2021 Fiat 500X

16
1820
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Here’s an oddball thing: Fiat – the Italian small car brand – currently sells only one new car, the 2021 500X.

Making the brand and the car synonymous, almost.

Can Fiat – the brand – survive when it’s only got one car to sell?

Time will soon tell.

What It Is

The 500X is a subcompact-sized five-door crossover with standard AWD – and the last new car Fiat still sells, the two-door 500 and 500L wagon having been dropped. Also the Mazda Miata-based (but Fiat-engined) 124 Spider.

Not so much because they were bad cars but because it is hard to sell Americans on small cars.

The 500 was really small – just 139.6 inches end to end, which for reference is almost four feet shorter end to end than a small car like the Toyota Corolla sedan.

The 500L – also no longer offered – was larger, but not much (167 inches end to end) and didn’t offer much, in terms of performance, capability or room. It was underpowered and front-drive-only.

The 500X offers capability – it comes standard with all-wheel-drive – as well as a strong standard engine for the class (177 hp) and only a bit less room than others in the class.

Which just might help it sell.    

Prices start at $24,840 for the base Pop trim. There are also Trekking, Sport and the top-of-the-line Trekking Plus trim, which stickers for $29,745.

Its chief same-sized/ballpark-priced rivals are the Mazda CX3 and the Honda HR-V, which both come standard with FWD – AWD optionally – and so a lower price tag to start ($20,640 and $21,020 respectively). But their cost goes up when equipped with AWD – and neither is available with an engine that’s as strong as the one that comes standard in the Fiat.    

What’s New

To make the 500X more compelling to potential buyers vs. its lower-priced rivals, Fiat has added a Sport Value Package to the roster of options that bundles an oversized, dual-pane sunroof, 19-inch wheels/tires, LED headlights, heated seats and a premium eight-speaker BeatsAudio stereo for $700.

Previously, these features – if ordered a la carte – added more than $3,000 to the price of a 500X.

Otherwise, the 500X soldiers on as the last of the Fiat mohicans.

What’s Good

A fun little thing that’s also a practical little thing.

Does not have a CVT automatic (very common in this class; some people dislike them).

Does have a much stronger standard engine than the engines available in rivals like the CX3, HR-V and even the much-more-pricey to start BMW Mini Countryman, too.

What’s No So Good

Standard turbocharged engine needs premium fuel to make its peak horsepower.

It’s significantly more expensive than rivals like the CX3 and HR-V and can get as pricey as a Mini Countryman, too.

It’s still a little thing.

Under The Hood

All 500X trims come standard with the same 1.3 engine – which is the smallest four cylinder engine there is in anything not a motorcycle. But it makes more power – 177 hp and 210 ft.-lbs. of torque – than the larger 2.0 and 1.8 liter fours that are standard in the Mazda CX3 and Honda HR-V, which only make 148 hp and 148 ft.-lbs. of torque and 141 hp and 127 ft.-lbs. of torque, respectively.   

The reason for that being they’re not turbocharged while the Fiat’s engine is.

The downside of that being the Fiat costs more – because the turbo and related components add to the cost of building the car. It also costs more to feed this car, because the Fiat’s turbocharged engine needs premium gas to make its maximum power.

You don’t have to feed it premium – but if you don’t, it’ll cost you horsepower.

The Honda and Mazda’s engines are regular unleaded engines, which saves you about 30 cents per gallon at every fill-up.

On the upside, the Fiat’s gas mileage is pretty good, especially in view of its stronger engine and its standard AWD.

The window sticker says 24 city, 30 highway – within the margin of error vs. the 27 city, 32 highway posted by the FWD version of the Mazda CX3 and the 26 city, 31 highway posted by the AWD version of the Honda HR-V.

The Fiat has another upside, too – at least vs. the Honda. Which is that the 500X comes standard with a conventional automatic transmission – with gears that shift – vs. the continuously variable (CVT) automatic – with no gears, just ranges – that is the only available transmission in the HR-V.

The Fiat’s transmission has nine gears, too – the most gears you’ll find behind such a little engine. The multiple overdrive gears are a big part of what enables the 500X to more-or-less match the mileage of lower-powered rivals like the HR-V and CX3.   

That and the fact that the Fiat’s AWD system can be disengaged and let you operate in FWD, which reduces driveline drag on the engine as well as wear-and-tear on the AWD system itself vs. systems that are always on (i.e., “full-time” AWD, as most AWD systems are).

