As a student of the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, I share Nietzsche’s and Kierkegaard’s conviction that philosophy should deeply reflect the personal concerns of individual human beings. As a Nietzschean Anarchist, this entails a rejection of traditional values, including the christian religion. As a Nietzschean Anarchist, I declare “emancipation from god” and would encourage you to consider joining western culture’s unspoken general abandonment of any genuine commitment to the christian faith.
In Twilight of the Idols (1889), it was shown that western philosophers since Socrates represent a degeneration of the natural strengths of humanity. It was made clear that a noble taste for a heroic style of life can only be corrupted and undermined by endless debates using dialectical reason. It was proven that traditional western morality philosophy—and the christian religion in particular—oppose a healthy life, and try vainly to escape unfortunate circumstances by destroying native human desires.
It is only perverse tenacity and cowardice, that encourages us to cling to this outdated servile morality. As a Nietzschean Anarchist I consider it more brave, more honest, and much more noble to cut myself loose and dare to live in a world without god’s authority. In such a world, death is not to be feared, since it represents nothing more significant than the fitting conclusion of a life devoted to personal gain and loss. To voluntary give and take.
To those holding a slave’s mentality, this means nihilism. In the absence of both external human and external mystical authority, the weak-minded fall into despair and conclude there are no rules for human life, no absolute values, no certainties on which to rely.
Rather than grow and evolve, these Homo Pastoralis refuse to become producers and active discoverers of morality, and instead remain frustrated followers with no one to lead them. While this is an unfortunate circumstance, the Nietzschean Anarchist continues apace. If truth can be achieved at all, he reasons, it can come only from such courageous individuals who purposefully disregard everything that is traditionally held to be “important.” It is such an avant-garde of super-human men, the Übermensch, who will succeed in living an authentic and successful human life. For the masses of the slave-minded, these preliminarily successful Übermensch will become the new class to be emulated and applauded, by throngs of imitators who know no other way, but to follow their betters.
In Beyond Good and Evil (1886), and in the quasi-historical account of the harmful consequences of traditional ethics in On the Genealogy of Morals (1887) – “Good” was initially and properly designated only as the right of those individuals with social and political power to live their lives by the sheer force of this will.
This ancient understanding of “Good” was upended by a “priestly” caste, who were motivated by their resentment of their natural superiors. This priest class, including the Paulists that perverted the New Testament, generated a corrupt alternative that appealed to “the herd” of less capable persons.
This mutilated morality effectively turned traditional values inside-out. In this bizarro “slave morality” endorsed by religious establishments, any forceful and timely action which should be admired, instead gets labelled and vilified as “evil,” while the cowardly and feminine tendency to think through everything in advance is transformed into the supposed virtue of prudence.
Genuine autonomy, if you wish to achieve it, means freedom from all external constraints on one’s behavior. In this natural and admirable state of existence, each individual human being lives a life without the artificial limits of moral obligation. No other sanction on conduct is necessary than the natural punishment involved in the victory of a superior person over a vanquished enemy.
The dearest wish of lesser people is to secure themselves against interference from those who are their betters. Due to this natural fear, the inferior enlist the aid of brutally aggressive enforcers which are used to give rise to a false sense of moral responsibility. The natural fear of being overwhelmed by a superior foe then becomes internalized as the self-generated sense of guilt, and individual conscience places severe limits on the normal exercise of human desire.
Thus, the fundamental self-betrayal of the human race is to submit its freedom to the fictitious demands of an imaginary god or imaginary human authority. Afraid to live by the strength of our own wills, we invent religion as a way of generating and then explaining our perpetual sense of being downtrodden and defeated in life.
To live your life as an anarchist, first let go of all solids you think exist. Meditate levitate contemplate in gonzo exaltation exited state and let the liquiding become your fate. Soon your spirit at boil will exist even though still thirty seven celsius.
Yeh Laal Ishq, Yeh Malaal Ishq
Oh This red coloured love, this sorrowful love
Yeh Aib Ishq, Yeh Bair Ishq
This flawed love, this adversarial-like love
Tujh Sang Bair Lagaya Aisa
Love made You an enemy in such a way
Raha Na Main Phir Apne Jaisa
I haven’t been the same since then
Mera Naam Ishq, Tera Naam Ishq
My name is love, Your name is love
Mera Naam, Tera Naam
My name, Your name
Mera Naam Ishq
Our name is love
Apna Naam Badal Doon… Badal Doon…
Should I change my name
Ya Tera Naam Chhupa Loon… Chhupa Loon…
Or should I hide Yours?
Ya Chhod Ke Saari Yaad Main Bairaag Utha Loon
Or should I forget all my memories, and become completely detached
Bas Ek Rahe Mera Kaam Ishq
I just have one job which is to love
Mera Kaam Ishq, Mera Kaam Ishq
My job is to love
Mera Naam Ishq, Tera Naam Ishq
My name is love, Your name is love
Mera Naam, Tera Naam
My name, Your name
Mera Naam Ishq
Our name is love
Yeh Kaali Raat Jakad Loon
Should I catch hold of this dark night?
Yeh Thanda Chaand Pakad Loon
Should I catch hold of this cold Moon?
Din Raat Ke Andheri Bhed Ka
The difference between light in the day and in the night
Rukh Mod Ke Main Rakh Doon
Should I change it?
Tujh Sang Bair Lagaya Aisa
It made You an enemy in such a way
Raha Na Main Phir Apne Jaisa
I haven’t been the same since then
Ho… Raha Na Main Phir Apne Jaisa
I haven’t been the same since then
Libertarian Utopia- Brave the World
Only in the USSA is it illegal to live in a home of your own construction or outdoors due to poverty
Even so, 600,000 are doing so in violation of the law nationwide
Law & Order Leninism – W. Grigg
Forget ‘evil’ Putin – we are the bloodthirsty warmongers
Until this week the Russian people had some hope.
If anyone really is trying to punish the Russian people for being patriotic, by debauching the rouble, I cannot imagine anything more irresponsible. It was the destruction of the German mark in 1922, and the wipeout of the middle class that resulted, which led directly to Hitler.
Stupid, ill-informed people nowadays like to compare Mr Putin with Hitler. I warn them and you that, if we succeed in overthrowing Mr Putin by unleashing hyper-inflation in Russia, we may find out what a Russian Hitler is really like. And that a war in Europe is anything but fun.
So, as it’s almost Christmas, let us sing with some attention that bleakest and yet loveliest of carols, It Came Upon The Midnight Clear, stressing the lines that run ‘Man at war with man hears not the love song which they bring. Oh, hush the noise, ye men of strife, and hear the angels sing’.
