2016 Chrysler 300

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This could be it.

2016 Chrysler 300C PlatinumThe last of the line, the end of the road.

In a way, it already is.

Chrysler’s 300 is the only large, rear-wheel-drive sedan available with V8 power you can still buy for a few bucks north of $40k.

Well, there’s also the Dodge Charger.

But it is to the 300 what a Chevy Tahoe is to a Cadillac Escalade. Same basic vehicle – sold by different marketing arms of the same company.

So, doesn’t really count.

The next-closest thing to the 300 (or the Charger) is the Hyundai Genesis – which is also large and also rear-wheel-drive (with AWD available, too – like the 300).

But when you opt for the available V8, the MSRP of the Genesis soars to a few bucks north of $50k.

What’s happened?

Big sedans with big V8s were not always for the rich only.

Or at least, mostly.'16 300 Hemi 2

Today, they are – because of a one-two punch emanating from Washington. Federal fuel efficiency mandatory minimums impose “gas guzzler” fines on cars that don’t make the cut – which makes big sedans with big V8s more expensive to sell. But the fuel efficiency mandates also jack up the price indirectly, by putting pressure on car companies to build fewer such cars – because the more they build, the lower their overall “fleet average” MPG numbers will be… and the more “gas guzzler” taxes they’ll get socked with.

Lower production means having to charge more for each car, since you can’t make the profit on volume.

Long and short, cars like the 300 are in the crosshairs.

2016 may be last call.

Grab one before closing time.

WHAT IT IS'16 300 side by side

The 300 is Chrysler’s top of the line (and full-sized) sedan.

Unlike all of its sort-of competition – models like the Toyota Avalon ($32,285-$37,170) and the Chevy Impala ($27,060-$40,660) the 300 is rear-wheel-drive (with AWD optional) and can be ordered with a mighty V8 engine, a powerplant no other car that’s not a luxury-brand car or a car with a sticker price over $50,000 offers.

You can get into a 300 S with a 363 hp 5.7 liter Hemi V8 and an eight-speed automatic for $41,300.

The next closest thing is the Hyundai Genesis V8, which starts at $51,500.

Or, go with the V6 version of the 300.

Base price for this one’s $31,895 ($34,890 with AWD).

An S – with a higher-output version of the V6, low restriction exhaust system and a sport-tuned version of the standard eight-speed automatic starts at $35,350.

The fanciest 300 is the Platinum C – which lists for $47,945 with the Hemi V8 or about $3,555 less than the V8 powered Hyundai Genesis.

WHAT’S NEW FOR 2016'16 300 side shot

A 90th Anniversary Edition package is available to celebrate… Chrysler’s 90th year in business.

The sport-themed S model gets revised suspension/steering tuning and can be ordered with high-performance Goodyear F1 tires. 

The suite of electronics has been updated and an 8.4 inch touchscreen (largest in class) is now standard equipment in all trims.


Other than the Charger, it’s the only V8 four-door you can still get your paws on for about $40k.

V6 gets the job done, too.

AWD is available. Most rivals don’t even offer it.

No turbos or other likely-to-break (post warranty) mechanical overkill.

Big, solid – everything American cars used to be.


If you want the V8 and AWD you’re out of luck.

AWD is only available with the V6.

Though it’s FWD (and doesn’t offer a V8 or AWD) the Chevy Impala is a damned nice boat – and a lot less expensive (just over $27k to start) than the $31k and change to start 300.


The 300’s standard 3.6 liter V6 makes 292 hp – or 300 in the S, which gets a freer-flowing exhaust. This is more hp (either way) than the standard engines in price-equivalent rivals like the Toyota Avalon (which comes only with a 3.5 liter, 268 hp V6) and the Chevy Impala (which comes standard with a 2.5 liter, 195 hp four).

The 3.6 liter V6 is paired with an eight-speed automatic – vs. the six-speed automatics that are used in the GM and Toyota sedans. It is controlled by either a rotary dial or (in S models) paddle shifters. The S trims also get a driver-selectable Sport mode.

You can pair the V6 with all-wheel-drive, a feature not offered in either the Avalon or the Impala, both of which are front-wheel-drive only.

