The same people who insisted that “masks” would prevent the emitting of viral material – even from people who weren’t sick – also insist that high-voltage electric batteries powering high-output electric motors will prevent the emitting of carbon dioxide.
As if that were necessary.
An inconvenient but central truth about “masks” is that they are made of material that is porous to viral material, which is so minuscule in size it easily passes through the gauzy fabric and certainly bypasses the devices entirely by escaping via the sides. This can be demonstrated by observing smoke exhaled by a person wearing a “mask.” And, of course, the whole exercise is based on a false premise – that of perpetual contagiousness.
An inconvenient but central truth about carbon dioxide is there’s very little of it. So little it is probably true more of it would be a boon rather than a bane, if – as we are told – more carbon dioxide in the air will warm up the planet a bit.
Warmth is good for living things. Cold kills them. Directly – and indirectly, via starving them. But could an increase in the amount of carbon dioxide in the air warm the Earth dangerously? This has been asserted – by the same people who assert that “masks” are necessary to keep people who aren’t sick from spreading a sickness they haven’t got. But is there evidence to support this assertion – other than predictions based on computer models fed cherry-picked variables?
According to the models, New York City should be under water by now. The renowned scientist Al Gore said it would be so, 20 years ago. Florida should be mostly gone by now. Neither are – and, if science were hewed to, false predictions would be taken as evidence the models and hypothesis were erroneous and the whole matter requires revisiting. Instead – like “masks work” – the same people continue to insist their models and predictions will eventually be vindicated.
Like”peak oil,” to cite another predicted inevitability you generally do not hear about much anymore, probably because it’s embarrassing to speak of it given the facts have proved it to be erroneous. We were supposed to have run out of oil by 2000. There is so much oil available 20-plus years later that they had to resort to attacking the cars that use it via the force-feeding of cars that use electricity, instead.
These of course use a great deal of electricity – and the bulk is produced by burning hydrocarbon fuels to generate it, emitting mighty plumes of C02. And they know it. Which is strongly suggestive that the people pushing these elsewhere emissions vehicles (EEVs) are not truly worried about the 0.04 percent of the Earth’s atmosphere that is C02 increasing by a fraction of that fraction – which they must realize is as likely to effect “climate change” as the drugs that do not prevent infection or transmission are vaccines.
Both are, however, a means toward essentially the same end. It is not sickness reduction or carbon dioxide reduction that is wanted. It is us reduction.
Less of us equals more for them. And they have said so, openly. By saying it will all be for them. This is the implied leer in their motto: You will own nothing and be happy. And they will be very happy, once they own everything.
Interestingly, they are unworried about the emitting being done above us, by airplanes – which appear to be leaving something unusual in their wakes. Something that lingers long after they have passed and that disperse to form cloud streaks that criss-cross the skies. What are these things? Maybe they are something not good for us that will result in . . . less of us.
Why is the Environmental Protection Agency so . . . indifferent to what is being emitted up there but absolutely obsessed with what is being emitted down here? The same “environmental” apparat that redefined “emissions” to encompass carbon dioxide – a gas that was never previously so defined because carbon dioxide has zero effect on air quality . . . that is as relentless in its pursuit of fractional differences in the reduction of those “emissions” as Inspector Javert was of Jean Valjean . . . yet seems to be perfectly okay with things being emitted in bulk, into the sky?
Maybe it it is just water vapor.
But what if it is something else? Perhaps it is something else they do not want us to know about. Just as they did not want us to know that the drugs they practically force-fed to millions of people were not vaccines but used that term to manipulate those millions into believing they were.
Just the same as they are assuring us there’s nothing to worry about with regard to what we’re seeing in the skies above – while endlessly haranguing us about the always-imminent but never-arriving “changes” to the “climate” supposedly threatened by an increase in the 0.04 percent by a fraction of that fraction.
But never mind that.
“Masks work” – and the drugs they’re still pushing are “vaccines.”
They are “safe and effective,” too.
. . .
If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos.
PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $20 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)
My eBook about car buying (new and used) is also available for your favorite price – free! Click here. If that fails, email me at EPeters952@yahoo.com and I will send you a copy directly!