We’re Offering Safety…

3
1012
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In November, General Motors’ Cruise automated test vehicle attracted unintended media attention when it froze behind a taco truck during a press drive. Between traffic cones, double-parked cars and the lunch stand, the car’s computer could not figure out its next move.

That situation, and the snarky tweets that followed, is one Phantom Auto wants to help manufacturers avoid. The company says it can eliminate cases where a driverless vehicle may become confused or stuck by having a human take the wheel from a remote operations center.

“We’re offering safety,” Phantom CEO Shai Magzimof says. “We want the experience to be smooth, clean, sharp. As companies struggle with the last step of getting to a stable, reliable automated vehicle, that’s where we come in.”

At CES in 2017, Nissan Motor Co. said it developed, in collaboration with NASA, a system known as Seamless Autonomous Mobility that calls on human help centers when self-driving cars encounter unforeseen situations.

However, Nissan’s system maps a solution to send to the car, which will execute it itself, while Phantom physically takes over the controls. To do so safely and consistently, the system needs to have low latency, or delays in the transfer of data.

Magzimof said the biggest obstacle when he began approaching self-driving engineers with his remote operations idea was “latency, latency, latency.” However, as a former engineer working on mobile networking for video games, he already had determined a way to find a strong, consistent connection.

Using a process called bonding, Phantom can switch and combine networks from carriers such as Verizon, AT&T and Sprint to maintain connections. Before deploying its service, the company maps the area of operation to determine which networks are strongest at every coordinate.

Magzimof said when the company began tests, the connection experienced frequent “hiccups,” causing a jerky ride. But the process eventually was refined enough that Phantom could operate vehicles in Las Vegas during its first demos at CES this year from its headquarters here.

Share Button

3 COMMENTS

  1. Or you could just drive the damn car yourself and the only “latency” would be your physical reaction time, but that would derail our overlords plan to limit our lives. There’s absolutely no need for self driving cars other than to restrict our movement/freedom. Look at any tv traffic report during rush hour and what do you see – thousands of cars bumper to bumper going nowhere fast. Now wave a magic wand and instantly convert every vehicle to self driving and voila, still thousands of cars sitting still. The only difference being now you can take a nap or read while your self crawling car makes it’s way home. Absolutely ridiculous waste of technology.

    • Traffic jams will be worse with robot cars if my throughput model of traffic is correct. Simply put there is not going to be enough traffic leaving the system per unit time when the robot cars obey the underposted speed limit and all the other antidestination league laws traffic jams will start earlier and end later. They might go all day.

LEAVE A REPLY