You may have seen the interview Trump stormed out of after he was confronted with his lies about the stupid, evil war he started – that he also lied was about to end. Trump told the NBC interviewer that he doesn’t “consider” the war he’s embroiled this country in on behalf of the state of Israel “to be a war,” but “if you want to define it as such, I guess you can.” The boggled interviewer followed up with, “how do you define it”? To which Trump replied: “I don’t define it at all . . . I don’t think about it . . . I just do what I have to do.”
Italics added.
He doesn’t think about it.
Just as he doesn’t think much about anything, apparently. Well, at least insofar as it affects us. He just does what he has to do . . in order to be in congruence with the requirements of his Israeli overlords, toward whom he is strangely simpatico to a degree that can be fairly characterized as either worshipful or servile – perhaps because of things in the Epstein Files (to use the popular term) that compromise not just him but the entire termite-riddled so-called ruling class of both parties. 
It is true – as Trump said – that NBC and the rest of the Fake News apparat is corrupt but that does not change the corruption of Trump. He audaciously claimed he never promised no war, a lie so stupendous it could be used as an example of the Big Lie most everyone has heard about. The saying is attributed to Joseph Goebbels, the Minister of Propaganda in National Socialist Germany (“Nazi” is a term the National Socialists never used themselves but which is reflexively used by the American socialists and their brethren communists to sort-of paper over the reality that the “Nazis” were in fact socialists; a kind of militarized socialism but nonetheless socialists.)
When called out on this, his usually orange visage turned beet red. He eventually stormed out of the interview, dropping his microphone on the floor and audibly crushing it – perhaps inadvertently – with his enormous bulk.
Some finger-waggers didn’t like this, describing Trump’s Randy Watson Moment as unbefitting. In the past, many of Trump’s supporters would have clapped – and some still did.
Trump has played on the corruption of the Fake News – which everyone who is intellectually honest knows to be a thing – to efface his own corruption. He portrays himself as the righteous crusader against the exasperating corruption of the “media, which is effronterous in its peddling of Fake News. But a small truth can be used to spread a bigger lie. An excellent example of this being the use of the truth that people do catch colds and even a cold can be dangerous when you’re already old and frail to peddle the lie that “COVID” was a serious threat to everyone.
Trump got a lot of mileage out of his Fake News mantra. But it’s now clear it’s Trump that’s Fake – and dangerous. (Also gay, in a way, when you stop to think about the way he likes to play – and dance to – the Village People’s YMCA song. A song about gay men hooking up at the YMCA.)
He does not turn red because he is ashamed of himself for having betrayed one of his key campaign promises – and not just a little bit, as all politicians routinely do. This is a yuge betrayal – and Trump knows it is. More accurately, he knows (he has to know) that his supporters (most of them) regard it as such. It is why he knows he has to puff up like a cobra and make a threat display, in order to get his followers – so he hopes, because it has worked before – to see him being attacked by the Fake News-peddling “media” as an attack on them. It has worked beautifully – to use Trump’s favorite term – in the past, because there was a kernel truth in it. But now the truth is this country is embroiled in a stupid, evil war that drags on interminably, bleeding Americans every day at the pump – to the tune of $40 billion so far.
There seems to be – per the old Kevin Costner/Gene Hackman film, No Way Out – to be no way out. Our Greatest Ally doesn’t want this stupid, evil war to end. Not before Iran is ended, at any rate. Also Lebanon, which Israel – Our Greatest Ally – is in the process of ending. The Iranians, meanwhile, do not wish to be ended and – key thing – they appear to have the ability to prevent their own ending. This places Trump and his ego in a place too small for them both. A psychologically normal man would try to cut his (and our) losses and come to some reasonable resolution. Trump is not that man.
Neither is Our Greatest Ally. The latter knows this is a kind of two-men-enter-one-man-leaves scenario, for both Our Greatest Ally and Iran. The latter could and probably would agree to an honorable peace. But Our Greatest Ally does not want that. It wants Iran ended – and by dint of that, so does Trump.
But do Americans want that? Well, Trump does not care. He has said so. Best to take him at his word.
. . .
If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos.
We depend on you to keep the wheels turning!
Our donate button is here.
If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:
EPautos
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079
PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $25 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)
If you’d like a Baaaaa hat or other EPautos gear, see here!
Bolshevik Mockingbird enemedia is owned by Hymie.
I call kayfabe kabuki.
Notice Moshe Trumpsteinberg (MIGA) doesn’t mention MAGA anymore.
He prattles on about communism which is also owned by Hymie.
Amen 5-D Checkers –
Trump has shown us who he really is; who always us. Some of us hoped he wasn’t what we knew him to be. He has disabused us of that hope. The worst is the price we’re going to pay for what he’s done. What we voted for him not to do.
Hal Turner says:
Iran directly rejects today’s claim circulating throughout the mass-media, that Iran sent a new draft peace proposal to the US, saying “no such proposal exists,” due to the suspension of talks with the US, per Fars News Agency.
Iran also denied agreeing to a 15-year enrichment suspension, denied “zeroing in” on four nuclear issues, and denied Trump’s claim of a deal being reachable in “two or three days” and that the Strait of Hormuz “will open up right away.”
—————-
Trump and the US media are gaslighting the world with a completely false narrative about a deal and negotiations with Iran.
Once again, I ask, why spend one moment of your precious life even listening to Orange MIGAturd’s daily bullshit spewing?
The question to really ask, as Trump says himself, “I just do what I have to do…”, is…
(((Who))) is telling Trump just what he has to do???
And then you will know who the true enemy of the US really is…but…
YMMV….
Well-said, Jack!
We came up with a new Maaaaaaaaggggaaaaa sheep hat to express the sentiment!
Houston to Caracus Venezuela is 2200 miles. Gasoline in Caracus is only 13 cents (0.13 USD per US gallons)
Why are we paying $5 a gallon?
https://www.globalpetrolprices.com/gasoline_prices/
Kind of a commodity, Jack…and I’d figure that gas price in VZ is subsidized. Could be wrong…
As far as I know Bill, we are not getting any gasoline from the Persian Gulf. I ask Goolag Ai:
“how much gasoline does oregon get from the persian gulf?”
“Oregon receives virtually zero gasoline or crude oil directly from the Persian Gulf.
