President Trump has imposed tariffs – a word used to prevent people from regarding them as the taxes they are – on vehicles not made in the United States, so as to make them cost as much as (or more than) vehicles made in the United States. The key point here is that taxes do not make anything cost less.
The same as regards compliance – i.e, the cost incurred complying with government regulations. Tariffs (taxes) do not reduce the cost of compliance. What they can do is raise the costs of the goods that escaped the costs of compliance.
This is something Trump – or the people who support his imposition of tariffs (taxes) – do not understand.
It costs more to make everything in the United States because of the costs of compliance. A good example that will make the point is the cost of chrome-plating anything in the United States. It is so expensive that there are not many companies left int he U.S. that still chrome-plate parts; instead, they import chrome-plated parts – because it costs less to import them than to chrome-plate them in the United States. That is to say, even factoring in the cost of having these parts shipped across an ocean, it still costs less to have them chrome-plated in another country and shipped here than it costs to chrome-plate them here.
Now, some will say that is because chrome-plating is a nasty business in that it involves very caustic materials and processes, which is absolutely true and absolutely beside the point. The point is that it costs less to chrome-plate parts in another country because the compliance costs are lower. Taxing (via tariffs) these foreign-chrome-plated parts does not result in chrome-plated parts Made in the USA costing less. It simply raises the cost of the foreign parts to parity with those chrome-plated here.
The same applies to vehicles that are not Made in the USA. It costs less to put together a vehicle in China than it does to put one together here, even if the vehicles are otherwise identical. If an American is able to buy the lower-cost item, it saves him money. It does not save him money if the government of this country taxes (tariffs) the lower cost item. It merely eliminates the lower-cost alternative. It thereby makes everything cost more.
It does this by not addressing the costs of compliance.
Trump’s motives – assuming that they are his motives – are not bad, in the sense that there is nothing bad (as such) about wanting to see Americans working in American manufacturing again, as opposed to Americans shopping at Wal-Mart for items manufactured not in America. But this is a kind of economic non sequitur because unless compliance costs are reduced, those manufacturing jobs are not coming back – because Americans won’t be able to afford what is manufactured in America. There being little point in manufacturing what’s not going to sell. See the implosion of the EV “market” as a case of for-instance. Car manufacturers invested – if you want to use that word – billions in R&D, new plants and so on, all of which depended on the true cost of manufacturing EVs being hidden, as via federal subsidies. When the subsidies ended, the cost of an EV increased by thousands – and sales decreased in consequence.
Along with thousands of jobs.
As for example the 3,400 workers at GM’s Factory Zero, where EVs and EV battery packs were being manufactured. These workers just lost their jobs due to declining interest in GM’s battery-powered vehicles. Due – more finely – to the untenable cost of battery powered vehicles, which has kiboshed their prospects as mass-market vehicles. There will always be a few – a relative handful – of people for whom cost is no object.
But a few is not enough to support many jobs.
Trump – were he not so preoccupied with Putting Israel First and bombing speedboats full of drugs (supposedly) that no one is forced to take (unlike the drugs he helped to push during the “pandemic” panic he abetted) – could at least address the compliance costs issue by explaining it to people. Or assign someone who does understand them to explain it to people. That would be the first step in the right direction. Then he might be able to reduce them, which would result in lower manufacturing costs. That, in turn, would reduce the incentive to manufacture things in places such as China, where manufacturing costs are so much lower, it not only costs less to manufacture things there – it costs so much less that it’s worth shipping stuff from there to here. Even with those costs folded into the mix, the Chinese-made stuff can be sold here for less than American-made stuff because it costs that much more to make stuff right here in America
Because of the compliance costs.
Instead, Trump levies tariffs as a kind of catch-all solution to a problem he does not understand – and like so many things Trump does, it will not end well for Americans. The latter already sense this. The gubernatorial and mayoral elections just concluded are a kind of referendum about this.
The Red Hats, of course, will never acknowledge this and that will seal their doom – as well as ours.
. . .
If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos.
We depend on you to keep the wheels turning!
Our donate button is here.
If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:
EPautos
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079
PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $25 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)
If you’d like a Baaaaa hat or other EPautos gear, see here!
