GM made some great cars but some of them were afflicted by not-so-great ideas, such as the infamous GM side-terminal battery set-up.
Pretty much every other car company’s vehicles use batteries with top-mounted terminals for the obvious reason they’re easier to get at. This makes it much easier to remove the battery when it’s time to replace it – and to install the new one, because it’s easy to get a wrench or a socket on the clamps that hold the positive and negative cables to the battery.
Side-mounted terminal connections are much-less-easy to get at – and much-less-easy to get a wrench or socket on. There is usually very little clearance, in the first place. The side terminal’s positive side is in some cases maybe two inches from the inner fender well, which is made of metal. That can easily result in sparks flying if your metal wrench or socket touches the metal (i.e., the ground) while it is also touching the positive terminal.
The negative side – on my car’s battery – is awkwardly close to the windshield washer reservoir.
The job of disconnecting the cables is made even more more fun via absurdly tiny 5/16 bolt heads. While almost everyone has a crescent wrench, adjustable pliers or similar tool handy that can be used to easily disconnect top-terminal battery cables, many non-wrencher types do not have a tiny 5/16 open-end wrench, which you have to have to loosen/tighten the battery clamps on a GM side-post battery because of the clearance issue; it’s difficult if not impossible to use a 5/16 socket because there’s not enough room to work with. A vice grip might work, if you can get the thing on the stupid 5/16 bolt.
That means a 5/16 open end wrench, which is awkward to use in this usually very tight spot. You also have to use your fingers to get the cable bolts “started” when you’re trying to get the battery cables hooked up. This can be exasperating, because the threaded tips of these cable bolts are typically very stubby; you may have half-an-inch to work with. And trying to get the bolt aligned correctly with the threaded hole in the battery while you try to hand-thread it in that really tight spot down there is even more challenging (and far less rewarding) than fumbling with a bra strap in the back of a car on prom night. It is very easy to get the bolt misaligned (and cross-threaded).
Then you’ll have a bad connection and when you go to start the engine, it might not. 
Top mount terminals are superior as connection points. You have these big, protruding lead terminals to clamp the cables to – making a strong, positive connection much more likely. It’s easy to physically see and feel the clamp and thus ascertain whether the connection is tight and right – and also because it is impossible to cross-thread a clamp.
I recently decided to fix what GM broke.
I wanted to do this in a way that wasn’t visually obvious, because my ’76 Trans-Am is an antique car and I sometimes take it to antique car shows. Antique car people try to keep their antique cars as original as possible because they are into preserving the historicity of the things. Modifying my car in a visually obvious way – as by installing an incorrect top-terminal battery – would cost me points as well as money (I’d have to replace the perfectly good side terminal battery with a new top terminal battery, plus replace the factory side-mount cables or mutilate them in a visually obvious way).
Instead, I decided to modify the factory side-terminal cables’ heads, by removing the obnoxious (and stubby) 5/16 headed, barely-threaded studs from the cable with a same diameter bolt but longer-threaded and with a 9/16 bolt head. This is easily done. Just work the original 5/16-headed stubby bolt (see pic at the head of this article) out from the rubber that encases the cable end. It slips through a “O” loop within the cable that’s connected to the wire that transmits the current.
Once that’s done, you’ll be able to run the new, longer-threaded bolt (an extra 3/4 of an inch or so makes all the difference) through the cable head’s “O” loop. It may be necessary to use a metal spacer (a hollow brass tube cut to the length you need using a hacksaw works perfectly) to assure a wiggle-free/tight connection. Don’t forget to use a washer under the threaded head, to distribute clamping forces evenly.
That 9/16 bolt is much easier to turn by finger at first – to get it threaded straight – and much easier to tighten up with a 9/16 open-end wrench. It’s also much easier – and arguably, much safer – to get a jumper cable’s alligator clamps affixed to. If you have ever tried jump-starting a GM vehicle with 5/16 side terminal posts, you already know what a treat that is!
Once done, the fix is very difficult to discern because you still have side-mount cable connected to the positive negative terminals. It takes a keen eye to notice the bolt heads are larger than 5/16. Few will.
Once fixed,you’ll never feel like smashing something again when it comes time to replace the battery or jump-starting the engine.
. . .
If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos.
We depend on you to keep the wheels turning!
Our donate button is here.