The Chrysler’s main worry, V6-wise, is the Hyundai Genesis. It’s rear-wheel-drive, comes standard with a 311 hp 3.8 liter V6 and an eight-speed automatic, too.

AWD is available in the Hyundai as well.

But the fly in the soup (Hyundai-wise) is the price tag. The Genesis is a very nice car … with a very fat MSRP: $38,000 for the base V6 version – which is $6,105 more than Chrysler asks for the V6 300.

With AWD, the Hyundai clears $40k ($40,500) as compared with $34,890 for an AWD-equipped 300.'16 300 shifter knob

The V6 Genesis is slightly quicker than the V6 300. It can get to 60 in about 6.5 seconds vs. 6.7 for the 300. But that’s a difference (about three tenths of a second) only the stopwatch notices. Whereas the several thousand dollars’ difference in what you’ll pay to buy the Hyundai is something you can’t help noticing.

Equipped with the V6, the RWD 300 delivers pretty solid EPA numbers: 19 city, 23 highway. This is slightly better than the RWD Genesis (18 city, 29 highway) and about the same as the four-cylinder-powered Impala (22 city, 31 highway) which makes about 100 less hp than the Chrysler’s V6.

The V6 Avalon clocks in at 21 city, 31 highway.

But what puts real distance between the 300 and the rest is the optional Hemi V8. It makes 363 hp and knocks the Chrysler’s 0-60 time down to about 5.8 seconds. That is a very noticeable difference vs. its V6 rivals – which do not offer V8 upgrades.

The Genesis does – but (even more than the V6 version of this car) the price differential is so extreme that it’s not really a fair side-by-side comparison. The V8-powered Hyundai starts at $51,500 – a ten thousand dollar-plus jump vs. the Hemi-equipped 300 ($41,300).

Just two catches.'16 300 Hemi 1

First, the obvious: Buy the Hemi and you will be buying a lot of gas. Best case says EPA is 16 city, 25 highway – reminiscent of a 1970 Hemi ‘Cuda. But the ‘Cuda didn’t have climate control AC or an Alpine stereo rig and fouled its plugs constantly – so there is consolation in that.

Also, the V8 Genesis is even closer to the ‘Cuda, thirst-wise: 15 city and 23 highway. You have to be rich to buy that car – and to feed that car.

Second, AWD is no longer available with the V8. This version of the 300 is sold in RWD form only.

If you want to know why, re-read the EPA numbers above. Adding AWD would lower the already luminously un-PC EPA stats dangerously close to single digits (in city driving at least) and these days, that’s the equivalent of presenting Obama with a cement lawn jockey as a Christmas present.lawn jockey

It’s also the reason why the RWD V8 300 is probably doomed.

With CAFE mandatory minimums set to hit 35.5 MPG in just a few months, a car that averages just 19 is going to find itself in the spotlight. The V8 Genesis can get away with it because it’s already a $50k car. It swims with E and S-Class Benzes and 5 and 7 Series BMWs. People willing to pay $50k will probably not blanche at paying $55k or even $60k (prices jacked up to absorb the government’s “gas guzzler” fines).

But the V8 300 sells because it’s a $40k-ish car. It depends on volume sales. If Chrysler jacks up the price (to offset the CAFE Effect) then fewer people will buy 300s. And if Chrysler builds fewer V8 300s, each will necessarily have to cost more.

Vicious circle.

Carpe diem.

ON THE ROAD2016 Chrysler 300S

People in their 20s today have no idea what it used to be like – when big/RWD and V8-powered cars were the rule rather than the exception.

The 300 is the exception to today’s rule. It (and its sibling, the Charger) is a retro experience everyone ought to at least experience once. Like shooting a .44 magnum at a helpless watermelon.

Big V8s are like big guns. They have knockdown power. In the case of the Hemi 300, we are talking about nearly 400 ft.-lbs. of torque – as compared with the knock-kneed 248 ft.-lbs. produced (eventually) by the Toyota Avalon’s 3.5 liter V6 and the downright pathetic 187 ft.-lbs.  produced by the Impala’s erectile deficient four.

