Last year, they “locked down” the country, so as to condition the populace to living as prisoners within their own homes – like lower-tier criminals similarly allowed, just sans the ankle bracelet.
And, of course, the conviction.
Now comes the ankle bracelet – if the would-be Wardens of the Homeland are successful – in the form of the vaccine passport you will not be allowed to leave your home without.
You will be locked out rather than locked down – if you are one of those people who continues to put the health of the community “at risk” by refusing to pretend you are sick – and unwilling to assume the very real and very serious risks of being injected with “vaccines” that have already made tens of thousands of people extremely sick.
This places the healthy – those who wish to remain so – in an interesting position. The mugger’s demand – your money or your life – has become your health – or your job. As well as a number of other things, including – very likely – your permission slip to drive. Or to own a car, even if you don’t drive it.
Some states – New York, for instance – are on track to make such permissions conditional upon the supplicant having been Jabbed.
Those without Proof of Jab are already barred from entering “public” (but actually privately owned, nominally) venues such as restaurants, bars, gyms and so on. As yet, the actually public venues – government-owned temples where supplication is mandatory, such as the department of motor vehicles – do not yet debar the Unjabbed (though all must wear the Holy Vestment during supplication).
This is an interesting juxtaposition. Because it amounts to a confession of sorts.
On the one hand, the government can and has made “private” property a laughingstock by decreeing how the not-owners may use what isn’t in any meaningful sense their property, except as regards the tributum (i.e., “taxes”) they are expected to hand over at regular intervals (as well as collect on behalf of the government from customers) as the price of being allowed the fiction that they own the government’s restaurant, bar, gym and so on.
The legal authority for this usurpation and perversion of private property derives verily from the perversion of language; i.e., the re-definition of a once-privately-owned restaurant, bar, gym and so on into a “public accommodation.”
As is the case with all such oily redefinitions, there is an element of truth in this, used to empower the perversion and then the usurpation.
A restaurant, bar or gym does accommodate the public, in the sense that unlike a private home, people who are not family or invited friends are offered entry and service. But it does not mean – well, it didn’t mean, once upon a time – that “the public” had an unlimited “right” to be “accommodated.”
It was understood that the owner could decide who would be accommodated and under what conditions; those who didn’t meet his criteria – or who were uncomfortable with his criteria – could be denied entry and service or simply deny him their business.
But one thing remains the same as it was. No one is compelled or under duress to enter any restaurant, bar or gym. You do not have to eat or drink there.
You can work out at home. Or in your friend’s basement.
It is a denial, certainly, of your ex-right to freely associate (and do business) with whomever is willing to freely associate (and do business) with you, as well as a violation of the ex-rights of the restaurant, bar or gym no-longer-owner – who has become a kind of custodial unpaid employee of the government.
But you’re still “free” – so to speak – to go about your business.
What happens when you’re no longer that? When the government decides to require not only face-effacing (the wearing of the Holy Chin Hijab) but also Proof of Jab as the condition of not being locked-out of government temples it requires you to enter? You do not have the option to walk past the door to the DMV – unless you agree to forfeit your government permission to drive or even to own a car.
You also cannot register (note the etymology, especially the predicate reg – as in royal) a vehicle or get title to it without personally supplicating.
In other words, you are under duress. The government does not allow you the option of not entering – by imposing punishment for not entering.
Or at least, it will probably try to.
The interesting legal question is whether the government will be able to do so – legally – and get away with it. Since places like the DMV (and courts) are the very definition of public places – and also places the public is expected and told it must enter.
Probably, it will get away with so decreeing – given what it has gotten away with so far. But this may just push people too far.
It is one thing to told you may not enter this restaurant, bar or gym without a “mask” (or Proof of Jab). It is quite another thing to be told you must enter this DMV – or court – wearing a “mask” and with Proof of Jab.
If the government so demands, it will free us from any obligation to further supplication. Because it is one thing to fill out forms and hand over money; it is quite another thing to be told you must put your health at risk in order to be allowed to live. That if you don’t submit, then you will become an outlaw. Someone without permission.
So be it.
We don’t need it, anyhow.
This may be just the way to cure not only this sickness, but the source of all of this sickness – this diseased idea that anyone is obliged to beg permission from the government to simply live.
Or, for that matter, to eat at a restaurant that is willing to serve you.
. . .
If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos.
PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $20 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)