Home Features Affordable Redefined

Affordable Redefined

13
2092

It’s hard to find a cheap new sedan – mainly because so few car companies are selling them.

Ford stopped selling cars altogether (excluding the Mustang, which is a specialty car) years ago. Its other models are all crossovers and SUVs. The same pretty much goes for GM, which hasn’t had an affordable car in its lineup in years. The only cars it still sells are Cadillacs and Corvettes. Mazda and Subaru are nearly car-free brands, too.

It’s nice to see Nissan bucking the trend.

Well, sort of.

On the one hand, Nissan is apparently not going to offer the Versa after the end of the current (2025) model year. That is a blow to affordability because the Versa is the last new car you can still buy that has a sticker price under $20,000.

On the other hand, it is not killing off the Sentra. But it will sticker for about $3k more than the Versa does now.

The new “affordable” is about $23,000. That’s the 2026 Sentra’s base price. It is the new floor. The least you’ll pay to get into something new. The handful of remaining other-brand small sedans – Toyota Corolla, Honda Civic and Hyundai Elantra – also sticker for about the same.  That’s as affordable as it gets – if you’re shopping new.

It was only two or three years ago that there were several small sedans available for thousands less than that, the Versa among them. The Mitsubishi Mirage sedan was  available for $16,695 as recently as 2024.

That was less than one year ago.

It brings to mind that clip in the excellently done film adaptation of Orwell’s 1984 starring John Hurt and Richard Burton. Specifically, the scene about the chocolate ration being increased by so-and-so many grams when in fact it had been decreased just a few weeks prior. You not only weren’t supposed to notice, you were supposed to be happy about the “increase.”

This is not to slam the new Sentra.

The soon-to-be-here 2026 model comes standard with a big LCD dash display that – just ten years ago – you’d have had to pay Mercedes-Benz or BMW money to sit in front of. But made-in-China plastic touchscreen are cheap things that look expensive (to some) and that is why the are standard in $23k Sentras and $100k Benzes alike. You also get an “intelligent” key – which means a transmitter that unlocks the car as you approach and locks it as you walk away. Also a nice stereo and climate control AC.

Of course, an automatic (CVT) transmission is standard.

The Versa comes standard with a manual transmission – and it’s not even available with a cheap (to make and install) but “expensive” looking LCD dash display – which partially explains why Nissan can’t get away with asking more than $17,190 for one.

That is the current base price of the last affordable new car.

It’s arguable – because it is probably true – that Nissan decided to try to make more money by not selling the Versa for less and instead, sell people Sentras for more. Seems logical. It may also be problematical.

Nissan is pulling the last affordable new car off the market at precisely the moment when affordable cars are probably going to become very popular again – because most of us have to pay attention to not spending more than we can afford when groceries and pretty much everything else (cheap-to-make LCD touchscreens excepted) is becoming less-and-less affordable on account of currency devaluation (“inflation”) and taxation (styled “tariffs”).

The Sentra is without question a nicer car than the Versa. But you pay extra for nicer. Some will argue – and they are correct, to an extent – that what you get for Sentra money is comparable to what you used to have to spend Mercedes or BMW money to get, at least in terms of such things as huge LCD dash displays and TailorFit leatherette seats – which are available in the new Sentra. Yes, it’s all very nice. But many might consider it nicer to be able to buy something new without such frou-frou that only cost them $17k or so, like the soon-to-be-gone Versa.

Nissan might make more money that way, too.

It sounds counterintuitive at first. How do you make more selling for less? The answer is as easy as it is apparently hard to see – from the vantage point of car companies hoping to cash in on what’s known in the business as the upsell. Certainly, there is more money to be made on a per-car basis for each sale of a $23k car such as the 2026 Sentra. Nissan probably stands to make something on the order of $3k on each one, give or take. Meanwhile, the margin on a $17k Versa is a lot less, probably closer to $1,500 on each transaction.

On the other hand, if you sell three times as many $17k cars as $23k cars, there’s more money to be made on volume. This was Henry Ford’s insight and he was no dope. He did not lower the price of the Model T with each new model year because he wanted to make less money. He understood he’d make more money if he sold more Model Ts – and the way to do that was to make them more affordable.

Maybe Nissan ought to keep the Versa around for awhile. For buyers who can’t afford the new “affordable.”

. . .

If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos. 

We depend on you to keep the wheels turning! 

Our donate button is here. 

 If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:

EPautos
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079

PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $25 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)

If you’d like a Baaaaa hat or other EPautos gear, see here!