Add rear-wheel-drive.

And turn off the traction control.

Just like that, it’s 1974 again – hooray! – except with a Bluetooth-enabled, Pandora-playing premim audio system and a glowing LCD touchscreen instead of a pushbutton AM/FM radio, vinyl seats and a CB.

Eight speeds, too – instead of the three backing up a ’74 440-equipped Polara.

The V6-powered competition is quick.

The Hemi 300 is fast.'16 300 cluster 1

Too fast, probably, for its – for your – own good. This is a car that doesn’t seem happy until it’s doing 80, at least. At the legal limit, it champs at the bit like a Greyhound behind the grate, waiting for the rabbit. But there is a legally viable upside. The Hemi’s commanding torque is its own reward. No need to floor it – or even put the pedal half-way to the metal. At about 3,000 RPM, the V8 is already making more torque than the Avalon’s V6 does at 4,700 – and at 2,000 RPM, the Hemi makes more than the Impala’s four ever will.

The six, though, is also a player.

It hasn’t got as massive a power advantage over its rivals as the Hemi, but the way its power is delivered (to the rear wheels) is an advantage – if you like it served that way.

And those of us who remember, do.   

Remember the rapidly receding world of tail kicked out,tire-smoking countersteering launches; of power-braking launches, holding the engine with the brakes while applying throttle until the back tires begin to spin, letting them smoke for a few seconds to get them nice and sticky … then sidestepping the brake pedal while simultaneously hammering the accelerator.'16 300 road 2

This is something not doable in a FWD car, no matter how powerful its sideways-mounted engine. They’ve pretty much eliminated the torque steer issue that used to plague FWD cars – but there’s no getting away from the fact that in a FWD car, the wheels that steer also drive – a conflict of interest, when you’re interested in performance.

That goes for handling as well as accelerating.

Because the RWD layout is balanced vs. nose-heavy. The weight of the drivetrain is spread out more evenly, front to rear. This is a plus when cornering at high speed. Another plus is being able to add grip to the ass end of the car by pushing the gas pedal down, mid-corner. Power is transferred to the rear wheels, which causes the tail of the car to “plant,” which gives you more grip. In a FWD car, giving it gas in mid-corner will lighten the back end of the car, increasing its tendency to lose grip and slide out from under you.

This is why most race cars are RWD, by the way. '16 300 LED detail

Now, you can counteract the inherently unbalanced FWD layout by adding AWD – but neither Toyota nor Chevy do that. Chrysler, on the other hand, gives you the option to enhance the already better balanced RWD layout by adding AWD – which gives you both a handling advantage and a winter weather advantage.

But whether you go with the six or the eight, what you’ve got here is a main battle tank of a car. Intimidating, solid. Vault-like quiet inside. The kind of car that makes you feel safe – because you are – even without taking account of the air bags.

This car doesn’t need them.

The V6/FWD 300 weighs 4,029 lbs. – vs. 3,505 for the V6/FWD Camry and 3,662 for the four-cylinder/FWD Impala.

It’s like being 6ft 3 and 220 (all muscle) in a room full of Pee Wee Hermans.   

AT THE CURB'16 300 curb 1

Unlike so many cars, no other car looks like the 300.

It is a square-jawed, broody and slightly menacing – which is part of its appeal. Owning this car is like having a serious crew around you.

People respect it.

Other drivers defer to it.

Inside, it’s plush and smooth and super quiet.

One of the reasons for this is its weight, but another reason is its ultra-stretched wheelbase: 120.2 inches (vs. 111 for the Avalon and 111.7 for the Impala). The 9 inches of additional length between the front and rear axle centerlines also enhances the car’s substantial appearance. A BMW 7’s wheelbase is only incrementally longer (120.9 inches) and to get appreciably more impressive, you pretty much have to move up to something like a Mercedes S Class (124.6 inches), which is a six figure ultra-premium sled.'16 300 cut away

The 300 is also broad through the beam – 75 inches vs. 72.2 for the Avalon and 73 for the Impala – which accounts for the generous front seat shoulder room (59.5 inches vs. 57.9 in the Chevy and 58.2 in the Toyota).