Quick Look inside just how messed up the tariffs are for small manufacturing businesses are. Back in the late 90’s and early 2000’s Goldman Sachs went across the U.S. buying up packaging manufactures. This was not in the best interest of American packaging manufactures. Not many years after that many such packaging manufactures disappeared. And it seemed that China had new abilities to manufacture packaging. My business needs X packaging and my sources dried up. That packaging is the lifeblood of my business. I has to have molds made in China and have my most important packaging made in China. I still can get other packaging in the U.S. for now. Everything was rosy until Trump slapped a tariff on that packaging in his first term. Biden let it be and Trump raised it more in his second term. My company is international and a very large amount of that packaging from China goes around the world bringing in new revenue into the U.S. Trump’s threat of slapping a 100% tariff on China imports that would force my company into complete failure. Note: when buying items we use to manufacture our products we have a sales tax exemption. There is no such thing for US manufacturers even on the products we ship overseas. A very poorly thought out tariff. I’ve been a member of NFIB for decades and they tried to help but the system is too top heavy with people who are clueless about the private sector and how it operates. Building large buildings is a completely different world than manufacturing commodities. Fact: about 90% of the people in America who are employed in the private sector do so with a small business. And those small businesses have 14 and fewer employees. The Trump Administration is also clueless about small businesses being the backbone of the American economy, the proof of that; The tariffs and Obama care. Obama Care, flat out robs small businesses who try and provide health coverage for their employees, get raped every single month writing out that check to cover it’s employees. Forget those other countries someplace else in the world. Get the energy back home in the USA.
Great piece of work Eric, a grand slam!
Kind of like the deals El Trumpo made with the drug companies to bring manufacturing back to the US. Are they going to use American chemicals for their drugs? No, they will import them much cheaper from China or India. All El Trumpo sees is dollar signs…in his pockets. No arguing that government compliance raises the cost of everything. More and more people cannot afford to buy USA made products. Such a shame.
This article is posted at Lew Rockwell’s site today — congrats, Eric!
‘Speaking at an event in Florida, shortly after the justices concluded proceedings, Mr. Trump on Wednesday boasted anew about the fiscal benefits of his tariffs, bragging that they are bringing in “hundreds of billions” in revenue. So far, the United States has collected more than $200 billion from tariffs this year, more than double the amount in 2024, federal records show.’ — NYT
https://archive.ph/1cNip#selection-753.0-753.376
So in plain words, we have a Republican president, bragging about his massive tax increase. Even the old spook Poppy Bush had the good sense to declare, Read my lips — NO NEW TAXES.
If Republicans can’t be counted on anymore to hold the line on taxes — much less repeal freaking Obamacare — then they are as useless as tits on a bull.
OFF WITH THEIR HEADS.
I suppose that commenters here have already pointed out the Constitutional issue of Trump arrogating to himself the legislative branch’s power of taxation by issuing tariffs. There is no such grant of power in Article II for the executive branch.
Similarly, there is no grant of power in Article I for Congress to delegate any of its powers to another branch. I’ve had several replies to this issue on other sites that Congress has handed off ther power to tax, or to declare war (to address only a few items) over the years and that there is “precedent” for this kind of contempt for the Constitution.
Apparently, Trump isn’t the only politician who doesn’t read.
Hi Ed,
I don’t think it’s that Trump does not read. I think it is that he does not care. The distinction is important.
Exactly so. And I’m confident that it’s the same with Compliance Costs. It’s not that he and his ilk don’t know how it impacts ‘Murikans, it’s that they don’t care.
[…] https://www.ericpetersautos.com/2025/11/05/tariffs-dont-address-compliance/ […]
What is the amount of tariffs that need to be imposed that will drive the American worker back to the factory or farm?
That seems to be the goal of the Trump tariffs.
How many people will be satisfied with mind numbing repetition, hard manual labor, hot & cold conditions? What will encourage them to work in these conditions?
Perhaps more money? How does that lower prices?
We can have everything we’d ever want made in the good old USA, but most won’t be able to afford any of it.
So then, robots? How do workers with no work afford things?
Trumpians need to understand that our economy has moved on from manufactures of low end goods. We have farmed that out to the burgeoning economies. No tariff will undo that reality.
Eric, your piece motivated me to google “lincoln demanded the south pay tariff”
This is the AI response:
“Abraham Lincoln demanded the South pay tariffs, viewing them as essential for the federal government’s revenue and to protect Northern industries. This was a major point of contention, as Southern states saw tariffs as an economic burden that disproportionately benefited the North and threatened their economy. ”
Will historians record the parallels between Trump and Lincoln? Is “Civil” war in our near future? Will the history be written in Russian or Chinese?
Enquiring minds want to know.
Even if factories return to the U.S. en masse, you won’t likely see huge installations where thousands of high school dropouts make six figures for menial work—which is what a lot of people think will happen.
