Hybrids are becoming hot rods – well, some hybrids. Luxury hybrids.
They kind of have to, when you stop to think about it.
After all, what person with say $40k to spend on a car wants to spend that on a slow car?
Being “green” only goes so far . . . after a certain price point.
Thus the new Lexus ES300 – the first-ever hybrid version of the hugely popular ES350. It is capable of almost-Prius fuel efficiency – 40 city, 39 highway – but it’s not slow like a Prius.
Or – and perhaps more importantly – the new Lincoln MKZ hybrid.
The ES300 is the hybridized (gas-electric) version of the Lexus ES350 – a mid-sized, entry-luxury sedan based on the Toyota Camry. It differs chiefly in being propelled by a four-cylinder gas engine/CVT/electric motor & battery powertrain vs. the V-6/six-speed conventional automatic that propels the non-hybrid ES350.
The ES300 also has hybrid-specific instrumentation, such as a charge-meter that converts to a conventional tachometer – and back to a charge-meter again (more below).
Like the ES350, the ES300 comes in one well-equipped trim, with a base price of $38,850 (vs. $36,100 for the ES350).
Although there are lots of hybrids on the market, the number of luxury brand hybrids is relatively small. The number of entry-luxury hybrids is even smaller.
The ES300’s main price (and status) and otherwise similar competition is the Lincoln MKZ hybrid – which starts at $35,925.
Like the ES350 it’s based on the ES300 hybrid is all-new for 2013.
Gas mileage (40 city, 39 highway) almost as good as first-gen. Prius
Much quicker than a current Prius.
Quicker than the Lincoln MKZ hybrid.
CVT transmission is almost noiseless.
Relatively small price premium vs. non-hybrid ES350.
WHAT’S NOT SO GOOD
Also-new 2013 Lincoln MKZ hybrid costs $3k less – and gets 45 MPG (city and highway).
Traction/stability control is over-eager to step in – and can’t be turned off unless you stop the car first.
The ES300’s hybrid powertrain consists of a high-efficiency 2.5 liter gas engine, electric motor and onboard battery pack – all of them driving the front wheels through a Continuously Variable (CVT) automatic transmission.
Combined output is 200 hp.
This is more juice than the Lincoln MKZ hybrid’s 188 hp, so it’s not surprising that the Lexus is almost half a second quicker to 60: about 8 seconds flat vs. 8.4 for the Lincoln. What is a little surprising is that the hybrid ES300 – a mid-sized car – is also nearly as quick as its non-hybrid sport-sedan sibling, the IS250 – a compact car – which gets to 60 in 7.9 seconds (8.3 when equipped with AWD). These days, an eight second to 60 time is the threshold that separates slow from not-slow. Any car that takes significantly longer than 8 seconds to get itself to 60 is a car that can’t outrun $15k economy cars. If it is a $15k economy car, that’s probably acceptable. But when you’re driving a pushing $40k luxury car – hybrid or not – it’s embarrassing to be outrun by $15k economy cars. So, the ES300 is at least quick enough… .
While the ES is quicker than the MKZ, it’s also less fuel-efficient. Its 40 city, 39 highway is very good (the non-hybrid ES350 manages only 21 city and 31 highway). But it’s not nearly as good as the exceptional 45 MPG – in both city and highway driving – that the Lincoln MKZ delivers. Nothing that’s not a Prius can touch the Lincoln when it comes to MPGs. That includes the most fuel-sippy of today’s subcompact economy cars, the very best of which deliver just over 40 MPG . . . on the highway. They typically average in the high 20s/low 30s.
The MKZ hybrid even outclasses diesel-powered cars when it comes to at-the-pump parsimony.
But on the other hand, it’s slow.
Lexus is betting that the ES300’s better-than-econobox performance and gas mileage will matter more to prospective buyers than the MKZ’s emphasis on fuel-efficiency uber alles.
Like the first gen. Prius, the ES300 can be driven for short distances and at speeds of up to about 30 MPH on electric power only. To engage EV (electric vehicle) mode, you depress a button on the center console. If the batteries are fully charged up (it’s closed loop; you can’t plug this one in – for now) and you are verrry gentle on the pedal, you can creep along on volts alone for a mile or so. The system will automatically override and turn the gas assist engine back on when speed exceeds 30 MPH – or your right foot demands more rapid acceleration. Or the batteries are depleted beyond a certain threshold.
