We’ve been hearing – because it’s hard to avoid hearing about – the cases! the CASES! since last spring, endlessly. Most of these “cases” being nothing more fearsome than “cases” of positive tests.
How about deaths?
Not those attributed to the ‘Rona – but those which can just as plausibly by attributed to the “vaccine” for the ‘Rona?
So far it is at least 3,005 in the United States alone – a 9/11 level-level death toll. This this according to the Holy CDC, whose “science” cannot be gainsaid . . . when it conforms with Holy Writ.
This is not a small number, even relative to the number of people who are still alive in the United States. What would the reaction of the government be if there were that many deaths plausibly attributable to, say, a certain brand of cough medicine?
Do you suppose it would still be on the shelves?
How about a car that killed even 10 percent of that number? Would it still be for sale?
The infamously exploding Ford Pinto of the ’70s and the infamously rolling-over Ford Explorer of the ’90s caused fewer deaths combined – over several years – than the number of deaths so far from the “cure’ for the ‘Rona.
Just since December.
It is also a significant number in that a distressing number of the now-dead were not elderly/already very sick people – i.e., they were healthy, until they got the “vaccine.” How is this any less of a threat than the ‘Rona itself? Indeed, why is it not considered a greater threat, given the ‘Rona presents almost no threat at all – the “case” of a sickness that has a recovery rate of 99.8-something percent for otherwise healthy and not-elderly adults?
A healthy person, put more finely, may be more likely to die from the “cure” than from the disease.
And why is this treated with such indifference?
Both questions prompt some ugly answers. Or at least, they ought to.
If “public health” is in fact the motivating reason for such things as Face Diapering – a “practice” of extremely iff value if the wearer is sick, in terms of “stopping the spread” – since they are at best a partial palliative in terms of preventing viral material from escaping the mouth/nose of the wearer – and of zero value, if the person is not sick – then why the turgid, even fanatic insistence on the wearing by the healthy while so blase about the threat of injecting the healthy?
Why is the public not being told – with the same frantic hectoring about the cases! the CASES! – that this “vaccine” is not an immunization but rather a symptom-suppressor?
Why are people not being told that it is experimental?
That it has not been tested on people prior to injecting people with it – and for that reason no one knows what the effects on people may prove to be – and for that reason it is something advisable to take only in extremis – as is the case with any other radical, experimental treatment?
As in the case of people with actual terminal illnesses facing almost-certain death as the alternative?
As opposed to the slight risk of catching an almost-always mild sickness?
Is it not reasonable – because logical – to infer that if at least 3,005 people in the U.S. alone (and more than 10,000 of them, worldwide) have died after having received their infusion of whatever-it-is, that there is good reason to be concerned about how many more may die?
Yet the government is not concerned at all.
Well, about all these “cases.” .
Most of the country was “locked down” on the basis of assertions about bodies stacking up that proved to be grossly – grotesquely – exaggerated. In my state (VA) the Gesundheitsfuhrer issued a befehl – an order – forbidding businesses to remain open and threatening people who left their homes – on the basis of fewer bodies stacking up than have already stacked up due to – or at least, plausibly due to – the “cure” for the ‘Rona.
More bodies – as opposed to “cases” – are likely to actually stack up, too.
At the every least, this is as reasonable a projection as those made in justification of the “lock downs,” then and ongoing.
Yet there are no “lockdowns” of the Jab Centers, no public service announcements urging people to “practice” due diligence as regards the infusion of the Holy Waters (and whatever else is mingled with the Holy Waters).
A reasonable person might be tempted to ask: What are they up to?
And the answer to that question is of great concern – or at least, it ought to be.
. . .
Got a question about cars, Libertarian politics – or anything else? Click on the “ask Eric” link and send ’em in!
If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos.
PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $20 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)