The state does not produce its own crude oil and has no active refineries. Instead, Oregon operates within a localized West Coast fuel market.”
“Refined Gasoline: Approximately 90% of Oregon’s finished gasoline is imported from refineries in Washington state’s Puget Sound region. This fuel is delivered via the Olympic Pipeline and marine barges.”
“Persian Gulf Share: Historically, less than 5% of the crude oil processed by Puget Sound refineries has ever come from foreign sources outside of North America, including the Middle East.”
Obviously, Oregon should build it’s own refinery somewhere like Portand or upriver. Each state should become energy independent because we have Zionist lunatics running D.C.
Fuck everyone else, Oregon should save itself!
Your article reminded me of this bit: “Both men campaigned upon slogans which promised no foreign entanglements. Wilson’s re-election campaign slogan, “He kept us out of war,” is credited with his narrow re-election victory. Campaigning for election in 2000, George Bush promised not to send the armed forces abroad for what he called nation building, a direct criticism of Clinton’s armed interventions in Somalia and Yugoslavia. Instead, Bush promised to bring troops home from their many foreign deployments, leaving nation building up to the people of those nations. [Such a time, pre-9/11. Like, a set-up?]
Within four months of his re-election, Wilson reversed course and took the nation into the very war he promised to keep the nation out of. In a bizarre distortion of the nation’s principles, Wilson argued that entry into the war was an unfulfilled mission of the Founding Fathers, that it was imperative for America not to hoard its freedom and liberty but to expand it throughout the globe. In his April 2, 1917 speech to Congress urging a declaration of war on Germany, Wilson argued that “The world must be made safe…”
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2006/05/john-m-peters/wilson-in-the-mirror/
Lucy & The Football. …Stoopid American’t’s fall for it every time, I guess? And, never see the error of their ways. No matter the cost in lives & treasure, to say nothing of Liberty lost.
…So sad.
It is sad, Helot –
But there is an upside. I think Trump’s betrayal has frayed beyond fixing the already faltering hope that Voting Harder will serve any purpose other than demoralizing and degrading those who Vote Harder.
But, But…Eric…if you vote not just harder but REALLLLY HARDDDERRRRRR it’ll restore the Republic and er, uh, never mind. /sarc
So, that all raises the question: What is to be done?
…Just glad I don’t live in the U.K., …
Perhaps, the answer is similar to, “The cure for high prices is high prices”?
https://www.adamsmith.org/blog/the-cure-for-high-prices-is-high-prices
So far, everything seems to be: Status Quo
“2. The state of things; the way things are, as opposed to the way they could be; the existing state of affairs.”
Morning, Bill!
Yup. I am grateful I have my old car to piddle with. It keeps me sort of sane…
“George Bush promised not to send the armed forces abroad for what he called nation building”
I also read somewhere that in his 3rd year of his second term the NEOCONS wanted him to attack Iran. Bush didn’t go for it to his credit. I voted for Ron Paul as a write-in after Bush attacked Iraq in his first term. The ((NEOCONS)) have been known to control foreign policy. Money and power is how they do it. ((They)) have disguised themselves as Europeans and Americans by adopting the host countries naming standards. Many in America have been fooled by ((their)) tactic. So Mileikowsky in Eastern Europe becomes Netanyahoo if in Israel. If he resided in the USSofA he would become Gold, Silver, Roth, Kaplan, etc etc. Do not be fooled.
Who lives longest? Really?
You poor pussy. It’s a shame that you chose some ex poorly but stop whining about your poor life choices like a little bitch that has no control over his own life due to women.
To cobble lack of stones
Cobble lack of stones is in serious need of help. He went into another deranged “women are the problem with everything” on the Armed Government Workers thread.
It is really hard to have any kind of sympathy for these types.
Oh, men are a problem too, don’t get me wrong. For one thing, they’re all too happy to sign up for killing people who haven’t wronged them in wars that serve whatever empire rules them. Maybe men could stop doing that?
Calling me deranged doesn’t negate my point. Ad hominems are the refuge of people who haven’t got a legitimate argument.
One point: Women live on average 7 years longer than men. Women live longer than men in every single country on Earth. So are men oppressing women? Or is it the other way around? Can’t remember the last time I read a history of how the oppressed outlive the oppressors.
There isn’t a single indicator of well-being in which men come out on top. Not one. But god help the poor sap who point it out.
In 2016 Her Hillaryness was jumping up and down with pom-poms in both hands cheerleading for MOAR WOAR! With Russia, with Iran, with Libya, with Syria, with whoever we didn’t agree with about something or other.
So were all the other semi-serious candidates — “MOAR WOAR!” they all roared. Except for Bernie Sanders and Rand Paul, who never had any kind of a chance.
Trump was at least *saying* something different. That right there was the main reason a LOT of people voted for him, three times.
‘Donald Trump has forcefully denied he ever promised not to draw the US into war, having spent years pledging to avoid doing just that.
The US president’s own biography on the White House website credits him with “putting a stop to endless wars” – raising questions about the US-Israel war on Iran, which he launched, with no end currently in sight.
NBC’s Kristen Welker pressed Trump in a Meet the Press interview that aired Sunday about his previous pledges to refrain from starting wars.
“Mr President, in your first term, you held to that promise, and it was so fundamental to who you were as a candidate, to a first-term president,” she said. “What changed? Because you insisted no new wars.”
“I didn’t guarantee no war,” Trump interjected. “Why would I have built the strongest military in the world? I built our military.”
His response sharply contradicts previous comments he has made over the years.
1. 6 November 2024
0:03 / 0:25
Trump promises no new wars at 2024 victory speech – video
“We want to have security,” Trump said, accepting his victory in the 2024 US presidential election. “We want to have things be good, safe. We want great education. We want a strong and powerful military. And ideally, we don’t have to use it. You know, we had no war – four years, we had no wars, except we defeated Isis. We defeated Isis in record time, but we had no wars.
“They said: ‘He will start a war.’ I’m not going to start a war. I’m going to stop wars.”
2. 5 October 2024
0:01 / 0:27
Trump touts ‘peace through strength’ at 2024 campaign event
“We had no wars,” Trump said during a campaign rally at State College, Pennsylvania. “We had peace through strength. It was a great thing, peace through strength, and that’s it.
