. But it’s a nice-sounding fairy tale, still.
I never bought into that participation=consent argument since I had no say in the creation or agreement of the system.
Maybe a vote to continue or abolish should be on the ballot every so often.
“I never bought into that participation=consent argument since I had no say in the creation or agreement of the system.”
I would argue that if one participates in “the democratic process” that they accept that process as legitimate and binding upon themselves and all others.
Why? How is that any different than, “You bought a house, therefore you owe us property tax.”
But you have to have somewhere to live- and whether you buy or rent, you still ultimately pay those taxes…. The difference is that one has no choice- it is something that is imposed on them, while voting isn’t. Much like buying a pair of pants because you need something to cover your junk. You have to pay the sales tax.
Property taxes and sales taxes are not legitimate, but because so many of our neighbors believe that government and taxes are legit, and keep participating in the perpetuation of the tyranny, these things are enforced on us, unwillingly, by threat of violence and theft of our possessions.
To put it another way…the plantation slave is not legitimizing slavery by living in the shack that the master provides. His only choices are to do so, or run (Fighting is nit even an option for him, as massa has superior weapons which Uncle Tom has no access to; and Uncle Tom will find little help among the rest of society or even his fellow slaves, because the vast majority accept massa’s claim over him as legitimate. And if you doubt that other slaves even felt that way, just read the writings of Frederick Douglas, the former slave, who explains how even slaves were indoctrinated to believe that they were legitimately the property of their massa….)
It is only when the slaves (virtually all of society today) come to the realization that they are not the property of someone else, and that choosing between two masters who both intend to perpetuate their slavery is the same as being free, that there can be any hope of ever being free.)
*******and that choosing between two masters who both intend to perpetuate their slavery is NOTthe same as being free, that there can be any hope of ever *******
The voting means implied consent argument would be fine if not voting resulted in full and complete separation from being governed. No, in reality they enslave you the moment you’re born by saying you’re party to a social contract by virtue of the fact you begin your existence at a certain time and place.
Well, no. While it is true that one person not voting does make one ungovernable, it does indicate that they do not accept the supposed ‘right’ of others to rule them; That they do not believe that they have the the right to enforce their will on others through “their *representatives*(LOL); and that they do not believe that liberty can be maintained by choosing between two masters.
Such people then proceed to maintain liberty as best they can, under protest, but living as free as possible, and avoiding as many encumbrances of the illegitimate government as possible.
If a decent segment of the population realized that and practiced it (or even just the “liberty-minded”) government would lose it’s power.
Conversely, if you participate in choosing a master by participating in “[hushed tones of awe]”The democratic process”, you are perpetuating that process, and agreeing to live by the results of that process- your participation signifying that you accept that process as legitimate.
If you join the army….you are accepting that what the army does is legitimate and just. One (such as myself, and many here) can’t say “I abhor what the army does” and then sign-up to join…… If one joins the army, they can not even legitimately complain…because they chose to participate. So too with voting….if you vote, you have no right to complain- even if your guy loses…or when he turns out to be a liar who does the opposite of what he promised.
If we reject the notion that elections give others the right to rule us, why would we perpetuate and participate in, thereby consenting to that notion?
If you participate in a coin toss, you’d better be willing to abide by the results without complaint, because you consented to the toss. If you vote, you are not only consenting to the coin toss, but one in which the terms are “Heads I win, tails you lose”.
It’s a 2 party system. You have to vote for one of them.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l7l9QmtiXHU
Gotta love the DKs. Great, my vote is for the wild, drunken orgy. The Bacchanal party.
Classic! Probably the truest, most realistic thing ever aired on TV!
Why are our politicians willing Jew whores? Power, money, and myth. Lindsey Graham was one of the worst, where his Christian religious beliefs merged with Jewish political power. What the United States is doing to Iran is pure wickedness, Trump has taken us to hell. That makes Trump a hell demon.
Most intelligent thing I have read in a long while, some complete unknown substack writer is brilliant:
“In the end, no human life is worth any mythological god. The time has come to ask the obvious question: why does the United States allow a foreign lobby like AIPAC and its network of allied organizations to exercise such extraordinary influence over our government, our politicians, and our foreign policy? This control must be confronted and ended immediately.”
https://bishopraytaylorphd.substack.com/p/theres-no-god-worth-one-human-life
“it is long past time to separate these ancient stories from modern policy. No god no chosen people and no holy land justifies the suffering we continue to fund with American lives and resources. Human life must be placed above ancient legend.
Yet any attempt to question this arrangement is immediately met with accusations of antisemitism. The term has been weaponized not to protect Jewish people from hatred but to shield the state of Israel and its supporters from legitimate political criticism. Legislation has been passed in multiple states and pushed at the federal level that equates criticism of Israeli policy with antisemitism itself. The Boycott Divestment and Sanctions movement known as BDS has been targeted and in many cases outlawed despite its nonviolent approach and its roots in tactics that were once celebrated when used against apartheid South Africa.
This tactic serves a clear purpose. By branding critics as antisemitic those in power seek to make discussion of American interests in the Middle East impossible. Questioning why the United States should send weapons billions in aid or potentially American soldiers to fight for Israeli objectives is not hatred. It is the most basic exercise of national sovereignty and moral reasoning. American foreign policy should be determined by American interests and American values not by deference to any foreign power or ancient religious claim.”
