“Improperly manufactured propellant wafers could cause the inflator to rupture and the front passenger airbag to deploy abnormally in the event of a crash,” the company said in a statement.
Now, the relevant question to ask here is not whether Toyota is guilty of endangering the buying public – and what should be done about it. It is how come the government gets to endanger the buying public – and what do we do about that?
If air bags were not mandatory, people could weigh the potential risks against the claimed benefits – and come to a decision they were comfortable with. In exactly the same way people consider whether to sky dive, or any other such thing that entails both potential risk and potential reward. If something goes awry, they at least can take comfort in the fact that no one forced them to do “x.”
Certainly, Toyota is culpable for selling an apparently defective part in its cars. But at least, no one was forced to buy Toyota’s cars.
While the pro air bag crowd can point to “lives saved” – which is true enough – people like me (weirdoes who believe in adults deciding things for themselves) can point with just as much truth behind us to the deaths and injuries air bags have caused.
And will cause in the future.
Whether air bags have saved more lives than have been lost is not the issue. Even if they have, there is an effrontery that boggles a sane mind when it comes across a person presuming to make life and death choices for another human being – at gunpoint, never forget.
I realize I harp on the “at gunpoint” qualifier. But it’s necessary – critically necessary – to not permit these creatures who would control us to soft-sell the violence that underlies everything they do.
You’ve no doubt heard the bleat – If it saves even one life! – as the justification for forcibly imposing “x” (or not allowing “y”).
Why is this bleat never applied when lives are not saved as a result of these violent interpositions? When a life would have been saved absent the violent interposition?
The ugly truth is that the people killed (and maimed) by air bags don’t matter to the control freaks. To them, these deaths – the deaths they caused – are incidentals, the cost of doing business.
How would you feel if you had forced another person to to do something and it directly led to that person’s death or mauling? Would you ever presume to make such a choice for someone else, knowing that choice might result in that person’s death or injury?
No, of course not. Because you – like most people – are not a psychopath.
Normal people feel extremely uneasy at the prospect of making life or death decisions for others. But the two-legged things that issue regulatory decrees are not normal people. They don’t feel anxiety or angst – much less regret – over what they do to other people. It’s all in the “public interest” – as defined by them. If it ends up costing the lives of some of the public, oh well.
This “public” they constantly refer to is an abstraction to them. It is not flesh and blood individual human beings. The pain and suffering caused is therefore easy to not think about.
Or not care about.
Stalin once reportedly said: “A single death is a tragedy. A million deaths, a statistic.” This is the sort of mentality were dealing with. It’s not on the mass-murder level. Yet. But the attitude is exactly the same.
If there are negative outcomes, it will be your problem; all for the greater good. We – your betters, the social engineers who pull the levers (and hold the guns) know best. And you’d better do as we say – though the latter is rarely said openly.
This attitude now suffuses American society – and has become glib, commonplace. It’s routine for politicians of either party (Team Red and Team Blue) to cavalierly banter about the disposition of other people’s lives, as if this were perfectly reasonable.
I say it’s time to put an end to this disgusting routinization of playing with other people’s lives. No one has the right to do it. Whether you believe air bags – or whatever it happens to be – pose an “acceptable risk” is entirely beside the point.
The point is, it’s not up to you to make that calculation for anyone other than yourself.
Your job – your obligation – is to mind your own business and leave others free to mind theirs.
Throw it in the Woods?
Spread it via Twitter: LibertarianCarG (they would not let me have “guy”).
We depend on you to keep the wheels turning. If you value alternatives to the MSM, please support independent media. Our donate button is here.
For those not Pay Pal-inclined, you can mail us at the following:
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079