For one thing, the factories of today are far more automated and mechanized than those of even a few years ago. And we’re not talking about robots—technologies like continuous casters, basic oxygen furnaces, and rotary dumpers, in the case of steel mills, mean fewer people are needed to produce more steel, or cars, or computers.
For another thing, the people these factories employ will increasingly be people with some kind of technical skills. These jobs will require some sort of training, even if it’s a 1-2 year program. And they’re are fewer people who can do that than just show up and put a bolt in a Buick.
What’s more, these factories will be built in southern, midwestern, and western states where the average wage is lower, land is cheaper, unions are weaker, taxes are lower, and regulations more lenient. Note that European, Japanese, and Korean car companies’ US plants are nowhere near Detroit.
And what are we going to do with those people?
They may be unemployable, or minimally employable…but they aren’t exactly going to just vanish into a black hole.
Drugs, video games, and UBI is, at best, a band-aid. It is not a solution. And it’s a rather insulting suggestion.
Agreed: The point being that the Bad Orange Man’s tariffs, as mentioned here and elsewhere, fail to address the core reasons why manufacturing has been declining in the U.S. and fail to bring back sustainable jobs.
Not sure what to do about this situation, but the fact that no one except the Bad Orange Man and his ilk have even discussed it speaks volumes.
Factories in the US will be more and more like those huge server farms that tech companies build. They may be big, but they will employ only a handful. They won’t employ thousands, not even hundreds.
They are replacing the Sear’s HQ in the northwest suburbs of Chicago with a server farm. Sears once employed a couple thousand people on the site, but the tech company is only promising like 50. Yes, those 50 will have good paying jobs, but it’s only 50.
The famous kids toys LEGO’s are one of the few things actually still manufactured in Europe. Why? Because it’s automated. There are so few people there, they don’t bother turning on the lights. Robots can work in the dark.
Good point, that he/they should explain it better.
How about this: “One of the reason’s our stuff costs more is because of things like the EPA, Osha, etc…. Our overseas competitors do not care about these things and why they can produce things a lot cheaper than us.” “These tariffs, partially protect us and our country”
An explanation like this might get some better moderate support….
I also think these agencies have gone way too far, and they are now used as competition limiting endeavors, and worse such as political tools, etc….
Agreed: There is a sound argument for using tariffs and other measures to reduce or eliminate our dependence on other countries, particularly other countries who are politically unstable and harbor anti-American sentiments, for certain essential goods, such as food staples or critical medications. Such an argument is readily apparent, and most reasonable people buy that argument.
That said, the Trump administration has failed to explain the reasoning behind the tariffs in a coherent way that makes sense to the public, has failed to apply tariffs in a coherent way, and has done so in a manner contrary to the Constitution; i.e., Congress has the authority to impose tariffs, not the White House.
And once again, the Trump administration hasn’t really done much to address the compliance issues that affect manufacturing.
Supreme court tariff case update:
‘What’s happened so far? Arguments have cleared the two-hour mark. Justices Roberts, Barrett and Gorsuch have posed questions suggesting that they may not accept the administration’s arguments in favor of the tariffs. The three liberal justices also seem skeptical of the tariffs.’
https://apnews.com/live/supreme-court-tariff-arguments-updates
If both the RINOs and the DemonRat socialists are skeptical, then Tariff Man is in big trouble. Article I Section 8 is pretty damned plain.
‘Chief Justice John Roberts said the tariffs were an “imposition of taxes on Americans and that has always been the core power of Congress.”
‘Justice Barrett, who is seen as a key vote, questioned the scope of President Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, which she described as “across the board.”
“Is it your contention that every country needed to be tariffed because of threats to the defense and industrial base?” she asked. “I mean, Spain? France? I mean, I could see it with some countries but explain to me why, as many countries needed to be subject to the reciprocal tariff policy, as are.”
‘Prediction markets have revised the probability of the White House winning (and the tariffs being found constitutional) from 45% to 30% in just half an hour.’
https://tinyurl.com/3s278ud9
Tariff Man’s Waterloo is dead ahead. When you’ve lost the RINOs …
‘Because of the compliance costs.’ — eric
And differences in culture. In China, millions still work ‘996’ — 9 am to 9 pm, 6 days a week. In richer Taiwan, where I lived in the 1990s, Saturday morning was a regular business day. In Japan, where I also lived for awhile, 8 am to 8 pm, five days a week, was standard in the office.
