The Cadillac Escalade is ridiculous – but then, so is my orange Trans Am. Both are (or were, in the case of my ancient Pontiac) designed to meet emotional rather than practical needs.
We could stand more of that.
The Escalade is, in its way, the closest thing new to something old like my TA.
It is over-engined, exuberant, garish – and absolutely glorious.
Both annoy the living daylights out of people like Jill Stein and Hillary Clinton. Park either one next to a Prius wearing an I’m With Her sticker on its bumper. Goose the throttle.
You can’t put a price tag on that.
The Escalade is the end product of giving Cadillac designers a Chevy Tahoe – and a blank check.
The Tahoe’s still in there … somewhere.
There is also Corvette kinship. Pop the hood, behold. You will find not the Tahoe’s mild-mannered 5.3 V8 (which does not power the Corvette). You will find a 6.2 liter V8 – and 420 hp, almost as much power as the Corvette’s V8 and basically the same engine – and similar banzai! acceleration, only more spectacular because it happens in a roadbound battleship that can seat eight people and which weighs almost twice what a new Corvette does.
Base price for the RWD (and standard length) Escalade is $73,395. Add 4WD and the price ticks up to $75,995. Luxury, Premium and Platinum trim packages are available from there, with the latter topping out at $97,795 for a 4WD-equipped extended-length (ESV) version.
In comparison, the Caddy’s traditional rival – the Lincoln Navigator is a super-sized blue light special. Its base price is just $63,195 – and you can buy the “L” stretch version for just $65,560 to start. But the once-proud Navigator (which beat the Escalade to market back in the ’90s and outsold it for several years) no longer even offers a V8 engine and no matter how many turbos Ford (er, Lincoln) bolts to it, a V6 will never be a V8.
Probably the most direct-comparison cross-shop – at least in terms of shock and awe value – is probably the also Brobdingnagian Infiniti QX80 ($63,250 to start). However the Japanese schlachtschiff comes in one size only (in between the merely Brobdingnagian Escalade and the uber Brobdingnagian Escalade ESV) and while it has a V8, it isn’t a 420 hp V8.
You might also consider the Lexus LX570 – but it’s getting long in the tooth (current model, same as last year’s model, which was the same as the previous year’s model). The Lexus is also less gaudy – and that’s a big factor here. It is also smaller, can’t pull as much – and has a much weaker engine.
Plus, it costs more than the Caddy: $89,380… to start.
Jill and Hillary’s influence.
GM (not just Cadillac) is becoming a Cloverific corporation – ululating paeans to “safety” (and “diversity) even as most un-PC models like the Escalade remain in the lineup, though only so long as they continue to make money for GM.
But the Jills and Hillary’s must (apparently) be mollified. So while the Escalade’s “carbon footprint” remains the same, the ’17 is fitted with ugsome idiocy such as a Rear Passenger Minder that pesters you if you forget about your kid back there, so he doesn’t roast to death while you’re shopping. And a Teen Driver Monitoring System – to get him used to living in a police state.
Other than that – and a price uptick across the board – the ’17 Escalade is pretty much the same as it was last year.
The heartbeat of a Corvette.
The most – of everything.
And not ashamed of it.
WHAT’S NOT SO GOOD
22 inch ree-uhms (standard on Luxury and up trims) are imbecilities. If you gnoe what I am ‘sayin.
4WD system lacks two-speed transfer case and Low range gearing.
V6 Navigator can pull more than V8 Cadillac.
All Escalades come standard with V8 power.
A big V8.
Almost as big as my Trans-Am’s V8.
Sourced from the Corvette, the Escalade’s V8 makes 420 hp and 460 ft.-lbs. of torque. Put that engine in something that weighed a couple thousand pounds less (like a Corvette) and you’d have a supercar. Tasked with pulling what amounts to two Corvettes, the 6.2 V8 delivers super truck acceleration: Zero to 60 in 5.6 seconds for the RWD Escalade; a few tenths more for slightly heavier 4WD versions.
To get a handle on that, ponder the fact that the Escalade – six thousand pounds or so, as tall as an NBA forward and with the aerodynamic slipperyness of a pinball machine – is only about a second less quick than a new Camaro SS (which also has the fabulous – and versatile – 6.2 V8 under its hood).
And the Camaro can’t pull 8,100 pounds or carry seven passengers along for the ride.
