2023 Cadillac CT4

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Many luxury car brands are now luxury SUV brands. GM’s Cadillac division is one of the very few that still sells luxury cars as well as SUVs.

Specifically, sedans.

And one of them – the CT4 – doesn’t cost much more to start than some family sedans. 

It’s also not just a badge you’re buying.

What It Is

The CT4 is Cadillac’s entry-level luxury sport sedan. It is also a rear-wheel-drive sedan, which is becoming harder-to-find even in the entry-level luxury-sport sedan class. CT4 rivals like the Audi A4 are based on front-wheel-drive layouts – like current economy cars.

And rivals like the rear-drive Mercedes C300 and BMW 3 sedan are expensive cars.

The Benz starts at $44,850 – vs. $34,395 for the CT4.

A BMW 3 starts at $42,300.

Cadillac also offers high (and very high) performance versions of the CT4.

The $46,595 CT4 V comes standard with 325 horsepower and if that’s not enough, the $60,995 CT4 Blackwing comes with 472.

And it comes standard with a manual transmission.

What’s New For 2023

All trims now come standard with the previously optional surround-view camera system and the Blackwing gets updated appearance packages.

What’s Good

Rear-wheel-drive for thousands less than front-wheel-drive-based rivals like the A4.

Three available engines – including a V6.

Very roomy up front for such a small car.

What’s Not So Good

Manual transmission only available in the Blackwing.

Very cramped in back – even for a small car.

Much less trunk space (just 10.7 cubic feet) than others in the class.

Under The Hood

The CT4’s standard engine is the seemingly Universal Engine – because practically every new car seems to come standard with one, regardless of make or model. It is a 2.0 liter four, with a turbo – just like the 2.0 liter turbo fours that are standard in rivals like the A4, C300 and the BMW 3 sedan.

The main difference is the output.

The Cadillac’s 2.0 four offers 237 horsepower – a bit more than the A4’s 201 horsepower and a bit less than the BMW (and Benz’s) 255 horsepower.

An eight speed automatic is standard. As is rear-wheel-drive.

All-wheel-drive is optional.

A second engine is available – and though it’s still a four (and has a turbo) it is a bigger (2.7 liter) four that’s nearly the size of a small V6. And – in the V – it produces horsepower comparable to the output of a small V8: 325 horsepower and 380 ft.-lbs.of torque. A slightly less potent (310 horsepower) version of this engine is also available as an option in the Premium Luxury trim.

This engine comes standard with a ten speed automatic that has a very deep a 0.64 overdrive ratio that reduces engine RPM at highway speeds of 70 MPH to just under 2,000 RPM, accounting for the slight fuel efficiency penalty you pay for all that additional power. The 2.7 engine takes the CT4 20 miles in the city and 29 on the highway – vs. 23 in the city and 34 on the highway with the 2.0 liter engine.  

If you would like a manual – a feature none of the others in the class offer – the CT4 Blackwing comes standard with one. To go with the turbocharged 3.6 liter V6 that’s also standard. This one generates 472 horsepower and 445 ft.-lbs. of torque – more than most large V8s.

It’s sufficient to get the Blackwing to 60 in just under 4 seconds.

Blackwings also come standard with a limited slip rear differential, upgraded brakes, launch control and a free-flowing exhaust system.

ASS – automatic engine stop/start – is (unfortunately) standard with the 2.0 and 2.7 liter engines.

And all three CT4 engines are premium unleaded engines.

On The Road

The CT4 is what luxury-sport sedans once were – in that is authentically sporty. Perhaps too much so for some tastes. The car has been faulted by some reviewers for having a too-firm ride (even the base Luxury trim) but this is a subjective and one you might disagree with – if you like an authentically sporty ride.

And handling.

The ride is firm – and the steering is sharp. But that’s what makes this car fun to drive – as opposed to just driving along. The Blackwing is even more so (you can read more about that, here). But the relevant point is the other iterations of the CT4 are, too. Just not as brutal – this is a compliment – as the Blackwing.

This car’s chief problem isn’t fun.

It is practicality.

Like others in the class, it is a small car. But – unlike many of the others – it is too small in terms of passenger (and trunk) space to serve as other than a fun car.

Though it has four doors, its back seats are almost useless – being much-too-tight to sit in for most adults. And the trunk is almost as small as you’d find in some two-seater cars, which makes using this car to take more than two people on a short trip (sans their stuff) problematic.

Even so, these deficits are countered by the car’s options – which include the available 2.7 liter engine, which you do not have to step up to a top-of-the-line trim to enjoy. And you can enjoy it even more given you do not have to buy all-wheel-drive to go with it.

Rear-drive is the default standard.