Vestiges of such a work-oriented culture remained in the US through the Fifties. The New York Stock Exchange traded on Saturday mornings until 1952. As a six-year-old boy, I watched my dad leave for work on Saturday mornings, just as the journalist next door did.
But way back in 1938, socialist Frank Roosevelt’s [unconstitutional] Fair Labor Standards Act had set 40 hours as a normal workweek. It took several decades to permeate our culture and end the six-day work week.
Not only are American workers costlier than labor in developing countries, also they do not have the same work ethic. Entrepreneurs will put in brutal hours, but employees generally won’t. It might be different if the US were a growing economy with rising living standards. But drowning in $38 trillion of debt, it is not.
Moving manufacturing here wholesale is not going to work. Thanks to the Uniparty, the USA is a sunset empire, slowing sinking beneath the waves just as Britain did in the mid 20th century after its ruinous wars. Permawars for Israel are doing the same to us. Sic transit gloria americana.
One income was also sufficient to buy a house, save for retirement, and support a rather large family while taking a nice vacation or buying a new car every few years. Probably middle-income in 1950 would be equivalent to about a $200k salary now.
Essentially no one gets paid enough, today, for that kind of workload to be worth the effort.
I worked from 6:00 to 6:00 most of my working life. Anywhere from 4 to 7 days a week. I retired at 59 in 2012 and I can still pay my bills. The work was worth it. Too many people in the USA think work is not worth it and that is one reason why manufacturing will not come back to the USA. Eric is right about compliance costs as well. Government regulations sometimes cost the company I worked for, millions for no real benefit to anyone. There were 1200 employees and I am talking about hundreds of millions. The costs were passed on to customers. That money could have been used for lower prices and better wages to benefit everyone.
If working more actually gets you raises & promotions & a path up the ladder & appreciation from bosses/coworkers & personal satisfaction then sure it’s well worth it.
But that was & is not my experience. It is not true for lots of people out there.
So we as a society need to be much more honest with everyone about that.
Let’s not forget that cost of “health insurance” that more than anything else makes the cost of using American workers prohibitive. And why the hell is employer provided “health insurance” a thing, anyway? It is the WORST of all possible worlds, much worse than even “single payer” government healthcare in that it turns employees into “indentured servitude” that many find the can’t leave miserable jobs so as to not lose “coverage” for their families. Just what the Oligarch class want.
Trump is incapable of anything but theater on this.
Employer-provided health care is an artifact of Frank Roosevelt’s WW II price controls. Wages were capped, while workers were in short supply owing to millions in the armed forces. But fringe benefits were not.
Therefore, employers started offering full-indemnification health benefits to attract workers. What started out as a workaround for wartime price controls inadvertently became the template for a dysfunctional, employment-centered healthcare system.
Thanks, Frank. You did a lot to us.
I’ve heard it said that many employers would actually like single payer health care. It means they don’t have to deal with it anymore, and they may end up paying less in taxes than they do for health insurance.
Tariffs are mostly a giant pain in the ass as far as paperwork and supply chain goes, but they don’t have nearly as much of an impact as people think.
First of all, depending on what you make, the raw materials are probably mined out of the ground, which is a function of geography. The right material and the right grade need to be there, and you pretty much can’t tariff that into existence.
Secondly, what ends up happening is the supply chain just gets shunted around/redirected to mimimize the amount of duty that is “owed.” If they have to they’ll stop off in a port somewhere just long enough to slap a sticker on it, and then continue on.
Thirdly, there is nothing magic about an imaginary line across the land/sea; it’s an egg tiredly arbitrary, man-made obstacle, the government is just mulcting everyone again.
Fourthly, “free trade” means both ways, and is very simple — it doesn’t need thousands of pages to hash out. One-way free trade is economic suicide. In order of preference, free trade > reciprocal tariffs > gobbledygook. Most countries have tariffs and trade restrictions. The U.S. mostly lives in utopian la-la-land, or spends its time trading barbs for the sake of scoring political points, rather than trying to optimize the actual situation on the ground. On this much, Orange Julius has a very valid point.
Also
If you happen to own a factory somewhere else, and sell to a global market, you can bypass USA tariffs entirely.
In some ways, by trying to incentivize onshoring (and by creating chaos) he’s actually further incentivizing even more offshoring.
If you want to get people to put factories here, you have to make the tax/regulatory environment favorable, and you can’t seesaw back and forth every four to eight years. Businesses thrive on low costs, predictability, and stability.
Trump either doesn’t have a clue or he doesn’t care.