“You don’t have to send your kids out to war, have your kid blown up for a country that you’ve never heard of and that doesn’t want anything to do with you anyway. But I will not send you to fight and die in a foolish, never-ending foreign war.”
3. 5 August 2024
In a campaign stop with controversial Kick streamer Adin Ross during the 2024 election, Trump claimed “the only war” which took place on his watch during the first Trump administration had “started long ago”, against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. “And we defeated – I defeated – them in a very short amount of time, very quickly,” he said. “And we had no wars under the Trump administration, and that’s a great thing, you know. That’s a really great thing. It was I think 82 years since that’s happened.
“And we won’t have wars again. But we could have a war before we even get there. That’s the problem.”
4. 4 March 2023
“I was the only president in modern history who did not have any new wars.” Trump said at the CPAC convention. “No new wars. I finished some old wars. Remember when the Democrats and my Republican opponents would often look at me during the debates or whatever and they’d say: ‘No, no, he’s going to bring us into world war III.’ Because it’s a personality type.
He continued: “No, I had the personality type that kept us out of wars because people knew that they weren’t going to mess around here. That’s why I rebuilt our military. We were strong. We were safe.”
5. 20 August 2020
“Remember we’re going to be in war with North Korea? Remember? It’s going to be a war? Right, congressman?” Trump asked at a rally in Old Forge, Pennsylania. “There’s going to be a war … No, it would have been a war if you had Hillary Clinton. Would’ve been a war if Obama were allowed to stay any longer. He thought there was going to be a war.
“Where’s the war? I don’t see the war. Maybe things happen. You don’t know. But there’s been no war. Nobody killed. He would have lost 25, 30 million people.”
He added: “I kept us out of new wars. Everyone said: ‘Oh, Trump, it’s his – he’ll be in a war his first week.’ Instead of that, I got you out of wars.”
6. 13 February 2016
Trump has made anti-war statements for over a decade. Facing off with Jeb Bush, a former Florida governor, in a Republican presidential primary debate in South Carolina, he attacked the record of his brother, president George W Bush, who led the US “war on terror” across Afghanistan and Iraq after the 9/11 attacks.
“Obviously – the war in Iraq was a big, fat mistake, all right? Now, you can take it any way you want,” said Trump. “The war in Iraq, we spent $2tn, thousands of lives, we don’t even have it. Iran is taking over Iraq with the second-largest oil reserves in the world. Obviously it was a mistake. So George Bush made a mistake.
“We can make mistakes. But that one was a beauty. We should have never been in Iraq.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/08/what-trump-actually-said-no-war-promise
We’ve seen the House draft of the NDAA, which the House Armed Services Committee advanced on a 44-12 vote with the treasonous Section 224 intact.
Next step: the Armed Services Committee of the Senate marks up its version of the NDAA on June 9 at 2:30 pm and June 10 at 9:00 am. Video links are posted here:
https://www.armed-services.senate.gov
Does the Senate version have its own Section 224, or the equivalent? Only our Israeli masters know for sure. Tomorrow, we can watch the sordid proceedings ourselves to find out who is a patriot, and who is a foreign-agent traitor.
Blogger ‘b’ exposes the Israeli puppet who’s running the US quisling regime:
‘Trump has several times claimed to restrict Netanyahoo, to hold him back or to order him to stand down. Israel has bombed anyway and, at least in its attacks on Iran, continued to rely on U.S. controlled air defenses and U.S. flight refueling tankers.
‘Trump’s claims about ordering Israel to do this or that are obviously fake. The strong cooperation between the U.S. and Israel continues and it is indeed Netanyahoo who is calling the shots while Trump is either agreeing with him or deciding to stay silent whenever Israel ignores his ‘order’.
‘It seems that Israel has yet to learn the lesson. The fronts are connected and attacks in Lebanon will be responded to with attacks on Israel and U.S. interests just as if they were attacks on Iran.
‘With the recent exchange of bombs and missiles Iran has demonstrated that it can not be lulled into a ceasefire trap. It will keep the U.S. and Israel engaged until they agree to Iran’s peace conditions.’
https://www.moonofalabama.org/2026/06/war-on-iran-iran-will-respond-to-ceasefire-breaches-wherever-those-are.html
Death to the IDF.
US-Israel Attack Iran: “Leave it to Bibi” Playbook Used Again, US Feigns Ignorance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nqd1aoyu3c&t=306s
I would love to see just one journalist respond to the Orange Douchebag’s childish insult of “are you a stupid person” with “I know you are but what am I”. Fight fire with fire and nominate that person for a lifetime achievement award.
This wasn’t an interview
it was more like an argument
i think the only way to interview trump is to ask a question with trump’s microphone turned off, give him 3 minutes to answer it, then turn his microphone off again for another question
Listening to trump lie for more than 3 minutes would be cruel and unusual punishment
if elections were really rigged, then how did trump win 2 out of 3 times and almost won a third time?
My apologies for a comment in a prior article saying that trump sounded like archie bunker … Grump sounds more like a very angry, unhinged old man
Our country is in trouble as long as he’s in office
Perhaps Grump should get extra credit for stepping on the microphone on the way out of the interview
I have a more charitable take. Trump is a true believer. He genuinely wants to make America great again. He thinks those who do not agree at best want America to suck or worse. The temptation is great to drop to emotion over reason (witness this very comment section) and portray your interlocutor as a bad person, or worse, evil.
There is a genuine case to be made about how he chose to go about making America great, but that never happens. In a populist era, it can’t. Rationality is not what drives populism.
Problem is, he’s a delusional true believer, whose fixes often do more harm than good. Results matter, not belief.
Would you consider the possibility that you only hear the results that are harmful?
Absolutely. I see a lot of positive stuff he’s doing, like a shift in the culture away from woke-ism. The border is closed, which is good, even though the approach was hamfisted.
however, the bad is so terrible, that I can’t accept the good if it comes with the bad. We are destroying our children’s and grandchildren’s economic future, and through greater deficits (given how the USD reserve works), we’re increasing foreign ownership of all kinds of American assets.
Insightful: “the bad is so terrible, that I can’t accept the good if it comes with the bad.”