Trumpenstein says he wants to invade Iran. Here are outstanding graphics why that would be insane.
https://www.renegadetribune.com/so-you-want-to-put-boots-on-the-ground-in-iran/
Morning, Jack –
War is disgusting but these chickenhawk warmongers even more so. It astounds me that so many MAGA people can cheer this fat old man – who dodged the draft when he was a young man – when he bellows belligerently about war.
Hi Jack,
I think three things explain it.
One, they have to be. You cannot get elected without money and you won’t get it without being a whore for Israel.
Two, they have to be. Many – maybe most – have partaken of the honeypot and so are owned and do as their owners say.
Three, they want to be. Many are fervent (just the right word) believers in Darby/Scofield eschatology. Huckabee is an example. I doubt he’s partaken of the honeypot; I believe he is a genuine believer. He’s just insane, that’s all.
Here is my take on the future. Not good. Trump is really screwing us good.
https://www.unz.com/mhudson/were-headed-for-a-depression/#comment-7706684
I think there is a sea change in voter attitudes coming, already AIPAC candidates are losing.
The concept of “judeo-Christianity” is one of the greatest coups the jews have successfully pulled off on Christianity itself.
Until the early 1960s, the Catholic Church was successful in partially nullifying that flawed concept.
Not only were jews considered to be spiritual enemies of Catholicism and by inference Christianity, jews were held responsible for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ. That all changed when Vatican II changes were implemented.
From a Catholic perspective, with the Vatican II Ecumenical Council, the crypto-jews who had infiltrated the Catholic hierarchy were successful in grafting judaism on to Christianity. Vatican II declaration defining jews as “our elder brothers” was a nail in the coffin of traditional Catholicism
Protestants had a head-start in grafting judaism on to Christianity with their basic beliefs that failure in business or to thrive in society was a moral failing–both basic jewish concepts. Coupled with the worship of money, the “prosperity gospel” and the belief that “good works” were useless in the grand scheme of things, concepts that Protestants espoused from earlier times, these flawed beliefs thoroughly judaized Protestant Christianity.
Thankfully, there are Catholic sects that are on the right side of Catholicism by rejecting both the synodality of Vatican II as well as the present-day synodality being pushed by present-day Catholic leaders.
The SSPX and other pre-Vatican II Catholic sects are being condemned in Rome, but elsewhere, traditional Roman Catholics see SSPX and other offshoots as their new home. SSPX parishes are thriving while post-Vatican II parishes are withering on the vine–a good thing.
More and more Catholics are becoming aware of the coup of “judeo-Christianity” as well as the spiritual vacuum left in the wake of Vatican II and the present-day synodality push and hunger for a real honest spiritual experience.
The whole concept of judeo-Christianity must be placed on the trash heap of history. There is nothing “judeo” about Christianity.
There is nothing true about Judaism – it is all plagiarized and respun mythology stolen from other cultures. I go into details on this recent Unz comment, which they actually published (Ron Unz is Jewish):
https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/they-are-coming-to-take-us-away/#comment-7699146
“There is nothing “judeo” about Christianity.”
The basis of Christianity is Judaism and the Torah. There can be no NT without the OT. Jesus only makes sense if Yahweh is true and is the bastard Jew in the sky. The only reason a Christian needs a Jew savior is to save them from the meglomaniacal Jew sky god.
Lucky for us, as it turns out, Judaism is utter bullshit and thus so is Christianity.
https://bishopraytaylorphd.substack.com/p/did-abraham-exist
“The basis of Christianity is Judaism and the Torah. There can be no NT without the OT.”
That much is true. The rest. not so much. God does not want sin in heaven for the same reason you don’t want a turd on your sandwich.
You couldn’t be more wrong. The Bible, whether OT or NT, has NOTHING to do with “jews” (in the Bible they’re called PHARISEES). The authors of all 66 books of the Bible are white men, not jews. You can’t find a single passage where any of the OT people were called “jews”. Nowhere does it say Noah is a jew, or Abraham, or Jacob, or David, or (pick whoever you want). The Bible is NOT a jewish book.
Well, clearly, the bible tells of a man named judah, who fathered the tribe of judah. Jew was supposed to be an epithet, but similar to the way, “racist” is no longer an insult, and many proudly bear the label, “white supremacist” they chose to accept it.
If you consider yourself christian, you might want to brush up on especially the pauline epistles. Paul speaks of his own lineage as being half jew, half roman citizen. He speaks in rom 1:16, “…salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.”
I get that talmudic/rabbinic judaeism traces its roots through the pharisees. I also get that there are sects of judaeism (maybe down to just one now, Karaite or something like that) who reject the talmud and use only the hebrew bible, the old testament, as we know it.
The word “Judah” does not mean “jew”. The word “jew” didn’t exist when the Bible was written, it came along much later.
The word “jew” when you see it in the Bible doesn’t mean “modern jew”, it means “Judean”, as in, someone from Judah, the tribe of Israel.
Modern jews are NOT part of that. They are NOT of Judah. Jesus even addresses this when he tells the PHARISEES (modern jews) “You are not my sheep. My sheep hear my voice and they know me.”
The obfuscation and intentional juxtaposition of the words “Judean” and “jew” is all part of their plan to confuse Christians as to the true identity of both modern jews as well as modern Christians.