I remember about a dozen years ago, I was at Red Wing Shoes. They still made about 30 percent of their stuff in the US back then. A few steel toe slip ons, and some oxfords, even some sneaker looking steel toes were available. Then, they ceased being available. One reason was obvious. China cost less. But the hidden reason is that teh EPA prohibited some kind of adheasive or mold that was used to make the shoes. The sales guy told me that if it wasn’t because of EPA, they would be making them here.
It was bad enough that the country was exporting manufacturing to china for cost, but the EPA drove out more than enough jobs from the country.
The costs of compliance are real. My estimate is that we are paying as much as $10k more for vehicles because of it. Most of those costs were written into car prices even before 2021 or so.
Trump doesn’t have a clue on how to solve those. Vance might, but it depends on who his masters really are.
I don’t hold out much hope.
The 2025 election reults suggests to me that we are in for some even rougher crap the second half of Trumps term.
Trump himself has made life miserable for any American or person who is not of scandanivian or european origin.
Sorry, I had to say it. Not trying to sound like some liberal washcloth here.
Red Wing is one of very few manufacturers that sometimes makes a few models in my actual size, and I’ve noticed it’s gotten far worse over time. Sometime crocs 2020, maybe a year or two before them, I noticed models started dropping out of the catalogue.
Very rarely if ever does the EPA ban anything, they just make the permitting cost-prohibitive. Interestingly they usually grandfather in existing manufacturers when they do that; I wonder what the big issue was. Anyway what this usually does is it doesn’t solve the problem, so much as it moves it into some country that doesn’t care about industrial pollution nearly as much…planet-wise, if anything it makes the problem worse if anything. But it’s not our problem anymore…except for all of the now-jobless people and the brownfield Superfund sites that are left behind. Meanwhile the owners are laughing all the way to the bank. Thanks, @ssholes.
wish it was true but it aint. rabbi trump will bring millions of hindu cow piss drinkers here
Trump’s commerce secretary is Jew Lutnik – famous for escaping the plane crashing into his company’s office space on 9/11 (his brother died).
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/howard-lutnick-trump-tariffs-september-11-1.7475499
Now while Lutnik Sr. pushes tariffs on the rest of us, his sons through the family firm buy up “potential refunds” of these tariffs (will you and I get refunds?): Lutnick Family Angling To Make Astronomical Sums Off Court Nixing Tariffs
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/lutnick-family-angling-to-make-astronomical-sums-off-court-nixing-tariffs
https://www.propublica.org/article/us-officials-stock-sales-trump-tariffs
https://upriseri.com/insider-trading-trump-tariff-announcements/
Tariffs as employed by these financiers (crooks) is just another way to get money out of us and shovel it into their own pockets. As you say, they don’t address compliance and the way Trump Administration has employed them just make the US a more uncertain environment to invest in than ever. One can only conclude that Trump is no more interested in making America great again than the man in the moon.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DA1oiaYv0GA/?hl=en
https://forward.com/fast-forward/708565/elon-musk-doge-lubavitch-ohel-lutnick/
Interesting AJC,
If the Supremes (hopefully) rule that Donnie Douchebag’s tariffs are void how will the refunds be sorted out? The only thing we know for sure is the average consumer WON’T be getting any of it.
From your link: ‘The idea is that a Wall Street firm goes to an importer and says, you’ve now paid $10 million in tariffs. I’ll pay you $2 million right now for the right to collect the refund if courts ever end up deciding the tariffs were illegal.’
This is just a twist on the age-old business of factoring accounts receivable, coupled with insider knowledge of government policy. One is shocked — shocked — that these highly-reputed Hebrew businessmen would permit the appearance of impropriety. Their rabbi reviewed these transactions and declared that all is kosher. 🙂
One reason why importing products that are dirty to produce is that you’re not polluting your own land. Some bleeding heart liberals would occasionally produce a documentary showing the Chinese factory right next to a rice paddy, dumping whatever wastewater and other chemicals right out into a ditch, no treatment plants or even drainage pipe. Or the coal smoke in Beijing, looking like a fog at high noon. But they sold products at a price that was so much lower than what we could here. And if the CCP was willing to allow such environmental damage, well, it’s their country.
Back in the 1940s and 50s the smoke in Pittsburgh was so bad that the streetlights ran day and night. Wives had to watch the winds before putting out clothes or those white shirts would be black with soot just hanging on the clothesline. This was accepted because it meant the furnaces were running, and people were working. When the soot went away so did the jobs. I’m not saying it was pleasant by any stretch, but it was better and more predictable work than subsistence farming, and certainly better than being a peasant farmer working on someone else’s land. And those workers had homes, a car and electric light. Later they had televisions, a second car and their kids went to college without having to grab money from taxpayers to get it.