Or gloat at your peril over the scenes of panic in Moscow.
Sacred History of Saint Louis Blessed Be the Great Show Me Spirit
The sacred place of Saint Louis was a center of Native American Mississippian culture. The devoted natives built numerous temples and residential earthwork mounds on both sides of the Mississippi River to please the Great Spirit.
Their major regional center was at Cahokia Mounds, active from 900 AD to 1500 AD. The major earthworks within Saint Louis boundaries were the source of the city’s early nickname as the “Mound City.” Historic Native American tribes in the area included the Osage and the Illiniwek.
It then pleased the Great Spirit that European exploration of the area began about 1673, and the divine plan brought French explorers Louis Jolliet and Jacques Marquette to Mississippi River valley.
Five years later, the Holy Spirit handed over title to Yahweh, and said let their be White Men. And let the Red Men serve the White Men. And so it came to pass that La Salle claimed the region for France as part of La Louisiane.
In these earliest European settlements in Illinois Country (aka Upper Louisiana) during the 1690s and early 1700s at Cahokia, Kaskaskia, and Fort de Chartres.
The lord sent migrants from the eastern French villages and the White Men founded Saint Genevieve, Missouri, across the Mississippi River from Kaskaskia.
Early in 1764, after France lost to the British in North America, Pierre Laclède and his stepson Auguste Chouteau founded the city of Saint Louis as foretold in the Book of Rams and the Book of Cardinals.
The early French families built the city’s economy on the fur trade with the Osage, as well as with more distant tribes along the Missouri River. The Great Spirit told them to use African slaves as domestic servants and workers in the city. And so the White Man was now served by the Black Man. And verily the Red Man was no longer needed and wandered off and died, or whatever, the Lord knows not what.
Suddenly a Spanish God – Dios, from 1764 to 1803 took control of the area west of the Mississippi to the northernmost part of the Missouri River basin, called Louisiana. The Great Spirit took a break and Dios ascended and assumed control over Saint Louis as part of the Viceroyalty of New Spain.
So it was written, in the book of Muddy Rios. In 1780 during the American Revolutionary War, Saint. Louis was attacked by British forces, along with mostly Native American allies, and this was recorded in the Good American Gospel as the Battle of Saint Louis.
Finally Saint Louis was transferred back to the Republic of France in 1800, and then sold to the United States in 1803 as part of the Louisiana Purchase. The city became the territorial capital and gateway to the western territory. And verily the new God was an American God. And on his godly head, he wore a Tri-Cornered hat to remind everyone of the Trinity.
Shortly after the purchase, the Lewis and Clark Expedition left Saint Louis in May 1804 to explore the vast territory still to the west of this Gateway Garden of American Eden.
These two exploratory apostles reached the Pacific Ocean in summer 1805, and returned on September 23, 1806 precisely as foretold in the Book of Canoes.
Then the American God said “Let there be Steamboats. And they were, first arriving in 1818, on the wings of the angels. The angels improved and connections with New Orleans and eastern markets.
Missouri was admitted as a state in 1821, in which slavery was legal. The White Man was still given dominion over the Black Man. Because woe to Cain, his progeny were the Black Men.
Immigrants from Ireland and Germany arrived in Saint=. Louis in significant numbers starting in the 1840s, and the population of St. Louis grew from less than 20,000 in 1840, to 77,860 in 1850, to more than 160,000 by 1860. Verily in the book of Numbers, everyone was being fruitful and multiplying. To this day, Saint Louis remains the largest city of the former French Louisiana territory.
In 1904, the city hosted the 1904 World’s Fair and the 1904 Summer Olympics, becoming the first non-European city to host the Olympics. Permanent facilities and structures remaining from the fair are Forest Park, the St. Louis Art Museum, the St. Louis Zoo and the Missouri History Museum.
In the aftermath of emancipation of slaves following the Civil War, social and racial discrimination in housing and employment were common in St. Louis.
Starting in the 1910s, many property deeds included racial or religious restrictive covenants. Like the waters of the Red Sea, the Black Man, the Red Man, and the White Man all remain parted.
If you’re ever wandering alone near Union Station in Saint Louis at night. You may have cause to call out to the Lord. I know I did, in 1993 when a black man emerged from a white sedan and verily, did say these ancient words to me: “Giveth me your money, thou MotherFucker.”
And so it was said, and so I did find myself fleeing from the Lord and his demons of torment. I ran right out in the middle of the street and stayed in the street running all the way back to the Drury Inn. Never did I turn my head, as Lot was once advised and I had read in my children’s bible, so long ago. Lest I become a pillar of salt. Or even an abstract statue filled with lead and all manner of devices intended to make me meet my maker.
Jesus Is An Anarchist- Chris Slavens
Most libertarians and anarchists can point to a few major influences whose writings or speeches seized their attention, and made them want to not only embrace their philosophy, but spread it. Some might point to Lysander Spooner, Murray Rothbard, or Ayn Rand.
Many of my peers point to Ron Paul. And some might point to relatively unknown activists, close friends or distant online acquaintances who challenged their views by offering new ideas about peace and liberty. Several people played a part in shaping my worldview, but one in particular stands out. He was a voluntaryist, a proponent of the non-aggression principle, and also nonviolent resistance. He was a peaceful criminal, guilty of victimless crimes for which he was arrested, imprisoned, tortured, and executed. His name was Jesus.
If you’re still reading, thank you for being open-minded. This is not a sermon, an attempt to convert anyone to Christianity, or even a defense of my religious convictions. This is not about the existence, or nonexistence of God. This is simply an explanation of why I call myself both a Christian and an anarchist, which places me on the fringes of two communities that barely overlap. Most Christians believe that civil authority was established by God, and most anarchists are hostile towards all religion and spirituality. The little they have to say to each other isn’t usually pleasant. I hope to change that.
When I say that I’m a Christian and an anarchist people usually assume that I’ve altered my religious beliefs to suit my political views. Not at all. In fact, just a few years ago I was volunteering for Republican campaigns, and arguing with those irritating anti-government nuts who kept undermining my efforts to get my peers involved in local politics. I favored a limited government, but the idea of no government—a truly free society, a truly free market—seemed ridiculous and undesirable.
My political views changed radically when I began taking my faith seriously, studying the teachings of Jesus, and confronting uncomfortable truths as they became clear. I’m not a Christian and an anarchist in the sense that someone might be a vegetarian as well as a deer hunter. I didn’t mash two philosophies together. I rejected Statism, and all that goes with it, only because I came to believe that it was wildly inconsistent with the teachings and example of Jesus.