It certainly explains the blinders so many people have on.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/blinder
He’s a true believer in what?
In making America great again. Which is just another way of saying make Trump great.
Making the trump family more money
MTMM
Donald Trump is a jew working for jews.
That’s what he is, and that’s all that he is.
Of course, this is no different from any other “president”, but the delusion is so feverous and fanatical with Trump it screams “artificially created”.
“the “Nazis” were in fact socialists;
a kind of militarized socialism but nonetheless socialists.)”
the nazis were fascists
their enemy were communists / socialists
they also claimed that all jews were communists
The Nazi Party ONLY used the term “Socialist” in its official name—the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP)—primarily as a cynical branding strategy to capture working-class votes. During the 1920s and early 1930s, Weimar Germany was suffering from severe economic depression, and socialist ideas were immensely popular among the impoverished public.
Richard –
You’re wrong. Fascism was the invention of Mussolini. Hitler did copy elements of Mussolini’s program. But the essential thing Hitler did was to combine nationalism and socialism. Hence the name of the party. BY the way, FDR emulated the program of Il Duce.
Exactly. Extending on it a bit, in the 30’s, all the smart people were socialists. If you read political and economic books of the time, Richard, that becomes very obvious. It’s why FDR pivoted into socialism, and got his 4 terms. In a lot of ways, it’s like any of the other “smart people” crazes we have gone through, like CoViD, climate change, green new deal, acid rain, Silent Spring, etc.
there was a HUGE private sector in germany
and the they made the profits
that is not socialism or communism
Both Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler were fascists who established brutal, totalitarian dictatorships in Europe during the early-to-mid 20th century. While Mussolini founded the original fascist movement in Italy, Hitler adopted and adapted these principles to form National Socialism (Nazism) in Germany
many people are confusing the propaganda use of the word “socialism” with the actual policies of the nazi party
Concentration Camps (e.g., Dachau, Buchenwald, Sachsenhausen): These were established starting in 1933 primarily to house political opponents. German communists (members of the KPD) and Social Democrats made up the overwhelming majority of the early prisoners here. Historians estimate that in 1933–1934 alone, tens of thousands of communists were arrested and held in concentration camps. Over the course of the Nazi regime, political prisoners remained a major category in concentration camps, where they faced brutal forced labor, torture, and high mortal
Adolf Hitler considered communists and socialists to be his ultimate and mortal political enemies. From the inception of the Nazi Party to the fall of the Third Reich, anti-communism and anti-Marxism were core pillars of Hitler’s ideology. He viewed these leftist movements as an existential threat to the German nation
“there was a HUGE private sector in germany
and the they made the profits”
For a narrow definition of private. They were allowed to keep title of their companies as long as they produced the goods the State demanded. Each company was to hold the interests of the State paramount, and if the party decided they weren’t sufficiently enthusiastic, would be taken over. Unknown if they would have been returned after the war, since Germany lost.
“They were allowed to keep title of their companies as long as they produced the goods the State demanded”
That is an excellent definition of fascism
Agreed. That was the major way fascism “improved” on socialism — you still have the title to the property, you will maintain it and avoid tragedy of the commons, but as with property tax, you don’t really own it. Don’t do what your overlords demand and you will find out that paper titles don’t mean much.
Much like Palantir, Anthropic, etc. today.
Trump vs Il Duce meme
https://i.imgur.com/sj1D4Dv.jpeg
Then the easiest way to accept National Socialism, is to compare it (which is a laughable experience) to the jewish forms of socialism, such as communism.
In jewish socialism known as communism, of course being communism there is complete control over the means of production (as well as all property), but it funnels all of that production to jewish interests. For an example of this, see the Holodomor in Ukraine.
The result of jewish forms of socialism (by matter of fact, the jews STOLE the word “socialism” for THEIR constructs because of the wonderful reputation of German National Socialism) is, as always, enrichment of a few jews and their puppets, while the people starve.
This is, of course, why it has such a bad reputation. People, especially white people, starve under it.
The German version of “Socialism”, aka “National Socialism”, is as close to jewish socialism as a raccoon is to a beaver. They may look similar at 200 yards, but up-close comparison illustrates the difference between the two quite clearly to all but the most mentally deficient individual.
With NATSOC, the state only controls the means of production when necessary (such as war time). You’ll notice that nowhere in the history of NATSOC, does anyone talk about the 3rd Reich marching around taking crops from farmers while they lay starving in the fields (see: Holodomor) or stealing the land or property of white citizens. And herein lies the main difference.
The goal of NATSOC is not to abolish private property. The goal of jewish communism IS. That is, in fact, Karl Marx’s stated goal, the abolition of private property.
What makes NATSOC “socialist” is the fact it places race and family first, understanding that healthy cells make a healthy body. Instead of women being degraded (see: jewish LGBTQ agenda, feminism, transgenders in sports, etc, etc), women are uplifted in ways that strengthen the family (try saying THAT for jewish socialism), and instead of punishing taxation, families producing children are given incentives.
Ie, instead of funneling tax money into the destruction of the society and the racial demographic that is a “target”, that tax money is put back into the culture that it serves.
That it ACTUALLY serves. Which is, the people.
National Socialism is REAL socialism. It is the legitimate social structure that serves THE FOLK, rather than vice versa.
To compare it to the corrupted jewish forms of socialism is very, very short sighted. It’s to say, “Yeah, my time spent studying National Socialism amounts to reading the word “socialism” and deciding I knew all I need to know.”
It’s hardly the intellectual approach.
NATSOC is best described as “libertarianism’s big brother”, which is grown up enough to recognize the need to secure the borders and encourage racial homogeneity.
It should also be pointed out that the initiatives carried out under “National Socialism” are directly (and swiftly) responsible for lifting Germany up out of the jew-banker-created global (yes, global) great depression and turning it from a struggling has-been country to the world’s greatest technological superpower in 5 years.
Try that with jewish forms of socialsm.
Yes, indeed.
National Socialism glorified the role of women.
So-called “women’s liberation” was only necessary to liberate women from the mind prison of communist thinking.
Katy D:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katharine_McCormick
had it figured out a long time ago.
>the essential thing Hitler did was to combine nationalism and socialism.
Yes.
Communists are, by definition, internationalists.
