Armed Government Workers Are “Uncomfortable”

8
453
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Here’s a video of an armed government workers who is “uncomfortable” about a girl taking video outside the New Hampshire Supreme Court. The double-chinned, opaque-sunglasses wearing armed government worker eructs “acting suspicious!” – the new omnibus crime that empowers armed government workers to harass people at will – and demands ID.

The girl – brave chick! – refuses to ID, tells the armed government worker it is none of his business what her name is.

Where do I meet girls like this?

. . .

Got a question about cars – or anything else? Click on the “ask Eric” link and send ’em in!

We depend on you to keep the wheels turning! And we are running low this month. If you like what you’ve found here, please consider supporting EPautos.

Our donate button is here.

 If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:

EPautos
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079

PS: EPautos magnets are free to those who send in $20 or more. My latest eBook is also available for your favorite price – free! Click here. If you find it useful, consider contributing a couple of bucks!  

 

Share Button

8 COMMENTS

  1. Love her. And can somebody show me where this “right to feeling safe” is documented? What makes asshats believe there’s some inherent promise of safety from the second their mom poops them out??

    • Hi Moose,

      The Safety schtick began, as far as I can tell, in the ’80s. There was the Safety Dance, for instance. And Baby on Board signs. All of a sudden you kept hearing about “moms” and their “concerns.”

      Prior to the ’80s, anyone who was “concerned” about “safety” was laughed, considered a geek or a homo (used as a synonym for effeminate). A really good explication of this attitude – and the emerging cultural shift – is the movie, Cannonball Run. Buncha people tearing ass in fast, loud cars – mocking the law as they go – pursued by a whiny little geek from the government …

      Back then, such geeks were the minority and considered the enemy by most people.

      Today, that whiny little geek would be considered the hero of the movie by most of the populace, which has been metrosexualized and snowflaked into something soft and whiny but also very dangerous in numbers.

      • So culturally it wasn’t a concern prior to that, but was it ever legally documented like “US citizenship includes guarantee of safety”? Why’re people so entitled to feeling secure? I am well aware of the risks involved in being alive and am responsible for my own safety, i.e. I take measures to avoid being stuck anywhere near piggies, I use my own best judgement when driving instead of fretting over speed limit signs and butthurt yuppie clover objections, and if I have a beef with someone I’ll handle it myself, not outsource it to the boyfriend or to law enforcement, because my safety is my concern, not to be projected onto some higher authority, and certainly not to be used as an excuse to call a hit on anybody.

        • Hi Moose,

          No, there is nothing in law – in the law, the Constitution – decreeing a “right to safety.” The idea is ridiculous, besides – since “safety” is a subjective thing. And so can be anything. It would or at least could justify limitless government.

          I am about to take a break and for me that means a 5 mile run through the woods. Some might regard this as “unsafe.” I will be alone in the woods. There are possibly bears in the woods. I might trip and break my leg. I might have a heart attack.

          Being free means being free to weigh (and assume) risks without being punished for doing so.

  2. Hi Eric,
    I thought you and the group might like this.

    A DEA officer stopped at a ranch in Texas, and talked with an old rancher. He told the rancher, “I need to inspect your ranch for illegally grown drugs.” The rancher said, “Okay , but don’t go in that field over there…..”, as he pointed out the location.
    The DEA officer verbally exploded saying, ” Mister, I have the authority of the Federal Government with me!” Reaching into his rear pants pocket, the arrogant officer removed his badge and proudly displayed it to the rancher. “See this fucking badge?! This badge means I am allowed to go wherever I wish…. On any land !! No questions asked or answers given!! Have I made myself clear?…. do you understand?!!”
    The rancher nodded politely, apologized, and went about his chores. A short time later, the old rancher heard loud screams, looked up, and saw the DEA officer running for his life, being chased by the rancher’s big Santa Gertrudis bull…… With every step the bull was gaining ground on the officer, and it seemed likely that he’d sure enough get gored before he reached safety. The officer was clearly terrified. The rancher threw down his tools, ran to the fence and yelled at the top of his lungs…..

    “Your badge, show him your fucking BADGE!!”

    • Good one, Adam. Reminds me of the old Comanche sitting outside the store when the FBI agent shows up.

      The FBI guy is trying to act friendly and looks at the big dog lying beside the Comanche gradpa’s chair. He says,

      “Hey, old timer. Does your dog bite?”
      Granpa shakes his head no. The FBI reaches down to pet the dog and the dog just tears his ass up. FBI hollers,
      “You old asshole, you said your dog won’t bite”.

      Granpa says,
      “Shit, boy. That ain’t my dog”.

  3. Oh well, whomever it was here touting your list of “freedoms” in New Hampshire the other day….here is what is coming up your skirt from your own cry-baby bureaucrats and Gestapo-State-Po-Lice! See guys, there is no where to run from these cock-suckers. We either grow a pair, like this “GIRL” has, or take it up the ass, which is it? Stand your ground. If a single unarmed female shows no fear, why does anyone here still talk of running away? Bullies act this way because THEY are afraid of the public. THEY are fearful of being watched because they know their own crimes committed behind closed doors, and those they have yet to impose upon us. A guilty conscience will scream “innocence” before the first accusation is ever made, you watch!

LEAVE A REPLY