There is a distinct reason why modern jews call themselves “Israelis” instead of “Israelites”. They AREN’T Israelites. The jews even admit this themselves in their own reference books.
“Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘jew’, or to call a contemporary jew an ‘Israelite’ or ‘Hebrew’.” Jewish Encyclopedia, 1980 pg. 3.
The Bible was written by, for, and about the white race.
I see from most of the recent comments that a lot here don’t get the point Eric was trying to make. There is still way to much griping about how the Orange Douche (and the Repukes in general) was “robbed” in the 2020 selection when the (1) the totals in 2020 were out of whack for BOTH the Orange Douche and Joey Pantshitter (2) having a “choice” between 2 increasingly horrific candidates is not worth fighting over and (3) “elections” are dependent on billionaire money and parasitic foreign countries and have been rendered meaningless and likely completely pre-determined.
Thinking things will get better if the whore from “your team” gets in is a delusion of the highest order.
Also, the bullshit that there needs to be more power given back to “white males” is ignorance of the highest order. Like the Orange Douche, Petey Kegsbreath, Tom Cottonmouth and the late unlamented Miss Lindsey aren’t what more “white males” would mean.
How about getting rid of most of these positions of power in the first place instead of griping about the genitals or skin color of those holding them?
I’d agree, the proliferation of centralized power is the biggest problem. But local power belongs primarily to women and women’s interests these days. The power that needs to return is the small power of the husband and dad. Every kid has a mom, but the difference between civilization and something less than that is whether the kid has his/her biological dad or not. Moms are mandatory, inescapable, but dads are socially-constructed. There are no examples of great civilizations where women rule the family.
When people say power should be given back to “white males”, they mean ACTUAL white males. Not jews like Trump, or their shabbos goy.
When you have white males in charge, you get the global entity known as “SEARS”.
When a jew is in charge, you get the global failure that was “SEARS”.
When a white male is in charge, you get “Snow White”.
When a jew is in charge, you get “Snow White 2025”.
The patterns are easy to discern…if you look.
“How about getting rid of most of these positions of power in the first place instead of griping about the genitals or skin color of those holding them?”
Sure. How? Other than obtaining seats of power, voting to put like-minded people into seats of power, or breaking out the torches and pitchforks, I mean.
There’s nothing we can do. I voted for that Economic Dimwit Trump but I’m finished. Except for a handful or Representatives, the only choice is Socialism/Authoritarianism or Corporatism/Authoritarianism. The only way I would go to the Ballot Box in 2028 is if Rand Paul and Thomas Massie were on the Ticket – and there’s not a chance in Hell that would be allowed.
I’m just glad I own nothing in the States anymore.
Ditto, Doug –
I am bracing for impact at this point. We are not going to vote our way out of this.
Wait until the AI bubble collapses.
Cutting economic ties is the only practical way to assert your independence. Even there if you do expatriate and renounce your citizenship the IRS will hound you for what you “owe” if you do earn a living through a financially traceable method involving paychecks and banks. You’re not allowed to live a comfortable life without paying tribute to the U.S.G. basically anywhere in the world anymore. You gotta live under the radar and not seem like you’re worth the trouble of going after.
Indeed, Larry –
But how to do that? I wish I knew. I mean, without living under a bridge or in a tent.
“Instead it might be better to put away childish things and look squarely at the reality of things – as unpleasant as that often is.”
Agreed. How can we as a society meaningfully do so? All I see is lots of complaining, and no action items.
Hi Steve,
I don’t think “we as a society” can meaningfully do a thing. Only each of us, as individuals, can.
OK. What do I as an individual do to, say, stop the Iran war?
Hi Steve,
Exactly. Most of us can do essentially nothing – other than make our disapproval known. I have the ability to make my disapproval known a little more loudly, but what functional good does it do? We are carried along by events we have little, if any, control over.
Still, we can say god-damn them all.
I mean, we can always organize and pick up rifles.
Go outside and pop off a few rounds. If no one else joins you, go back inside, clean your rifle and wash your hair. It’s not time yet.
The problem with organizing should be obvious. Unless you have known someone for years, and spent time with them you’re probably walking into a trap. Most people don’t even know their neighbors. How do you expect to vet the inevitable fed-boys? Not saying you’re wrong. It just somehow needs to become a spontaneous uprising> which probably wont be in the cards until our suffering reaches a much higher level.
A variation of “two men with a plan is an army, a thousand without a plan is a mob”
And rulers have always been VERY adept with controlled opposition, spies, and informants.
“How secure would you feel in your home if you knew your wife and kids could, come November, vote to eminent domain you curbside? That’s what the ballot box is, just writ large.”
Actually, that’s the primary function of ‘family’ courts – it’s exactly what they do. Hundreds of millions of men booted from their homes, families and kids’ lives without cause in every country in the western world since the 1970s, demoted to financial serf status. Check the numbers if you doubt it, from USA to to Russia to Columbia. It shocks me to this day how few men complain, and how many men (and women) trash anyone who tries to speak out about it.
Where in the constitution does it say govcorp can take away a man’s kids for no reason? Along with his house, his business, his savings and his future? Why are both American political parties and almost every government in the world all-in on this model?
What state do you live in?
“Divorce Plunged in Kentucky. Equal Custody for Fathers Is a Big Reason Why…. In 2018, Kentucky became the first state to pass a law making equally shared custody the default arrangement in divorces and separations. Four other states—Arkansas, West Virginia, Florida and Missouri—have since passed their own versions of Kentucky’s custody bill. Around 20 more are considering or close to passing similar laws, according to an analysis by the National Parents Organization.