Adolph Hitler believed in the tradition of national pride.
I actually watched part of that interview – both the President and the ‘journalist’ were horrifying. Every time I click on a youtube video from a network news channel these days the primary anchor’person’ or interlocutor is female (or a GPOC). Why are women taking over the news business? What happened to the men who used to do that work? Is journalism (always a shaky business, tbh) getting better or worse?
Society has changed. Probably in large part because of fear, uncertainty and doubt. FUD drives people away from rationality into emotionalism, to the point where it’s hard to find good discussion anymore. And women are masters of emotionalism, or more to the point, weaponizing it. Which is why women now dominate, both at Fox and CNN. Their viewers want that.
Trump is also trapped in that. Any rational person would say, “Yeah, the LA election looks pretty fishy, and likely had massive fraud.” But he would also concede that there is nothing approaching evidence. Even that blue-haired chick stuffing the ballot box is not proof — she could be just doing a favor for those who won’t get off their butts and drop off their own ballots. But he is incapable of considering the fact that the same is true of the 2020 election. Yes, it stunk to high heaven, but so far, I’m unaware of evidence of enough fraud to make a difference.
YT channel Valhalla VFT said he shit his pants as he stood up to walk away. Americans love pretending to vote for pants-shitters, don’t we?
From the notorious interview cited by Eric:
‘[Trump] did critique Israel’s strategy in Lebanon.
“I’d like to see Lebanon have a better life,” he said. “I’d like to see a more surgical attack on Hezbollah. I think it should be more surgical.”
‘Trump said that the U.S. “can help” Israel in that effort.’
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5913962-trump-nbc-iran-california-election-interview/
Besides condoning ongoing Israeli attacks in Lebanon — which make peace impossible — the Orange Puppet is using is using loaded Israeli terminology.
‘surgical’ = indiscriminate mass slaughter of civilians
I wasn’t born in the US-fuckin-A to be ruled by this stinking, treasonous foreign puppet.
Israel is our misfortune.
Honest question. You don’t think that Trump would like to have Lebanese people have a better life?
Hi Steve,
Based on Trump’s actions and statements, I do not believe he gives a damn about anyone other than himself. He uses people so long as they are useful and then dumps (or betrays) them. He’s a sociopath at the least.
Sort of agreed. He wants what is best for himself, which he thinks is also what is best for America. Which is why I hold that Trump is the personification of consistent, once you understand him. (I’m projecting, I know. I cannot possibly know what is in his head. And neither can you.)
I believe Trump is driven by the need to make America great again, almost certainly because that would make Trump great. That overrides pretty much all other concerns. If that means lying, cheating, stealing and killing, American and Trumpian greatness is worth it.
Sociopath, yeah, by definition, since he sought control over others, or he would not have run for office. Like you, he saw the direction the country was headed, and where it would certainly go under the Dems.
What is the relevance of whether Trump would like to have Lebanese people have a better life?
Frame of reference is everything. There are only events. How we string them together determines how we perceive our world.
Hezbollah is a minority paramilitary that effectively took over Lebanon. The Lebanese government is not powerful enough to oppose them, just as they were not powerful enough to oppose the PLO. But after Israel kicked out the PLO, the Lebanese had a period of time when things were looking up, until Iranian money, training and troops once again rode in like desperados in some spaghetti western.
Upshot is that under that frame of reference, the way to improve the lives of the Lebanese is to kick the desperados out of town.
“Hezbollah is a minority paramilitary that effectively took over Lebanon.” If Hezbollah took over, Steve, why isn’t Trump and Netanyahu negotiating with them? Is the president of lebanon a member of Hezbollah?
“But after Israel kicked out the PLO,” when was that, Steve? The US army evacuated the PLO out of Lebanon–and guess what the filthy racist Zionist cowards did as soon as the PLO was gone: WIKI (PLO Withdrawal from Lebanon): “The aftermath of the PLO’s withdrawal also led to several tragic events, including the infamous Sabra and Shatila massacre in September 1982, where Christian Phalangist militias, allied with Israel, killed thousands of Palestinian refugees in camps in West Beirut, while Israeli forces were complicit by allowing the militias to enter the camps.” [They blocked the exits so defenseless women and children could be slaughtered like fish in a barrel.]
US Army evacuates PLO and ISRAEL CONTINUES TO OCCUPY LEBANON (some “peace”): (AI) “Israel occupied southern Lebanon FOR 22 YEARS, maintaining a continuous military presence from 1978 until May 24, 2000.”
U.S. evacuates one army, and the filthy zionist jews with their OCCUPATION create another one: there was no Hezbollah until Israel occupied Lebanon.
WHY DID ISRAEL LEAVE LEBANON IN 2000? (AI) “Israel evacuated southern Lebanon in May 2000 to halt the unsustainable loss of Israeli soldiers caused by constant guerrilla warfare, and to fulfill a campaign promise made by then-Prime Minister Ehud Barak to end the 18-year occupation of the “security zone”.”
Hezbollah kicked Israel’s ass again in 2006 when they tried to capture Israeli soldiers (just like Hamas on 10/7) to FREE PRISONERS Zionist state holds without trial, without charge, just because it’s only way the racist state can survive. Israel is a failed racist state just like South Africa.
Guess what the sodomizing, gang raping, terrorist Israeli scum bags are doing to the Palestinian Authority. Like the Jew-controlled US steals Iran’s, Iraq’s, Venezuela’s and Russia’s money, the Jewish state steals the Palestinians’ money: 6.8.26 “Knesset approves law: Funds to be deducted from Palestinian Authority for terror attack damages. The Knesset plenum approved in second and third readings a bill to deduct funds from the Palestinian Authority for damages caused by terror attacks. The damages are estimated at hundreds of millions of shekels annually, which will first be transferred to families of terror victims and then to the state treasury. MK Avichai Boaron, who initiated the bill, stated: ‘The Authority has chosen for years to incentivize terror. The time has come for it to bear the consequences.’
https://www.ynetnews.com/article/kj6jo4ba1
Obviously Orange BLOTUS has the inability to be honest about what he said in the past, and it is to the level of a pathology with him. Trump exhibits the Jewish brain syndrome:
jewish brain diagram
https://i.imgur.com/nqwmnTJ.jpeg
A perfect example of how the supremacist Jew thinks was offered for our examination last week by the liar Danny Demon.