The 6.2 V8 is paired with a new eight-speed automaticwhich together deliver mileage stats almost as miraculous as the 0-60 stats: 15 city, 21 highway for the rear-drive version and 14 city, 21 highway for the 4WD-equipped version.
To get a handle on that, my Trans-Am – which has a bigger V8 (7.4 liters) but nowhere near 420 hp – gets maybe 10 MPG.
And it does not have 4WD.
The Infiniti QX80’s standard V8 displaces a comparatively small-bore 5.6 liters. And the poor old Navigator – actually, the poor new Navigator – comes standard with a V6 that’s only about half the size (3.5 liters) of the Caddy’s V8 and which makes a comparatively puny 380 hp.
However, the Lincoln does have a higher maximum tow rating (9,000 lbs.) which may be a function of its turbo’d V6 producing its max torque – the same 460 ft.-lbs. as the Caddy – sooner. The EcoBoosted Lincoln’s peak occurs at just 2,500 RPM vs. 4,100 RPM for the Escalade’s V8.
The Caddy’s system does not have a two-speed transfer case and so lacks 4WD Low range gearing. That plus those 22 inch ree-uhms and short sidewall sport tires are this SUV’s soft spot. A FWD Camry is probably a better choice for snow-day driving.
Or even a RWD muscle car.
Think twice about wet grass, too.
The Lincoln Navigator’s optional “4WD” system is similarly light-duty.
If you need real off-road capability, go with something like the Infiniti QX. It is the only super-sized SUV you can still buy that has a heavy duty 4WD system with a two-speed transfer case and Low range gearing.
ON THE ROAD
The Escalade is kind of like Mr. T in Rocky III. Mean and surly. Eye of the tiger.
Its Corvette-sourced 6.2 liter V8 is pure urge overkill. You could probably pull a spark plug wire, run the thing on seven cylinders and still outrun the Navigator. And on the highway, thanks to the eight-speed automatic’s deep overdrive gearing, the revs at 75 are just over 2,000. This makes it feasible to travel almost 550 miles on 26 gallons of fuel.
That’s about as far as a Prius will go on a full tank, by the way.
I was able to truck down to Raleigh, NC from my home base in the Woods of rural SW Virginia, a trip of about 250 miles – without stopping for fuel on the trip down or back. And the Escalade’s passing power at 80 is much superior to that of the Prius.
The ride – especially Limited (and up) models with the 22 inch wheel/tire package – is stiff. Which is to be expected, because there’s just not much give or cushion available when your tires’ sidewalls are only about two inches high. These ree-uhms are the vehicular equivalent of holding a Glock sideways. Maybe it’s stylish in certain hoods – but it’s functionally as ridiculous as pants three sizes too big that show your ass crack and trip you up when you’re running away from The Man.
The ree-uhms also increase rolling resistance. With 17s or even 18s, the Escalade would be even quicker and – not that anyone cares at this price point – probably get better gas mileage, too.
The Navigator, incidentally, comes standard with more functionally sensible 18 inch wheels – and not surprisingly, has a much softer, more luxurious ride.
On the other hand, the low-aspect-ratio tires do give the Caddy sharper response to steering inputs. And they do a very effective job of reducing body roll to almost nil.
All the vehicles in this class are true ships of the line, but the Escalade doesn’t feel its size because it has a tighter turning circle (39 feet) than either the QX80 or the Navigator (41.6 and 43.9 feet, respectively). This makes it noticeably easier to maneuver in tight confines such as the car-crowded parking lot of a fast food joint. It also sits lower than either of its two competitors: 74.4 inches for the Escalade vs. 78.1 for the Lincoln and 75.8 for the Infiniti. This makes it less awkward to deal with drive-throughs (as at banks) and low-ceilinged parking garages. The Escalade’s lower-in-the-weeds stance also enhances its stability at higher speeds.
100 in this thing feels more sedate (and quiet) than 70 in my Trans-Am.
It is, however, wider than its rivals: 80.5 inches vs. 78.8 for the Nav and 79.9 for the Q. This makes parking public parking spots – which are generally designed for Camry-sized cars – a tight squeeze. You will find opening the closing the doors/getting in/out to be a challenge at times.
I like the new capless fuel filler system GM is adding to its vehicles. It’s convenient – and much less messy, an important consideration when considering a premium vehicle. You will not have to worry about griming up your hands on the gas cap, because there is no gas cap. Just push the fuel pump’s nozzle in the hole.