On The Road

This little thing fits almost anywhere a motorcycle fits – and it can go places few motorcycles can, unless they’re off-road dirt bikes.

And not just because it comes standard with AWD.

This Fiat has the most ground clearance (7.9 inches) of the bunch and without which AWD doesn’t make much difference off-road.

Or in the snow.

It has much more ground clearance than either the Honda HR-V (which has 6.7 inches) or the Mazda CX3,which has only 6.1 inches, about the same as most cars. Both of these two are more on-road-oriented, with their optional AWD systems being meant chiefly to deliver a handling/wet-weather traction enhancement than being of much help in the snow, much less less off-road.

Without ground clearance, the car rides on top of the snow sooner – and once that happens, you’ll be spinning your wheels, whether just two or all four.

The not-CVT automatic is another plus, if you don’t like the way CVTs operate. They are designed to maximize fuel efficiency by letting the engine rev to the optimum spot in its powerband for maximum efficiency. The problem is this can get noisy – because the engine will stay at that spot in the powerband, usually close to redline under WOT acceleration. A conventional automatic will shift up to the next-forward gear, reducing engine revs – and engine noise.

CVTs also have a reputation for not being as tough or as durable – and replacing a croaked CVT is not cheap.

As far as speed:

The 500X isn’t – zero to 60 takes about 8.5 seconds – but it’s much quicker than the glacially-accelerating Honda HR-V, which takes almost 10 to make the same run. The Mazda CX3 gets to 60 about as quickly as the Fiat and is more confident in the curves – in part because of it being much lower to the ground than the Fiat – but the price you pay for that is less confidence when it snows.

To make the most of the 500X’s bad-weather capabilities, opt for the available Michelin CrossClimate tires.

And if you are desirous of more speed, dialing up the turbo boost would slake that desire. You could have a lot of fun with this rig by adding Abarth over-the-counter upgrades, including the open-piped Harley exhaust dump that used to come standard in the 500 Abarth.

Guaranteed to wake up the neighbors!

But be careful as these little engines are already running a lot of boost and the Abarth force-feeding is likely to end up resulting in the same as force-feeding a goose to make pate de foi gras.

At The Curb

The 500X is the smallest vehicle of its type you can buy – but just barely.

At 167.7 inches long end-to-end, it is only slightly smaller overall than the Mazda CX-3 (168.3 inches end-to-end) and the Honda HR-V (170.4 inches) but it feels bigger from the inside because you’re sitting up higher. The other two – even though they are nominally crossovers – have car-like ride height.

The 500X also looks very much like the small crossover it is – rather than trying to pretend it’s the car it’s not.

And it looks different, perhaps this Fiat’s single most persuasive sell. It looks like the Italian job it is, especially if outfitted with the available contrast-color exterior paint schemes that are available. There’s a cheery vibe about the thing that sets it apart from the others, especially the Honda – which is a brilliantly utilitarian rig with all the personality of a kitchen sink.

The Mazda’s a looker, too – but it looks very different. Sexy – vs. cute. It’s nice to have this meaningful choice of visuals in a class of vehicle largely defined by looks-alike.

It’s not quite as spacious as inside as its main rivals – especially vs. the Honda HR-V in terms of backseat space. The Honda has a very impressive for the size of the thing 39.8 inches – as much or even more backseat legroom than in several full-size sedans – vs. 34.8 inches in the Fiat’s second row. However, the Fiat stacks up well vs. the Mazda CX-3, which has 35 inches of second row legroom.

It’s pretty much the same story with regard to cargo space.

The Honda is the leader – again – and not by a hair. It has 23.2 cubic feet of space behind its second row and if you fold them down, you have 55.9 cubic feet, which for a subcompact crossover is cavernous space.

As far as being practical goes, it’s the king of small.

But the Fiat still has more room behind its second row – 14.1 cubic feet – than most much-larger cars and with its back seats down, there’s 39.8 cubic feet of space, which is still a lot of space given the ultra-small size of this package. It’s also very close to the space inside the larger CX-3, which has 17.8 cubic feet behind its second row and maxes out to 42.7 cubic feet when they’re folded.

The Rest

The 500X has two big problems – aside from it being small.

The first is its cost – especially as you ascend the trims and get up to the Trekking Plus, which stickers for more than a BMW-built Mini Cooper Countryman, which lists for $28,400 to start (vs. $29,745 for the Trekking Plus 500X).