The Chevy does have spectacular front seat legroom – 45.8 inches vs. 41.8 for the 300 and 42.1 for the Avalon. But unless you’re really, really long-legged, it’s a distinction without a meaningful difference. Push back the driver’s seat that far and most people won’t be able to reach the pedals.

All these cars have more than plenty of legroom up front – and in back, too.

The 300’s second row has 40.1 inches, just slightly more than the Impala (39.8 inches). Both have less room in this respect than the class-leading Toyota, which clocks in with 42.1 inches (more legroom in the second row than the 300 has in its first row! )

When it comes to trunks, though, the Chevy is the clear winner: 18.8 cubic feet vs. 16.3 for the Chrysler and 16 even for the Toyota.  


The 300 is a solid buy, too.

Features like heated seats and an 8.4 inch LCD touchscreen are standard in all trims. Heated seats cost extra in the Impala – and it comes standard with a 4.2 inch LCD. The Avalon comes standard with heated seats, but to get a bigger tocuhscreen you have to move up to a more expensive (XLE Touring) trim and you still only get a seven incher.

You can really go nuts and order a Platinum C with the Hemi, a dual-pane sunroof, heated and cooled cupholders, heated and cooled seats, heated steering wheel with power tilt/telescoping, “extended” leather trim,  power-adjustable pedals, 20-inch wheels and a 19 speaker (not a typo – that’s 19 speakers) Harman Kardon ultra, ultra premium rig and not crest $50,000.

This is S-Class comparable stuff for about half the price of an S-Class.

Pound for pound (literally) it’s a lot of car for the money.

Gripes? More like regrets.

The V8 is being edged out. It’s subtle, but you can see it happening. The SRT-8 is no more. And the C – which used to come standard with the Hemi – now comes standard with the V6.

And only the V6 is available with AWD.

The V8 lingers – but for how much longer?   

2016 Chrysler 300S2016 is probably the last year for the 300 before a major – perhaps fundamental – re-do.

Which might leave us with a V6-only 300.

Possibly, a FWD 300.

Chrysler, after all, is now owned by Fiat – and Fiat is a small car (and small engine) company. Cue Howard Jones:

And do you feel scared…?

I do!


Remember when they phased out Freon? The stuff used to sell for $3 a can and anyone could buy it. Now it’s something like $30 a can – and no one can buy it except “authorized” AC mechanics.

The V8 300 may be another such.

Fair warning.

If you value independent media, please support independent media. We depend on you to keep the wheels turning!

Our donate button is here.

 If you prefer to avoid PayPal, our mailing address is:

721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079

PS: EPautos stickers are free to those who sign up for a $5 or more monthly recurring donation to support EPautos, or for a one-time donation of $10 or more. (Please be sure to tell us you want a sticker – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)EPautoslogo



  1. I rented out a 300 a year or so ago on a trip. That was a NICE car-wow! Even though it had the V6, it was a really nice, solid car. I only wish I could have afforded one…

  2. My father used to buy a new Caprice every 8-9 years,
    one in 57, 75,74, and then when cars turned into little turds with no frame and only half an engine, he started buying K-5 Blazers, on in 83 and 91, since that was the last year they made em, then got a 98 Yukon and the a 06 Expedition

    its gotta have a V-8, a full frame and be as big as a house, or they aint buying

  3. Hey Eric, Have you ever driven the current Australian built Chevy Caprice that they only sell (new) to police departments? To bad the feds make it so GM will never offer it to American drivers. Maybe someday I will be able to pick up a used one………………..Looks like there are some used ones out there with only a couple hundred miles on them. Too bad most of them will be mostly worn out by the time taxpayers will be able to get their hands on them.

    I bet the last of the V8 powered Chargers when it comes to that time, will be offered only to government agencies in the fashion of the Caprice.

    I think over the next decade, V6’s will start to disappear in the same way the V8’s have been going now.

    My folks, who are now in their 70’s, didn’t own a car that wasn’t V8 powered or rear wheel driven until the 1980’s. They haven’t had one since.

    • Hi Rich,

      No, unfortunately. I’ve never been “down under” – but I’d like to. In fact, NZ seems like a viable bug-out destination for when the S hits the F.