Al-wheel-drive has traction advantages, certainly. They include handling advantages, especially if the roads are wet. But you give up the intangible satisfactions – such as being able to slip a little, sometimes. Some will characterize this as “immature.”

Those who say so have forgotten how to have fun.

It would all be a lot more fun if the manual transmission that’s standard in the Blackwing were available in other iterations of the CT4. And it might be smart. After all, Cadillac is trying to offer something different here.

Why not make it even more so?

At The Curb

At 187.2 inches long, the CT4 is one of the largest – longest – small cars in the class. But it is also – per the commentary above – one of the most cramped.

At least, for those condemned to suffer in the back.

It has just 33.4 inches of rearseat legroom – which isn’t much more room than you’d have in the back seat of a two-door performance car like the Ford Mustang. It is also almost three inches less than what you’d have to work with inside a Benz C300 -which has 36 inches of rearseat legroom – and a BMW 3 series (which has 35.2 inches).

Rearseat headroom is also almost two inches less (36.5 inches) than in front (38.3 inches) which means taller adults have to duck as well as tuck to sit back there.

This problem is exacerbated by the smallness of the CT4’s trunk – which is something odd to say about a Cadillac. At one time – a long time ago – Cadillacs were as famous for their big trunks as for their big engines. It was said – and it was true – that you could fit two bodies in the trunk of a Cadillac – back when Cadillac was still building Sedan deVilles. This Cadillac might have room for a trunk – sans the the legs and arms. You only have just over 10 cubic feet to work with, which is markedly less than the BMW 3’s comparatively generous 13 cubic feet and the C300’s almost-the-same 12.6 cubic feet.

It is only slightly more than the 9.9 cubic foot BMW Z4’s trunk. And the Z4 is a two-seat roadster.

That said, size isn’t everything.

Price is.

Well, it is something, certainly.

You can buy a CT4 for about what it costs to buy a loaded Honda Civic. Not that there is anything wrong with the Civic. The point is you could have a Cadillac for give-or-take the same. A rear-drive (vs. front drive) luxury-sport sedan vs. a sporty economy sedan. It’s not forbidding a jump to move up to the Lux trim, either – at which point you can opt for the 310 hp 2.7 liter engine.

The lower-trim CT4s still have analog gauges rather than flat screen displays, which is another difference relative to others in the class – which come standard with LCD dash displays. If you don’t want an LCD display in front of you, here’s a way to avoid having to buy one. There is, however, the seemingly Universal LCD Tablet poking up from the center stack. These are also as common in new cars – regardless of make or model – as the Universal 2.0 liter engine.

Oddly, the Sport trim is not available with the 2.7 liter engine. It comes only with the base 2.0 liter engine. It does come standard with “sporty” affections, however – including a rear spoiler, metal paddle shifters, sport seats and a sport steering wheel.

The Rest

The CT4 is anomalous – being both a sedan and a sedan that’s still available with a manual transmission. These two things together set it dramatically apart from the automatic-only crossovers (most of them with 2.0 liter engines) that have become as prolific as dandelions after a spring rain – and just as individual.

Cadillacs used to stand out – and this one still does.

The Bottom Line

If you’re looking for a bargain that’s also fun – and different – this one might be the one!

. . .

If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos. 

We depend on you to keep the wheels turning! 

Our donate button is here.

 If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:

721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079

PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $20 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)

My eBook about car buying (new and used) is also available for your favorite price – free! Click here.  If that fails, email me at EPeters952@yahoo.com and I will send you a copy directly!


  1. I find it unsurprising that Cadillac has not bothered to upgrade the size of the trunk and back area to accommodate something more than an infant and a shopping bag. Stupid. On the other hand, GM is not promoting these cars. I’m surprised they are still being built.

      • such a shame. The more Cadillac-like CT6 was really nice and big, and discontinued. Why, I don’t know, saw many of them relative. I tried to buy one, but their packaging was horrendous. They originally came with either a turbocharged 2.0-liter 4-cyl (stupid, stupid, stupid), or twin-turbo 3.0-liter V-6 engine (OK but only uptrims). Then later the non-turbo 3.6-liter V-6 the base engine (stupid, stupid, stupid) and the twin-turbo 4.2 V-8 the high-powered alternative (ok, but again, only way uptrim).
        If they would had made the 3.0 TT the base, I might have bought one.
        The V version was stupendous, but 100K+.
        If this car would have made it to todays trim methodology, ie.. base with 2.7T, slight uptrim with 3.0 or 3.7TT for the V, and then a blackwing fire breathing monster, it may have has a stay of execution.
        I think they made a blackwing version, not sure.
        bottom line I didn’t buy one, and I’m guessing a lot didn’t with the stupid base engines.