To understand why Statism is incompatible with true Christianity one must first understand the Bible. Despite a popular Christian tradition which holds the Bible to be the Word of God, divinely spoken into the minds of scribes, and divinely preserved through centuries of copying and translating, I doubt that many of the men who wrote its many books believed that. Paul, traditionally believed to have authored fourteen of the twenty-seven books in the New Testament, would probably be horrified to hear an American preacher refer to one of his letters as the Word of God.
Even the traditional titles of some of the books seem to challenge this doctrine. The Gospel According to Saint Matthew is followed by The Gospel According to Saint Mark, The Gospel According to Saint Luke, and The Gospel According to Saint John. Surely God would not speak slightly different versions of the same events into four writers’ minds.
One of the consequences of the Word of God doctrine is that all of the passages in the Bible are considered equally authoritative. Scholars and theologians have struggled for centuries to explain apparent contradictions, and devise a consistent Christian doctrine, but they’ve only succeeded in convincing Christians to overlook certain biblical teachings in favor of others. For example, Jesus taught his followers not to injure those who injured them, yet most Christian denominations prefer Genesis 9, in which Noah and his descendants are instructed to kill anyone who commits murder.
On the one occasion that Jesus was present at a public execution, he not only refused to participate, but put a stop to it, rescuing the condemned woman. Yet many Christians enthusiastically support capital punishment.
Skeptics who criticize the Bible’s seeming inconsistencies are no better. Asking a Christian why they aren’t carrying out the violent punishments prescribed in the ancient Jewish book of Leviticus is like calling a Heinlein fan a hypocrite because Asimov’s fiction contains different ideas. The compilation of several books, stories, or teachings in a single volume doesn’t make them a single work. A follower of Jesus reads the Book of Leviticus to better understand the religious history of the Jews, not to find support for execution and other violent punishments.
I think of my interpretation of the Bible as the Jesus First doctrine. I read all of the books for various reasons, but the accounts of Jesus’s life are vastly more important than the rest, and on several occasions he challenged traditional Jewish beliefs. The Book of Proverbs is full of practical wisdom, but I’m not a Solomonian. Paul’s letters to the earliest churches contain valuable insights about Christian living, but so do C. S. Lewis’s writings, and I worship neither Paul nor Lewis. I follow Jesus Christ.
But what does it mean to follow Jesus? What did he ask of his followers? What is a Jesus-centered philosophy?
If I had to choose a single passage of any written work to base my life upon, I would probably choose the Sermon on the Mount. The most complete version is found in Matthew 5-7. It features some of Jesus’s most radical teachings, including nonviolent resistance, love for enemies, and the Golden Rule—treat others the way you want to be treated. (Just to be clear, I’m not preaching pacifism.
The morality of self-defense is far from a settled issue in the Christian community, or in my own mind.) Because the Golden Rule goes a step farther than the non-aggression principle, which could be paraphrased “treat others the way you want to be treated, unless they initiate force,” it follows that Jesus would not approve of the initiation of force in any situation.
Government as we know it is inherently violent. It cannot exist without threatening, robbing, caging, and killing. None of the pawns who carry out the State’s many punishments want to be treated the way they treat others. Clearly, Statism is utterly incompatible with the Golden Rule.
It was with this truth in mind that the Russian novelist Leo Tolstoy wrote:
“All State obligations are against the conscience of a Christian—the oath of allegiance, taxes, law proceedings, and military service. And the whole power of the government rests on these very obligations. Revolutionary enemies attack the government from without. Christianity does not attack it at all, but, from within, it destroys all the foundations on which government rests.”
As if that wasn’t clear enough, a few pages later he stated:
“Christianity in its true sense puts an end to government…no honest and serious-minded man of our day can help seeing the incompatibility of true Christianity—the doctrine of meekness, forgiveness of injuries, and love—with government, with its pomp, acts of violence, executions, and wars. The profession of true Christianity not only excludes the possibility of recognizing government, but even destroys its very foundations.”
This view isn’t very popular with American Christians, but it is shared by a minority. Many Mennonites (including the Amish) submit to civil authority rather than support it, and refuse to participate in politics, or recite the Pledge of Allegiance. They might not think of themselves as libertarians or anarchists, but their lives are governed by the non-aggression principle, which they find in Jesus’s teachings. For centuries they have peacefully resisted governments for as long as possible, and emigrated to friendlier jurisdictions when oppression became too much to endure. Throughout history, other Christian denominations have challenged the State, and preached non-aggression, including the early Quakers, and some of the early Methodists.
Today there is a small but growing group of people who believe in God, and look to the Bible for truth, but, like many libertarians, regard the non-aggression principle as a natural law, and have dedicated their lives to peacefully sharing this message with a society that desperately needs it.
I’m not a member of any specific Christian denomination, and I’m not inviting anyone to join one. However, I am inviting libertarians—especially the skeptical majority—to revisit the teachings of Jesus with an open mind. Perhaps, unlike me, you don’t believe in God. Perhaps, unlike me, you won’t choose to become a Christian. But perhaps, like me, you’ll come to think of Jesus as an influential anarchist, as well as a religious figure, and you and I can meet on that middle ground, agree to disagree on other issues, and accomplish more together than we ever imagined.
I think Yeshua allows for self defense. The phrase ‘turn the other cheek’ refers to a humiliating blow, not a damaging one. When He sent the disciples out, He told them to take a sword, and if they did not have one, to sell a garment to buy one. This implies as least the threat of self defense. I for one would have no problem defending my family or others depending on me, even though I would consider NOT defending myself if I thought God would get greater glory.
Chris seems to look at things much from the same perspective that I do. I can relate to how he feels.
I would say that the book of Mormon goes into more depth about the anarchic character of Jesus. But humans–being weak and unwilling to learn from past folly–demand kings, presidents, magistrates and other such rulers. Hence the cycles of freedom to bondage, over and over and over.
By my belief in God, He gave us free agency. We choose bondage rather than freedom. At some point we pay the consequences of that choice. God made us free. We give that freedom away for pathetic lies of “safety, peace, and comfort”. All of which is actually barbaric bondage if viewed honestly.
Most people try to run their minds using Direct Current. This means a single type of thought going in a single direction. Secular. Religious. or Egoist.
I try to run my mind using Alternating Current. This means simultaneous cycles of all three kinds of thought in which the flow of thought periodically reverses direction. My mind is secular, religious, and egoist all at the same time and going in different directions during each thought cycle.
