Sanity, Maybe

2
683
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Holy Mackerel! Maybe someone is finally listening… .

A pair of Michigan lawmakers introduced a bill to make it easier for automakers to comply with federal fuel efficiency requirements, as the Trump administration considers softening standards that require nearly doubling the fuel economy of the U.S. new vehicle fleet by 2025.

The proposal, introduced late on Wednesday, would extend the life of fuel economy credits that would currently expire after five years, lift a cap on transferring credits between car and truck fleets and award automakers credits for emissions reductions not measured by existing test procedures.

The measure proposed by Representatives Fred Upton, a Republican, and Debbie Dingell, a Democrat, would also grant an industry wish by requiring that the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reconcile their respective fuel economy standards so the industry can comply with just one set of rules.

The proposal comes on the heels of a bipartisan measure to create a single federal standard for self-driving cars, also backed by the industry, that is on track to passage.

Of course, there is opposition from the Usual Suspects.

The Union of Concerned Scientists – who are very concerned with things that are properly none of their business – said the harmonization legislation and a similar bill introduced in the Senate would allow manufacturers to make vehicles that are on average 3 miles per gallon less efficient in 2021.

Oh, the humanity!

The busybody group estimated that would result in additional U.S. oil consumption of 350 million barrels of oil, costing drivers $34 billion and an additional 155 million metric tons of greenhouse gases.

The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, a trade group representing General Motors Co, Toyota Motor Corp, Volkswagen AG and others, praised the bill for “recognizing the consumer benefits that can come from better alignment of government programs.” The group noted there were significant differences between how the EPA and NHTSA award and allow use of credits.

Last week, automakers told U.S. regulators they should revise fuel efficiency mandates because the standards do not reflect how cheap gas prices are affecting consumer demand. Automakers want changes in the 2021-2025 requirements that would make it easier for them to comply with fuel economy standards.

Former President Barack Obama’s administration finalized rules in 2012 to double the fleetwide average fuel economy to 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025, but the EPA revised the target to 51.4 mpg based on rising truck sales. The Obama administration said the rules would save motorists $1.7 trillion in fuel costs but cost the auto industry about $200 billion over 13 years

. . .

Got a question about cars – or anything else? Click on the “ask Eric” link and send ’em in!

If you like what you’ve found here, please consider supporting EPautos.

We depend on you to keep the wheels turning!

Our donate button is here.

 If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:

EPautos
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079

PS: EPautos stickers are free to those who send in $20 or more to support the site. Also, the eBook – free! – is available. Click here. Just enter you email in the box on the top of the main page and we’ll email you a copy instantly!

 

Share Button

2 COMMENTS

  1. “The busybody group estimated that would result in additional U.S. oil consumption of 350 million barrels of oil”

    My guess is that’s per year? That means about 1 extra “barrel” of oil for every American per year. 42 gallons. At $2.75/gallon that’s about $115 per year per person. That will be a little more for some since not everyone drives but you get the idea. And of course that $2.75 is retail and taxes included, the actual cost per family isn’t going to be that much. How much extra cost to the car payment would compliance with all the fuel economy rules cost the average family? My guess is more than $115 per year, possibly less if the loan is stretched out to 6+ years (but then added interest payments kick in).

    But the larger issue is that these guys love to throw out big incomprehensible numbers, while never pointing out that the US is still a pretty big country, 3rd in the world for population. And land mass, even if you don’t count Alaska, is huge compared to most of the world. It is incredibly easy to come up with these giant statistics.

    It seems to me the real reason for the desire for Washington control over everything is just plain power grabs. If you have the power to force your will on 333 million people that is going to be very addicting. It’s also why Hollywood is full of horrible people, they see that millions of people are swayed by a few key people. What they don’t like is when their plans don’t work. By throwing out large number facts it helps keep the non-math oriented, non thinking people in line.

  2. Interesting. I am a little confused. I thought that the Energy Policy Act of 2007 set the standard at 35.5 mpg and Obama administration upped that requirement because there is no legal restraint on that action. Trump needs to shelve it. The requirement needs to drop back to 27.5 mpg like it was before this insanity. I am also still trying to figure out what happened with the designs of cars vis a vis safety. The Bush administration made substantial revisions to FMVSS 208, giving cars their current look, but I don’t know the implementing legislation. There has to be one, but I don’t know.

LEAVE A REPLY