    • I agree swamprat, the ATS-CTS were always too small. They fixed some of it with the new CT4-5, but not enough. Either way, whoever is a car guy, you owe it to yourself to go drive a CT4 or 5 blackwing before they are gone. smallness aside, they are amazing and makes you giggle. The value compared to similar versions from Audi, BWM, M-B, is really really good.

  2. I appreciate these dynamic RWD sports sedans they have been making for 15+ years but they still make no sense to me. Cadillac is a perfect example of eschewing your customer base to become something you are not, nor will never be. Cadillac buyers don’t want to buy a BMW and vice-versa. Best of luck to them, unfortunately I don’t think I could ever bring myself to get a Government Motors car.

    • Thanks, Mark!

      This car is a kind of holdout – or rather, leftover – in that it was developed before GM decided to go all-in on EeeeeeeVeeeees. It is interesting to note that GM gives it very cursory coverage on its media-access site, indicating the corporation isn’t very interested in promoting it.

      But EeeeeeeeVeeeeees are luridly splashed all over those pages. They are the future, you see.

  3. We just bought one of these, or more like my wife did, after driving most all of the plus $50K sedans. She settled on this caddy but not the trim level. So she spent a few hours and drove them all. I had already owned a ATS 2.0T manual sport trim and really liked it, but as Eric said it was a pretty stiff riding.
    So she goes out on a test ride with the 4 V Blackwing, comes back after a 30 min. test ride (I thought she had wrecked it!), and mumbles under her breath to me “get me this dam car no matter what” haha………. The dealer is one of our favorites, a place where they don’t have a revolving door of people and a very low BS meter. We made a good deal and and it has become, one of, if not our fav. vehicles of all time.
    It as surprised with the following:
    Instant throttle response, rare today. 1/4 throttle chirps the tires easily.
    In ‘tour’ mode, very compliant suspension. Not like old caddy boats, but pretty good and acceptable compared to current day. We have had no issues taking it on a long trip on our very rough roads in the rust belt. My big Ram truck still ‘rides’ better, but it is not nearly as fun as the 4 blackwing.
    Turn on the ‘V’ mode where you can instantly adjust any perf. setting and she becomes a snarling dragon.
    There is supposedly a special ‘race’ setting that I haven’t attempted yet, don’t see a need too at all.
    We are both 5-8″ so no troubles fitting in the great seats, other than it’s a little tougher to get in and out. This leaves a decent amount of room in the back seats, only our son who’s 6-0″ wouldn’t like it in the back, but everyone else is fine for non-trip runs.
    A lot of our friends have driven it already and say “wholly crap”
    We get challenged on the road all the time. and it just says V on the back, no ‘blackwing’ signs anywhere. The blackwing is a different tamed animal than the regular, but very good V.
    Caddy did a very nice job on these and I’m no GM fan.
    The only question that I have is when will they stop making them? We will go get the last one for sure.

  4. “Some will characterize this as “immature.” Those who say so have forgotten how to have fun.” -EP

    Man, isn’t that the cause of a lot of intrusions into life today!

    Stop having fun & be safe instead. Now drive a toaster.

    • Indeed, Dan!

      If I could afford to, I would buy myself an old Viper. That thing says it all – and louder, even, than my orange Trans Am!

      • Love those Vipers – I raced one off a stop light a while back on my 88 ci Harley (cam, headers, etc). I was in front until about 60 mph when it got rolling and blew by me like nothing. I can still hear the roar of that incredible engine.

  5. ALL cars of this size, to add to their practically, should be hatchbacks. Somewhere along the way folks became adverse to hatchbacks – Pintos & Vegas? I’ve owned two Chevy hatchbacks,
    a V6 Citation (4-speed manual) and a 2004 V6 Malibu Maxx – which is still going strong.

    Some were also adverse to station wagons. So what are most buying today – SUVs – a
    combination of a station wagon and a hatchback.

    • Hi liberty,

      I completely agree in re the hatchback thing. It is not only practical, it can be beautiful as it allows for a tapered roofline and seamless transition from roof to rear. Much as I am not a fan of the Benz EQS EeeeeeVeeee, the hatchback is a functional plus and the car looks good, too.

  6. Cadillacs are now (and have been for some time) visually indistinguishable from every other car. Why would anyone buy one? Remember the days of the big Caddys, when a Cadillac instantly stood out, not only from all the generic sedans in the Walmart parking lot, but even from other “luxury cars”? Back then, even your glaucomic grandmother could instantly tell the difference between a Caddy, a Lincoln, and a Benz. Today, even a car guy can not readily tell the difference between a Caddy and a Kia……

    • I disagree Nunzio, I think this car stands out vs the rest of them, and why my wife was drawn to it vs the other sedans in it’s class. I would agree the base trim version is hoo-hum, but the V and V-blackwing look really good IMO. lots of angles vs the roundness of most.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here