The pump, however, is not under Cadillac’s control.
The main gauge cluster is driver-configurable and now entirely flat-screen. This is the trend in high-end cars, for two main reasons. First, it looks slick. We live in an iPad Age and old-style analog gauges are not hip, dude.
Second, they’re configurable. More information can be displayed – called up at will by scrolling through the various menus. With analog gauges, you can only fit so many gauges – and so much information – in the limited space available.
The flat-screen theme continues to the right of the main gauge cluster, where there is a secondary eight-inch LCD screen via which you access/operate the audio system, GPS and various apps. Cadillac styles this the CUE – Cadillac User Interface. If you like iPads, you will like the CUE. It works pretty much the same way. It has text-to-voice and Siri Eyes Free capability, too.
Below this are the controls for the AC/heater. They are not flat screen. They are haptic – GM’s term for finger-swipe (and tap) control inputs. My only beef with it is that sometimes you get too much (or not enough) of what you want, such as more or less fan – because it’s fairly easy to swipe too far – or not far enough – especially with the vehicle in motion.
AT THE CURB
The Escalade is big – but it’s not the biggest.
Not the standard model, anyhow.
At 203.9 inches long, end to end, it is 4.4 inches shorter than the Infiniti QX (208.3 inches) and 4.5 inches shorter than the standard-sized Lincoln Navigator (208.4 inches).
This might just be “just right” sized – big, but not too big. I can vouch for the Q being a bus. A nice bus.
But a bus.
It’s a handful.
The Escalade is big – but manageable. See points made earlier about turning circle, ride height and steering response.
And if you do want more metal – even more than the Q – there’s the Escalade ESV. It’s almost two feet longer than the regular Escalade. That’s also longer (by about an inch) than the Lincoln Navigator “L,” too. But don’t forget: The regular length Lincoln is underpowered; imagine how much more underpowered the longer – and heavier – “L” version is.
Packaging in the Caddy is also better.
You get 45.3 inches of front seat legroom – by far the most in this class (the Navigator has 41.1 inches; the QX80 just 39.6 inches) and plenty of room in the second row: 39 inches for the Caddy, 39.1 for the Nav. The Q has more – 41 inches – but remember the front seat spec.
The Caddy also has much more headroom than its rivals: an NBA forward-friendly 42.8 inches – vs. 39.5 in the Lincoln and 39.9 in the Infiniti.
The third rows in all these rollers are compromised because they sit on top of the rear axle, which means the floorpans have to be higher in the third row than in the second row. This is the chief deficit of the RWD-based layout (and why FWD-based crossover SUVs are more space-efficient inside). But, though you sit with your legs tucked up a bit, there is decent room for your legs – and the third row is thus usable by most adults and absolutely fine for young kids and teens.
The Escalade’s second and third rows also fold flat – and at the touch of a button. This creates a total of 94.2 cubic feet of space – enough to easily cart home a full-size outdoor gas grille with accessories. I know it can, because I did exactly that with my test Caddy.
Per the Mad Men meme, Cadillac has been dialing up some classic-era Cadillac themes. These include very tall – and very thin – taillights whose shape evokes the classic look of Caddys from the late ’50s and early ’60s. Up front, a massive chrome grille is set off on either side by inverted L-shaped headlights with five stacked individual LED projector bulbs.
If they ever reboot Mad Men – fast-forward it to our time – this is what a latter-day Don Draper would be driving.
And annoying Jill and Hillary with.
You can order everything imaginable – just about – that might be on a just-signed first-round draft pick’s wish list, including Blu-ray player and power retracting steps with puddle lighting.
Base trims come standard with a heated steering wheel (and heated seats), three-zone climate control, power adjustable pedals, Bose 16-speaker audio, five USB ports and a driver-adjustable, magnetic ride controlled suspension. Platinum trims add massaging front seats, “semi-aniline Nappa Leather,” electrically chilled cupholders and a chilled cooler box in the center console.
Plus twin Blue-Ray DVD players for the second row.
WiFi hot spot take-it-with-you Internet access is also on the menu – and the Escalade will even send you text messages when it needs servicing.
Cadillac hasn’t caved.
It has doubled-down.
Instead of bending with the prevailing winds of political correctness and downsizing, de-powering or even outright dropping V8s from the roster, Cadillac installed a bigger and stronger V8 in the Escalade.