Direct Current is a simpler technology you don’t need calculus to implement and comprehend, but it can’t be used over long distances the way Alternating Current can.
If I were to make a bible, I would discard every work of the Apostle Saul/Paul and at the end of the New Testament I would add the books of Mormon. I would refer to this section the same way as the Mormons do which is: “Another Testament of Jesus Christ.”
I would also include some version of the actual life of the prophet Muhammad and chronicle the major events that have taken place in the last 1,800 years since the New Testament was written.
14 Helaman 30
“Cheer up your hearts, and remember that ye are free to act for yourselves.” – 2 Nephi 10:23
The traditional family is believed to be the ideal setting, but of course is not to be tyrannically imposed.
Many believe the safest place to raise your children is in a gospel centered home.
Freedom of religion or belief goes both ways. It is important to support the freedom to believe regardless of how you might feel about one topic or another. Do not confuse the support of the freedom with an acceptance of others’ beliefs. A tyrant forces others to believe as they do. The wonderful commandment from the Lord is one of love and kindness. Though we may disagree, we should not be disagreeable.
Transgender story linked to LDS Libertarian page with caption: “Here is some food for thought.”
Following your duties as a man is never an excuse to permit the loss of liberty.
The stripling warriors provide a powerful example of moral courage: “They were men who were true at all times in whatsoever thing they were entrusted. Yea, they were men of truth and soberness, for they had been taught to keep the commandments of God and to walk uprightly before him.” – Alma 53:20-21
Young River Tam explaining why the Browncoats fight
Hispanics are the second largest libertarian demographic. An LDS libertarian says “I’m not that surprised. I served a mission among Hispanics in the United States. As with many missionaries I gained a profound love and respect for the people I served. This was one of my reasons for becoming a libertarian. Both major parties miss the point with immigration and nether want to offer real solutions. Democrats use race to build social walls between American cultures and Republicans want to build walls between nations.
Most Hispanics are stuck in a state of political limbo. Libertarians need to fill this space. Not only because liberty should always be taught but Hispanics are the future of America. Right now they have to choose between a party that wants them gone as many see it or a party that patronizes and hands out lip service. Some times unpopular topics are hard to swallow. Just remember nether God nor liberty have borders.”
“We will all face fear, experience ridicule, and meet opposition. Let us–all of us–have the courage to defy the consensus, the courage to stand for principle. Courage, not compromise, brings the smile of God’s approval. Courage becomes a living and an attractive virtue when it is regarded not only as a willingness to die manfully but also as the determination to live decently.”
I am an intransigent atheist, but not a militant one. This means that I am an uncompromising advocate of reason and that I am fighting for reason, not against religion. I must also mention that I do respect religion in its philosophical aspects, in the sense that it represents an early form of philosophy.
Ayn Rand, to a Catholic Priest.
– – –
“As a human being, you have no choice about the fact that you need a philosophy. Your only choice is whether you define your philosophy by a conscious, rational, disciplined process of thought and scrupulously logical deliberation—or let your subconscious accumulate a junk heap of unwarranted conclusions, false generalizations, undefined contradictions, undigested slogans, unidentified wishes, doubts and fears, thrown together by chance, but integrated by your subconscious into a kind of mongrel philosophy and fused into a single, solid weight: self-doubt, like a ball and chain in the place where your mind’s wings should have grown.”
– – –
Address To West Point Graduating Class Of 1974 – Ayn Rand
The best way to study philosophy is to approach it as one approaches a detective story: follow every trail, clue and implication, in order to discover who is a murderer and who is a hero. The criterion of detection is two questions: Why? and How? If a given tenet seems to be true — why? If another tenet seems to be false — why? and how is it being put over? You will not find all the answers immediately, but you will acquire an invaluable characteristic: the ability to think in terms of essentials.
Nothing is given to man automatically, neither knowledge, nor self-confidence, nor inner serenity, nor the right way to use his mind. Every value he needs or wants has to be discovered, learned and acquired — even the proper posture of his body. In this context, I want to say that I have always admired the posture of West Point graduates, a posture that projects man in proud, disciplined control of his body. Well, philosophical training gives man the proper intellectual posture — a proud, disciplined control of his mind.
In your own profession, in military science, you know the importance of keeping track of the enemy’s weapons, strategy and tactics — and of being prepared to counter them. The same is true in philosophy: you have to understand the enemy’s ideas and be prepared to refute them, you have to know his basic arguments and be able to blast them.
In physical warfare, you would not send your men into a booby trap: you would make every effort to discover its location. Well, Kant’s system is the biggest and most intricate booby trap in the history of philosophy — but it’s so full of holes that once you grasp its gimmick, you can defuse it without any trouble and walk forward over it in perfect safety. And, once it is defused, the lesser Kantians — the lower ranks of his army, the philosophical sergeants, buck privates, and mercenaries of today — will fall of their own weightlessness, by chain reaction.
There is a special reason why you, the future leaders of the United States Army, need to be philosophically armed today. You are the target of a special attack by the Kantian-Hegelian-collectivist establishment that dominates our cultural institutions at present.
You are the army of the last semi-free country left on earth, yet you are accused of being a tool of imperialism — and “imperialism” is the name given to the foreign policy of this country, which has never engaged in military conquest and has never profited from the two world wars, which she did not initiate, but entered and won. (It was, incidentally, a foolishly overgenerous policy, which made this country waste her wealth on helping both her allies and her former enemies.) Something called “the military-industrial complex” — which is a myth or worse — is being blamed for all of this country’s troubles.
Bloody college hoodlums scream demands that R.O.T.C. units be banned from college campuses. Our defense budget is being attacked, denounced and undercut by people who claim that financial priority should be given to ecological rose gardens and to classes in aesthetic self-expression for the residents of the slums.
Some of you may be bewildered by this campaign and may be wondering, in good faith, what errors you committed to bring it about. If so, it is urgently important for you to understand the nature of the enemy. You are attacked, not for any errors or flaws, but for your virtues. You are denounced, not for any weaknesses, but for your strength and your competence. You are penalized for being the protectors of the United States.
On a lower level of the same issue, a similar kind of campaign is conducted against the police force. Those who seek to destroy this country, seek to disarm it — intellectually and physically. But it is not a mere political issue; politics is not the cause, but the last consequence of philosophical ideas. It is not a communist conspiracy, though some communists may be involved — as maggots cashing in on a disaster they had no power to originate. The motive of the destroyers is not love for communism, but hatred for America. Why hatred? Because America is the living refutation of a Kantian universe.