“The law has become a model for other states, not least because Kentucky’s divorce rate has plummeted. Between 2016 and 2023 it fell 25%, compared with a nationwide decline of 18%, according to an analysis by the National Center for Family & Marriage Research at Bowling Green State University. …He suggested that parents are increasingly likely to stay together because they realize they’ll be in regular touch regardless, so “they might as well work it out.” He added that he’s heard stories of couples who decided not to break up because of the presumption of shared custody, and years later are glad they stayed together.” (It could also be less money/not seeing your children, regardless if you are in a different state, maybe should try to get this one passed in your state and then have it applied retroactively to you (?))
https://www.reddit.com/r/Divorce_Men/comments/1ngw5sy/divorce_plunged_in_kentucky_equal_custody_for/
Good on Kentucky, it’s a start to fixing the mess. I haven’t seen my kids in 15 years, they’re both well into adulthood (26 and 23), and I’m still being forced to pay child support (to their mom, of course). How many other states (and countries) are moving down this path? It looks to me like most of the world is going the other way.
But the entire system is illegitimate, based on a false narrative, a fraudulent legal foundation, and a direct contradiction to the concept of basic human rights.
And sorry for criticizing the ladies (anathema in the modern neo-liberal zeitgeist) again, female privilege is driving this train, like so many other destructive pathways that are playing out today.
Hi Cobbletones,
They can make you pay “child support” for grown adults? Your kids being 23-26? Holy cow!
In some states, yes. So long as they are still claimed as dependents, daddy has to pay up. ObamaCrap made sure that kids could be dependents until at least 26 if they were still in school.
Astounding, Steve –
How can any sane person say – with a straight face – that a 26 year old man or woman is a “dependent”?
I might only add “unconstitutional” “family” courts. Since they absolutely deny the right of men to their trial by jury for all controversies exceeding $20. And the also deny single men their trial by jury by declaring statutory liability/responsibility.
Why is it allowed? Who is it that stands up against tyranny?
Yes, the unpleasant reality is you can vote your way into communism, but, you must always shoot your way out. Every single time.
Until we have in person only, one day counting, no dead people, no mail in, no illegals, a none of the above option, and perhaps, no one who is a net drag on society gets to have a say in things, we will continue to get the same fake and gay results.
Arizona is fixing to rub the peoples face in the rancid dog shit of NoDebateKate once again. In an honest election, one not controlled by Maricopa and Pima county, she would be lucky to pull 20-25% of all statewide votes cast. If you look at and listen to her it quickly becomes apparent, she is the reason it’s so hard to get people to stop saying RETARD.
Men of Arizona will need to unite. Maybe it starts as a state income tax boycott and spreads out from there. Resist the urge for manufactured civil war. Revolution 2.0 is the answer. Taxation (property tax, state income tax) without “legitimate” representation is a perfectly justifiable reason for stacking bodies..It is our right as Americans and Arizonans. It will be interesting to see which state takes this route first. Lots of contenders in the running
I agree this is a necessary intermediate step.
The whole point of election integrity is to drum home that we can no longer pretend to be united states. We are at least 3 or 4 drastically different major divisions. I do not see any other means of convincing such disparate factions that the only peaceful way forward is dissolution.
Libertarians, bless their hearts, can neither accept that reality nor advance a realistic alternative.
I am trying to comprehend the full consequences of saying NO completely and fully to the state of Arizona. Probably need to divest myself of my Real estate first, even though it’s all in LLCs. Maybe I just give it away and hope my wife and kids don’t fuck me later. Not quite ready for that, as once that road is taken there is no turning back. And life right now, even for all its problems is pretty damn good for us here.
Becoming ungovernable in every way you can is the path forward. Every step one takes leads to more chances. The only problem with the process is the older you get, the more they can get you by the short hairs. Anybody working on becoming ungovernable, highly recommend doing it from a young age. Thats how it should begin.
A thousand tyrants a mile away, or one tyrant 1ooo miles away. The ones locally are very vulnerable. Always liked that hippie saying, “Think globally, but act locally.” I’m pretty sure there is enough anger and animosity in Arizona to pull it off. Once enough people decide the absolute despotism has gone on long enough, the control architecture fails. Especially because there are still so many of us who have lived here off and on our whole lives. We of Pepperidge farms remember the golden paradise this place used to be. It would be perfectly OK if we returned to 1 million/ish people.
Fair. It does take a critical mass. And so far, everyone who has made the effort to be ungovernable has not come out very well. And made enough of an example of to keep the populace in order. And you have to admit the general response would be, “Good riddance, Boomer.”
I’m not sure a million people would be a good idea, considering white males would have been disproportionately eliminated. Leaving our wives and kids and grandkids to the tender mercy of musloids isn’t a great idea, as we can already see in Europe.
Prototype early GENX, born in 65 here. Although that distinction is lost on many under 40 who see all us grey beards as being the same. Many of the recent arrivals to the state, even White ones, haven’t really impressed me. Dragging along the failed crap from the states they left is no way to show respect for the place they flee to..
When I say a million I’m talking the way Arizona used to be. 85+% Whites, with a smattering of heritage brown and red Arizonans. Throw in some Asians (not river shitters) and the rest of the newly arrived must all go back.
