Hut! Hut! Hutted! for Fishing

3
514
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Just found this enraging clip of AGWs harassing a couple of guys over fishing. They are fishing with crossbows – and someone was “alarmed” and called the Hut! Hut! Hutters! Who, rather than inform the termagant that no laws have been violated and that the caller’s being “alarmed” doesn’t rise to the level of a criminal act on the part of those who alarmed her – they Hut! Hut! Hut! the fishermen.

IDs are demanded – with the usual implication of murderous violence if the demands of the AGWs are not “complied” with.

More AGWs arrive to supervise the Obeisance Training. The AGWs are “polite” but that is entirely beside the point.

Apparently, you can’t even fish in this country anymore without having to deal with a gaggle of AGWs interrupting your peace and affronting the former right Americans used to have to be left in peace if they hadn’t committed a crime.

Now, of course, everything is a “crime” – including a phone call to AGWs by some random stranger.

Hut! Hut! Hut!

Got a question about cars – or anything else? Click on the “ask Eric” link and send ’em in!

If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos. 

We depend on you to keep the wheels turning! 

Our donate button is here.

 If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:

EPautos
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079

PS: Get an EPautos magnet (pictured below) in return for a $20 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a sticker – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)

My latest eBook is also available for your favorite price – free! Click here.  

 

Share Button

3 COMMENTS

  1. If you don’t know about the legality of something shouldn’t you find that out before you waste someone’s time? If AGWs were about the law that’s the first thing they’d do. If they were about enforcing compliance.

    • Hi Mike,

      The common thread seems to be that the AGWs don’t tell the “concerned” caller: “There’s no law against (insert X) forbidding what the person you’re calling about is doing.” And that should be the end of it. If AGWs harass someone on the basis of someone’s “concern” rather than a law having been broken, the AGWs should be summarily fired and prosecuted for harassment under color of law.

      That neither happens is proof we live in a police state; that the law is whatever those who enforce it decide it is.

  2. I didn’t have time to watch the whole video now, because I have to do other things right now. That said, even in the first 20 seconds, something OBVIOUS stood out: the fisherman weren’t using crossbows! They were using what looked like to either be regular or compound bows. If the AGWs are going to hassle people, they can at least know what they’re talking about. Come on!

LEAVE A REPLY