Can you envision a Buick that is made in China?
It’s more than just that, too. Buick – as a brand – probably owes its survival to the fact that Buicks are very popular in China. Pontiac and Oldsmobile not so much – which is why those brands have been retired.
But why might an American want to consider buying this made-in-China Buick?
The Envision is a compact-sized, two-row crossover sold by Buick that’s made in China – which may account for why it costs thousands less than other small, luxury-brand crossovers in the same general class such as the BMW X3 – which stickers for $49,950 to start – the Acura RDX – which stickers for $44,700 to start – and the Volvo XC60 – which stickers for $47,050 to start.
The Envision’s base price is $36,500 – and for that you get a standard 30 inch (not a typo) digital LCD dashboard with voice control, a nine speaker Bose premium stereo system, adaptive headlights that turn in tandem with the steering wheel and a standard 2.0 liter, turbocharged engine paired with standard AWD.
For $49,950 you could get pretty much the same (with a smaller touchscreen) in a BMW X3.
$47,050 will buy you a pretty similar Volvo XC60.
Or you could spend a little less – $46,200 – on a top-of-the-line Buick Envision Avenir with quilted leather seats, a massaging driver’s seats, adaptive suspension and 20 inch wheels.
What’s New For 2025
The Envision carriers over unchanged.
What’s Good
Extremely attractive price vs. other small, luxury-badged crossovers.
More room inside – especially for backseat riders – than most of them.
Standard features – such as huge digital dash and massaging driver’s seat – aren’t available in other small luxury-badged crossovers.
What’s Not So Good
Standard 2.0 liter engine is not as powerful as the 2.0 liter engine in rivals such as the BMW X3, Volvo XC60 and Acura RDX.
Massaging driver’s seat is only available in the top-of-the-line Avenir trim.
Maximum towing capacity is only 1,500 lbs. Several rivals can tow as much as 3,500 lbs.
Regardless of trim, every Envision comes with the same drivetrain, which consists of a 2.0 liter turbocharged four cylinder engine, paired with a nine speed automatic transmission and all-wheel-drive.
The Buick’s turbo 2.0 four touts 228 horsepower – which is a bit less than the 255 horsepower touted by the BMW X3’s standard 2.0 liter four and the 247 horsepower touted by the Volvo XC60’s 2.0 liter four – and lot less than than the 272 horsepower touted by the Acura RDX’s 2.0 liter four.
Still, they’re all 2.0 liter fours. So it’s not much difference – unless you’re timing 0-60 runs by the stopwatch. The Buick takes about 7 seconds to get to 60; the BMW X3 can get there in about 6 seconds; the Acura RDX and Volvo about the same. They are quicker – but not dramatically quicker. Eight tenths of a second either way not being much of a difference.
Gas mileage is 22 city, 28 highway – which is comparable to the others in the class, none of which tout great gas mileage notwithstanding they are powered by small four cylinder engines and are small vehicles. Probably because even though they are small – and have small engines – these little crossovers are astoundingly heavy for their size.
This little Buick’s curb weight of 3,940 lbs. is greater than the curb weight of this writer’s old muscle car, which has a V8 engine almost four times the size (7.5 liters) of the Buick’s little four that’s also made of cast iron – not aluminum – and has a bolt-on steel front subframe, cast iron rear axle and stamped steel (rather than aluminum) suspension parts, heavy steel exterior body panels and so on. Yet my old muscle car weighs about 150 pounds less than this small crossover with plastic front and rear bumper covers, much thinner metal exterior panels and mostly aluminum suspension parts.
And a (relatively) tiny four cylinder engine, also made of aluminum.
The Buick’s weight probably explains why it can’t pull much weight – just 1,500 lbs.
Interestingly, the Volvo XC60 is even heavier – 4,154 lbs. – but Volvo says it can pull up to 3,500 lbs. So maybe it’s not just the weight but something else – such as Buick being concerned about the Envision’s transmission holding up to the load if tasked with pulling both the vehicle and more than 1,500 lbs. hooked up to it.
Buick – historically – offered a particularly cushy and quiet driving experience. The Envision delivers exactly that. Unlike the Acura RDX and BMW X3 – both of which try hard to be sporty (and are) – the Envision doesn’t even try to be that. And that’s appealing, if you don’t want a firm ride and to feel (and hear) the road. Or the engine. The Envision insulates you from the outside world; the ride is like your favorite sofa – and there’s nothing bad about that, especially after a long day at work on the long drive home.
If you spring for the Avenir, you’ll get that massaging driver’s seat already mentioned – which is by itself arguably worth the Avenir’s price. Especially since you can’t get massaging seats in other small, luxury-badged crossovers at any price. You generally have to move up at least one size – and to a much higher price.
The standard adaptive headlights are another nice plus, especially since you don’t have to pay extra for them. They turn with the road – more accurately, in tandem with your turning of the steering wheel – to give you a better view of the road ahead when it curves. You also get a standard (and very good) nine-speaker Bose premium stereo system. Surprisingly – given their prices – a good stereo is often extra-charge in some of the others in this class.