Today’s mawkish concern with and compassion for the feeble, the flawed, the suffering, the guilty, is a cover for the profoundly Kantian hatred of the innocent, the strong, the able, the successful, the virtuous, the confident, the happy. A philosophy out to destroy man’s mind is necessarily a philosophy of hatred for man, for man’s life, and for every human value. Hatred of the good for being the good, is the hallmark of the twentieth century. This is the enemy you are facing.
A battle of this kind requires special weapons. It has to be fought with a full understanding of your cause, a full confidence in yourself, and the fullest certainty of the moral rightness of both. Only philosophy can provide you with these weapons.
The assignment I gave myself for tonight is not to sell you on my philosophy, but on philosophy as such. I have, however, been speaking implicitly of my philosophy in every sentence — since none of us and no statement can escape from philosophical premises.
What is my selfish interest in the matter? I am confident enough to think that if you accept the importance of philosophy and the task of examining it critically, it is my philosophy that you will come to accept. Formally, I call it Objectivism, but informally I call it a philosophy for living on earth. You will find an explicit presentation of it in my books, particularly in Atlas Shrugged.
In conclusion, allow me to speak in personal terms. This evening means a great deal to me. I feel deeply honored by the opportunity to address you. I can say — not as a patriotic bromide, but with full knowledge of the necessary metaphysical, epistemological, ethical, political and esthetic roots — that the United States of America is the greatest, the noblest and, in its original founding principles, the only moral country in the history of the world.
There is a kind of quiet radiance associated in my mind with the name West Point — because you have preserved the spirit of those original founding principles and you are their symbol. There were contradictions and omissions in those principles, and there may be in yours — but I am speaking of the essentials. There may be individuals in your history who did not live up to your highest standards — as there are in every institution — since no institutions and no social system can guarantee the automatic perfection of all its members; this depends on an individual’s free will. I am speaking of your standards. You have preserved three qualities of character which were typical at the time of America’s birth, but are virtually nonexistent today: earnestness — dedication — a sense of honor. Honor is self-esteem made visible in action.
You have chosen to risk your lives for the defense of this country. I will not insult you by saying that you are dedicated to selfless service — it is not a virtue in my morality. In my morality, the defense of one’s country means that a man is personally unwilling to live as the conquered slave of any enemy, foreign or domestic. This is an enormous virtue. Some of you may not be consciously aware of it. I want to help you to realize it.
The army of a free country has a great responsibility: the right to use force, but not as an instrument of compulsion and brute conquest — as the armies of other countries have done in their histories — only as an instrument of a free nation’s self-defense, which means: the defense of a man’s individual rights. The principle of using force only in retaliation against those who initiate its use, is the principle of subordinating might to right. The highest integrity and sense of honor are required for such a task. No other army in the world has achieved it. You have.
West Point has given America a long line of heroes, known and unknown. You, this year’s graduates, have a glorious tradition to carry on — which I admire profoundly, not because it is a tradition, but because it is glorious.
Since I came from a country guilty of the worst tyranny on earth, I am particularly able to appreciate the meaning, the greatness and the supreme value of that which you are defending. So, in my own name and in the name of many people who think as I do, I want to say, to all the men of West Point, past, present and future: Thank you.
1_What’s the difference between Paul Walker and a computer? I give a fuck when my computer crashes.
2_My Grandpa said, “Your generation relies too much on technology!” I replied, “No, your generation relies too much on technology!” Then I unplugged his life support.
3_What do you call a five year old with no friends? A sandy hook survivor.
4_Jesus Christ fed 2,000 people with 5 loaves of bread and 2 fish, but Adolf Hitler made 6 million Jews toast.
5_What’s the worst thing about breaking up with a Japanese girl? You have to drop the bomb twice before she gets the message.
6_What’s got 5 arms, 3 legs and 2 feet? The finish line at the Boston Marathon.
7_What did the boy with no hands get for Christmas? GLOVES! Nah, just kidding… He still hasn’t unwrapped his present.
8_How do Ethiopians celebrate their kids first birthday? By putting flowers on the grave.
9_How did Rihanna find out Chris Brown was cheating on her? She found another woman’s lipstick on his knuckles.
10_How can you tell if your wife is dead? The sex is the same but the dishes start piling up.
11_Why do Mexicans never have Sex Ed. and Driver’s Ed. on the same day? They have to give the donkey a break at some point.
12_What’s the difference between a 4 year old boy and a bag of cocaine? Eric Clapton wouldn’t let a bag of cocaine fall out a window
13_So I suggested to my wife that she’d look sexier with her hair back… Which is apparently an insensitive thing to say to a cancer patient.
14_Most black 15 year-olds in this country are decent, law abiding citizens. It’s their kids who cause all the trouble.
15_How many feminists does it take to change a light bulb? Don’t be stupid, feminists can’t change anything.
16_What is a pedophiles favorite part about Halloween? Free delivery.
17_So I painted my laptop black, hoping it would run faster… Now it doesn’t work.
18_How do you kill a redneck? Wait ’till he fucks his sister then cut the brakes on his house.
19_What’s the difference between a gay man and a freezer? Freezer doesn’t fart when you pull the meat out.
20_What do you tell a woman with two black eyes? Nothing you already done told her twice.
21_How do you fit 4 queers on a barstool? Flip it upside-down.
22_Why do Jews have big noses? Because air is free.
23_What happened when the jew walked into the wall with a hard-on? He broke his nose.
24_How long does it take for a black woman to take a shit? Nine months.
25_How do you get a nun pregnant? Dress her up like an altarboy.
26_What do you call 40 mexicans buried up to their neck in sand? A spicket fence.
27_How many women does it take to screw in a lightbulb? None,they just sit in the dark and bitch.
28_Did you hear about the two car pile up in Mexico? 200 Mexicans died.
29_What kind of file do you need to turn a 15mm hole into a 40mm hole? A pedophile.
30_What’s a pedophile’s favorite part of a hockey game? Before the First Period.
31_How do you swat 200 flies at one time? Hit an Ethiopian in the face with a frying pan.
32_What is a redneck virgin? A seven year old that can run faster than her brothers.
33_How many feminists does it take to change a light bulb? One, she just holds the bulb to the socket and waits for the world to revolve around her.
34_Girls are like blackjack… I’m trying to go for 21 but I always hit on 14.
35_Why does Stephen Hawking do one-liners? Because he can’t do stand up.
36_Did you hear the Score of the Egypt vs Ethiopia soccer game? Egypt 8, Ethiopia didn’t.
37_How many cops does it take to change a light bulb? They don’t. They arrest the bulb for being broke and beat the room for being black.