On the one hand – and in defense of the Fiat – the almost $29k-to-start Mini comes standard with a much weaker 1.5 liter, 134 hp engine and FWD. You get more for your money at the Fiat store. The Mini also comes with less ground clearance(6.5 inches) even when ordered with its extra-cost AWD system, making it less practical.

But you also get less of other stuff – the second problem.

Fiat isn’t Mini – and Fiat may not be around much longer, depending on what the new Stellantis combine – which owns Fiat and Chrysler and Dodge and Ram and Jeep and Peugot, too – decides to do with the not-doing-well Italian small car brand.

Which is already almost gone. Just finding a Fiat store to sell you a 500X is a challenge.

On the upside, it is almost certain you’ll be able to buy a new 500X for much less-than-sticker . . .  precisely because Fiat isn’t Mini.

If you can pick up a loaded Trekking Plus with AWD and 177 hp for say $25k or even less – then the almost-$29k price of the FWD, 134 hp Mini which you’d almost certainly pay (because it’s a Mini) seems ridiculous. You’d also likely feel gypped if you paid around the same for a mid-trim HR-V or CX-3 without all the goods you get in the TP, which includes the excellent Beats upgrade audio system, the heated (and leather-trimmed) seats, the upgraded 7-inch UConnect LCD touchscreen, suede Alcantara trim and an electric windshield deicer.

The Bottom Line

It’s so small it’s almost not here anymore. Better hurry if you’d like to see one before they’re not.

. . . .

Got a question about cars, Libertarian politics – or anything else? Click on the “ask Eric” link and send ’em in!

If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos. 

We depend on you to keep the wheels turning! 

Our donate button is here.

 If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:

EPautos
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079

PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $20 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)

My eBook about car buying (new and used) is also available for your favorite price – free! Click here.  If that fails, email me at EPeters952@yahoo.com and I will send you a copy directly!

Share Button

16 COMMENTS

  1. Those tires and wheels are stupid for most drivers that want a shitbox to go to and fro in snow. Sell us the 14′” steel wheels with cheap snow tires that can be rotated to those dopey wheels come late April.

  2. I am dicking around to shave 300.00 off of their asking price of 18,500. I do not beat cars and maintain them fairly well. This FIAT would need fluids and such more often than the factory numbers. I am leery of any automatic but there is a wife to consider. She learned on a three on the tree but waited until 24 to test in an automatic.
    I figured it out with purchase and tax to be 10.88 OZ of gold or 712.58 Oz of silver. The silver cost me 4.805 plus delivery that I made happen. It would be fun to take seven or eight 100 oz bars to swap. It makes me think that cars are very cheap now.

    • Good stuff, Erie!

      On the wheels: Clearance should be ok if you swap a smaller set but make sure it doesn’t mess with any of the wheel-rotation dependent electronics, if any.

  3. ANOTHER THING, IF IT HAS A MANUAL i WOULD BE MORE INTERESTED. eRIC DID A REVIEW ON sUBARU SCHEISSBOX WITH A MANUAL IF ONE CAN FIND AN EXAMPLE.
    I was unable to find one with manual.
    Obviously I will get put on a list for demanding a manual even on a Cadillac.
    I will see if they are giving away the last FIATs now.

    • FWIW, the 2020 500X is going for 18,499 which is reasonable, excepting those who are not a “hero” must pay 1,500.00 more.
      I am not so sure about the definition of a “hero”. It seems to be code for gummint drones. I( was a real hero back when I intimated to my setter that I would take her out to run her legs off and pointing birds.

  4. Those ginzo cars never really did well here. (Car buffs of a certain age know “FIAT” as an acronym.)

    FIAT slunk away from the U.S. market over 35 years ago before returning through the shotgun marriage with Chrysler. Looks like they are going to turn tail and run again, at least as a visible brand. Now they’ve merged with the frogs, who also failed in selling cars here and left not long after FIAT – what could possibly go wrong?

    • Morning, Jason!

      I agree with Jim, who mourned the simple, light and cheap Fiats of the past. The current Fiats – the few left – are shockingly heavy and pricey for what they are.

      Which likely explains why they aren’t selling…

    • Heard hanging about foreign car parts places in days of yore…
      FIATs have two wiring diagrams, both wrong.
      FIAT invented rust, and licensed it to British Leyland.
      “Magneti Marelli” is Italian for “Lucas Rejects”.