December 31, 1964.
I could get behind rolling back demographics to, say, ’56, or better yet, ’24, when they had already recognized and addressed a problem with certain types of immigrants.
Really, when a third of working age males are sitting it out, we don’t need to import labor. Reduced demand for goods and services and housing would solve the affordability mess we are in.
“Becoming ungovernable in every way you can is the path forward. Every step one takes leads to more chances. ”
^This!
“Anybody working on becoming ungovernable, highly recommend doing it from a young age.”
And ^ that!
I won’t go into the details, but I have seen the state as my enemy before I even became an adult, so I have always made decisions which have kept me free; and am working on ridding myself of the few encumbrances that remain.
It’s easier to stay free from the git-go than it is to try and claw back that freedom once you have traded it away; And more so now, seeing as every interaction requires a signature(consent) and ID; and everything is logged into databases, and flock cameras/ALPRs and datacenters.
My driver’s license recently expired. I tried to renew it online, but couldn’t. Turns out, my last license photo was taken before they had the capability to take biometric photos. I am not renewing. I’ve hired someone for the occasional times when I need to go to town. I am NOT have my biometric photo logged into databases, to be used with flock cameras and facial recognition!
I did not commit any crime nor consent nor do anything that warrants such an invasion of my privacy, and sharing of my most personal physical traits with God-knows-who or what. I opted out.
It kinda sucks….but such are the decisions we need to make and things we need to do. We have arrived at that line in the sand. You either comply and submit, and take the consequences (and those consequences are going to be becoming much more severe in very short order); or you say enough is enough, and deal with workarounds.
I feel freer already. No more submitting forms and signing on the dotted line and paying fees, or being subject to their armed goons who can invent a reason to stop you whenever they feel like it.
Being ID-less will also serve to keep me from future entanglements. That, and the fact that I have never and will never have a smartphone…. Just those two things alone go a LONG way to becoming free.
The only ties I now have are property taxes and a mailbox. We either live as we desire, or we just sit around and gripe about it as we rely on the state and all of it’s “benefits” and conveniences. There are trade-offs, for sure…but freedom is not free.
They are counting on us doing nothing. If just those who consider themselves Libertarians/anarchists/Voluntaryists would become less governable, the state would be overwhelmed and lose much of it’s power….and the concept would spread and become much more common.
[To all]Where is your line in the sand? We’re getting to the point where the state has total control and total surveillance….but the only reason they can have these things is because the majority readily comply and aren’t willing to suffer any inconvenience. We’ve gotten to the point where once they have your biometric identifiers; your DNA; your medical records (I stopped using the medical cartel decades ago); a history of everywhere you go [No, turning off “tracking” on your phone doesn’t prevent that!] etc. there is no opting out or expunging your details…they have it forever. Game over.
Ever think about why they need your biometric identifiers, when you’re not a criminal? Is there a rampant plague of people using doppelgangers to acquire DLs and IDs? Is it to “prevent ‘terrorism’ “? Is it because this is the way they achieve total control and surveillance? Bingo! And obviously, no amount of voting will stop this.
I want my freedom now, and I want to be well positioned for what is coming, as we are seeing the establishment of it being built and implemented right before our eyes. There are no take-backs; no do-overs. What you do now will affect the rest of your life- and if you haven’t been working to stay free in the past, it is largely already too late.
You’ve hired a driver? Like full/part time or a cab/Uber/Lyft? As a fellow no cellphoner, I appreciate your commitment to the bit, so to speak. Do let us know how it works out. If I should be “reading between the lines” on your actual intent while not renewing, please ignore my earlier questions. Hehehe…
Nah…no ‘reading between the lines”. I just don’t consent to being enlisted in their tracking/surveillance scheme, in exchange for using the roads I paid for without being harassed/assaulted.
Yes…a driver, as in someone I can call when I need a ride, and pay them for the service. There’s no Uber/Lyft out here in BFE, and even if there were, I don’t think it would be tenable without a smartphone….or for a few hours of running errands, stopping at various stores, and carrying a lot of stuff accumulated on such trips.
It’s different- especially when you’re used to doing what you want, when you want…but yet it seems very freeing- and will save money, to boot, as it was quite inefficient maintaining two vehicles, buying gas; paying insurance, etc. Overall, it seems quite freeing, and isn’t as bad as I had imagined it might be.
Turns out, in the little town where I usually shop, there are already 17 flock cameras/ALPRs! -Strategically placed at every ingress/egress point of the town- and this is just the beginning!
The driver’s license- even non-‘REAL ID’ has become a defacto national ID.
Fellow no-cell phoners unite.! Probably less than 1% of us in the entire US, and three of us, right here in a row, lol, time to buy a lottery ticket. You are so right about how just a handful of us becoming ungovernable would overwhelm them.
Ridding your self of their encumbrances is, in a way, practicing spiritual sovereignty. This cage they’ve constructed is left largely unlocked. When you consider the only real power they have over a sovereign people is the FEAR of death. Also, if you chose a noble death, on your own terms, outside their system, it deprives them of their last nick on your life. I look at it like a toll. One that I am no longer willing to pay, because I no longer recognize their lawful authority. How can anyone claim the controllers have any moral authority over any authentic human?