38_What’s 9 inches long, pink, and makes my girlfriend scream when I put it in her mouth? Her miscarriage.
39_A Jew, a black, and a Muslim are on a frozen lake, not talking to each other, so I thought I would go over there and break the ice.
40_What’s difference between dollars and Jews? I’d give a shit if I lost 6 million dollars.
41_How does a black woman know she is pregnant? When she pulls her tampon out the cotton is already picked.
42_Whats the difference between George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin? Zimmerman knew how to dodge a bullet.
43_One time I fucked this chick so hard, she almost came back to life
44_I don’t understand why Obama has to give his speeches behind bullet proof glass. I mean,I know he’s black and all, but I doubt he’ll shoot anyone.
45_What’s the difference between a Jew and harry potter? Harry can escape the chamber.
46_What do you call a woman who thinks she can do anything a man can do? Wrong.
47_Whats the difference between a hippie chick and a hockey player? A hockey player showers after 3 periods.
48_What’s the difference between cancer and Black people? Cancer got Jobs.
49_Have you ever had Ethiopian food? Neither have they.
50_What’s a word that white people can call white people, but black people can’t call black people? Dad.
51_What do you say when you see your T.V. floating in the middle of the night? Drop it nigger!!
52_Whats the difference between a truckload of bowling balls and a truckload of dead babies? I can’t unload a truckload of bowling balls with a pitchfork
53_How do you blindfold a Chinese man? Dental floss!
54_Why are black people so fast? Because all the slow one are in the jail.
55_What’s the difference between a drug dealer and a hooker? A hooker can wash her crack and sell it again.
56_Why do brides wear a white dress? So that the dishwasher matches the washing machine.
57_What do you call a bunch of black people running down a hill? A jail break.
58_What’s faster than a nigga stealing your TV? His brother with your xbox.
59_What’s the toughest thing about eating bald pussy? Putting the diaper back on.
60_What do you call an ethiopian with a bag of rice? A restaurant owner
61_How can you tell if a nigga is pregnant? Have her squat on a watermelon and check it for teeth marks.
62_What’s 7 inches long and hasn’t been sucked in over 2 years? Whitney Houston’s crack pipe
63_What’s the difference between a 4 year old boy and a bag of cocaine? Eric Clapton wouldn’t let a bag of cocaine fall out a window
64_What’s the difference between a woman and a computer? You can punch information into a computer.
65_How do you make a gay fuck a woman? Shit in her cunt.
66_What’s better than winning a gold medal at the Special Olympics? Not being retarded.
67_What does a nigga and an apple have in common? Both look great hanging from a tree.
68_the parents of the sandy hook victims should of kept the Christmas receipts.
69_ Have you ever had Ethiopian food? Neither have they.
70_ How do you start a rave in Ethiopia? Staple food to the ceiling.
71_ Why don’t black people go on cruises? They’re not falling for that one again.
72_What’s the most confusing day in Detroit? Father’s day.
Q. How can you tell when a polish woman is on the rag?
A. She is only wearing one sock.
Q. What do most polish women die from?
A. toxic sock syndrome.
75_What’s the difference between a pair of jeans and an ethiopian? A pair of jeans only has one fly on it.
77_What’s faster than a speeding bullet? A jew with a coupon.
78_How did Hitler kill so many Jews? Free transportation
79_What’s the difference between a baby and a watermelon? One is fun to shoot and the other is fun to eat.
80_How do you stop a baby from crawling in circles? Nail it’s other hand to the floor.
Q:Whats black and eats pussy?
82_How do you get a dead baby out of a blender? Nachos.
83_How do you stop a Mexican tank? You shoot the guy pushing it.
84_I just gave my sister head. First time eating cheese.
86_Why can’t you fool an aborted baby? Cause it wasn’t born yesterday.
87_Why did Hitler kill himself? He got the gas bill.
88_How do you turn a fruit into a vegetable? AIDS.
90_How does a black woman fight crime? She gets an abortion.
91_How do you drown a nigga? You pop their lips.
92_Why can’t Mexicans play UNO? They steal all of green cards.
93_What’s the worst thing about being black and Jewish? Having to sit in the back of the oven.
95_What do fat chicks and bricks have in common? They both get laid by Mexicans.
96_What’s pale, white, and bounces up and down in a baby’s crib? A pedophile’s ass.
99_What’s the difference between a nigger and a pile of dog shit? Eventually the pile of dog shit will turn white and stop stinking.
100_What’s the difference between jelly and jam? I can’t jelly my dick down a baby’s throat.
101_What’s better than winning the WNBA championship? Peeing standing up
102_What do a nigger and a sperm have in common? Both have a one in a million chance of becoming a human being.
103_I saw a black man walking down the street carrying a tv. And i thought to myself “huh, that one looks a lot like mine.” Then i remembered mine was at hone, shining my shoes.
Larken Rose 17 hrs ago facebook account
While I’m doing pet peeves of stupid arguments that people make to defend jackboots, how about the “but he had a wife and kids!” routine? Since when is having a family a free pass to do whatever evil crap you want without any consequences?
Yes, it’s very sad for the family of some sadistic fascist asshole that they had a husband or father who was like that. But it’s a little daft to argue, “You should let him keep assaulting and/or murdering innocent people–who, by the way, also have families–because otherwise his kids will be sad!”
If you’re a cop who wants to make it home at night, then DON’T ACT LIKE A GODDAMN NAZI!
It seems, you used to have your site more spam proof. If you dilly dallied to long to post, you’d go into moderation, and other safeguards that’ll be listed below. I think 10% of my brain is spam, so I’m immune to it, but I can see how frustrating it must be for you normals.
Maybe its unclear, I post in ways bending my reality and play the villain much as a comedian does, just so I can more objectively approach sensitive topics.
But of course, I understand you’re just a regular guy, trying to earn an honest living, and this forum shouldn’t be run for the benefit of spammers or amateur comedians.
WordPress Stop Spammers Plugin
Stop Spammers is an aggressive spam plugin that stops spam registrations, logins and comments using multiple checks.
It looks for typical spammer bad behaviors and blocks those. It blocks access to users who anonymize their browsers, and it checks how long it takes to fill in a comment or login form and blocks users who are too fast.
The plugin is extremely aggressive and makes no apologies for occasionally blocking users who do not behave well. It will block users who install anonymizing plugins or turn off headers and cookies.
Normal users will never know the plugin has been installed. The plugin installs “honeypots” to fool spammers into leaving spam with a hidden form, where they will be marked as a spammer and blocked.