But unlike the first gen. (or current) Prius – or the Lincoln MKZ – this one also goes when you need it to. It’s easily 2-3 seconds quicker to 60 than a Prius – the current one – and also handles with plausible sportiness (not much body lean, fairly precise steering and a decently high lateral grip threshold) with one caveat: The traction/stability control is a more aggressive nanny than Mrs. Doubtfire. It also cannot be turned off if the car is moving. This can be annoying if you’re like me – and the urge to power slide the car through a decreasing radius curve occasionally wells up. The system will literally almost kill the engine in mid-corner. Fuel and spark are summarily turned off (or dialed back to next to nothing) while the ABS pumps furiously to negate the controlled drift you were attempting. Your speed drops – and so does the fun. The good news is you can shut the bugger off – the traction/stability control – and have it stay off. It’s just not easy to shut it off. You must first bring the car to a complete stop, then press and hold the TRAC button until the dash light tells you you’re good to go. And you have to do this every time you want the nanny to stay in the background and let you control what the car does. All new Toyota-Lexus vehicles are similarly afflicted.
The ES300 has three selectable drive modes: ECO, Normal and Sport, which you engage by rotating (or pushing in) a knob on the forward part of the center console. It’s a set-up very much like that used in the GS350 sport sedan I tested a few weeks ago. Sport mode increases steering effort and sharpens throttle response, to make the car feel quicker – by causing it to respond more quickly to driver inputs. Normal is normal. In ECO, the AC and some other accessories go on low – in order to reduce the load on the drivetrain and thus maximize economy.
An interesting touch is the changeling tachometer/battery charge meter. In Normal and ECO mode, there is no tach to the left of the speedometer. The big dial indicates Charge – or Power – and states in between. But when you select Sport mode, the charge-meter disappears and is replaced – electroluminscently – by a traditional rev counter.
Backlighting also switches over to red.
My test car had both heated seats and a heated steering wheel – all of which heat rather than merely warm. If you like the idea of heated seats (and steering wheels) be certain to try them out before you buy a given make/model of car – because all seat heaters are not created equal. Some barely rise to the tepid. The ES300’s are roasty toasty.
Also worth a mention is the ergonomically excellent mouse input controller. There’s a pad contoured to fit your right hand and wrist, with the toggle just ahead of that. You use the toggle to select what you want, then click it. The toggle itself has just the right amount of drag – making it so you don’t overshoot what you want and accidentally click on something you don’t.
There are haters who for years have mocked the ES as a tarted-up Camry. Which it is. But it’s an exceptionally nice Camry. With the appeal of the Lexus brand – and the Lexus dealer experience. The haters can say what they like; Lexus sells these things hand over fist – and at full MSRP, too.
Here’s what I say:
The ES – either version – is one of the most comfortable, quiet, pleasant-to-drive cars on the market. It may not be as sporty looking or driving as say a BMW 3 or Caddy CTS – but it’s much more comfortable than they are and – for everyday driving – apparently just sporty enough.
Styling-wise, the ’13 ES – again, both versions – has the new Lexus “face” that’s shared with other Lexus models like the new GS and also the top-of-the-line LS. It’s a kind of wasp-waisted, two-piece deal that pinches toward the middle, where a body-colored bar separates the upper and lower sections. Off to either side are narrow-slit headlights with the LED lower brows that are becoming a popular thing. The ES also shares the lower side bone line with its GS and LS siblings – as well as a very fast (sharply angled) fastback rear glass – with power sunshade, natch.
One of this car’s chief draws has always been its interior roominess – especially backseat interior roominess. Check it out – 40 inches of rearseat legroom.
Some perspective: The BMW 3 Series Active hybrid (which starts at nearly $50k and maxxes out at 33 MPG) gives you a meager 35.5 inches of rearseat legroom – almost five inches less!
Another mid-sized luxury car, the Cadillac CTS, has only 36.6 inches of backseat legroom.
But, the comparo that matters most is vis-a-vis the new Lincoln MKZ. Well? Just 37 inches of rearseat legroom – three full inches less than you get in the ES.
The MKZ does have very generous front seat legroom: 44.3 inches vs. 41.2 for the ES300. But unless you (the driver) are an NBA forward, you’ll need all of those 44.3 inches much less than your backseat riders will the ES300’s 40 inches of rearseat real estate. I’m 6ft 3 – and long legged. And I had to scoot the front seat forward a bit to get comfortable. In my opinion, Lincoln made a mistake by tipping the balance of space, front to rear, too much toward the front – at the expense of the rear.
The ES also has a slightly larger trunk than the MKZ’s – 12.1 cubic feet vs. 11.6 cubic feet – although both are on the small side. These are hybrids; the battery pack has to go somewhere. And where it goes is where some of the trunk would otherwise be. The non-hybrid ES350 has a 15.2 cubic foot trunk. The non-hybrid MKZ, 15.4 cubic feet.
I averaged (according to the car’s onboard computer) 32.7 MPG in mixed-use driving during the week I had the car. That’s about 7 MPG off the EPA’s projected average (city and highway) number of 40 MPG.