This is a very large part of the Escalade’s appeal. Of Cadillac’s appeal. It is not for people who are ashamed of what they make – or how much gas they use.
So do enough other people to keep Cadillac in the black.
Nothing else rivals the Escalade for power/performance – or testosterone overflow. Who needs Viagra when all you need to do is stand near one of these things?
THE BOTTOM LINE
All it needs, really, is a shaker hood scoop. And maybe a Carousel Red paint option.
Maybe send Jill and Hillary an Ambien, too.
If you have had it with control freak Clovers, Goo-guhl, diversity mongers and like contrarian, liberty-minded media, please consider supporting EPautos.
We depends on you to keep the wheels turning!
Our donate button is here.
If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079
EPautos stickers – new design, larger and magnetic! – are free to those who send in $10 or more to support the site.
Again, another nice review.
I’d point out that no, the AWD system in the ‘Slade is quite capable on snow/ice and wet grass, especially when compared to a FWD Camry. The bigger problem will be the scratches to the 22″ rims from the ice and road grime mixed into it when it comes to winter use. When on wet grass, the biggest problem will be the weight of the thing sinking into the soft ground whereas a Camry might be able to float on top a little better. Rim size won’t affect snow/ice traction as much as the tires or the drive system, and of course having AWD does nothing to help you stop faster and only a little to help you turn corners better in the snow or ice. Lacking low-range and, more importantly, lockers front and rear, would be limiting in many winter conditions. The AWD system is not sophisticated enough to properly transfer power to the one wheel that has grip if all three others lose it, but then only a few systems ARE that capable without lockers (e.g., the Lexus LX and possibly the Infiniti QX).
And, of course, you can get effectively all of these features and capabilities, minus a few of the crappy ones (CUE, haptic touch controls), by getting the GMC Yukon Denali/Denali XL which prices it down much closer to the Navigator. Same engine. Same AWD system. Nearly the same interior. Tens of thousands less in price.
The biggest rub, though, is not the price. If you buy an Escalade, you’re buying it for show, not for value. The biggest rub is that, for whatever reason, GM’s full size body-on-frame SUVs have been sucking badly on reliability ratings across the board with the Cadi being the worst of the lot. For the beau monde, they won’t like it when their favorite sparkly thing spends more time in the shop than ferrying their egos around.
. . .but I still wouldn’t mind having one.
It needs 1950s tail fins.
> If you need real off-road capability
The only choice in this group of SUVs is the Lexus. Full-time 4WD, two-speed transfer case, locking center differential (lockers are available for the front & rear differentials from the aftermarket), and air shocks at each corner. Plus, it’s really a Land Cruiser, legendary around the world for it’s off-road prowess.
So far as the Escalade – those tail lights are AMAZING. So cool.
eric, since you’ve driven one you know there’t not anything to bitch about except those 22’s. Back when the patch was booming I’d see them all the time pulling tandem axle trailers with 7500 lb. axles with pumping systems or big gearboxes, definitely stuff a Nav or any of the others would have trouble pulling at 90mph. I drove one with the front and rear built in radar detector that worked great. I’d guess this vehicle is probably outfitted with those things more than any other single thing.
What’s not to like anyway? My only complaint was no CB so I could call ahead to the T/A and check the status of the pump lanes that were open all the way through. I like the ESV model. It could easily be the “Pussy Wagon” the Chevy pickup only touted to be in Kill Bill. The only way it could be better would be with a big turbo and an 18 speed auto shift Fuller Eaton transmission(well, auto shift for most, I’d take the manual shift) so when you really put your foot in it pulling a big load you’d get to hear the turbo spool up and get to pick those gears as you liked. Cruise the interstate with Choctaw Bingo turned way up……or Born to be Wild.
I very much enjoyed your review … It was unbiased and stayed focused to us, the readers, for sure !
It presented most of the real meat information that a future buyer and driver both, wants and dose need to know !
Thank You …
Thank you, Larry!
Does this thing still come in a ‘2 seats and a short bed’ version, a la the Avalanche?
No, the Avalanche (and the Cadillac version of that) are gone.
So, you got back on GM’s “approved reviewers” list? 😉
Nope! These are “on the down low” reviews. I cannot divulge my associations but let’s just say it pays to have friends in the right places… 🙂
Thoroughly enjoyed reading the review.
Seems like you could have compared it to one of those decked-out Mercedes van conversion RVs. For an extra 10 grand or so you could a kitchen and bathroom too.