(Danny Demon (Hebrew: דני דנון; born 8 May 1971) [1] is an Israeli politician and diplomat serving as Israel’s Ambassador to the United Nations since 2024)
He brings a Hezbollah drone to the UN last week and complain they are killing IDF, as they invade their nation!
Feel sorry for the poor downtrodden wittle Jews! Hezbollah is killing IDF invaders with drones!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDsr0yPloWs
59 years ago, our greatest ally attacked an American navy vessel and murdered 34 American sailors.
https://ussliberty.org/
Yep. I’d love to see the truth come out. Why, for example, was one of our premier signals intelligence ships almost 90 miles away from where it was supposed to be? Everyone on deck could have seen land on the horizon, so everyone, from captain to helmsman to swabbie knew they were not 100 miles out to sea.
Why was the US military liason to Israel not in the report, when his job was to be the contact, but the ambassador was in the report, when that was not his job?
Someone in Washington covered things up to at least make Israel the good guy or the bad guy, depending on your frame of reference. Who and why?
Zio-Steve: Your feigned naivety is just precious. We’re all well-aware of the truth about the USS Liberty (occurring on June 8, 1967). It was a failed Israeli false-flag attack intended to be blamed on Egypt as a way to drag the US into the six day war (which occurred between June 5 – 10, 1967). Whoops! It didn’t sink.
Yes, you know what your echo chamber says. Have you read the official report? Reports, actually? Didn’t the glaring gaps and inconsistencies stand out?
Again, frame of reference. Yes, false flag is one possible interpretation. Another is that the Liberty was where it was because its real mission was different than its official mission. Which, frankly, would hardly be surprising for a spook ship. How can one decide between even just these two without, you know, evidence?
Regardless of why or where the USS Liberty was or was not, Israel attacked and tried to sink a US flagged ship off the coast of the Sinai Peninsula. Israel admitted this. There’s no mystery here, Zio-Steve.
All agree what happened, but why makes a huge difference. The reason I’m skeptical of the false flag story is that according to Washington’s official reports, they never considered the possibility. Instead, they maintained it was a snafu on our side, that either the captain never received his orders or that they were never sent.
That seems weird, does it not? Wouldn’t an hypothesis more consistent with the facts be that Washington was desperate to keep the real story suppressed? Possibly that a US signals intelligence was actively snooping in an active war zone? Every country knows even their allies are snooping on them, and make noises if it becomes public, but no one intends to stop the practice.
Hi Steve,
Well, I’ve read (and heard, directly, from the men who where there, on the Liberty) that Israeli warplanes not only attacked but continued to attack despite the Liberty flying the American flag and other identifying insignia.There were, as I understand, it several waves of attacks – so I’m not buying it was a misidentification/accident.
Context matters. The Israeli state is a vicious gangster state. It is run by people who think terrorism is not only justified but funny, even. Viz, that bastard Netanyahu joking with Trump about the exploding pagers, which maimed many people who just happened to be standing near one of the targeted people who had one. There is also the King David Hotel incident – and I strongly suspect the Israelis were involved in JFK’s assassination and the 911 attacks.
That much of the Liberty story is undisputed. That’s why Israel agreed to reparations, though I strongly suspect they were just US tax dollars.
The problem is it is less than half the story. Someone was sending coded messages of decoded Israeli battle plans that showed up in Egypt shortly after the USS Liberty sent coded messages to Washington. Israelis at the time were convinced that the US was a rat bastard, spying on Israel and collaborating with Egypt to destroy Israel. Either that or the Liberty was an imposter. After all, Washington insisted the Liberty was 100 miles from shore. If the Liberty was 100 miles away, who was 25 miles away?
After the fall of the USSR, we found out that the Soviets had broken our codes, and were the likely source to Egypt. Liberty to USSR to Egypt.
There’s also a connection to British Intelligence. The Intercept, no fan of Israel, had a pretty good treatment a decade ago https://theintercept.com/2017/06/06/fifty-years-later-nsa-keeps-details-of-israels-uss-liberty-attack-secret/
I did a quick search and here’s a copy-paste post in case you don’t want to enter your email.
https://ninetymilesfromtyranny.blogspot.com/2026/06/june-8-1967-uss-liberty-was-attacked-by.html
Your explanation sounds very “Israeli.” Blame the victim for being attacked. “It was a snafu on our side.” -Zio-Steve.
For fuck sake, you’re going to continue to obfuscate here? Israel fully admits that it attacked a US ship. That’s not a US “snafu.” It’s an act of deadly aggression. Why would Israel attack is closest ally during a war against against Egypt, Syria and Jordan? Hmmmm. I wonder why?
Note that it was the USS Liberty. The designation USS (United States Ship) means it was an *armed* warship of the U.S. Navy. My understanding is the Liberty’s armament consisted of two 50 caliber machine guns.
Attacking an *armed* warship of a foreign power operating in international waters is an *act* *of* *war*. The Jewish “explanation” they mistook it for an Egyptian horse transport is horseshit nonsense.
The traitor Lyndon Johnson ordered the fighter jets which were dispatched to deal with the unprovoked attack on the Liberty by a hostile adversary to be recalled.
Mr. Massie’s speech to Congress today:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7bRtT1xjJI
So, why no standing ovation?
RE: “So, why no standing ovation?”
…Didn’t you see how important it was for the guy in the background to file papers, seemingly aimlessly?
THAT! is what’s important! Obviously.\\Sarc /OFF.
A captured nation, and culture.
Incidentally, don’t you find the parallels between the USS Maddox (Gulf of Tonkin) and the USS Liberty at least a little curious? Particularly since at the time, they had so far gotten away with the coverup of the Maddox, and have no reason to believe they would not have gotten away with covering up the Liberty…?
There is no parallel. Israel admitted to attacking and nearly sinking a the USS Liberty, killing 34 and wounding 171 Americans. This was a despicable Israeli act of war against the US.
The “Gulf of Tonkin incident” was a fake false flag reported by the U.S. in order to create a casus belli for the Vietnam war. The USS Maddox suffered no damage, and nobody was even hurt (save the truth).