To be fair to the car (and to Lexus) I must point out that I tend to drive faster the average bear. And also that my “mixed-use” driving is mostly open-road/steady high-speed, which is exactly the sort of driving hybrid’s aren’t optimized for. So, almost 33 MPG average given all that is pretty solid. I don’t doubt for a moment that, driven more reasonably – especially with more “city” driving thrown into the mix – the ES300’s numbers will meet or even exceed the EPA’s stated numbers.
Also keep in mind: The non-hybrid ES350’s best-case number is 31 MPG – on the highway – and (having driven it) in mixed–use conditions as above, can vouch that the V-6 ES350 averages closer to 23 MPG. So – roughly – you can expect a 10 MPG uptick, ES300 vs. the ES350.
Math-wise, this means the ES300 makes sense.
It won’t take long to work off the $2,750 difference in up-front cost between the ES300 hybrid ($38,850) and the non-hybrid ES350 ($36,100). That $2,750 will buy – roughly – 850 gallons of gas at the current $3.20 or so per gallon. That’s about a year’s worth of fuel, assuming you drive about 12-15k a year. You’ll reach break even within two or three, at most.
Over say 10-12 years – the typical length of time most people keep their cars these days – you stand to save a lot of green by going with the ES300 over the non-hybrid ES350. Especially if the price of gas jumps up during that time.
But, there’s the MKZ hybrid – and its 45 MPG rating. And its $35,925 MSRP. That’s an advantage of 5-6 MPG every tankful – and $2,925 less to work off in up-front costs.
Lincoln, of course, had to price the MKZ aggressively because Lincoln ain’t Lexus – and a big part of the reason why people drop $35k-plus on a status car is because of the status of the car. Lexus is top-drawer, blue chip. Low depreciation – high re-sale value. Lincoln not so much. The MKZ is not a bad car – and Lincoln’s not a bad brand. But it’s not Lexus.
Also, the MKZ is a road toad. With two people inside, it will probably take closer to 9 seconds to get to 60. That could prove to be a bigger problem for Lincoln than rebuilding the status of the brand.
THE BOTTOM LINE
If you demand some Go with your Green, the ES300 has got you covered.
It’s not JUST Hybrids. The average American cseuomnr in general, when given a choice, will buy cheaper light bulbs than compact fluorescent/LED, 50 year roofs rather than 20 year, cheaper tires rather than long lasting ones, etc.Buying for ROI means you likely also learned to buy for reliability before that. It’s a step up IMHO of course.People who typically change cars every few years often are not thinking about ROI anyhow.so narrow minded yes but pretty common.Our experience maybe typical. We looked at the Toyota Highlander in both the base and hybrid version. The Hybrid was about 5K more that’s up front of course. We thought since it was a Toyota it probably would give ROI but we were not 100% convinced and 5K is a lot of money (at least for us). In the end, we went with the Rav4 to save money, get better mileage (than the Highlander) but at that point it was a contest with the Prius. But the Prius did not have all the safety features of the Rav4 nor 4-wheel drive ( for the winter). CR ranked the Rav4 high and still does so in the end it won out but the next car will likely be a Prius or other hybrid. This plays out over 10+ years for us and I would suggest that it may take that long for others.Now, the guy who puts 100 miles a day on his car commuting may well be on a much quicker tempo on replacement cars.I just think it takes time for people to adjust to new technologies and young folks tend to not be as focused on ROI ..not as financially well off and not as concerned about reliability/durability.all of the above blather, clearly and thoroughly IMHO!
There is, of course, a difference between cheaper (i.e., of lower quality) and less expensive.
A less expensive car is not necessarily cheaper – and a cheaper car may prove to be more expensive in the long run.
With regard to hybrids (or any other car) if your object is to save money, you should consider total ownership costs, not just gas mileage.
That includes not just the higher up-front costs of the hybrid but also the potentially higher down-the-road service costs, including the possibility of having to spend a great deal of money on battery replacement after 10-12 years (perhaps less).
Arguably, if the object is to save money on transportation costs, the best course is to buy a good used economy car. Such are readily available for $8,000 or less – about one-third the cost of something like a new Prius. It would be very hard to “come out ahead” buying the new Prius vs. the $8,000 used econo-car, especially when you factor in the much lower peripheral costs of used car ownership, such as minimal, liability-only insurance (vs. comprehensive), taxes and so on.
I like everything about it but the styling. I’m just not a big fan of the direction the Lex’s have gone recently with their looks. It is nice to see performance, comfort, and fuel economy being mixed together with a not-so-high price tag, though.
I don’t dislike the look – but I agree it’s nothing to write home about. In fact, I’d levy that criticism at probably two-thirds of the cars on the market. There’s a great deal of homogeneity as regards general shapes and themes.
That aside, overall, I like this one. I’m betting it will do very well. There’s an already established market for the ES, but this one will probably expand it.