When China opened up for business it meant we could have the best of both worlds. One where we could have all that stuff and sunny days. But the downside is that we have to all get along. If one side becomes untrustworthy it risks ending the good times. Xi Jinping’s rhetoric made the world nervous. Cutting China out of the marketplace won’t be as easy as we all thought but that’s why Trump’s the fall guy. Everyone pretty much agrees that the world is too dependent on China, but no one wants to be the first one to cut the out. Because everyone knows that you can’t have a manufacturing base without environmental impact.
And factory jobs are boring.
You just described my dad’s childhood near Pittsburgh. His dad and most other men worked at the steel mills. It was dirty and sweaty but that one paycheck enabled them to raise a family, take some vacations, own a car and save enough to buy a modest house a few years down the line. The houses had two baths a basement and an attic. Some even had pools.
Everyone says we got greedy and complacent. Fact is, the Asians played dirty and “we” pretended they weren’t. Because cheap subsidized steel was a better deal than the full-priced and penalized stuff we were making, especially after ending Brenton Woods to pay for all the guns and butter. Sure, USS and Bethlehem could have scrapped their open hearths and gone full electric, but they couldn’t cut the dividend. And those furnaces were producing steel long before anyone running the company in the 1970s was in diapers. No one was thinking they’d go anywhere until the Japanese “built back better.”
Also, open hearth steel is different and better than electric furnace steel. Smoke, soot, carbon, and a low oxygen environment are pluses for making good steel.
Cost of everything has gotten so high that I now look first at buying everything used now. From auto parts to impact wrenches.
I would like to buy new but even the new stuff is crappier than 40 years ago. Case in point back in the 80’s I could find decent drill bits made here but now everything seems to be titanium coated which dies after drilling one hole in steel, I’m having OK results with cobalt bits but they’re stupidly expensive.
This is to say that the problem is not that stuff is being made in China but that it’s in many cases reasonable quality sold at a reasonable price. I bought the knock off Milwaukee chainsaw that Project Farm tested and it works pretty well so why would I buy the Milwaukee saw made in Asia for a lot more money?
I’ve had hit or miss luck with stuff from harbor freight. Knock off saws all works like a boss. Impact drill had a plastic gear that detonated after a few uses.
Cheap shit from chyyyyna has caused quality of American made tools go down as well.
The problem MH is that a lot of once were American companies are now foreign owned and yes Milwaukee is now foreign owned.
Here’s a handy guide: https://toolguyd.com/tool-brands-corporate-affiliations/
Is that such a bad thing though? After all, car brands are owned by conglomerates like GM. Where they go south is when the CEOs decide that brand differentiation is in round or square headlights, not what’s under the hood.
‘Everything seems to be titanium coated which dies after drilling one hole in steel.’ — Landru
Titanium nitride (TiN) is a hard surface coating that is chemically sputtered onto the raw bits in a vacuum chamber.
Very likely, some Chinese suppliers are just spraying a gold-colored pigment on drill bits to make it look like TiN. Real TiN shouldn’t dull after drilling one hole.
Hi Jim
I can’t remember what brand they were but most TiN coated bits suck. I was drilling into used bed frame angle iron not stainless steel or a harder alloy.
Most people drill metal way too fast and overheat the cutting edge at which point it dulls almost immediately.
Slow down the drill speeds – especially on anything over 1/4” diameter in steel.
Cutting fluid (almost anything will do) to help keep the cutting edges cool.
Learn to sharpen drills. A drill that has been overheated will need to be cut back to get rid of the tip that has lost its temper. If you don’t know how to sharpen then – then you’re relegated to replacing them.
3/16″ TiN bits and I ran them at a lower speed using Rigid brand cutting oil. They would drill for a while then make a high pitched screeching sound. The cobalt bits on the other hand worked OK.
Bed frames are actually much harder steel than hot rolled angle iron. They are probably harder than normal cold rolled steel. Throw away the scrap and get some good angle iron or use the bed frames where you don’t have to drill holes.
Just FYI bed rail steel is really hard, tough stuff and eats ALL drill bits. I use it a lot for fabricating stuff, it’s a great material and I stock up lots of free angle when people dump it on curbs, but I make holes with a plasma cutter unless I need a really clean hole.
But I do agree that my Chinesium TIN bits are not even close to the quality of other TIN bits and dont last nearly as long.