Of course there is a parallel. The only difference between the two is that Vietnam didn’t attack the Maddox. Had they, the stories would have been almost identical, with Washington insisting both ships were outside of national waters, when, in fact, they were both either 6 or 12 miles offshore, depending on which official US report you find more credible. Neither with a good explanation of what they were doing there.
Sure Zio-Steve. One was a deadly attack by Israel (our greatest ally) and the other was a fictitious attack three years earlier 6,000 miles away that resulted in no deaths or injuries. Just the same [sarc].
Your analogical reasoning skills need some work, buddy. Surely you’re not this obtuse, right?
When the Orange Douche starting spouting about “fake news” it struck a nerve because a large number of people realized what the MSM (from both “sides”) was spouting was mostly BS. However, you cannot keep ranting about “fake news” without actually supplying concrete examples of your accusations, nor by not including one “side” of the MSM Wurlitzer (note that he excludes Faux News from his rant). Also, you cannot keep spewing about election fraud/corruption without providing specific examples, nor by not including your own “side” and their malfeasance – the primary that ousted Massie may have been the most corrupt “election” ever.
He is become nothing more than a sick old man in the throes of toddler tantrums.
Morning, MQ!
Yup, and he’s not even a sympathetic sick old man. In fact, he’s so vile he almost makes Biden a sympathetic figure. Why? Because Biden didn’t betray the people who voted for him. They got what they voted for. Trump, on the hand, is a betrayer – which for me is just about the worst thing there is. I can abide an honest enemy. I cannot abide a dishonest “friend.”
Ordinarily, I would want a sick old man to be treated with deference and kindness. But what I want in Trump’s case is to see him shit his pants on live TeeVee and to hear the voices of millions laughing at him.
I could have done without that image, Eric. …It likely wouldn’t have phased all his Fox supporters anyway.
One should never have faith in any politician. With the exception of very few, they’re all whores that will do and say whatever it takes to please their monied overlords. “Governance” has been corrupt for millennia. It’s just a lot more obvious now with more decentralized media and journalism, as well as video archives. Trump is just the latest and loudest whore. Goddamn him and his blatant fraud.
“they’re all whores that will do and say whatever it takes to please their monied overlords.”
Even for me, that’s cynical. Only a tiny number of politicians are able to skip the bush leagues, almost exclusively $100 millionaires and up. The rest make political speeches, and, depending on their perceived fidelity to what they are saying, attract moneyed interests who want that championed further up the chain.
Who gets into national politics is almost completely those who stand for things that people are willing to support financially. And libertarians are notoriously tight-fisted. Even moreso than Chews.
Hi Steve,
Why is it that some people spend money to support a politician? It’s because they expect a return on their investment. Libertarians would just like to be left alone – and there’s no money in that, you see.
I don’t doubt many people do expect ROI. But its always safer to invest in someone who already believes in what you want than to hope against hope that he stays bought. The true believer is much more likely to vote for the legislation you want.
Libertarians have to understand that though we want to be left alone, the uni-party will not leave us alone. Like the right likes to remind their voters, freedom is not free. We are going to have to play the game if we want to be left alone. Eternal vigilance and all that.
No Zio-Steve, as an Hasbara agent, you know damn well it’s better to own a politician by getting him hooked on your money and having kompromat to ensure his allegiance.
I’m guessing someone has kompromat on you? Or do you live high on the hog with all you get paid?
Or is there an off-chance you actually believe in liberty?
I’m the embodiment of liberty. 😉
Right. And you can’t entertain the possibility that others might also act on principle?
Total non sequitur, Zio-Steve.
Hmm, “if we want to be left alone. Eternal vigilance and all that.”
Via Webster: “vigilant adjective – : alertly watchful especially to avoid danger”
How does being watchful = being left alone?
You never dealt with a bully before? Being, ‘watchful’ doesn’t cut it.
‘Warren Zevon – Lawyers, Guns And Money – 4/18/1980 – Capitol Theatre (Official)’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZx_TokIHdI
The monied interests want grift, protection and monopolies.
“For the love of money is the root of all evil.” -1 Timothy 6:10
Sometimes. In others, it’s just paying a protection racket. The most obvious example is the way the DOJ treated Microsoft in the Clinton Era. The government was serious about the “Nice place you have here. It would be a shame if something happened to it.”
Persia (a.k.a. Iran) is one of the most ancient civilizations on Earth. It was here for thousands of years before the State of Isunreal was “founded” (by murdering Arab women and children), and it will be here long after Jizrael has been turned to dust. F*ck the Ashke-Nazis.
100% agree. Israel is also modern Sodom and Gommorah, proudly advertises itself as the gay capitol of the world. The Iranians are saints and the Israelis demons.
‘Our Greatest Ally does not want that [peace].’ — eric
Resuming the war would be a short-term political boon for Netanyahu. — NYT
So he resumed it, attacking Beirut on Sunday. Iran retaliated by attacking the shitty little apartheid colony, which fired back at Iran’s Bandar Imam petrochemical complex.
Lebanon remains the bleeding sore which keeps this war going, since Israel is determined to gobble up and occupy much of it, the same way it has gobbled up and occupied 70 percent of tiny Gaza, taking away all its farmland and leaving only wrecked urban cores.
Now, horrifically, AIPAC-owned Congress Clowns plan to integrate the Pentagon into the Israeli military, making America’s mighty AGCF [Armed Goyim Cattle Forces] an arm of the IDF. This ghastly plan is supposed to be completed in July, with enactment of the ‘must pass’ NDAA appropriations bill.
Till the end, I will not give up fighting. But I must tell you that we are about to lose America for good to a hostile foreign adversary which has hijacked our failed ‘democracy.’ Like Texans at the Alamo, we are seriously outnumbered in this existential struggle.
I’m with you, Jim – and any other patriot who will never bend the knee to Israel (or any other state). If I am an “anti-Semite” for questioning the overweening obsession this country’s political leadership has with the welfare of that state, then it is an honorable title and I will wear it with pride.
If Israel wants people to stop criticizing it, maybe they should stop atrociously abusing, and killing people.
That’s very well-said, John –
It is rarely asked – though it is being asked more nowadays – why people dislike “the Jews.” As if there were no (legitimate) reason for disliking assertions of self-choseness, along with endless assertions of special victimhood and also hypocrisies such as it’s just fine for an American politician to be an Israeli citizen but illegal for an Israeli politician to hold dual citizenship.