I’ve always picked my battles. I plan on being mentally prepared for the final one. Thinking about all those red lines is time well spent. Better than having to decide spur of the moment. My current DL has no yellow star. It expires in 2030, passport in 2032. That will be the end of ID for me. The rush for the biometrics is concerning as it hints at the states core operating system of, ‘show us the man, we will show you the crime.’
The main red line for me is water. My property, my well, my water. The effort to get everyone on a 5/8th metered line, only able to pay digitally is accelerating. We have a windmill on one of our wells. As long as I’m alive that water belongs to me. I don’t really care what “comprehensive Agreement” they come up with. It doesn’t apply to me. Agua es vida!
Another red line I’ve come up with is smog tests. Only a couple counties in Az require it. The communists at the capitol are working hard to institute it across the entire state.. This one will come down to a fight as my cars will soon all be over 25 years old. Will not comply with any new tax to promote ‘safety’ or ‘climate.’ As long as I can see, I’ll still drive where and when I want, although without proper papers my range will be cut down. My world will get ever smaller. But thats comes along with old age, so, no complaints on that front.
Election denialism is moving into the area of red lines. If our current AG snake slides her way into another term she wants blood from anyone who claims our elections are illegitimate and/or manipulated. She tried to arrest people early on and will feel empowered to do worse this time. OK by me. Az (specifically two large counties) have some of the crookedest elections in the world. I wont ever back down from saying that. If they don’t like it, they can fix it. In fact, I would say so to that dumb bitches face in court. Although going forward I don’t plan on ever showing up in any court, The Solzhenitsyn rule could soon to go into effect.
Any new gun laws where I live would be laughed at. The cop-f**ks would have a choice to make. Side with the side that already hates them, or side with the side that still (sadly) has some nostalgic regard and good feelings toward them.
Norman!
Very well said!
Wow, indeed, re us ‘non-smart(phone)s! But then again, this is the place I’d expect to find fellow resistors. The fact that there are so few, speaks volumes as to how well *their* gradualism works- like the frog being put into the proverbial pot of water in which the temperature is so gradually increased…or the wild hogs being coaxed to eat free grub, while every day a new panel is added to a fence which gradually ends up enclosing them. [Unlike the frog fable, the hog thing is an actual true story…wish I had a link handy!]
I think too, that a lot of people are unaware of the fact that most (if not all) state are using the biometric photos, even on non-‘REAL ID’ licenses.
Oops. Just looked it up- (Who Has Your Face? https://whohasyourface.eff.org/resources/)
VT, NH, OK and IRONICALLY….CALIFORNIA are the only states not using biometric photos on standard licenses 😮 (I suppose, with CA. it likely will be implemented, it’s probably just that with such a large population and so much bureaucracy the expense and logistics of implementing it are likely slowing it down. LOL- California…’the free state’!)
My vehicles are 25 years old too. That raises another issue: I would never buy newer vehicles…only older; and parts are becoming harder to come by, and of increasingly lower quality. Thanks to Cash-4-Clunkers, and the utter crap that the car manufacturers (in conjunction with Uncle Scam) over the last 20 years, I see having and maintaining economically viable vehicles going forwards is going to be a very difficult thing (And add to that how non-rusty functional vintage vehicles are now so expensive…).
We’re getting squeezed. I’ve even looked into leaving this country (I wouldn’t care about the biometric passports once I’ve left), but it seems like jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire to do so. Most I’ve looked at require you to get a national ID or “health services ID card”; and even if you go out into the boonies and wild areas, the culture of the people there, and the existence of warring political (or other) gangs and such, make the prospect of living in such places less than appealing.
It’s sad that the best people -the spiritual heirs of the Pioneers, have to live an avoid-and-evade style existence. We’d probably be better off becoming criminals and taking up residence in big cities, if we could stand such an environment; as then they’d treat us better….well…maybe if we changed our name to Rodriguez or Patel or Syed.
Re Solzhenitsyn: I often picture our fellow countrymen, and especially the liberty-minded, fully caught-up the Chinese social-credit-like system which is being implemented before our very eyes here, moaning and groaning, and picture Solzhenitsyn’s voice from beyond saying “Why did you go along so willingly? Why didn’t you resist? -Especially considering that you could have done so easily and without inviting or using violence, even? All you had to do was not buy that smartphone; Not move to that county where they control everything you do on your own property; Not trade your autonomy for that six-figure corporate or government job….but you traded liberty and privacy for convenience and ‘benefits’ because you valued those things more than liberty. You saw the fence being erected, but instead of staying away from it, you kept coming back for more free hog slop, and assured yourself that if you participated in their system by indicating which tyrant you preferred to have rule you, that all would be O-K; but now you’re pizdets! [Fucked]”.
The whole control architecture rests on an offer. There is discomfort in refusing that offer. The offer (giving up freedom/liberty-for convenience) is a hook, like a shinny fishing lure. it promises worldly comfort so warm and soothing, so tempting, that the weak and tired person, the one with no ability to read, let alone any ability to think past ‘food good/fire bad’ is easily swayed. Add that being in a weak and depleted state from a hard life, and being hard sold on all the shinny baubles they parade before us, and the math of why 95-99% of people give in without a whimper is understandable.
Many accept these terms, based on ‘thats just how it is, and how it’s always been.’ and, ‘Don’t ask questions, don’t make waves.’ I heard that often as a child. Didn’t really understand it until I had kids of my own. But again, everything has been constructed to gain maximum unquestioning acceptance. It’s amazing that so many of us still slipped through the cracks.