      V8s are without doubt going away – and I agree, V6s are next..

    • That Aussie built Caprice will be no more after 2017. Our gov’t has foolishly killed our auto industry through over regulation. The unions have also helped out, but management have helped the unions by agreeing to many of their outlandish demands. The newer V8s sold here are quite fuel efficient.

      At least you yanks get to vote on hosting speed scameras. We don’t, they are forced on us, and our little state of Victoria, population 5KK, collects $1 BILLION in motoring fines annually. Fortunately a few of us are fighting such fines in court and winning.

      Victoria is home to Redfucks (aka redflex) the company that makes its money by bribery of corrupt local gov’t officials.

  4. The bread and butter full size family sedan back in the pre-emissions era typically came as a Biscayne with a 6 cylinder engine hooked to a Powerglide. The V8 was exclusive to the middle class and higher, Dad knew 15 mpg with the standard six was both cheaper to buy and refill than 10 with the optional 327 and the Powerglide paid for itself at trade in. All the oldies we see today decked out with every available option is quite different from the basic r&h models people actually bought. Zero to sixty in 20 seconds was typical, 15 seconds was good, 10 seconds was exceptional.

    Yesterday’s exception is today’s slug even thought now comes every possible amenity and more.

  5. re this: “A 5.8 second zero to 60 time is decent, but not awe inspiring.”

    That used to be awe inspiring performance. Now it’s just really fast.

    re this: “The Chevy does have spectacular front seat legroom – 45.8 inches vs. 41.8 for the 300 and 42.1 for the Avalon. But unless you’re really, really long-legged, it’s a distinction without a meaningful difference. Push back the driver’s seat that far and most people won’t be able to reach the pedals.

    All these cars have more than plenty of legroom up front – and in back, too.

    The 300’s second row has 40.1 inches, just slightly more than the Impala (39.8 inches). Both have less room in this respect than the class-leading Toyota, which clocks in with 42.1 inches (more legroom in the second row than the 300 has in its first row! )”

    I’m six-two, and 42″ of front seat legroom in the Avalon is a couple inches shorter than what would be optimal for me. But, you can move a front seat forward but not backwards, from full stop back … so the 300 in effect has more front AND rear seat legroom than Avalon if you scoot the 300’s front seat forward about three inches, giving you 43″ front and rear.

    • Well Jim, calling a 5.8 second 0-60 time “really fast” is really a matter of perspective.

      For instance, a 2013 automatic Honda Accord managed the same feat in 5.6 seconds.http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2013-honda-accord-sedan-v-6-test-review

      And current V-8 Mustangs and Camaros run it in approximately 4.5 seconds.

      From my perspective, 5.8 seconds to 60mph is “brisk by current standards.”

      But “really fast” has got to equal a 0-60 run under 5 seconds.

      • Hey Mike,

        I meant really fast as in, that’s faster than about 95% or so of the cars being built in a given year.

        But, yeah, an ordinary V6 Camry or Accord can smoke most older muscle cars. The bar is that high now.

        • Hi Jim,

          Watch out! If you state the dread truth that a current V6 sedan is quicker than two-thirds (or more) of stock, classic-era muscle cars, expect to be deluged by hate mail (trust me on this)…!

          • Hate mail from people who haven’t bothered to google readily available 0-60 or quarter-mile or top speed or G-force statistics.

            Instead of taking the high road and pointing out that a fast, soulless box of an appliance is less likely to get you laid. =D

            • Jim, in Lonesome Dove, when accused of cheating at cards for sex, Gus said “A guy who won’t cheat for a poke doesn’t want one bad enough”.

              And then there’s people like me, who don’t have the price of admission…..so to speak.

  6. Finally the Hemi is available with an 8 speed auto! With that desperately needed improvement, the V-8 300 becomes a worthy high water mark for this dying breed of car. It should be a good investment for collectors.

    A 5.8 second zero to 60 time is decent, but not awe inspiring. We’ll give it a pass because its best and highest use is not as a sprinter, but as a long distance road car.

    And Damn, that’s a nice looking lawn jockey! 😉


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here