I don’t give a damn whether a man is a Jew, per se. Just as I don’t give a damn whether a man is black. I do give a damn when either says he’s entitled to special deference on account of it – and that to question it makes me “anti-Semitic” or “racist.”
Likewise! I was married to a Jew for 35 years, and it was NOT a factor in our parting of ways.
Per Walter Williams (paraphrased):
“Your rights require no action on my part.”
I think most people think (and feel) that way. Being fair minded is not anti-semtic.
Agreed. Except on the hypocrisy charge. If America wants to get rid of the absurd and contradictory notion of dual citizenship, they can. It’s hardly hypocrisy to take advantage of someone else’s stupidity.
https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/israel-could-solve-its-pr-problem
“If I wanted people to stop hating my favorite country for committing war crimes and genocide, I personally would simply encourage that country to stop committing war crimes and genocide.”
Message sent to Congress Clowns this morning — the first of many in coming weeks. This is our last stand for what little remains of the republic:
The Defense Intelligence Agency has upgraded the counterintelligence threat posed by Israel to the lop level. But you didn’t need this leaked report to know it. Section 224 of the House Armed Services Committee’s draft NDAA, disastrously integrating US and Israeli military research and procurement, provides overt, undeniable evidence of Israeli hijacking of our legislative process.
In plain words, Section 224 enables and legalizes Israeli espionage. Theft of national security secrets by IDF and Mossad operatives no longer will be indictable, once they have official Pentagon badges. Apparently, they already have Congressional staff badges.
Section 224 must be stricken from the NDAA at all costs. It effectively eliminates Congressional oversight and completes the conversion of the US government into an AIPAC-owned, Israeli quisling regime.
STOP THE TREASON.
Absurd.
Here’s the current version of NDAA.
https://armedservices.house.gov/uploadedfiles/fy27_ndaa_chairmans_mark_-_final.pdf
Section 224 starts on page 40 of the bill, page 43 of the PDF, and is only about 4 pages. Do you see anything remotely like what you just said?
Rather than mindlessly repeating nonsense from the echo chambers, can’t intelligent people look it up, even once in a while?
Bite me, sayan liar — it says EXACTLY what I just said. Ex-CIA officer Dr Philip Giraldi expands on the theme:
https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/congress-moves-to-institutionalize-us-israeli-relationship/
No it absolutely does not!
You are smart enough. Read the goddam thing, instead of listening to your echo chamber.
But you have, like most men, bent the knee to the feministas who are the greatest threat to America and the free Western world. How many times have you bitched (rightfully so) about the nanny/safety/totalitarian control state in its many guises? Thousands, but never once have you pointed the finger at the actual source of the problem: women and the men who support the female agenda, among which you’ll find a 75-year-old intention to destroy the family and the dads which are the bedrock of civilization.
Why? Because men are programmed from birth (and possibly genetically) to elevate and honor women at any cost, to turn a blind eye to their machinations, to ignore the vast advantages women continue to accrue versus men, to gloss over the genuine evil they perpetrate. The first man to defend any woman is the man who has been cucked and betrayed by one.
Read ‘The Woman Racket’ by Steve Moxon. It’s out there on the webz, a heavily-documented and thoroughly-researched look at the numerous false realities we live under and who inflicted them upon us.
You’re an intelligent and insightful guy who engages in a fair bit of rational ‘wrongthink,’ to your great credit. But you’re still stuck on the China propaganda, and you’re hopelessly awash when it comes to the feminist attack on civilization.
Hi Cobbelstones,
I agree with some of your points – to a certain extent. To the extent that feminism is bad news for men – and women. It has creates an unnatural antagonism. It has also effeminized society; this much is obvious. Where I disagree with you is (assuming I am understand your position correctly) that women – all women – are inherently “trouble.” I think some are. So are some men. And I think both can be trouble on account of the other. The thing is for men to be men and for women to not try to be men.
What matters is not whether all women (or all men) are trouble – neither assertion will ever be entirely true. The question is who, which group, has control over the zeitgeist, the law, education, medicine, and many more fields. The answer is feministas and the men who support their agenda.
Who lives longest? Who enjoys the lion’s share of medical and welfare spending? Who wins by default in family court? Who wins under the debased standards of the VAW Act? Which population is dominant in universities today? It isn’t men.
Contrariwise, who dies on the job? Who dies in combat? Who kneels in a proposed marriage arrangment? Who are the homeless? Who get evicted from their families, estranged from their children, and sentenced to life-long financial slavery without cause or wrong-doing? Who endures the greater share of inter-sex violence, including genital mutilation? It isn’t women.
Hey Mang,
“Ju got dat right in spades Mang”!! (Tony Montana Scarface)
I have Literally watched “The decline and fall of the Gutless Amerikanski male” (simp) in real time…..And after my parole from
from estrogen infested New England…my observations:
ALWAYS CHOOSE FUNCTION OVER FORM…(buttered pussy has an expiration date)…
SCORE A KOOL “TOMBOY” WITH SOME EQUITY..
and Wild adventures await…barbie/me two/empowered .. types please stay home!
Epitaph: (5/20/2010)
My dear departed Honey’s daughter told me …
WOW…YOU TOOK MY MOM TO PLACES…SHE DIDN’T EVEN KNOW EXISTED….Yeah..My kind of Woman!
Semper Fi, Mac
Oops forgot to mention ..
She scored 1- way tickets to 5 of the 7 “Big Islands”….for extended…”Walk abouts”… as my Bud.
Now that’s one BAD ASS Bitch!
Awesome Zin/Yang synergy… Unfortunately it’s
Presently..out of balance.
Roger that, Expat!
If a woman likes old Trans Ams, she is probably ok. If she doesn’t, walk away.
RE: “If a woman likes old Trans Ams”
Pardon me. Imho, Almost no women, “likes old Trans Ams” or, even for many, New ones.
…Rather, they like/love the drivers of ’em.
…And, the places it takes ’em.
…And, they way they get there.
Judas Priest – Turbo Lover (Official Video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhY9GOhFwN4
[Pics, expat, or it didn’t happen]
Jmho, YMMV?