The plugin is not active as long as your site is being browsed so that it does not block content, but only kicks in if a form is submitted. When a spammer is detected, their address is added to a temporary cache so that future attempts are immediately blocked without having to recheck the spammer all over again.
The plugin checks known spammer hosts such as Ubiquity Servers, disposable email addresses, very long email address and names, and HTTP_ACCEPT header.
White List Requests: When a user is denied access to login, registration or comments, they are presented with a form which allows them to notify the Admin user that they wish to be allowed into the site. Spammers usually do not fill out the form, or if they do, it will be filled in with spam. When the user presses the submit button, the admin will get an email and can then white list the user so that the person will have access to the site.
The admin should also clear the cache (on the stop spammer history settings page) and then the user will have access to the site.
The Stop Spammers plugin keeps a count of the spammers that it has blocked and displays this on the WordPress dashboard. It also displays the last hits on email or IP and it also shows a history of the times it has made a check, showing rejections, passing emails and errors. When there is data to display there will also be a button to clear out the data. You can control the size of the list and clear the history. If a user tries to log in and passes all checks for spammers an icon appears next to the IP address. Only users you know should be allowed to login, so by clicking the icon, you can add the IP to your black list.
The Stop Spammers plugin keeps track of a number of spammer emails and IP addresses in a cache to avoid pinging databases more often than necessary. The results are saved and displayed.
You can control the length of the cache list and clear it at any time. The plugin caches IP addresses that do not fail, assuming that they may be valid users. In order to prevent re-checking these IP addresses, the plugin stores the last two IP addresses that passed all tests. Persistent spammers, who pass once, may be placed in the good cache allowing them access to comments for a short while. If this happens then the cache should be cleared to force a recheck on the spammer.
Marc Stevens quotes and law power questions.
“A ‘law’ is the ‘written will’ of some men and some women.”
“The law is nothing more than an opinion or belief by one man, or a body of men, backed by violence and a gun.”
“Violence is the means by which the irrational get the rational to act.”
“A ‘government’ is a body of men and women doing business using physical violence and coercion under the political banner of ‘necessity.’ ”
Ask the judge: “What facts are currently before you proving where, when, why and how the written will of individuals, ostensibly labelled ‘legislators,’ became applicable, binding or obligatory on me?”
“How is an ‘act of parliament’ a complaining party? What obligation do I owe, and how did I damage an alleged ‘act of parliament?’ ”
“The ‘state’ is not a natural phenomenon. It is man-made and exists only in the mind.”
Whether the ‘law’ is binding or not is really a ‘jurisdiction’ issue; so ask “Except for coercion, exactly where, when, why and how was your control over my life acquired?”
“It is far more effective to ask a judge: “Explain factually where, when, why and how your so-called ‘jurisdiction’ over me was acquired?”
“Is your jurisdiction based on my consent?”
Ask a judge: “Do you equate violence and coercion with fairness and good faith?”
“Everything being used against you is supposed to be subject to challenge.”
“Using so-called ‘evidence’ not subject to challenge is not a trial in any sense of the word.”
“If I have to accept opinions without challenge then what is the point of having a trial under any circumstances?”
“The testimony of a witness concerning a particular matter is inadmissable unless he has personal knowledge of the matter.”
“Is this civil case in the nature of a contract dispute or a tort?”
“A so-called ‘civil’ cause of action can only fall into one of two categories: contract or tort.”
“There must be a ‘meeting of the minds’ for there to be a contract. For an enforceable contract to exist there must be: offer, acceptance, consideration and sufficient specifications of terms so that obligations involved can be ascertained.” – Savoca Masonary Co., Inc. v Homes * Son Const. Co., Inc.
“For a valid contract dispute to exist there must be evidence of both a loss and a wrong (to bring a cause of action).”
“For there to be a cause of action there must be both: 1) the breach of a duty and, 2) actual damages.”
“A ’cause of action’ is a breach of known ‘legal’ duty (right of life, liberty or property) that results in injury, loss or harm.”
“A cause of action is supposed to require the breach of duty resulting in damage.”
Ask the judge: “Is there evidence of a cause of action against me?”
Ask the judge: “What facts are his ”legal’ opinions based on?”
“A ‘tort’ consists of two elements: the breach of a duty and damage.”
“Are there any allegations of damage here?”
“There are no binding ‘rules’ for bureaucrats because they just don’t follow the ‘rules’ – until you sue.”
” ‘Traffic court’ is a matter of obedience, domination and money, not a matter of safety, fairness and justice.”
“It is a fantasy to think people are damaged if I don’t have I.D. on me.”
“Violence is the modus operandi of bureaucrats. Just imagine what compliance would be like if they could not use violence.”
“Force cannot give right.” – Thomas Jefferson.
“Bureaucrats don’t create value, they only take it.”
“Bureaucrats feed off the productive.”
Ask a bureaucrat if they require your permission to ‘proceed’ against you.”
“Bureaucrats in the geographic area known as the ‘United States’ or ‘Australia’ put a pretense of legitimacy.”
“This pretense, or public relations scheme conceals what is really going on: the taking of money, property and productive time through coercion and violence.”
“Political words and opinions are used so there is a perception that politicians and bureaucrats are a wonderful, benevolent group of men and women ‘protecting’ people and their property.”
“No man’s life, liberty and property are safe while the legislature is in session” – Mark Twain.
“In ‘Legal Land’ a political label magically transforms robbery into something ‘honorable.’ It’s a magical word where facts are opinions and opinions are facts.”
“Reality = facts. Additions, deletions and distortions = opinions/beliefs.”
“Every time a politician or bureaucrat spews forth an opinion or belief he is deleting, distorting and, or adding to reality.”
” ‘Legal Land’ words cover up the real issue and distort reality. That reality is someone is taking your money and property through physical violence, threats and organized coercion.”
“When you assume or accept presumptions and opinions (delete, distort, add to reality), you relieve the bureaucrats of their alleged burden of proof and make the taking of your valuable time and money easier for them.”
“The only real difference between what the men and women doing business as the ATO do, and what a common thief does is the political opinion (label) attached, i.e. one is ‘legal’ and the other is not.”
“If taxation without consent is not robbery, then any band of robbers have only to declare themselves a government, and all their robberies are legalized.” – Lysander Spooner. Letter to Grover Cleveland.
“What is the basis for the alleged “power to tax”? It’s the so-called “constitution.” The “constitution” is unsigned pieces of paper. If there is an alleged “obligation”, then it must be based on the “constitution.” What facts are there to prove those pieces of paper created this alleged “obligation”? If you think there are facts to prove an “obligation” to pay “taxes” exists, then factually prove it.”