I am now exempt. My exemption comes from the fact that I am not property of this prison planet, of the powers that rule over it, and, or, any other MFer that insists on asserting some kind of claim or contract over the fruits of my existence. Any of these ‘so called’ contracts were largely entered into before I had the full emotional development to recognize the fraud on which they were based.
Thats a great interpretation of Solzhenitsyn, btw. He is worth the effort to channel. I lived in Vegas long enough to know I could do that dirty shithole again. Most cities have walkable areas where everything you need is available. Being able to carry would also make me feel safer. The thing that would make it hard is I now prefer to live solely among people who look and act like me.
No one should laugh at California being/becoming the free state. As a youth I always envisioned a confederacy between Ca, Az, and Nv becoming a worldwide beacon of liberty. There are parts of Northern California that I’ve been to in the last few years that still act almost as jurisdiction unto themselves. Unanswerable and unalienable to Sacramento.
Wife convinced me, so we will be traveling to South America first thing next year. Already got the plane tickets even though we haven’t quite worked out the itinerary. Flying into, and out of Ecuador, Will be there for a month, hopefully we take a side trip into Colombia, or Peru. It ought to be interesting as our recent driving trip down to Rocky Point left her feeling a little faded..
I fully agree, Norman.
Only I’m pretty much dome with South/Central America. Argentina may hold some hope though. Ecuador though? Only if you want to live in a gated community with people much like the ones we’re trying to get away from. (Crime is a way of life there. And in general, all of S. & C. America seems to be implementing socialism. It’s a shame; up until about 15 years ago, most of those places didn’t even have property taxes on residential and agricultural properties…which is what initially attracted me- but that is the least of the issues…)
We’re going down there because I’ve still never been. They all seem to be socialist or cartel run. One of the guys I play cards with every week lived in Ecuador for a year before the sniffles psychosis hit. There are a few smaller places we want to check out. For a socialist country food and daily living seem really cheap. Food quality it could be argued is better than we have here. It’s shame Mexico never revolted against their uni-party. I read that as of first of the year they plan on going cashless. A recent visit to Rocky point makes me question how they will pull that off. Lots of people down there still using cash, probably more than here.
Then only place I know of on earth still without property tax is the Prince of Whales Archipelago in Alaska.
Always Alaska! Always the cold places with short growing seasons! Darn!
I knew someone who lived in Ecuador for a while too. Seems typical of that continent- Very cheap living; Open-air markets in almost every town where you can buy pristine locally grown food from the people who grew it; and little governance in the more remote areas- only problem is, between the rather dysfunctional cultures, and cartels, etc…..it amounts to the same thing….maybe more so.
I would like to check out Argentina- as the culture is much more functional there (Pretty much everyone has at least half European blood- be it German or Italian); there are huge remote areas largely free of government, if you like living on your own rurally, as I do. Issues of liberty seem to be on the table, what with pseudo-libertarian Javier Milei having been elected president (Although, that could just be a ploy to purposely construct failure, and thus usher in more socialism).
I’d check it out, but I’m just so spent and disheartened that it’s hard to get motivated now.
Ironically, some of the countries of Europe seem to offer the best quality of daily life, despite being very socialized- only because the people still maintain a higher culture (Which is being assaulted by migrant invaders and the other tenets of socialism).
Many say that Georgia (The country) is rather inexpensive and accommodating; offers good traditional European lifestyle- but I don’t see myself trading a nice piece of acreage and guns in a still-nice place for that. But it could be worth a look for city/town dwellers.
There are those who claim that the 2020 election fraud claims were all bogus and not based on any real manipulation.
I beg to differ as most people are unaware that it does not take a massive number of fraudulent ballots to change election results.
All it takes is fraud in key precincts and areas , not a very large number of fraudulent ballots are needed. Proof was the turnover of the 2020 election to Biden.
In Detroit, Republican poll workers were purposely denied re-entry into the ballot counting areas if they left the premises for any reason. In addition, throughout the night, ballots were being delivered through the back door of the Cobo Center where election results were tabulated. Paper was installed over the windows in the ballot counting areas in order to hide the fraud taking place.
The same things occurred in other areas where ballots were being tabulated as well.
That being said, I would like to see a “none of the above” option on ballots. Any candidate’s failure to achieve at least 50% of the vote would be deemed to invalidate that candidate’s suitability for public office.
Agreed. I’d take it one step further and redefine “quorum”. The house cannot call into session unless a quorum of the entire 435 (218) are present. If a state fails to seat a legislator, it counts as a “not present” and does not adjust the number needed for quorum.
It’s still tough. It’s basically a prisoner’s dilemma. While it would be in the interests of all to vote “none of the above”, at least until a candidate acceptable to the majority of voters can be found, it is in the individual’s interest to defect and elect someone to advance his ideological goals and to punish the opposition.
Election integrity is like trying to put a band aid on a hopelessly corrupt system of state. Even if you eliminated fraudulent votes you still have total corruption.
To fool the people into thinking they have a say, the owners allow us to vote. It is a big joke on us into playing along, because even if they were not cheating the two candidates are both Zionists. Both whores on every ballot are pro-Israel. The last president who tried to reign in Israel, JFK, was shot dead in full public view.