If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:
EPautos
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079
PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $25 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)
If you’d like a Baaaaa hat or other EPautos gear, see here!











Oh my, outlier here. I like the clean design and an actual threaded battery connection.
Literally in decades of GM side terminal ownership never had an issue with this setup.
I am the only one to replace batteries in my rigs no shop has ever done this, perhaps this helps since I can take the time to carefully tighten the side terminal bolts. Shops can F Up a top post battery as well, smacking the cable connector into place instead of spreading the clamp, enjoy your compromised now leaky battery post. The other GM win is the base battery clamp no over the top strap to corrode away, I have the original intact steel battery tray in my ‘91 Silverado.
I’ve jumped plenty of cars using a side terminal battery. Positive on the battery only, then connect the negative to a bare spot on the engine away from the battery should be the process on any setup. If the neg side sparks it’s a long way from the battery.
Also going to be contrarian here and vote for the side terminals.
Probably has a lot to do with familiarity.
Having owned over half dozen A/G bodies, a couple H-cars and a pair of GMT800’s, my (made in USA before the Chinese took over) Craftsman 47757 side terminal wrench isn’t too far back in the toolbox.
Ironically, the one GM vehicle (85 K30) I owned WITH top post battery terminals was a huge headache. Had to replace some soft metal clamps with aftermarket brass connectors when they became over-torqued and would no longer clamp tight enough to the battery.
The backyard mechanic is rarely thought of. On one of my Trans Ams (95) I used a top terminal conversion kit.
Side terminals are a pain in the dick, I’d rather not deal with it.
They all do dumb things. I remember being stranded at a friend’s house while he struggled to extract the broken bolt no longer holding the water pump on his Willy’s Jeep. Who thought using an easily warped metal vessel designed to hold liquid, with thin cork gasket strapped to the engine block was a good idea? True he should have been using a torque wrench, but young and in a hurry to get back to school doesn’t think about engineering specs.
The main reason GM went with a side post battery was that it would allow for a lower hood line however it looks like they never took advantage of it in the cars I’ve looked at.
GM made lots of mistakes over the years and this ranks as one of the more trivial ones compared to poorly designed transmissions, engines and such.
Also they make a small ratcheting box end wrench specifically designed for side post batteries that works OK for under 5 dollars.
‘a side post battery would allow for a lower hood line.’ — Landru
That was then; this is now. Reportedly the hood line of a Silverado pickup is 51 inches off the ground in front, and 58 inches high where it meets the windshield. That’s taller than the roof line (52 inches) of mid-1980s Chevrolet Cavaliers.
What changed? People. As they are progressively stripped of influence and control over their country and their fate, their last psychological refuge is to command the road with a great honking 3-ton pickup, even though they need a running board step to scramble up into it.
Speak softly and carry a big stick, counseled Teddy Roosevelt. I’d rather have a superficially unimpressive ‘gray man’ vehicle with a concealed flame thrower, grenade launcher and twin machine guns to rule the road. An armed society is a polite society. 🙂
They need the electrically retractable stair steps, simple running boards are too high.
I’ve always thought claymores in the doors and side mounted flamethrowers would give a nice peace of mind when forced to deal with Gestapo and stasi types.
Speaking of baaaaatteries, Lord Elon of Teslonia observed this week that the US electrical grid has a capacity of about 1 terawatt, but owing to low demand at night, averages only half that output in a 24-hour workday.
To power a massive expansion of
spydata centers, baaaaatteries that store higher grid output at night and release it during the day could effectively increase the grid power supply without new generating capacity. Lord Elon, as it happens, can provide them.Either way, though — with baaaaatteries or new generating capacity — it’s big capital investment that someone (probably us) must pay for.
Energy storage is not a new subject. Decades ago, engineers proposed pumping water uphill at night, then releasing it downhill through turbines during the day. This at least avoids the nasty, fire-prone chemistry of baaaaatteries.
A person of skeptical bent might question why we need all these data centers, just to perform the parlor trick of supplying an instant AI overview in response to search inquiries. Probably with the implantation of an auxiliary chip, we could have talking dogs, cats and horses that at least don’t hate us like the Tech Lords do.
Auotmotive Engineer, “OK, you made fun of me and stuffed my head in the toilet in junior high. Watch this, you losers!!”