Buick – like most of the others – has done away with the superfluous gear selector that takes up space (and wastes space) on the center console. It is superfluous because in all new vehicles, gear selection is handled electronically, as in drive-by-wire. It’s an illusion, in other words, when you think you are moving it from Park to Drive – because that handle isn’t connected to anything. It is sensors that are sending signals to actuators that engage the transmission’s ranges. So why not just get rid of that space-hogging gear selector and instead have a rotary knob or a toggle-stalk mounted on the steering wheel to tell the transmission to go from Park to Drive or to Reverse?
And that’s just what you’ve got here.
That frees up space for a coin tray and larger cupholders that you can put cups into and out of without having to worry about accidentally bumping into the gear selector handle and spilling stuff all over.
Buicks – historically – have been defined by their tasteful elegance; less flashy than a Caddy but having a similar cut-above aesthetic. The Envision carries on that traditional nicely.
Inside, you’ll find what the others don’t offer. That being a single, integrated digital dashboard that encompasses the driver’s instrument display and all the other displays. The one-piece look is more coherent than the general practice of having a driver’s instrument cluster and then a tablet-looking LCD screen mounted on top of the center stack, where it looks like it was added after the car was designed. The Buick’s full-length, single sheet display looks like it was designed to be there and it also looks like the similar full-length/single sheet displays that you generally have to buy a much more expensive vehicle to get.
The display does not house all the controls, however. You can still adjust the climate controls, for instance, via switches you can operate by feel without having to look (in order to accurately tap/swipe).
Some reviewers have noted – correctly – that the Envision has a bit less cargo capacity behind its second row (25.2 cubic feet) than some of the others in the class, but like the difference in power output/performance, it’s not a big difference. For example, the Acura RDX has 29.5 cubic feet of space behind its second row. You can certainly fit more stuff in the RDX – but not all that much more stuff.
A more meaningful difference is rearseat legroom. The Buick has 39.3 inches, which is several inches more than the BMW X3 has (36.3 inches) and more than both the Volvo XC60 and the RDX have, by about an inch in both cases.
The really meaningful difference, though, is what comes standard in this Buick – for the money – vs. what you get for much more money in the others in the class. Indeed, this small crossover has very few options – because so many features and amenities are standard.
Buick does offer a Sport Touring version of the Envision – MSRP $39,000 – but it’s not actually sporty in that the package is entirely cosmetic. You get black roof rails, dark exterior trim accents and a flat bottomed steering wheel inside.
The Bottom Line
This small Buick doesn’t come standard with a big price – relative to others that don’t offer as much and for more money.
That’s not a bad reason to consider this Buick as an alternative to them.
. . .
If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos.
We depend on you to keep the wheels turning!
Our donate button is here.
If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:
EPautos
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079
PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $20 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)
If you like items like the Baaaaaa! baseball cap pictured below, you can find that and more at the EPautos store!














China can make garbage or high quality products depending on how much you are willing to pay. For decades we got garbage from China because that is what the companies that manufacture there wanted to pay for.
It will be interesting to see how this car holds up? It’s neither cheap nor expensive for a Chinese product.
‘you get a standard 30 inch (not a typo) digital LCD dashboard’ — eric
A Clownscreen as big as an ironing board!
How much extra would I have to pay to NOT get it?
Perhaps the next gen Electra 225 will have an IP/dash screen that’s 18′ wide.
Did they give you a test unit or was this just your “on paper” review? I’m wondering what the quality is give it’s made in “Chyna.”
It’s probably fine.
But that’s no reason to support our economic enemy.
Enemy? So voluntarily exchanging American dollars for goods and services creates an adversarial relationship?
Dang, James N, what’s with all this ‘thinking’ crap.
Just go along, to get along. & your country, right or wrong.\\
Our overlords tell us who to hate, why are you messing with that? Don’t you know that Made in China is bad, & Made in India is good?
…What’s wrong with you?
Yeesh, it’s like you noticed the shift from making things in America to making things in India?
That’s as bad as noticing the shift from Geo-engineering is bad, to well, colored dyes transfix the eyes, American Woman, get a case of stupids. …American Woman, close your mind. …
Yes, an adversary at least. In China, economic conditions are poor for the Chinese who produce the goods we purchase. Unfortunately, the buyer is completely unaware or is oblivious to the conditions in Chinese factories.
In a very real sense, the average Chinese is not free. You can’t have free trade with unfree people.
“Buick does offer a Sport Touring version of the Envision – MSRP $39,000 – but it’s not actually sporty in that the package is entirely cosmetic”
They could offer the GM 2.5 turbo as an option. This would make it very competitive with cars like the Porsche Macon. The Buick is slightly shorter than the Macon; 182 to 186. The Macon starts at $63 thou which is mucho dinero.
Very soon Porches will be built in China. I wonder if the price will drop. The Lincoln Nautilus I think is built in China. Itz amazing how many things are built in China.