You are not being given a real choice if political whores are vetted as both Zionist tools who are both for Israel, both for Jew wars for Greater Israel, both support massive aid and arms to a genocidal apartheid state. Since when has a president actually cut aid to Israel? Since when has a POTUS issued an arrest warrant for crimes against humanity for an Israeli politician – when in fact our government is neck deep in the mass murder itself.
Since when has a political leader stopped aid to Israel under the Symington Amendment – Israel has not signed the NNPT -yet has 2,000 nuclear weapons – making it illegal for the USA to give Israel one penny.
When was the last time the Prime Minister of Israel, like the current mass murdering maniac BB Nutjobyahoo, charged or even arrested, let alone tried and executed? Mandamni is also a ruse, he is in on it, he is not going to arrest BB. It is a big game they play with us. Kamala, Hillary, Trump, Obama, Bill, Mamdani are all on the same team. Fooled you good. They all are part of one big club and you ain’t in it.
Believe what you want, hold political views you want, vote if you want – not a damn thing is changing. The deficit goes up. The Fed prints more money. Inflation is never tamed. Israel keeps killing. Jews keep manipulating our political whores. Wars go on. Bankers get richer. You get poorer. Figure it out!
Trump wants to fix election corruption. Uh huh. Donald Trump is one of the most corrupt people in the history of the world. How does a Zionist mass murdering scumbag fix corruption? How many nations has Trump bombed? How many people has he killed? How many billions has he stolen from us for his illegal, immoral, and evil wars? How many hardened criminals has he pardoned? How much money has he taken from Miriam Adelson and other Jewish donors to make decisions which harm us? How much money has Trump pilfered from the public till, how many billions did he make on the Trump coin crypto scam? What about those thousands of oil trades?
I only vote in local elections to vote against whatever grift the PTB are proposing that will raise my already outrageous property taxes. Even that is futile because there always seems to be enough sucker fools (hat tip to Mr.T) to pass it anyway.
As Jim H. mentions below, requiring a passport to vote will blow up in Treasonous Trump’s ugly face since most passport holders live in blue states.
Voting is your validation of the results. What if they held an election and nobody voted? There would be no “mandate” at all. Who would take office with zero votes?
I too had to access articles through comments.
How could that happen, John? At the very least, the candidate and his staff will show up. In a school board election, we had less than a 1% turnout, almost exclusively teachers. They seated the commies that were the highest vote getters anyway. The system has not crumbled due to lack of a mandate.
Trump is promoting election integrity through the SAVE Act. It imposes a paper chase on new voter registrants, starting with a passport or certified birth certificate — the DMV hassle, in other words.
Since passport holders are more common in wealthy urban areas than in the rural countryside, quite plausibly the SAVE Act would disenfranchise more Repukes than Dims. It wouldn’t be the first time that the Stupid Party has shot its own foot off.
Yesterday I realized that my driver license had expired two days earlier — my bad! Tried to login online, but my DMV account was already cancelled and invalidated. Went in person to the DMV office fearing the worst — having to apply de novo, with all the attendant paperwork such as utility bills, which are sent to my p.o. box since there’s no street delivery in my town, creating a fresh hassle. But a clerk partially processed my renewal, took the photo, and said I can complete it by bringing in my passport on Monday. Whew!
Would I go through the DMV hassle to get registered to vote? No, I would not. And many others either won’t or can’t, having better things to do with their time than order, pay for, and wait weeks for a certified birth certificate. Arizona’s DMV can directly access the birth certificates of people born in the state, but that’s only about 12 percent of the population. The DMV clerk commented that Commiefornia is one of the slowest to respond to certified birth certificate requests. Maybe that’s why Repukes imagine the SAVE Act would discourage more Ds than Rs from registering.
As I waited in the DMV line contemplating my potentially awful fate [shockingly, the clerk turned out to be quite cute, empathetic and friendly], I gazed at the 12-slot Tesla-branded EeeVee charging station outside the window.
All the chargers were occupied, as flatlanders fled a record-setting 117-degree afternoon in Phoenix … plus, five more EeeVees were lined up waiting for a slot.
Imagine getting halfway to your weekend cabin, needing to get a full charge to venture into the boonies, and facing a half hour wait just to start charging. Talk about ruining your vacation!
They’ll peel my ICE-engined, manual-shift relics out of my cold, dead hands!
The only “representative” who ever did anything for me was Lauren Boebert. She opened her restaurant early one morning after I worked a night shift so I could eat breakfast. But then she went all Hollywood and got delusions of grandeur.
Yep, the second paragraph says it all and definitely explains why our sphincters clench on election day.
Once one’s rights become temporary privileges you know that people will sell you down the river for whatever small “gift” GovCo will give them for voting them in.
Sadly these fools fail to realize that their next.
test
Morning Eric. The article didn’t show up in on the homepage for me and I found it through the comments section. I use the more secure settings on my browser and that’s maybe why the homepage was blank but this problem didn’t exist until the site got updated.
Isn’t technology wonderful?
Hi Landru (and everyone) –
Yup; a glitch has occurred; hopefully it will be fixed soon. You can access the latest articles by clicking on the still-extant menu bar options. Oy vey; it never ends, does it?
This time is the first that I’ve seen the WP admin hyperlink also at the top left also.
https://www.ericpetersautos.com/wp-admin/
Yep. I’m seeing it too.