 

 

 

13 COMMENTS

    • Ford significantly undercut all the other competition of the day with his price. His philosophy was to make a car his employees could afford to buy to go to work in, and still make enough to stay is business. And it paid off handsomely for him. If Nissan keeps doing this, bully for them, because I’ve been looking and if a new or used near new one becomes available, with a manual transmission, I’ll pull the trigger on it. But new cars/vehicles are absurd in price now. I’m looking at moving internationally due to the insanity of inflation and the dollars destruction in the US. But I can always come back.

  1. I would not buy that car for 5k even they drop like trump drops bombs buy a old car way cheaper and build to last not junk soon as anything brakes.

  2. Henry Ford was not just a smart businessman, he was a benefactor. He paid a much higher wage to his employees than his competitors, understanding that the worker should be able to afford the product of his labors. He also paid his female employees less, understanding that their highest and most valuable calling was to become mature women, wives, and mothers, not “human resources” kept outside the home and far from their families. We lost that kind of of virtue and our society is going to have to collapse completely to break the strangleholds of illegitimate power and plantation scrip “wealth”.

  3. Yes, but it’s not Uncle henry’s America any more. The top 10% of earners account for nearly HALF of all consumer spending:

    https://www.marketplace.org/story/2025/09/17/top-10-of-earners-make-up-half-of-us-retail-spending

    So the car companies have calculated that it is more profitable to make vehicles for the top 10% rather than market cheap cars for the poors, who probably have lower credit scores and are more likely to miss payments and get their sub-$20k cars repoed.

    Henry’s America was dedicated to the economic well-being of the average worker. Today’s America is dedicated to the welfare of the globalist oligarchs… and Israel.

  4. The article that popped up in the “More Stories” box was about Toyota’s “Woven” cities. It seems like we’re building to a civilizational crescendo that will end in a dramatic crash.

    Each straw has its own weight that seems insignificant when taken in isolation. But, the load is increasing. How much more can our backs take before they are broken?

    The Keynesians keep telling us deficits don’t matter, that GovCo spending increases GDP even if there’s nothing to back the ledger entries. The same people that bemoan overpopulation are the same ones driving the “sealed for your protection” society. Tobacco will kill you but, it needs to be banned…if $14.55/pack in NYC doesn’t stop you.

    And they say they’re doing it for “the children” that aren’t aborted in utero. Any society with this level of cognitive dissonance will wither and die.

  5. ‘Affordable cars probably are going to become very popular again.’ — eric

    Ironic, is it not, that buyers who are financially constrained to the point of shopping for a $20,000 car probably should be buying used? They are, after all, the ones least able to absorb the one-third hit from depreciation over the next few years.

    A young couple of my acquaintance bought a new Jeep Renegade solely for the warranty coverage. They had no financial cushion to pay for repairs, and — like characters in F Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby — had destroyed every previous vehicle in a matter of months:

    “They were careless people, Tom and Daisy—they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made.”

    Maybe buying new would have worked out for them … but a few months ago, Tom was found lying in a field, dead of a drug overdose. So Daisy is left with a car payment she can’t afford. Hers is a conundrum that probably has no solution.

  6. That’s also the same model that Walmart and Amazon uses.

    Unfortunately the auto companies are screwed because they are forced to build cars that can survive high speed rollovers, side impacts and front end collisions. They are then told they need to be highly fuel efficient and can’t emit plant fertilizer out of the tail pipe. Somehow if you met all those conflicting requirements it would be a miracle if it was affordable. I would love to buy a brand new 80’s or 90’s car but GovCo made sure that won’t happen.

    If Henry Ford was around today he would be looking at something else to do.

    • Amazon is not an ideal business school case because they lost lots of money for years because they had deep pocketed backers who could afford it as a way to build market share on their volumes. Once they dominated their markets the prices rose to a profitable margin.

      A normal company started without generational and perhaps government backing could not have done this. Sam Walton did it originally, tapping an unserviced segment to build Walmart and Sam’s. The kids aren’t savvy of course, but the old man deserves acknowledgement.

      You know, I think Henry Ford might see the potential in today’s market. When you think about Nissan and the Japanese cars they hit a market for cheap and reliable that the Big 3 didn’t see. They have followed the same arc, ticking up scale chasing bigger margins. A company that made offered simple models could be successful. Hard to say, though, since the bottom half of consumers don’t even have $17K. Nissan knows the true sales numbers.

      For CY 2023
      6,958 Versa
      20,128 Sentra
      35,519 Altima
      981 Maxima

      For CY2024
      13,287 Versa
      28,927 Sentra
      27,219 Altima
      22 Maxima

      Looking at the cost/profit it’s no mystery that the Versa and Maxima are not needed. Maybe there’s a place for a cheaper Sentra to hit the lower end. Nissan isn’t working in a vacuum either, they have overhead in production they’re trying to optimize. If they can shut a shift or whole factory by not making the Versa that might help the bottom line much more than just sales numbers might indicate.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Skip to toolbar