      That having been said, these newer FIATs sold here were not nearly as unreliable as the “Fix It Again, Tony” era FIATs. But, they were no where near as entertaining either. The new ones do handle and “go” very much better, though.

      I still see a fair number of recent vintage FIAT 500’s zipping about where I live, but not a whole lot selling in the last year or so. In the end, even in places where there is demand, it’s not enough to justify the former FCA’s independent/separate building FIAT infrastructure. FIAT will retreat from the US again, I suspect.

      • Hi Crusty,

        I thought about buying a 500 about two years ago because they were almost literally giving them away. A friend (ex friend; she is a Coronamonomaniac and a Bidenite) bought one – a loaded turbo with practically every option – for $14k. It’s a fun little car to knock around in and actually fairly practical – believe it or not. I can fit in the back seat of one. Not super comfortably but it’s much more feasible – due to the roofline – to sit in the back of a 500 than say a new Camaro. And the 500 can carry a lot more cargo, too.

        I think the big problem – other than the car’s small size – is its big price. If a car like this could be made and sold for a profit at around $12k or so I bet it would do well. I think it would do better if it weighed 1,000 pounds less and delivered a steady 45 MPG, too!

        • Yeah, sold at a reasonable price-point, the new FIAT 500 is a rather nice little buzz bomb. I suspect out local C-J-F dealer has been discounting the crap out of them, and that may be one reason I see so many.

  5. I feel like this tiny car should get much better gas mileage than you state here. More like 50-60 MPG. Guess it has something to do with weight rather than volume.

    • Hi BaDnOn,

      The atrocious gas mileage of all modern cars is just that… atrocious. Given all the technology. But it’s due to all that weight. Even small cars like this one weigh 500-800 (or more) pounds than cars of otherwise comparable proportions from 40-plus years ago.

      • My brother had a FIAT 800D that was black, but he painted the doors white and put a POLIEZIE sticker/paint on it. Aluminum wheels with bigger tires, the turd got 54 mpg on the roads.
        He found one for his girlfriend that was fairly low miles. She went over railroad tracks and the frame broke from rust and pranged itself on one of the tracks nearly separating the back from the front. Luckily it was a RWD Rear engine so she was able to back up from the railroad tracks. It would have been cool to see it hit by the Chicago and Northwestern train. No one had a camera so it was better to get it off of the track crossing. I have no idea why the cables to the engine still worked enough to move in reverse. Maybe it was designed to be slightly manoueverable when in two pieces held together by the roof.
        The girls surely liked and laughed at my brother’s police car. His other car was a ’53 Studebaker coupe with 427 Chebby 590 wheel dyno HP. There is a difference.

  6. Good review. Fiat retains their italian heritage in design flair. Unfortunately americans prefer to drive rolling skyscrapers now so yes this will probably be the last of them here. Is the fiat 124 discontinued?

  7. ‘As you ascend the trims and get up to the 500X Trekking Plus, [it] stickers for more than a BMW-built Mini Cooper Countryman.’ — EP

    Like the Mini Cooper, the contemporary Fiat 500X is a nagging reminder of what engineers are not allowed to do anymore: namely, produce cheap, simple peoples cars under the hobnailed boot of the 21st century regulatory state.

    In the late Fifties, the ‘500’ label actually signified a 500 cc twin engine. Today its 21 horsepower would be considered ludicrously underpowered even in a motorcycle. But with only 1,100 lbs of car to push, it managed (barely).

    Compare today’s 500X, tipping the scales at a plus-size 3,300 lbs. Its 177 hp, 1.3 liter engine propels it to 60 mph in a leisurely 8.5 seconds. But imagine what that same 177 hp would do in the featherweight 1,100 lb original body. It would be a four-wheeled sister of the notorious Kawasaki triple, with enough power on tap to simply shred the flimsy go-kart brakes and suspension.

    Lest we get carried away in nostalgia, the atrocious mechanical reliability of the original Fiat 500 meant that it never rivaled the VW Bug as a peoples car, though it sold well in Europe.

    But that era is gone, replaced by droning gray suits on giant screens, hectoring us to swallow our prescribed EV medicine without complaint, or else be detained for compulsory re-education and struggle sessions in their garden of pure ideology. [Apple 1984 ad:]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtvjbmoDx-I

LEAVE A REPLY