“What will those anti-social parasites (politicians & bureaucrats) do when millions of people just decide not to file anymore? When millions of people start working for themselves and refuse to aid in the robbery of their fellow man’s money by acting as “withholding agents?” Imagine millions of people refusing to help rape and plunder their fellow man by “issuing” those stupid GST and income tax return forms.”
“For those who think “governments” are “necessary”, let me ask this question, it’s a yes or no answer only. Should a service or product be provided using coercion or at the barrel of a gun? Unless you’re a psychopath, the answer is no. And that is how “governments” operate. Instead of bringing their talents and services to the market like normal people, they provide them on a violent ‘pay us or get fined, imprisoned or shot’ basis.”
“Having courts, lawyers and opinions does nothing to make robbery any less of a crime.”
“It is undeniable a so-called “Supreme Court justice” is just a lawyer. Do the lawyers pretending to be a “Supreme Court” provide their services on a voluntary basis? Of course not; if you don’t pay their salary you are fined, imprisoned and, or have your property stolen. Now, is it reasonable to trust someone who thinks you should be fined or imprisoned for not paying a lawyer you never hired?”
“Political voting accomplishes nothing productive and only gives legitimacy to a gang of killers, thieves and liars; men and women incapable or unwilling to provide a service people will voluntarily pay for. The people who vote politically have no power because they have no real choice whether or not they want the services provided by government. Political democracy is a scam; it’s called a false choice.”
“You cannot really ‘win’ against bureaucrats. It’s all about damage control.”
“Justice and fairness is not the end goal of bureaucrats. The end goal is domination and taking money and property by force. Their purpose is to steal as much money and property as ‘legally’ possible, using the least amount of violence and coercion.”
“Never give bureaucrats something to deny. By simply agreeing with bureaucrats and asking them to provide the facts their opinions and beliefs are based on sets them up for a fall. Pit the bureaucrat against himself.”
“Feed the bureaucrats’ testimony back to them in question form and then sit back and watch it fall apart.”
Here are two spammer assholes who just registered as “new subscribers” :
email@example.com Subscriber 0
Select RoyceStable RoyceStable
How ’bout it, Tor?
I spend a good hour every day dealing with these bastards. I’d love to shit down their throats.
the nokia mail guy uses at least 9 different names. he’s pretty good. his scripts/tricks have got him in lots of databases as a legit user, client
are you able to just block ALL nokiamail.com addresses in bulk.
there’s a lot of spam shit sandwich makers using that domain
it’s unnerving that there’s a David @ 10904 Pinehurst Dr in Austin who’s part of the stratfor email hack. Why was this address posted? Might mean any number of things, but keep an eye out. Not the Long Island Baptist David, but the new one.
“Nov 15, 2013 – I just took a one year subscription to Stratfor. I would like the book to be sent to. David Drapela 10904 Pinehurst Dr Austin, Texas”
What if you did an asymmetric ban list.
No one can use the word sale (we’d just get used to using sail) or phone. (need to use fawn). Can’t use man(only mang is allowed) block the use of any greetings: hi, dear, friend, hello.
You should block “topic.” “blog” “blogging” “cheap” “help” “advice” “website” your spammers love these words.
Might be a cool thing to do. If you want to get thru here, need to purposely misspell a lot of common words, spammers won’t be in on this.
email spam trigger words
blog spam most common words
#1 100% satisfied
4U Accept credit cards
Act Now! Additional Income
Affordable All natural
Apply online Bargain
Best price Billing address
Buy direct Call free
Can’t live without
Accepted Cents on the dollar
Check Claims Click / Click Here / Click Below
Click to remove Compare rates
Congratulations Cost / No cost
Dear friend Do it today
Extra income For free
Form Free and FREE installation leads membership
offer preview website Full refund
Get it now Giving away
Guarantee Here Hidden
Increase sales traffic
Information you requested Insurance
Investment / no investment Investment decision
Legal Lose Marketing
Message contains Money Month trial offer
Name brand Never
No gimmicks No Hidden Costs
No-obligation Now Offer
One time / one-time
Order Now / Order today / Order status
Orders shipped by priority mail
Performance Phone Please read
Pre-approved Price Print out and fax
Profits Real thing
Removal instructions Remove Risk free Sales
Save $ Save up to Search engines See for yourself
Serious cash Solution Special promotion
Success The following form
Unsolicited Unsubscribe Urgent US dollars
Wife Win Winner Work at home
Thanks, Tor – I’ll try some of those suggestions. Meanwhile, this bastard just signed up”:
The bigdresses. pw one should be easy. Just block the French IP address range 195.154.180.xxx
184.108.40.206 appears in spam database 93 times
Current country of origin: France France
It uses bigdresses. pw, cdressesea. com
It’s a Toxic IP address or “bad” email domain
– – – –
Sometimes a person needs to get a taste of his own medicine”. The worse is when the spam message comes from a real person, rather than a spam robot. We’re used to spam robots doing what spam robots do, but we have higher expectations of our fellow human beings.
When you have revengeful feelings towards email spammers. You start to inquire, how does one spam the spammer—not the “big spamming conglomerates” , but the individuals who has breaches your blogs.
Why not post the spammer’s email address and/or IP on the internet, where other robots will find it and feed it to the spam machine. Especially in open forum Russian and other slavic sites, because in those lands, there are born more spam geniuses than the rest of the planet combined.
While using a little cloaking, I’ve let all your spammers know this message is sent to lots of email/IP scraper havens:
“Hi, this person has been in touch with me and I think they might hearing more about the following products:
Justin Bieber merchandise, t-shirts, clothing, apparel, hoodies, sweatshirts, Justin Bieiber high quality sex dolls, Dongs & Dildos: Huge Dildos, Anal Dildos, anal plugs, big, giant, and massive dildos, double dildos, Kong Dongs, Anal Beads, butt plugs, anal lubes, strap ons, anal douche, vibrating anal toys& Justin Bieber’s music.”
Don’t be shy, anyone here is free to do the same for these spam merchants.
Here’s another two – just “subscribed” within the last 5 minutes:
firstname.lastname@example.org Subscriber 0
Select RoyceStable RoyceStable
A beautiful renderer of The Nationals “Rains of Castamere.” There’s such a beauty of intention here, the rendition transcends the actual mechanics of the performance, I’d say.
And so it goes. :Indeed.
Vegas gunvernment responds to Uber
Nevada is first state to temporarily suspend Uber
Uber valued at 18 billion ceo likely a billionaire